RationalMadman

Yes and I mean this VERY sincerely. I used to mock and taunt.

There is no why, reality is reality God is God.

Really I am beginning to piece some things together, it is very clever how he has pulled this off, guy is a fucking genius.

but 'sociopath' does LOL

Cap'n Barbossa be the wiliest of pirates.

The Bible has truth in it but know that it often has nonsense intertwined. It is truthful in telling of the fixed, created flat Earth that is a circle. It is truthful in telling that the creator probably made humans as the leaders of the Earth but it forgets that humans like to prey on one another in a grand scale and it's no fun being 'top dog amongst 7 billion' it's much more fun to be '13 families that rule them all' :)

God is Satan, there is no escape. Accept it, use people and live life.

drafterman causing defamation of bsh1 when drafterman's the site's most twofaced member. If it suits him he is social justice warrior, next minute ambivalent sociopath.

I agree, I dislike Islam immensely because I am pro LGBT

Tune to the rap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chwyjG1F6Xs

Zed victor what's the time? What's that look on your face?

I'm here, a real alien from outer space,

What's it matter what all that is is made from? ("is is" is intentional)

Why worry why the cold's cold when you're home, safe and warm?

Why question the serenity, forever pondering a storm,

Good weather is good weather whether or not it can transform.

Fate is fate, and if it's real, it's done,

You're coded start-to-finish in zeros and ones.

If it's randomness that matter is, then to solve it would take a dunce,

The answer is no answer, organised chaos all at once,

You're inquisitive, aspiring to solved what's not a problem,

A cock's a cock and that won't stop even when it is not throbbin',

So you question why this happens, wonder how it came to be,

It's like you want to decode the Kraken but you're trapped far out at sea,

The answer isn't easy, thing is it's impossible, truly,

As soon as you answer what made everything, the God's not in reality,

Questioning the lies that NASA tells us; sphere-Earth, gravity,

This is a simulation, on that we can agree but we need to see eye to eye on more before the search has completed fully.

You do realise that this is what Fascism feels like... Except 200x more tyrannical yeah?

You're a Fascist, no?

I find it really amusing when right-wing nutjobs who preach so fervently about private property and the right to do what you want with it come to a privately owned website and... 

Yep, you got the joke.

Wrong, reality is also what is currently 'not' especially if you consider moments in time compared with one another.

What's the endgame? Why bother?

12 out of 13 relationships that ended did so because it was idiotic to begin with and neither party thought it through. You will know when you meet your soulmate, the chemistry will be so fucking undeniable and the situation so optimal. You may die never meeting them and may regret never seducing her, who knows... Not me... But it sure as fuck isn't something you need to do or should feel a failure if you don't.

She easily can be less into you than you think. The guys you say 'it's okay' and 'it could be a hint' are considering options, if she's an option she isn't the one. Don't be too optimistic and don't be too pessimistic. This is a gamble, consider the odds (including the odds of the odds themselves paying off enough to make ti worth the entire effort) and hedge your bets where you feel it's wise. She may even 'not lust' and 'not love' you if you don't get alpha and aggressive enough (no, this doesn't mean rape) but it's all about clues.

Do not go in ready to win, go in ready to assess if fate has set her up to be your conquest. Life in my eyes is so much about knowing that settling for the wrong pussy is cheating yourself of the one fate had in line for you, the treasure chest you never got to because you were too busy enjoying your bronze trophy.

Do what you want but consider what she wants as well as what you could want more (or less). It's infinitely complex to answer this question, stop looking for the simplicity where there isn't any.

You cannot alter my altering of reality being reality.

The irony of putting binary code as the final part of the non-binary-gender list isn't lost on me. ;)

This site has the fucking right to say whatever gender it wants, it could even have the gender 'faggot' and 'alpha' as male variants. that's absolutely within its rights because it's self-given not other giving the abuse or sexist compliment.

I will show you who you are fucking with when you say Pagans are this or that. You want to come preach your nonsense that the illuminati use to brainwash you? Go ahead, be an honest, hard-working puppet in their scheme. There's no heaven, there is only this life and then the hell (if anything) afterwards. Stop pretending we live for anything other than Hedonism in the end.

Be a rational Hedonist, care for others and their pleasure, don't be a psychopath but then again when they wanna fuck with you, remind them who they are stepping to. You gotta be the best you can be 'cause there's this life and that's it. That's the game God set up, there's not 'afterlife' no cheat codes, nothing.

DarC never gonna die, kid but DA>DART.

DART makes no actual sense and 'dart' is a fucking english word already boiiiiiiii

bring it right now

No it doesn't

I won't ever use that. 3 hours maybe but 30 mins is a fucking joke.

It doesn't matter what kind of genius you are, the physical laying out and typing is time-consuming in itself.

I will explain to you where you are going wrong only if you are willing first to consider you could be wrong.

Do you understand metaphors, lies and puzzles?

and what if the false prophet WAS HIM?

I have now altered my signature on DDO to DA.

By fixing the glitches, responding to userbase equally fast to DI (DI was always beastly at that) and having mods who think in terms of impact of the breaking of the rules and not 'letter of the law' type rule enforcement and severity of punishment, the site has surpassed DI because DI has more glitches, although it still has more that it allows you to do in formatting in debates, and basically is totally lacking in the way it's set up and laid out. 

Unlike DI, in DA there isn't a strict hierarchy of people. I used to be the go-to person for DI but after I told him how stupid he was  being by spamming 'come to DI' on DDO when DDO was grieving the events of its downfall, he basically ignored me and spammed even worse the next day.

After that, the admin never once pm'd me again (which was strange as he'd ask me every month what opinions I had on the site's latest update etc) and frankly the crowd there is the dumber, more toxic people from DDO who went there instead of here as here they got banned.

Willows is the most hilarious as he got banned everywhere except DDO (on CD he got banned in 2 days but much like on DI wasn't using the name 'willows' you could just tell by the frequency of what he was posting).

PM the stories, welcome back.

This be the black pearl, you either hop aboard or WALK THE PLANK! NO HALF THIS HALF THAT! ARRRRrrgh

You are blocked for a reason. This is a perfect example of you either being severely mentally disordered or sarcastic, I'm not sure which. The answer is blatantly because Jesus Christ is called Jesus Christ.

It's not. JHHillman is not form usa to my knowledge.

I think they are not from USA but can't tell the country I think because that's doxxing. You are helping doxxing by telling they are not from Aus so you can't report this.

PM me the stories if you want to.

Welcome back.

If you are actually interested PM me. I am not going to talk out here for the fools to mock.

This is true beyond transgenderism and beyond even hormonal changes and operation, it's raw brain chemistry and built into the networking between the subconscious and the conscious. They will never ever do this test as the politically correct world won't give the funding. The truth is men were designed to dominate women and women were designed to enjoy being fought over by men they can choose between to admire. This was the raw truth of the humans that led to us dominating the whole planet and all other species. Do not deny the truth, you will be a fool in how you handle the different genders if you don't comprehend this vital thing. Fail to admire a male colleague and/or boss, it doesn't matter how pleased you show yourself to be by their presence, they will learn to dislike you and thus to avoid you. In contrast, admire your female boss and/or colleagues all you want, they will NON-FRIEND and NON-ROMANCE zone you all at once. They only care about how pleased you are to SEE them to be NEAR them, to be in their fucking presence, to have earned their attention alone should be the reward you bask in. Do this, and no female will hate you for long regardless of your harshness towards her. Life is not complicated but it IS a puzzle. Know the pieces, it's simple, deny the puzzle pieces and their interactions and you will find it infinitely complex.

Who can deny?  No-one!

That is direct bullying. 

You're the type of guy who will never invent anything in your life. Just know that.

You may 'do' many things but you'll never create, never innovate, never evolve. You like to 'know' what is... You hate to 'think' what could be.

This brain you have perhaps is biochemically (or neurologically) bound to keep repeating a cycle of 'if it hasn't been done or proven by someone other than me who themselves has had their 'doing' and 'discovery' analysed by others, I won't even consider it could be of any value'.

People like you scoff at people like me but people like me come up with both the dumbest and smartest ideas on Earth while you GUARANTEE you'll stay mediocre. I don't envy you and I don't care about proving one single thing to you, go along and troll others but stop @ing me especially after I blocked you.

Explanation and citation are not the same thing.

I know that in the original John quote it seems to be anyone who opposes or denies Christ, I already said I knew that.

It's later made out to be a male offspring of the Devil who is very arrogant it will succeed, very cunning in how it deceives people and how it beats Jesus and god to begin with but loses due to the return of Jesus.

Jesus returning defeated the entire purpose of (from his enemies' perspectives) his Crucifixion. It completely let him win in a way they never could beat.

I don't need to do anything and I have very little motive to prove any of it to someone who treats me the way that you do. I love the idea of HELPING the powers that be deluding the likes of you. You do not deserve the truth.

Twitter and Instagram are worse than Facebook in all ways if we are talking corruption and/or politically-fuelled censorship (although Twitter does it for the 'opposite team of politicians' that Facebook does it for). 

The notion that staring at a screen for long periods of time is bad for POSTURE is true if you don't pay attention to how you sit/lay/stand while using it and position your neck relative to the screen but the added notion that it harms your eyes and optical health is only true if you don't do the following:

There is something called 'blue light' that is used in all screens (TV to computer to phone) to make it appear 'fresh' and 'vivid' to you. This is very good in short bursts at making things very powerful and appear 'wow this screen is so good' but is extremely detrimental to your eyes after long periods of use and somewhat ironically makes your eyes quite 'unblue' and red after long periods of staring at it. This even can damage your ability to process light if you 'toughen yourself up' to it and destroy your retina by making yourself seemingly immune to the eye strain's felt pain and irritating via conditioning yourself to it by extensive exposure. This is NOT a conspiracy theory, many screen-based technology providers acorss multiple platforms have realised this is the single thing harming people like me who are staring at the screen all day but for whatever reason failed to advertise or make 'big' their in-built solution in all models of things made post-2014 towards October 2015. They added something that Google calls 'amber lighting' but most call 'night light' (and Google ended up using that term too). It artificially makes all colours that stray away from orange to be toned down in what is shown to you (they can't actually 'cut out' or 'reduce' the 'blue light' element to the screen). What this does in turn is make your eyes receive a less vivid but extremely soothing version of whatever you are seeing whereby the glare and harshness is completely blunted if you set the strength at the right level but don't go all the way 'red' or 'extreme amber' nor forget the role that BRIGHTNESS plays in the harm to your eyes. 

A key aspect to most tech with screens (if not all by this day and year) providing amber-increasing screen intonation is that it enables you to not have to reduce the brightness to such a severely dark level that your eyes are strained ANYWAY as you have to make the screen so dark that you struggle to 'focus' on it relative to the brightness of the lighting around you. This means you can now have your screen as bright (although i suggest 'one notch darker') than the lighting of your room/environment but have it ambered to such an extent that the focusing on the screen doesn't 'hurt' or redden your eyes for a long time.

Some platforms, such as Windows, 'force' you to set a time that you consider 'night' for the amber lighting to be activated during and it will turn back to blue-light-inclusive non-ambered screen for the rest of the time. A trick to get around this is to leave a fifteen-minute gap where your 'end time' is fifteen minutes earlier than the time of the 'start'. If you set it so they are the same time, it will never activate and you can't be more precise than 15-minute-slots as that's how Microsoft has decided to do it for now. When the fifteen-minute period begins (or when you are in a period of time where you know you'll be on during the fifteen minute period) set is for a fifteen minute period far away form the time you're using it. Do this constantly, there's no other solution. You want to be constantly doing it and never staring at non-ambered screen, this does what 'gaming glasses' do without costing a single extra cent or penny beyond what you paid for your system.

Can you explain how much the 'factored in curvature of the Earth' is involved in determining the observed 'pull'?

Which facts am I rejecting?

There is absolutely nothing physical in reality's core at all. It's based on binary code (the type1 debate is actually based on something he's changed his mind on after opposing me on it):

But in the case where the majority are one and not the other (in this case male) it is going to increase the rate of failure of the default matching that of the user.

Aside from the easy flat-earter-type reaction to what you have given me of 'they're lying and paid-off or blackmailed' which I don't doubt is true to an extent and that the reason the expedition to Venus was underfunded and magically they decided to distract from why that project was cancelled by funding this with the money meant for that (it explicitly says it on the Wiki page for some strange reason).

What I am reading is that even Newton himself was immediately ready to scapegoat a lack of detectable deflection (implying he himself being prepared for negative results and saying 'but trust me it's just because the mountain is too small'). Aside from this, it appears the a ton of excuses like weather conditions and insignificance of the results which at best produced 50% deflection coupled with the fact that they altered how they interpreted the results based on accounting for Earth's curvature distorting what they see makes me wonder just what exactly these results prove and why this is never ever mentioned as proof of gravity in modern times as if to push it aside and prevent people on the flat-earth side looking into the details of it. Sorry, but I genuinely read it in in-depth and am not convinced, if anything I'm confused at the following:

They seem to have only proven that the Earth is far denser (and therefore more powerful at pulling things down versus things like the mountain pulling it side-ways) than they previously thought. This again adds to my idea that everything runs on density and nothing but. Whatever this 'arc-scale' was I want to know exactly how much their 'compensating for the assumed curvature of the Earth' factored into their apparent observing of any pulling from the mountain in the first place.

I agree with you on a lot of things, you do realise I'm not an atheist or a typical Theist, yes?

3 is irrelevant to me, what you perceive me as is your burden to bare.

I am interested in 2, please give me links and explanations. I believe you to be lying.