Total posts: 19,931
A man like this would find it intellectually easier to appear well groomed by shaving but instead has a more attractive look by utilising trimming.
The side with more clean shaven men that have 0 style outside of formal wear and clean shaving is the Republican side.
I think this was a very big misstep by you.
Created:
Facial hair is common on male intellectuals, actually.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
What exactly is it that your OP was saying here:
More and more organizations are getting on board with this issue. Even famous LGBT athletes are getting on board
When I asked you what 'on board' meant, you said this:
Supporting trans athletes
Surely it is meant the other way around based on what you then said after.
Created:
Posted in:
I guess what I'm about to say may be cringe and making a mountain out of a molehill to some, this is theory-crafting reality itself and if you dislike that quit now.
It just dawned on me that there is something many evolutionists failed to have noticed to explain something we never understood about the history of macroevolution.
There were only 3 types of predatory animals that could thrive:
- Those genetically predisposed to be shy/weary enough of the apex species.
- Those intelligent enough to be trainable (even if they were genetically predisposed to be not so weary).
- Those either via intelligence or sheer way of life that could operate aggressively and yet not conflict with the interests of the species or be too much hassle to properly make a bloodline go extinct.
Yes, this even applies to human beings.
Ultimately, what happened over time to explain the 'gaps' and many other things that make very little apparent sense, we notice that the only wild wolves left are either weary, trainable or sneaky (this isn't the same as weary, they'd rip you apart if they could they just fear groups of humans at once or don't mind a useful one that rewards them with food for company now and again but can't be truly domesticated).
This is a twofold rant/post.
I am saying that in all species other than humans, what happened was that brutally over time, it grew either very 'away' from us, steering clear or it grew domesticate to some degree. There is no third option other than the type that is simply operating sneakily and is that extremely smart it doesn't mess with us until our guard is down.
The third type is a significant minority of wild creatures now but 'back then' must have been the most thriving of any predatory species. What happened was we literally destroyed the apexes of other species, their entire bloodlines got thwarted. We know the 'scariest' like the dire wolf or the ancestor of the Alaskan bear AKA kodak bear. What we don't know is much about there side/cousin species at the times. This is because I predict the others were more ruthless and terrifying and humans instantly ganged up on them fast, eradicating them. The only species humans started becoming gentler and gentler and gentler to are those such as ourselves, cats so on and so forth.
Right now, there's not really anything in place for our species and hasn't been for longer than people say it (it's not a modern dumbing down and weakening phenomenon at all, it's ancient). The reason is that we are one of the only species where we separate the kind of traumatised military/intelligence types that can't form real bonds and are feral yet 'on a chain' all at once from the rest of the civilian population. We obviously separate the prison population from the general population.
What I wonder is if this is actually a slow but inevitable snowball, over time will intelligent 'overlord' human types keep reproducing with each other and the less intelligent humans reproduce making a larger and larger divide?
See, I have noticed that over time the difference between someone who is 'smart' or 'intelligent' and someone who is a 'fool' (think of a ruder synonym) has grown. People think we are in a more varied times but it's leading to the opposite effect. Take the rap industry, the world of science or just plain old Netflix series (not just originals). I have noticed that in the past, for instance, it was a miracle to see something near a 100/100 in showbusiness or any of those fields, if you did they probably were extreme niche experts like Einstein, Mozart or Hitchcock. Over time even in the last 200 years let along from Ancient Egypt and even the Ice age to now, you will find that there was less difference between what it meant to be 'god tier' and 'trash'. That's not because trash is lower but because actually medium existed far more.
Maybe I'm wrong but I am thinking about this from the perspective that if over time the most intelligent, creative and sexy people keep reproducing with each other, it will of course push the less intelligent, creative and sexy people to reproduce with each other. The invention of an entire system like Tinder and even the 'concept' of meeting your lover online means proximity and other factors will never enable someone lacking in several departments to reproduce with an apex intelligent or whatever being unless in a pure sugardaddy/sugamomma type arrangement.
As generations go along we are actually at a stage now where the poor, unattractive, uncreative and/or unintelligent will be pushed more than ever before to only reproduce with others of those traits. You may think 'that was always the case' but never to this scale due to proximity and pressure to have kids before it's too late being factors.
Eventually, not even through genetics but the sheer capacity for social networking to enable 'apex value' people to reproduce with each other, the 'elite' will actually have unironically become 'elite' by around the year 2560 based on the projection I see. As in there will be literally 2 'worlds' of humans. The intelligent, attractive, creative and yet sociable world and the ones still very simpleminded but they won't be non-connected until AI has totally replaced the 'simpler' ones in the world of the intelligent, attractive etc (can call them elite but I don't really mean specifically in a financial sense).
I actually do think that there is a 'progressive' lean to the elite but that's only because the most intelligent and creative will want to, not the most sexy and wealthy nor productive necessarily.
You may think 'but it used to be only rich married rich' etc. Yes, exactly... So if one elite was less sexy, intelligent, creative or pleasant to be around (take your pick) you eventually had no real 'apex' mixes. Perhaps I'm talking shit but I just realised the reason why humans can be so utterly stupid and it's because within our species only very few are outside the 3 types because even an asshole or bitch knows how to get by either via being productive, cunning or 'weary/tame' in selective ways.
If you really think the average wild beast in any forest or jungle today is that dangerous, you haven't understood danger. That's why the sea is extremely dangerous still. Even with all our seafood poaching and such, there's an untouched world down there. They had no equivalent to 'humans' not even dolphins did to the ocean ecosystem what humans did. Humans literally kill off the aggressive, dumb and/or too severely obnoxious members of ALL other species. Even insects today are far tamer than the ones people in the year 20 AD let alone BC had to deal with.
Idk what the point of what I'm saying is and nobody will really care but it occured to me that this isn't as simple as saying 'natural selection has stopped for our species, that's why'. It is still happening and now exists as the dating world.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
as opposed to something else they stood for before?
you think all lgbtq havethe same view on it?
Created:
Posted in:
What side is it that you claim the LGBTQ+ are on board with suddenly?
Created:
Posted in:
D. That is not evidence of systemic racism, it could be evidence that the way the dark-skinned doll is made is less appealing even to black people (this is assuming only black people would buy a darker doll as opposed to Indians or white people and all sorts of ethnic backgrounds).
The entire thing is ludicrous.
You should first statistically analyse the reasoning behind the demand. Perhaps people are into white dolls more, even black people. We don't even know or have a clue if black people are the ones primarily buying 'black dolls'. This is all assuming so much. It could be caucasians buying both and willing to spend less on darker skinned ones, it could be so many factors such as how the same outfit works with the physical look differently.
You must analyse all these things before saying more on the matter. Furthermore, it may cost more to colour and structure a face in a more caucasian-doll manner, some things need to be analysed and are not for you to talk as if you know the full story.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@MonkeyBara
Yes, I feel he made 0 points regarding this thread.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
It is you who changed the subject actually.
The subject is if Palestine is a country being denied the right to self-determine into a nation.
Created:
Posted in:
I didn't start this. I finished it.
Good fucking riddance. The thread is now your farewell thread.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
If you dont think cows let alone cats and apes have souls, you are just ignorant.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
So you literally support imperialism and conquering? You don't support sovereignty or self-determination?
I am trying to understand your fundamental basis for what makes a country a country as opposed to an undue colony.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh, you've attacked me plenty too.Let's not get carried away with this victim schtick. The mods can only buy it for so long.And as I've previously stated. The attacks between you and I should stay between you and I.There was no need for you to target Slainte specifically and isolate him by making him your punching bag
That is what you have tried to do to me in this thread and are projecting onto me. You have been trying to do that to several users here while I was away.
Good luck, you went too far with the vote collusion.
I just had to keep my mouth shut and you proved yourself to be what I always knew. I have not done what you say, you gaslight and lie all the time. That is why you are randomly trying to dig up some old shit between me and Wylted as you have nothing to do with me and Slainte.
Created:
Posted in:
So is harassing him days on end just because you don't like me.
You have yet to show any example of me harassing Slainte for days on end.
Created:
Posted in:
Just another coincidence eh? Nothing to do with you or something you arranged is it?
Funny.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
It is the other way around. Israel was founded on conquering and bullying out the inhabitants whether Nomadic or stationary Palestinians.
A nation founded on psychopathic conquering is the original sinner in the negotiation. Both sides need to apologise and move forward or they can be irl versions of keyboard warriors that quite blatantly know next to nothing about empathy or geopolitical resolutions to long-term conflict.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
??
What does flipping you off mean? Can you clarify?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@MonkeyBara
Name the points he made regarding the thread's title please.
Enlighten me how wrong I am.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@MonkeyBara
Then why did he end up apologising and making 0 points?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
Besides, when, if ever, has the loser of a war been allowed to determine the terms of the peace?
When the winning side isn't run by psychopaths.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
There is no negotiation with a party that has declared you don't have a right to exist. Any concessions to them are foolish because they are determined to destroy you.We would never show the restraint Israel has shown to our enemies
If by restraint you mean chemical weapons and killing children then I agree if 'we' means American Military, the US has done the latter plenty of times in fact to the very demographic that Israel has (Islamic youth).
That said, I don't understand what you are arguing for. Are you that genuinely insane that you think all Palestinians hold the ethos of Hamas?
I know more Israelis that believe that absolutely asinine idea that Palestine is 'theirs' and they are much more arrogant and 'entitled' to land they never earned. Both sides are extremely arrogant amongst some of them but only a minority of Palestinians support eradicating Israel, most want two-state solution.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
Your case seems to be based on some kind of idk what as it's even beyond racism and just stupidity.
Hamas has more justification for their acts due to 2 things:
- How far Israel has gone in retaliation (though the reason this ended up maiming children and slaugthering them is because Hamas uses underage human shields very intentionally).
- The fact Israel has themselves given up negotiating the land split.
If you removed part 2 from the equation, part 1 would only hold ground if Hamas kept being the aggressor (which defeats the point they're trying to make then).
Since the US has ensured that Saudi and its Sunni allies stay militaristically tame against Israel, it is only the Shi'ite ones to fear and essentially that's just going to be Iran and Palestine.
Created:
Posted in:
There is a two state solution that makes the situation infinitely better.
Idiots leading Hamas is problem number one and Israeli arrogance by 'one state or nothing' is the other. Both share knuckleheaded foolishness.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
If something is real it is inside reality and if something is outside reality it is unreal (not in the slang sense of 'unreal') do you understand?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
See, our humans' brains can't really comprehend things like (outside of reality), and (infinity), and (Nothing).
How are you capable of comprehending it to justify God then?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
in the afterlife maybe but saying we are demigods in this life is sheer arrogance.
As for 'gods' I don't really think there are multiple gods, I have come to the conclusion there has to be a godmother or godfather and since only females do the 'true' procreation in all species on Earth it's more suitable to think of her as a godmother. Seahorses can be left out of this discussion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Supply us the definition of 'exist' you wish us to employ in this thread.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
Created:
Posted in:
What does the original post have to do with transgender issues? What did 'be mine' mean?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
The purpose of a man's seed in Christianity is to procreate. Jesus died failing to procreate he also failed to be a good son to his parents actually as he defied one of the 10 Commandments and they ended up having to worship him.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
I took a test that emails me and got different sabeteur scores across 9 types.
It didn't give an overall out of 100. I think this test is out of 90 as the scores were out of 10. Since the scores are so detailed, i'd rather keep the results to myself.
Here is the test, you need to give a name, age, gender and employment status but only the name is forced, and you can give a fake name.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Why don't you make a thread of it, link us to the URL of a free but still good one?
I personally think too much optimism is toxic, stupid and unhealthy so I am not expecting a very high score but I do have good mental self-reassurement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Your brain and body are simulated, your sentient experience is simulated. They only match because those are the rules of this simulation. You are assuming you and I are real-real but the inner experience is the real part, whereas the body and brain are inextricably linked to that experience only within this realm/construct/simulation.
In the realm god exists, absolutely nothing physiological is attached to its sentience or longevity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
The Big Bang theory is just a hypothesis as well as the theory of evolution.
Latter has more irrefutable proof and neither are hypotheses, they are formed conclusions and theories, otherwise they'd not be called theories but still in the hypothesising stage.
I would not go so far as to compare them though, evolution has far far more proof to it that cannot be denied. Big bang theory is based on estimations and 'guesstimations' given the structure and behaviour of elements within our reality. Evolution is nigh-irrefutable if one understand biology enough.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
yeah that is what I am saying.
The 'now' is not real in the send of reality's timeline, the future has already happened in this simulation. You and I are in a simulated reality within reality. The real reality has generated a timeline for us. The real god probably intentionally leaves herself/itself blind to the future to make it interesting/fun to watch unravel.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
time is an element in reality.
To be honest I don't fully grasp that part and I think you need to not be 'inside' the simulation to remotely grasp how it is to exist without time affecting you. I am also quite sure that god herself/itself (it's a mother not a father of reality) made it so that a lot of the future tense during the 'show' is not known to her/it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
are you only asking things or making a point?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
so you don't ever like posts as in click the thumb?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
If you are outside reality, you are not inside what is real.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
we thumbs up on this site if we like comments but thanks.
I do believe in a god though as in an original being but the reality is intertwined with it. As in I see it as a hybrid thing, reality and the god. The personality and consciousness of the god came later on and was a persona that the reailty/god that were originally there granted it randomly.
I could explain it in a clearer way but I've already done that, this time I worded it how I see it not breaking down the middle parts.
So:
there's one layer of reality and god
then there is the personality and consciousness of god.
The former is a randomly firing creation, destruction and 'rule-setting' mechanism of sorts that keeps flickering each part of reality. The latter was a randomly created personality that was randomly granted the power to hijack the random god-power and reality itself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
If god is not physical how is god real?
As in is god more real than the space between things is reality?
I don't get how god is not just a subset of reality, god didn't make reality, no matter which way things played out, reality made god.
It's reality that is the axiomatic absolute.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Replace God not even with 'universe' but with 'reality'.No, because our universe is physical.It doesn't work the same.
I am not speaking about the universe, I am speaking of reality that was always there before and (if the universe somehow ends) after it. The canvas of reality, the backdrop, the raw reality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Which miracle made God and how was that miracle conjured, instigated and implemented?No miracle mad God. God has forever been, and always will be.The miracle was never conjured, instigated, or implemented because it never needed to be, because God has always existed.
Aside from correcting 'mad' to 'made' what you wrote is very solid.
Now, please do the following:
Replace God not even with 'universe' but with 'reality'.
Then it will hopefully sink in.
Created:
Posted in:
There was no need for you to harass and antagonize Slainte.
Same to you with me. You did it from just prior to the election onwards, relentlessly, finding it hilarious to push me to breaking point both before I left in part due to it and after my return that was over 2 months later.
You harass people without a shred of mercy and talk high and mighty about morality and mental health concerns.
Also, what exactly were my vicious and relentless attacks on Slainte?
Created:
Posted in:
Would you prefer I treated Slainte like he didn't exist and ignored the thread rather than posted that gif as a goodbye?
What exactly did you want from me? Whether he took it as peace or fuck off if he'd rather I ignored this that's his issue. Stop talking for Slainte and let Slainte speak for himself.
Created:
Posted in:
Your vicious and relentless attacks on Slainte are why we're even at this point, and now you're gloating.
Interesting.
What about your vicious and relentless attacks on me?
You may be unaware but your bullying of me was part of the reason I quit the first time around, of course it wasn't the only reason I was busier irl too and this whole place was a toxic mess at the time.
In fact, it's quietened down other than you. You are one of the only people perpetuating the toxicity here, such as in this thread itself.
I wasn't a fan of Slainte, however I'd like to note that if someone's mental health is at risk, making a spectacle of their leaving if they themselves didn't explicitly ask for it is actually toxic for them. Some people don't want a spectacle made of their exit here.
You didn't check with me on my mental health before telling me I was an autistic incel loser that nobody likes here who should kill himself. You didn't check my mental health before arranging votebombs against me with noobs and gaslighting me about it.
You didn't check with me on my mental health before calling me low IQ ridiculing me that I am autistic but lack the savant part and am just a loser and idiot.
You didn't check with me on my mental health before calling me disgusting, evil and strangely saying I need help as an insult (when saying I am the one who doesn't care about mental health).
You are the problem with this website to a large degree, Lancelot but you just don't get it. You are the one who goes around aggravating and trolling people off of here from Tigerlord through to Badger, through to me. You charm people as it suits you to have a 'gang' to back you up, that's how tactical you are about your abuse, what you didn't count on was that being a sycophant to the mods doesn't work here how it may on some other websites. They don't really care that I'm socially awkward and perhaps even a douchebag at times, they will still protect me if you violate the rules to abuse me. That was what you didn't count on and I appreciate their help.
I will now finish like this quoting what I posted elsewhere:
If Slainte left because of me, he needs to speak for himself on the matter. If I left due to Lancelot, which in part I actually did and just didn't mention it, as he makes this place a toxic negative cesspool that isn't nice to be around, people wouldn't care and didn't.Nobody is obligated to care why someone leaves this place, in a way it is freeing as all of us are free to leave without explanation.Has Slainte ever said I bullied him?I will wait for Slainte to speak for himself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Try answering the exact question I asked, you will realise the structure of it is different and entraps you even more by backfiring the logic of your very original post.
Answer what I asked, directly:
Which miracle made God and how was that miracle conjured, instigated and implemented?
Created: