RationalMadman

It's the same guy who is the 'main narrator' of the second video who was the rapper of the first video.

The O.D.D. is an acronym he sometimes hints at what it means but I think he likes to leave it mysterious like flat Earth or something he's hinting at.

It's not his initials. His name's Matt Procella (I know from a couple interviews he's had where his name showed on the screen etc)

Anyway, which part of the video is deceptive?

The point is that it is the bully who should be forced to walk away from their screen or punished, not the victim. Thanks for quoting one of the single worst rappers of the last decade, it's very intriguing he'd be the one to make such a tasteless quote.

Just to be clear, you have stated zero reasons why they are wrong, only that they are funny or bs.

I don't really, no. I don't see how it's humbling to have your friends tell you you're laughing at them and making them feel hurt. I can see how it's good for you to realise you to it though.

Even I didn't notice he said that and was shocked she'd be referring to something as recent as the last post he sent to her.

Indulge yourselves.

Very recent video put out by my favourite Youtube-flat-earther

If you had just said that earlier, he would have realised what she was referring to. Now that you'd cited it, the conversation between him and her can continue (idk why she didn't point it out).

Where did he do it on this thread?

Because if she's incorrect, it's her who should say sorry.

Actually he is not referring to you and seems to have conceded that he's said 'lol' to you among other things like 'haha' or whatever else. He is specifically asking janesix where he's laughed AT HER and she's yet to provide any proof.

God is a result of fate/RNG coding of a simulated reality. The true 'creator' is one level above the 'god' persona because the persona was created by an impersonal randomness generator.

Just change my vote for best voter to WF. Wf isn't as good as L-M or bla but he's a quality vote in third place so it fits the title.

Member of Honor is a kind of different award where mods and the owner can get it. Mvp excludes them and is more like best of the user base as opposed to best of the staff.

And mod scandal as trend.

Since virt wants to suicide-vote Mike as MoH, I vote Mike. Mike is not particularly honorable but he is very useful and efficient so Idc what the H means, he can get an award.

I vote environment for BD, jboy funniest and blamonkey as best voter.

Is it not true that outside of God (or one dimension superior) is fate itself AKA randomness?

I vote Trend mod scandal (I don't get it as that's not just one forum topic/thread). I hadn't voted on this yet.

Are you sure it isn't 4v4 jury vs environment?

Sorry for calling you a joke as you quoted, I corrected it as soon as I realised I had got too worked up. It was wrong of me to say. I wasn't sure how many warning he'd got and ignored though but at least that has convinced you.

He was absolutely 0% the latter thing (that is not at all what 'mean-spirited' means though).

He was not an ambivalent 'here comes madman again' user. He did precisely what you said, lied about what I said, lied about what his anti-flat-earth source actually held in it and never ever paid attention to anything I would say on any topic about anything. He'd attack my mental health across four subforums really laughing at me and spitting in my metaphorical face as all I wanted to do was bring up some points and perhaps change my mind if the opposition could bring up good enough points. I was nothing but passive-aggressive back. I didn't snap, I didn't abuse and he lost. You're mad because I saved the forum an abusive user who has targeted me, EternlVw and at least 2 others in an elongated, targeted manner. You are victim-blaming. I didn't bring it onto myself and he has no right to get other people to point and laugh at me in the way he did nor to others. Especially not when they block him and try their best to ignore him.

Ignoring him DID NOT HELP AT ALL. I saw others try it, he would keep at it again and again until you snap.

Do you know that there is truly no difference between malicious and mean-spirited? :)

Outplayz, I say this not as a timid, sensitive effeminate user who feels intimidated and terrified of Goldtop (no offence to such users at all, I know they exist and simply completely avoided him, tiptoeing too afraid to be weird around him in a thread). I say this as someone as domineering and 'pushy' in my forum interaction style as Goldtop is:

What he did is not acceptable and you are wrong even furthermore:

IT IS PRECISELY TOXIC PERSONALITIES who are here only to hurt other users that should get banned as opposed to the actions in themselves. You need to ban strategic sadists over outburst-prone now-and-again vitriolic posters.

Outplayz he doesn't vehemently disagree, he bullies. You're saying 'tolerate the bullying because he is an opponent to debate with' but you're missing out on how shallow his disagreements are and what he is doing is veiling bullying and harassment with argumentation as opposed to adding that on top.

I have proven this to bsh1 and others by several case-study examples. Unlike disgusted/vagabond and ethang as well as bench (but bench used to be as bad, if not worse so I am referring to the user imabench here, not back on DDO years back) all have two things in common as we know them now:

These two things were inverted with goldtop. He'd increase both things as opposed to decrease in said scenarios.

That is a very situational take and not an accurate viewpoint of a moderator to take on his/her userbase.

He's been blocked by me and others, asked to leave us alone and harassed us across all subforums really digging into us until we snap. If I had not done some things in private and got other victims to unite and contact bsh1 he easily would still be here. You don't know what it's like to be on the receiving end of targeted bullying as you try to convey peculiar views. It really hurts and is truly enough to make you scared to post if he's around.

And what I can't agree more worth is how you point out that his abuse isn't even loaded rebuttal, it's purely sadistic targeted shards of verbal glass.

He couldn't give a damn what's being argued, he cares how easy it is to get others to pile on you and to take focus away from any good points you bring.

I never once, ever, saw him target someome with a mainstream argument or socially normal reputation. He'd prey on the eccentric until their egos broke and either anger or sadness caused them to snap or stop posting.

Yes, and that's when my psyche becomes most powerful but no, 'follow' in this sense isn't the same as 'stalking'.

Good fucking riddance.

His worst posts got deleted by mods so his post history is only 80% of the abuse.

This was a brilliant ban, don't ever forgive him, he's sadistic and calculating as a bully gets short of IRL threats or suicide encouragement.

I know two other users he's target-bullied even after being asked to leave them alone.

Tell them about me and ask the other users he harassed to come forth if you want.

I just ask that you give me tips. Like you spy on me and say 'you could have handle it better this way' or 'she's into you' or 'he is being sarcastic'. Thanks for your help.

I love how ethang and drafterman preach so harshly against bsh1 and ignore the complete, utter, immovable oligarchic capacity to spy, use and abuse all private information of users able to be obtained via accessing this site (including page you came from and left the site to) haha you have blinkers on if you think "Mike" is the good guy and bsh1 is the evil one whispering in his ear.

I do not give a damn what you say, there is nothing we can do to defeat Mike. You have submitted now pay the price, stop pretending there's an option 2 where you fight bsh1 and feel less like you're under absolute, immovable oligarchy.

I am a happy slave. I am a comfortable slave.

The limit I don't agree to, you would be limiting active/addicts/weekend-visiters/day-off-bingers etc giving you genuine reports.

Limiting should be placed upon poor-rate reporters and they should be notified of it.

Anonymous reporting is absolutely stupid. A highly successful reporter should get their reports handled faster and you should gamble that they will give accurate reports more readily if pressed for time. A poorly accurate reporter, especially if high volume and rate needs to have a violation that you should add to CoC called report spam that can disallow them to report for a period of time until they learn. If they keep at it, a site ban should be in order no joke.

pls vote here 2 days left ty 

@drafterman

Then you would also, being the 'suck up to who is in power but fight the second in command' type of guy you are, realise that it's Mike who put bsh1 in the head mod position and blatant that he trusts bsh1 in that position.

I wonder if anyone has yet realised that Mike isn't who he says he is.

I will just say this; https://www.debateart.com/participants/coal

Think. Think. But rivalries. But, but, but... No. What if they never did what they appeared to do? What if they stayed?

Broken profile, working mic.

Drafterman why do you trust Mike to have that access but not bsh1? What the fuck has this faceless guy who came in with the DDO hacker bots do to earn your respect or trust?

I genuinely do not like this policy one bit. At any time anyone can say they think they're being doxxed by anyone and unleash this. It's that simple.

I get what bsh1 is doing here, it's what the 'control group' (way before they were Illuminati as we know them today) did to the world back in the monarchy periods of history (not ancient egypt even though they like the pharaoh eye). They say 'we rule you against your will but please love us, peasants' and they realised through time it never, ever appeases the masses. You either need democracy through controlled opposition rivalries or you need religion-based dictatorship (Sharia, or government-is-god-communism etc.). Bsh1 is used to democracy in his real country (idk if that's doxxing I thought you made it clear by the US on your profile, if it's doxxing delete this, but everyone knows it) this results in him trying this. Mike is used to Putin's 'honest corruption' so it results in him being totally confused when we cried about reporting not being anonymous and other things etc. 

Mods run identical to the Kaiser of Germany in WW1's regime as well as very similar Russia's original Aristocracy. Research Kaiser meaning and the way the government was structured etc during Germany pre-pre-Hitler (two pre's intentionally). That is how you should employ your regime and run things here, also research Czar tactics of taming the masses but not their policies as that's how they differed to Kaisers.

It's actually 4v4 for environment debate vs jury null

Mike reads all PMs when and why he pleases.

May I suggest something on PM?

Just to be clear, I am not really certain I understand which side is correct here. Sometimes I really do think Illuminati is the only way to run the world since I have seen all other ways fail but in the optimal society all spy on all at all times (I mean ALL on ALL, this way no 'threat of exposure to enemy' argument works) so I like this and all but really I don't know what's right or wrong here.

Spy on me all you want hombres but just know I see you too. Your all seeing eye is nothing to my third eye.

Also, bsh1 darling, Mike's read all your PM's every single letter against your will. Think about it, who really has the power here. Do not be ashamed of it, I sometimes get off on the idea of illuminati getting off to me getting off to others.

I am curious why it's a threat when I say it. If someone else said that and I said it was a threat, you'd definitely call me a troll.

There is no threat, you will realise you're a troll in time and it will sadden you more, you will whine more until you either reform or become properly toxic.