Total posts: 19,931
-->
@Imabench
No, this thread did not invite you to divulge such information at all. You are invited to keep your fucking mouth shut and cower in a corner.
I am not your buddy, I am not your bitch. I am also done here. Post whatever you want as a reply to this, I know when to pick my battles. I said enough and perhaps even too much, bsh1 may slap me on the wrist for all I know. You want to start spreading shit about me on PM to people that's your prerogative, just pick better people to trust is all. It's clear to me the one you told is still sided with me given who he/she came to for the full story and who he/she exposed to the other.
Created:
-->
@Imabench
The difference between you and I is over the last 6 years I've constantly been evolving, improving. You're still the same guy you were back then just with a tamer front.
You want to push me that's fine but those who know, know. Those who don't, don't need to.
You are what you are and this time you will not outplay me, will not out-provoke me. I will not be able to say more without breaking threat CoC.
I don't fear you, I don't dislike that you laugh. I relish in your vile narcissism for it is the very reason your guard is down all the time.
Created:
Posted in:
Go ahead elaborate on how your sources back you up on the depth you go into Antarctica. Also prove that you ever go around it in one trip.
Created:
-->
@Imabench
blogspot.com
Created:
-->
@Imabench
Created:
Posted in:
Goldtop you're the one lying. Read your own links and the travel plans
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Goldtop
You never get to go all the way around 'around' 'into' it's all subjective when they advertise. You don't literlaly go in a circle and time it. You stick to a small part and venture around, not in and cover what you assume is a quarter or something and come back (it's more like a twelvth at most)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
Let's please stop discussing why I'd bet on it being red in the OP scenario, this is very specifically about why I'd bet purple as opposed to rejecting the blue or the red in order to accept the other as valid.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
you didn't see the image, perhaps. Maybe you thought it was a virus link. let me help you here:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
You think you should keep points to gain medals from fallacious votes?
Created:
Posted in:
Actually you do get brownie points for doing the right thing after what you can't undo.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
@Ramshutu
@Username
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I will tell you the truth and give you advise 100x better than the bad advice LM gave but frankly I don't care if you like it or follow it at all. You deserve to learn the hard way with all these people supporting you, just to teach them a lesson but I worry more about you.
You're treating her like a fucking chocolate egg you find on an Easter egg hunt. You're so obsessed with the hunt you haven't sat back and asked if she wants you or if you actually want the egg long-term to not just indulge in one time and be done with.
I don't give a shit about monogamy or any social construct, I am talking about priorities. You're going to get trampled on and she's going to feel no guilt while doing it. Females at your age are extremely fluid emotionally and even in who they are. They aren't like us guys, they aren't developing gradually with a set personality or taste. She could easily crave someone else a week after kissing you and telling you she wants your babies in the future.
You don't trust me? Think I'm a sexist, ageist bigot? That's fine. You will see in the long run that I'm saving you from pain. Wait until you're older, school and having hobbies are more important at your age. You're experiencing a rush of hormones, you're not experiencing actual love, I know EXACTLY how powerful it feels and the way to realise what I'm saying is true is to ask yourself why you don't want the other girls in your class as bad as her. You'll realise there's absolutely no answer, you have developed a hormonal, irrational attachment that is going to scar you if you keep pursuing it at your and her age. You don't even give a shit about her either, you just want to make her 'yours'.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Goldtop
these tours are to the edge barely into Antarctica, you still don't get it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Goldtop
YOU CANNOT FLY OVER ANTARCTICA, you can take a helicopter near it just high enough to avoid the harsh winds and to see barely into it (white can distort depth as it's all one colour)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Smithereens
and much more such as humble debaters who don't like the stigma of reporting their own debate's votes and debaters who know it will be obvious they reported a vote FOR them resulting in beef with the voter in future etc
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
I am completely against 5 and 6 and am willing to have an official debate with you about it in a formal manner if you want.
Created:
-->
@David
I'm talking logged-in back and his return will not be as notorious as mine but yes, I understand what you mean. Not all accounts are unclosed, though.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
I believe everyone agrees with #1 just so you know.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
You just don't get it, Airmax was actually scared of Juggle back then and of losing his position. He was so terrified he told me 'I'm sorry please dont' admit you're RM and don't be too abrasive with the popular members' every single time I made an account. He let me be there for as long as I gave 0 hints I was special or weird. He knew who I was and Juggle told him to get rid of me as I was a nuisance and actually due to a vendetta I developed and have never truly overcome psychologically, I was a nuisance at first. I matured over time and don't really care what you say, your anecdotal evidence is complete and utter... Well, let's say self-deceit on the entire matter of laissez-faire moderation.
Airmax was a pick-and-choose moderator. He would be a complete tyrant if the situation suited it and flip into absentee ghetto daddy when it suited him too. He was just a whim-pushed spirit much like the jack sparrow that bench saw himself as. He had little strategy beyond maintaining his position and little morality beyond caring deeply about hurting the socially prominent members of the site. He isn't even a proper example of laissez-faire moderation. Head over to createdebate and see what laissez-faire moderation is right now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Bsh1 is the equivalent of our Mafia's underboss, not the consigliere. This is very crucial (research mafia hierarchy not the game, real mafia). He's not sacred, he's not immovable. He's an underboss to Mike, the godfather, and not a consigliere. People think he's an overbearing consigliere and Mike regards him as highly as one but in reality he's under Mike, who is the ultimate supreme authority and his connection to Mike is not one of 'here come, advise me' but rather one of 'you're directly under me, help me and do my dirty work but feel free to make others do some of that dirty work'.
Bsh1 can be demoted, promoted and fired by Mike. He is not a sacred, super-trusted advisor almost beyond hierarchy in the way a consigliere is. On the other hand, Airmax who began as an underboss with Ore-Ele as his 'favourite Capo' ended up a supreme Consigliere to Juggle and this is the key difference and why Airmax was far more immovable.
Created:
-->
@Earth
I wanna chat on PM to you about a couple of things
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
^ This is the personality and way the person who is advocating 'better justice system' treats other users.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
The fact you even ask that is telling in itself of the mentality with which you have designed your justice system. Yes, it's always subjective when it's out of control, we know that. Justice never is actually objective.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
Please stop kidding yourself with the Airmax apologist shit. Airmax was a dirt-tier mod who preyed on the socially vulnerable. What the fuck did he help you with? You are some super-optimistic past-alterer if you are trying to tell me Max was patient or kind with you. I know your history, I don't want to dox you here and can't but stop fucking lying about who he sided with. The only reason he even remotely helped you with Bench is all the altering to him I did behind the scenes as I exposed a ton of shit he never realised Bench was doing to users in private.
I am an extremely experienced internet user and troll. I know what 4-Chan is and how societies like that operate. You want to tell me you're socially awkward that's fine, you'll indeed survive in an enraged state of everyone tell each other they're cocksucking sacks of shit that their mother should have swallowed instead of taking in her womb that night.
The kind of environment lax moderation enables is brutal to social outcasts and forces all social outcasts to become hostile as shit in return. I know you are lying even about your anecdotal shit and I know the only reason it was remotely positive with Max was me, myself and I and what I made Max see in flaws in how merciful he was being to users like Bench and their calculated prodding of users like you until you snapped. I had many alts and many long PM conversations with Max on and off-site on Hangouts. I know him on a level few here do other than ShabShoral and TheHammer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Laissez-faire moderation is inherently unfair because it is social darwinism. This is proven by every single libertarian nation on earth being wracked with poverty and tyranny by the rich. All Afrcan nations that are not on the Socialist or Fascist end of the spectrum are proof of this.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
No it hasn't you're altering the dynamics and lying about votes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Both sides sharing equal guilt in a flamewar doesn't mean it's unnecessary for a mod to step in. I've never seen a one-sided flamewar, so that would in effect mean no flamewars are moderated. They're entertaining as hell, but they can really get out of control.
- Castin
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
You are a fucking liar plain and simple. S**mbag trying to alter the literal views of people as it suits you.
I don't see an issue with Bsh1, I see an issue with the policy. It's ridiculous that this sort of behaviour that's been going on in this thread is allowed to stand,
- Smithereens
Castin hasn't said shit about what she believes, just that she laughs and doesn't want to be mod.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't agree to Wylted on this, this is very good of you bsh1; a step in the right direction. Keep making threads like this.
Created:
Posted in:
In fact my stance on almost all of these can be explained by my mentality in the above post.
Created:
Posted in:
It should all revolve around credibility and built rep. Idgaf what a narcissistic fool you think me to be, statistically if you know behind the scenes how accurate my reporting is and how high volume it is in spite of that you'd know I live up to my standard here:
higher repped reporters should have their reports considered first, etc. Reputation for RM is currently shit-tier socially and that's irrelevant to this kind of rep I speak of.
Created:
Posted in:
I am completely against #6 for the same reason that I differ to drafterman on why I disagree with 5.
Created:
Posted in:
I agree with drafterman on disagreeing with 5 for totally different reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@bsh1
So it's possible despite what you told yeshuabought?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
There is actually a huge difference. Juggle told airmax 'don't worry, just ban those idiots'. Mike doesn't tell bsh1 the same thing, he cares. You are complimenting Max for things he didn't do at all.Max was not well-liked, he was capable of banning those who didn't like him. From Me to Qopel to that guy mike or something who exposed him for being corrupt and having some arrangement with 2 Juggle mods posing as non-mods (may be our mike) and Swagnarok here (bubbatheclown/vox_veritas etc) he banned outcasts when it suited him.Bsh1 hasn't done this, the mercy he's shown ungrateful pricks is hilarious to me.
- RM
he was extremely popular. just because many users, including yourself, had issues with him doesn't mean the other 95% of us did. and i dont really disagree that max's moderation was personally corrupt in many ways. i know from personal experience that if you were one of his favorites you could get away with far more than a regular user could. the point i'm making is that bsh has been, so far, less corrupt that airmax was and is still far less popular
- thett3
95% is pulled out of your ass, he wasn't popular at all he ensured the popular liked him, this is a totally different concept to ensuring he himself is popular.
- RM
Created:
Posted in:
LESS STRICT
- Tyrone
- Wylted
- Imabench
- TheHammer
- 1Harderthanyouthink
- Thett3
- ResurgetExFavilla
- Buddamoose
- Goldtop
- SupaDudz
- Outplayz
SAME / MORE STRICT
- RationalMadman
- YeshuaBought
- Argent_Tongue
- Mopac
- Swagnarok
- Ramshutu
- Vaarka
- Drafterman
- Castin
- Smithereens
- McSloth
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
95% is pulled out of your ass, he wasn't popular at all he ensured the popular liked him, this is a totally different concept to ensuring he himself is popular.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Smithereens says "I don't see an issue with Bsh1, I see an issue with the policy. It's ridiculous that this sort of behaviour that's been going on in this thread is allowed to stand," and you don't even admit that he is in support of same/more strict because he abstained from the old dynamic
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
you never even added mcsloth to the 'same' list.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
There is actually a huge difference. Juggle told airmax 'don't worry, just ban those idiots'. Mike doesn't tell bsh1 the same thing, he cares. You are complimenting Max for things he didn't do at all.
Max was not well-liked, he was capable of banning those who didn't like him. From Me to Qopel to that guy mike or something who exposed him for being corrupt and having some arrangement with 2 Juggle mods posing as non-mods (may be our mike) and Swagnarok here (bubbatheclown/vox_veritas etc) he banned outcasts when it suited him.
Bsh1 hasn't done this, the mercy he's shown ungrateful pricks is hilarious to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
When you fail, keep altering the dynamic and at some point the shit you throw at the wall will stick.
Keep trying, you didn't ask those people about forum moderation. I know Castin, for a fact, enjoys getting bullies off this site just doesn't want to be the one to do it. Castin is more strict, you're putting words in her mouth.
Created:
am I actually going insane?
Created:
-->
@Earth
You were unblocked from the moment I pm'd you about chicken wings, you just never thought to test.
Created: