RationalMadman

While I agree to you on the HvsB vote, I believe strongly that we do that for totally different reasons. I support corruption for the right reasons and abhor naivety that will enable sinister people in the long-run to topple you in brutally long-term ways.

That's why I'd always have supported Clinton over Sanders. Obama is a superficial asshole, I would vote like this:

Hillary>Bernie>Obama

There is SO MUCH behind the scenes that will make you dislike Obama from both wing's point of view. Obamacare is completely silly and is the inverse of what should have been done; single payer taxed healthcare insurance subsidisation.

Obamacare worked by blackmail more than subsidising, this was the entire problem with it. Insurance companies took it out on the poorest after they realised they were going to go bankrupt if they stayed genuine.

Law is a thing in and of itself. I am telling you that I don't agree with you on this at all. Law requires much higher English comprehension where 'Society' debates require much higher psychology and sociology comprehension. Politics requires both and also math on top of it, making it the most intricate of the trio.

I get it, you're the omniscience to Mike's omnipotence. I dig it. Is Virt the omnibenevolent one?

I agree with the bottom line, the rest I don't. Law is in and of itself something sacred and unique from both society and politics.

Society and politics are linked but not directly. Economics is closer to politics than 'society' is once you study it well enough. I'm sure to a far-left-winger such as yourself (strange for an Indian, I must say but good on you for not being a right-wing sellout) that you won't appreciate the difference. To you they're intertwined but to more right-wing individuals there's a huge gap. In fact the most right-wing philosophy is that law should never ever be about what society feels or wants but based in only the minimum amount of required restrictions possible.

This is 0% to insult you, I am not a pussy I make it clear when I mean something malignantly.

This is to help you and state raw facts (follow it 1-onwards):

I can imagine following poems of my level of metaphor-emphasis and flow is headache-y to read out. Don't worry, it's not your fault, it's your parents' genes and how you were raised.

"knees knees knees"

*shit, I'm running out of insults and RM's murking me at every comeback-trade... WAIT OMG I GOT IT!!!! Let's call him a REBEL with well-worn knees... Wait, then he's not a rebel*

derp

No mod or human would ever want to be balls deep in your throat, let alone touch you with a 10 foot pole. xoxo

No, this is completely serious. Wylted should be permanently banned and made a fucking example of. He's nothing but malignant to the site.

And who are you a whore to? Who do you break out the kneepads for? God? Your imaginary friend?

Think before you mock me, kid. At least I am kneeling before someone that actually exists.

This is why I don't like you, Thett. You don't know how to separate joking in a good way from joking in a nasty way. You also don't understand when to be serious.

You are not wrong about Airmax at all, as jokey as that seems I don't doubt a single quote (even though exaggerate by removing context) is something he'd say. Bsh1 isn't Airmax though even though he says he idolises the guy. Bsh1 is a much better mod and human being.

It is also other things he has done in and around said event. He is here to stir up negative emotions in others, period.

That's his sole purpose on the site in my eyes. From encouraging a blatantly sensitive user to breakout in hysteria as he knew she was sensitive at the time and feeling under attack by challenging her to a debate saying she should die to making a debate about his own suicide and being furious that I outwitted him at convincing him he should live without losing my temper or reason along the way, he has been nothing but a brutally malignant force beyond what most consider 'troll' to this date.

I mean he is a troll, he's not 'beyond' but he's on the severe end of it. He is personal, calculating and severely game-theory-analytical in how he goes about provoking people. He studies each to find their weakness. This is why he didn't try the tactic of faking a PM with me, he knew I'd take 0 offence and make a joke out of him if he tried, on the other hand with you he knew attacking your mental health or job wouldn't work how it did with me. He finds what gets under someone's skin and uses that specialised tactic against that one person until they snap.

This is a user under only B***h (stars to avoid doxxing accusation) in how calculating he is in his sadism. You should extend the ban to permanent for his own sake. I may call myself a madman but this is an individual who is a danger to himself and others, if not physically then at least on a psychological-welfare-level.

What you know is spread by people who abused me beyond lengths they'd wish me to reveal. It was them who stalked me and brought shit to facebook level and them who lived to bitterly regret it. You want to keep at this? I will reveal the full extent of abuse from the cunt who accused me of said things if need be.

The colours set the mood of the image and the viewer.

Mod scandal has two votes. Me and castin

I changed my voter vote to whiteflame from blamonkey.

Why is that sucking? The more skill-based the sport is, the more consistent the better players are at getting up the leaderboard each and every time.

The more variance there is in who climbs the leaderboard, the less skill is involved in the game as clearly luck is factoring in too highly.

Because it's sexy. I don't just edit the colour, I edit the lighting layers, curving of shading and contrast/saturation.

I use Pixlr.com to do it, it's free and nice.

You are now socially obligated to ask me a question, given the thread's title.

She had beef with RM.

The reason basketball doesn't change much is because it's so good. Football is so metally stunting to watch and follow that they need to change it a lot by sensationalizing events in different ways.

You cannot delete a debate comments on phones. If you press ok it literally doesn't work. Neither does tapling it again.

Debates and forums

Law isn't Politics. There needs to be a Law section. Not Society or Politics but Law.

here: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/346

Get bsh1 to add the details of the graded system and what the other choice does to the tutorial/terms thread.

"Winner Takes All" instead of Winner Selection

"Graded System (Four Parts)" replacing the other but also, four part should be the default. When the page loads, the position being Pro and voting system being Four Parts should be default options, as should Open Voting. You need to ensure noobs don't pick silly choices, it will decrease the stress on them and increase the pleasure to us as they're less likely to just go 'omg I don't know what to pick' and not be there with a debate to get a win from. ;) They are also more likely to recommend the site to friends and feel at ease creating debates when all they need to do is type obvious parts and the system picks the rest for them.

This is very deceptive naming. Most noobs won't realise you pick a winner in this four point system and will pick the other one.

you should definitely remove voting privileges and ban them harsher when/if they violate CoC due to their voting abuse as additional grounds to consider them a threat to the site's community.

As I said, this was one of the first times Drafterman had a great idea for the site, I was surprised.

I realise now the glitch is less bad than I thought but in a way more deceptive and then 'worse' even though 'less bad'.

It is an illusion. It stays red if you tap it once and turns black if you tap it twice. This is backwards from the reality. If I tap the flag once, it stays Red but then has unreported itself and I refresh the page and it's not red anymore. If I tap it until it turns black it's re-reported itself and is Red when I refresh the page.

Tell Drafterman this (he almost never replies to me):

Only the corrupt and/or foolish define their stance as what they want to get rid of. Only the genuine and/or intelligent define themselves as what they want to replace a system with that's better.

I don't know what you mean. Judge debates don't change your rating, this is intentional and good.

Judge debates don't affect rating it's coded very differently.

He'll just block you and permaignore you if you get too good at calling him out on his shit. Best to let him cry about one of the best mods teams you and I have seen on the Internet.

Drafterman had a good idea and the pigs flew oh so high.

Times do change.

I'm actually a huge Minaj fan, idgaf about her dumb songs being dumb, her songs like this make me want to die in the name of Rap:

Well? Do you want to know, still? ;)

MOTHERFUCKER DO NOT CALL CASTIN A SLUT; unless it's for me.

Seriously though, what the fuck are you implying, bsh1 is homosexual and Castin has class.

And due to that delay in elo changing, addicts like me will get really irritated by the extension teasing us of our orgasmic BOOM 

If it was the case that 'elo' altered as votes altered I'd support it but because of impatience and rating only fluctuating post-voting, I really wouldn't enjoy this... It would tease me like a sociopathic Dominatrix on a bad day.

They will, you are a good Illuminati member. You will be rewarded in due time. Especially because you encourage users to use Chrome and have that symbol for Religion Debate-section. Patience is your friend here. 

I read it and it doesn't make sense to me.

From Jesus to you:

Matthew is the first 'book' in the first BOOK of Lucifer, the New Testament (NT) Bible. It's best to treat the NT Bible as a taming mantra for the masses.

Jesus was Lucifer, Lucifer was not Satan... Satan was God of OT. Thanks for understanding. Jesus is the flesh-form of the ACTUAL devil. The "DEVIL" is not who you think, Satan was not the actual devil but let's just say he was as this term 'devil' is pointless. Satan is enemy of Jesus, not enemy of God. Lucifer is enemy of God, Lucifer is Jesus. Understand yet?  IGNORE NEW TESTAMENT I BEG YOU.

I've replied to you there.

Can you explain why you are asking both questions? Please specify what you mean by the second question.

Alright, I have thought about how to answer this and now can reply cautiously enough. The Illuminati, whether that's the name they use or not, is a completely real thing that I will not go into right here right now but have actually done on a chat with that purple-image guy who said he's from Anonymous and has his own religion. They are completely real, tangible and devastatingly powerful over the world from Ancient Egypt to this day (maybe even before as I believe it goes as high as alien demigod entities). The thing I won't go into on this particular post or thread is naming the names of Insurance companies or family dynasties involved. Okay, I'll name an OBVIOUS one on the right-wing side of Illuminati; The Bush Family but I'll not go further into it or elaborate.

The reason this is so important to know and appreciate is that my answers to you bear a lot of this into account. I am not the 'jump the gun' conspiracy theorist who thinks global warming is a hoax or that climate change in ways other than the warming of the Earth is irrelevant to consider. Just because I believe NASA is a corrupt organisation does not mean they don't genuinely research from time to time and that their non-space-based research on Antarctica and the melting of ice-caps is hoaxed. Frequently, throughout history, Illuminati has released true theories and facts as the entire reason for our flat Earth and why humans are no longer as oppressed as back in Ancient Egypt is they realised we are actually extremely intelligent (their IQ is on average 115 whereas the non-Illuminati geniuses can have IQs like 180). They know we are capable of variation in the upper-end of the intelligence spectrum so high that they simply will not be able to build AI to think like that kind of human genius in terms of creativity and theory-building. This is the only reason democracy even began in our entire history and why they considered a system different to absolutist monarchy. They realised that by making a system that makes you think you are free and enables the intelligent to debate and feel appreciated and mentally healthier than an enslaved genius who feels only worth the manual labour they do, they can enable geniuses to have their egos fed in exchange for genuine discoveries and developments they otherwise could not. Another reason they moved away from Totalitarian dictatorship is likely that they wanted to experiment with multiple systems of control and brainwashing and see what worked best to make us fight and then what went best to make us want peace and to maintain said peace. This means that I do not have a clue how much of climate change is false or true and I know for a fact that to value it weak is a sign of a weak mind that is on the shitty end of the Illuminati spectrum, such as Trump. The right-wing end of Illuminati are the worst end of it, period. They are not the stereotypical One World Order type of Illuminati like the Clintons are part of, instead they are part of the 'profit from ruining the world and inciting war' mentality. So, I would put climate change as the most important thing to care about as I do believe that Illuminati is such a powerful structure that the only thing they genuinely fear and would most want us to help them cure, aside form ageing and disease, is the weather and the powerlessness against alterations of the climate. This would mean that there is the least motive to lie to us since the only times they are honest to us about science is when they themselves fear and/or need a discovery made that their intellect and capabilities in science as a tiny group of rich and powerful people, are simply inadequate at coming to light and evolving.

Following this, I would say that the issue of poverty is almost a joke. Not a funny joke, a brutally inevitable one. As long as there are rich, there are poor. The mix-and-match dream that EU, Canada, Australia and other 'soc-dem' types have of tamed capitalism is the best of the systems where poverty is mitigated but there is always a degree of 'poor' in a society where there's a degree of 'rich'. The notion you can have a middle class as the lowest and an upper class of high achievers above is bullshit romantic novel type stuff. Since, in the UK, social democracy is already the system in place and frankly it's better than France, Italy and Spain in terms of not being over the top with what the government controls, I'd say I'm happy with the system as is in regards to poverty. Jeremy Corbyn is full of shit, he only justifies himself and has such a huge fan following because he demonises the opposition. The technique of all corrupt politicians in history has always been to speak only of how evil the opposition is and campaign based on what they stop instead of what they want. Poverty would be the least priority.

Drugs is all iffy. I can go into it if you want but I've answered your question as this is automatically in the middle of the three by process of elimination.

As for the death penalty, I am not so sure murder itself is a good enough thing to kill people for. I'd rather kill a rapist than a murderer. I'd also rather analyse why the person did the crime they did and how far-gone a psychopath or sociopath they are so as to think if they will make others in the prison population become more evil or less evil. We need to kill 'pure monsters' off but rehabilitating any and all cold and calculating psychologically-alterable people with some sense of morality and justice deep down. I think I fall into the semi-monster category. Almost all highly intelligent people are cold and calculating but we differ to proper psychopaths in that we have a moral code of some kind and are able to be pressured into obedience by reasoning with us. Our kind make fantastic leaders, we should not be killed off by society.

OG Maasai race still exists. The other tribes dominant in Kenya aren't Kenya-specific though.