RationalMadman

What is the answer

Do you find playboy bunnies hot?

I never understood the appeal, seems annoying to my eyes, the ears and glitter.

Yeah but I am usually not a funny guy, this time I was funnier than you by far. You pointlessly tried to ridicule me back.

I will admit something though, I could be into a hot woman in some kind of cat suit or dog suit (but not fully onesie, want belly and skin all over showing i mean facepaint and ears etc). Bunnies are lame to me though, not sure why.

defending someone who genuinely fucks animals just to one-up me is a bit odd.

I will support humans against the AI as I am not a pathetic fucking self-loathing suicidal loser and if I am, I still want winners to thrive.

I see, I am open to pussy as well.

Yours are probably bushier than the ones I'm into.

I don't think that's a dog. Sorry.

On a separate note, if you don't feel the urge hit that as a 'straight' guy, I wonder what you're actually attracted to. I have never understood it, is a 'straight' guy meant to feel no attraction to someone that feminine and sexy?

As for 'her' or 'them' how can someone be a nonbinary transwoman?

The mystery continues.

Time period is any stage where natural selection was still occurring.

Putin is also impossible to criticise and mock in Russia. Asians, as in East Asians, were historically the most truly vicious ethnicity-group of those prevalent today. The extent of pillaging, rape and psychopathic slavery actually outs what happened in US to shame in terms of breadth and duration of the evil. Search how Japanese Shogun or Mongol Empire ruled and conquered.

I will however drop this tyrant angle, it is clear what I am referring to is easily misunderstood as referring to tendency towards tyranny instead of nationwide embracing vs opposing of tyranny when tyranny occurs.

The time period, to be clear, was even happening past ice age. There is, consequently, a reason why Scandinavia has the most left wing liberal hippy dippy populace today, in the whole world. The key is NOT solely cold or eastern Europe would be it too. It is something deeper that my theory has not cracked yet.

I cannot pinpoint why Russia and Eastern Europe seemed to backfire and be very prone to aggression and impulsive brutality. There must be something more to it. It is a working theory, not a complete solved conclusion.

Yes there is. The reason yo respect their consent is that the leader can be an idiot too and there will be noone to hold them accountable unless the others can.

Yes. Since, if I do not, they would rape me anyway.

I would imagine that a rapist has a similar view on the requirement of consent for a sexual encounter and ongoing relationship. To me, there is very little different. 

You either rule people with their consent or you don't. If you don't care to earn their consent, then you can only rule by fear.

For somebody who elsewhere advocated for children being capable of genuine consent (this was you, not me) and that parenting is fundamentally dictatorial, it bemuses me that you don't see how much bigger and badder national dictatorship is then, when contrasted with consensual democratic rule.

One day when it becomes AI vs humanity, they will use the words you are writing against the species you should have been loyal to.

I hope you will be proud of that. From my side, I will be dead by then most likely (unless somehow I achieve immortality), there will be no forgiveness or mercy. That is absolutely certain. You are someone who is for humanity thriving and lasting against all foes, alien, AI or earthbound-creature alike or you are an agent backing enemies to our species.

My ego isn't hurt, you have a wrong idea of what I'd do as president. I would bring peace to the website and make us truly attractive to new users by completely revamping how mods approach things, this was my platform from year 1 to now. Free speech on topics, free speech on opinions but heavy moderation on personal attacks and harassment.

Trumpanzee is a term you used to refer to those who are supporters of Trump, you changed your lexicality. :)

If you are smart  shut your mouth and stop snitching on the elites still around and in power.

That is professional politics, I meant hobbying it, as in regularly keeping up with it beyond the basic news level just for the sake of it.

The Trumpanzee has a place in the ecosystem, the question is how to encourage it to play nice with the ebucuckoo bird.

I respect you enough to tell you that I had the courtesy to make your ex gf *** first, I respect her enough to have the courtesy to inform you that I only **** third.

You know, I have sometimes wondered if I was really truly dumb, ugly, riddled with genetic defects (prone to diabetes on top of cancer, allergies all of it), a midget and/or micropenisd so on and so forth... Let's say if I was solidly in 3 categories like that, would I be right to manipulate a female to reproduce with me and produce offspring that may have to experience the setbacks?

The reason I go to that extent is to say, yes I would risk it.

Why? Because fuck you that's my bloodline to hell with the logic.

It sounds irrational, I am blessed in some ways that I am not having to debate that at all, I am passing on my DNA only true issue that I worry is my innate social skills, I wonder things like  what my offspring will have holding them back, how autistic they may be, as it clearly is a dominant gene since I got the social issues primarily from my dad (he's a weird guy, not sure if he's autistic).

I'm not saying I have nothing else up with me, I have a ridiculously high metabolism that made me skinny as a stickman for periods of my life until I cracked certain intolerances I have but such medicine is miles ahead what it was when I was younger vs now even.

I never want to be genghis khan bullshit. It's nurture as much as nature, raise them to be legendary, love them if they're way below ordinary anyway. That's the motto.

If you aren't trying to mock my 'theory' then my 'theory' has zero conflict with that.

It fits perfectly with my theory that caucasians were the ones with that level of discourse across those topics because to have discourse and talk-talk-talk-talk over matters is a trait I believe is primarily prevalent amongst those that evolved to select out those that barely talk given their climate. Hence, many generations later, the ethnicities resulting from that end up being the ones most prone to higher degrees of communication and information-collaborating.

Here I meant natives, to be clear.

I think my point was misunderstood but I am struggling on how to word it.

It's more about style and level.

I do not believe that any of the dictators you named genuinely had/have people worshipping them to the same extent as far throughout the nation as the ones I stated are. This is because there is just much less of a social concept of glorifying anybody at all in said societies, they are less prone to even think of that political/social mechanism as essential or vital.

Due to increased huddling leading to increased socialising, it is slightly but noticeable prevalent in nature not nurture of caucasians (In my theory which has never been proven) that they respond much more fervently and passionately to 'people' themselves. As in their 'leader' becomes someone they naturally feel quite a bit of liking or dislike towards. Other ethnic-dominated-than-caucasian cultures tend to have far more ambivalence to the individual in charge (yes yes bring up north korea, I got it). The reason this matters is the extent people en masse would die for said leader and risk.

However, this also is linked to why caucasian cultures pioneered democracy as a concept at all and had anything like voting. It's because I genuinely believe that not just sociologically but psychologically they are more oriented to think about 'people' at all involved in their 'place' as 'part' of the immediate, which also may explain why they are the most prone towards social media addiction (again hasn't been tested to cancel out the fact that smartphones and such are more available in caucasian-densely-populated areas). I just genuinely believe that the brains of caucasians are more primed to react to and calculate around EQ decision making, as in a slight but real edge in that direction, linked to having eliminated those with severely low EQ whether due to being unruly and dangerous, forcing the group to exile them to the cold wilderness (or kill them) or alternatively by the fact that the more passive, low EQ male members would have spent so much time around the others they'd have just not gotten laid or married (polygamy was quite commonplace across all races firstly). If your climate and conditions allowed you to spend less time around each other and actually made you prefer more introverted guys who left you alone and got on and did shit, you end up with a lower EQ genepool which I predict the way groups/clans survived in Asia (especially East Asia) functioned via, as well as the middle east despite very different climates.

This is a separate topic though but I genuinely believe I'm onto something real, it's just that in this day and age it's too taboo to talk about or even get research done into.

For me, it's annoying and really is pointless. I need to know the level to where I don't live under a rock but beyond that it seems that being too educated politically only hurts my social skills. People don't give a shit about it or those that do hate if you argue them and don't agree with them. What the fuck was the point of learning it all then?

Whether this shill or that shill is in charge, I will just adapt and find a way not to perish.

I have had a larger theory about difference in certain ethnicities' behaviours and the environment they evolved in being linked but specifically relevant to this discussion is caucasians and travelling as well as passivity.

If you evolved in colder (actually straight up icy for a large enough period) environment, you very quickly had to gang up on violent people or push them away to perish alone in the cold (thus die off, not run off and fuck many women or meet a beastly man at random). This means that over time, it is likely that caucasians and similarly inuits and more northern American (as in Canada and very north part of US) had ensured that the most impulsively violent amongst themselves were minimised over time whereas other cultures probably had them spread the furthest and widest because it's not as instinctive or straightforward in the earlier stages of evolution to justify ganging up on a particularly strong and violent individual if it's open-plain and you don't naturally have the weapons (the weapons used to hunt mammoths etc were perfect for handling gang-up sitations vs a beastly violent individual).

Due to the sheer cold, 'sticking together' was forced, not optional, to maintain good body temperature and stay alive as well as defend the young. This is probably also why white people developed the high 'political intelligence' that is prevalent even today, since you just had to force that to be a trait that was important and selected for when living in close quarters.

This isn't just about literal heat though. There is more to it. It's about the way that colder climates make you feel you need to huddle together. In climates where it was easy to roam alone or in pairs for a long while, a very violent individual would likely, when ambushed or 'exiled' just accept it after defeated and walk off and survive and then meet and rape others, passing on genes.

Of course, I can be talking total nonsense, perhaps what I said is true for caucasians in colder climates ended up a common reason humans were sociable and the most capable species of teamwork but I have a feeling it may explain the headstart they had, the climate forced them to not only work better together but led to those that couldn't 'keep the peace' to perish, as in their bloodline dying out not just themselves.

If you look at what caucasian cultures are so ridiculously strong at that keeps them 'running the world' it is not 'intelligence', the Asians in particular equal them if not surpass them in this. It is collaborative political maneuvring. I am talking about trends, it also does backfire since people like Hitler, Putin, Stalin, Mussolini and other such dictators end up capable of far more severe damage than tyrants of other ethnicities in other cultures due to the fact caucasians are as a society more open to just socialise and get by with a new maniac in charge, rather than instantly jump to fight them out of power from within they sooner go to war for them on scale/extend that is nationwide in the breadth of obedience and fear that is not quite the same for other tyrants.

If you think I'm talking out of my ass, then correct me. I don't have data supporting me and of course this type of research is taboo to even look into in recent times.

Wylted and badger support you, along with others, being banned for content you post. Simultaneously they have completely tarnished and trolled the DART subforum.

As someone who cares very much for the finer details of things like this, your input would be appreciated.

Perhaps a referendum on what a president even is and can vs cannot do?

Perhaps shorter terms than 1 year?

Open to any ideas.

I severely doubt that.

Wylted is acting against every principle Badger stands for.

If anybody glances over this garbage can of a forum thread and the stuff like it that Wylted has made hot topics, they won't sign up.

Wylted has used slurs such as tranny and faggot, even n-word. He does it as recent as under a day ago.

All of this is forgiven, even Wylted transphobically identifying as a woman that is attracted to... men? (He says he is severely gay) while preaching that it is satanic for a biological male to do so. He can do all of this and get away with it. Whiteflame is happy to associate himself with wylted actually, not outwardly denying Wylted is best buds with him.

What we see is a disruptive prat ruining DART's image being perpetually forgiven.

I thought that was obvious, his ilikepie speech was also AI

I agree to what you just said, I also don't care for the immature nastiness here. Everyone is eating at each other, biting each other's ankles if knocked to the floor it's like a savage pit of starving headlice (they cannibalise when starving).

I am also fascinated that Wylted can't wrap his head around the idea I was keeping up with the website, not specifically Wylted. The replies here are part of the problem, nobody sane and mature is going to stick around. Badger realising it but being part of the immaturity and toxicity is the height of hypocrisy and irony, I haven't seen more of a hypocrite on here than Badger in that sense.

You are incorrect here but nothing will prove that as I cannot go back in time.

As for Wylted's replies to this thread, it highlights how seriously to take him as anything, president of the site or user.

I am not entirely sure what your point is here but I agree Wylted is irresponsible and it's beyond trolling what he does, he literally mishandled this whole fiasco to the point the website is in turmoil over what would be a strong way for him to have flexed his abilities as President by behind-the-scenes compromise and giving a united front.

I am personally against transgender surgery, I support hormones for fully grown adults (exculsively, not teenagers below 18 or worse, preteens) if they feel they need that to be happy. I am not sure why that topic is involved here but it would be unwise and pointless for me to take your side on this.

I am gendering Wylted as he/him because it has not been clarified to me concretely what Wylted identifies as (but I know Wylted went by he/him for over 95% of his time here other than a 'tulpa' personality which I'm not certain is even real) and I know Wylted is anti-trans.

Who was it who wanted people to attack the person instead of arguments banned?

@Sir Lancelot

I was referring to Imabench btw but the reason you don't know that is that Bench changed a lot between DDO and DART and other than some beef with ethang he wasn't his usual vicious self here. It was him who made TWS (The Weekly Stupid not the user, lol). I didn't want this to be about him and he and I have had very severe beef because he decided to take it to social media level.

I didn't want to return but this isn't exactly a 'relapse' of any kind. I am also busier irl these days and unlike Badger and Wylted (oh dear this will be a multiple 'callout' thread maybe? It really isn't) I don't need to 'flex' it. I have always had things going on irl, I set time aside for this website as it was my passion. I did this to be called a leech by some in my absence, with theories on which new account(s) I am, all of which were wrong as I didn't use the website other than as a lurker every 2-3 days.

I do not love DART, I love debating. That said, it doesn't detract from the dismay I feel at the best 1v1 text-based platform that was DDO diminishing to this over time. Badger's new 'tyranny tirade' is just an exaggerated form of everything I apparently stood for that Wylted stood vehemently against in the first election and which (s)he strawmanned me to support. What I actually stood for was stopping direct abuse such as from certain individuals Wylted (PREZ-HILTON) herself (profile says female) has hinted at.

The reason I came back was not the baiting Wylted did, which seems weird to even bait. I didn't try to login to PREZ-HILTON at all and there is outright lying happening about the site security since password resets are fully functional, perhaps it sends to the junk/spam folder of Wylted's Outlook email account (the one she shared with us).

I am unsure what people think I'd say or where I'd stand. It seems everybody presumed I'd be like Wylted and Badger. I told you all from the start, I am pro-freedom, Wylted is not. If you think that was just pretty words, you're wrong. This website has been a shithole just like DDO was. The Weekly Stupid was cyberbullying, it's just most of those he mocked were people who never watched the show so there was no conflict. I don't want to dig shit up or go into how much of a bully that individual was as it is not about him. It is about DDO and the culture. There was a locker-room high school bullying culture that's returning here and has always been here as an undercurrent.

This begins to propel itself and even I give in to the toxicity because it's impossible to be immune to unless you totally disengage from the website. Every change Wylted did to the CoC with the recent MEEP makes it harder to both protect our freedoms as users and for mods to justify actions they make. It leaves everything far murkier. That is linked to the fact the mods themselves are very murky-minded at the moment about everything, just look at the wishy washy waffling Barney and Whiteflame are dishing out about where they stand on this, it's pathetic.

I literally can promise you this; if I were president, this entire series of events would have been handled differently behind the scenes. Oromagi through to Whiteflame and me as President would have a united front as all things would have been negotiated and consensus reached. Oromagi indeed picked one of the most cringe things to propel this, BK clearly shouldn't be banned for that. I warned Whiteflame in private where this was heading. I knew it was a mistake for Oromagi to be posting that thread and that they had to come out ahead of it.

I feel pain and dismay at this website's state. Right now, the problem isn't just the politics or society subforums, it's also Badger and Wylted themselves. Do you think the way they carry themselves is how members should? No. Badger is talking about big muscles and big dick and jokes about Kaitlyn being adopted while Kaitlyn retaliates digging up in allegations and I am not saying she is in the wrong for that, what I am saying is both have been that way for a long time.

Coal and Danielle were pillars of the DDO community, the one Wylted and Badger glorify as does Barney.

This is how they carry themselves in DART:

This is exactly how DDO was. Wish it was still online but I'd have to dig deep to the days such behaviour was commonplace. After all on day 1 of DART the likes of... Actually there's too many to name to that saves me calling anybody out. It was toxic from day 1.

I know exactly what the right moves to make are. If Wylted is seriously leaving and wants me to return, (s)he should give me the presidency, Idc that I only get half a term. I am still eligible for reelection regardless as Wylted doesn't get it's a 2-term limit not 1-term, the restriction is if you served more than 1 before, not more than 1 including the one you run in.

I am happy to be in the moderator chat as a bystander of no official rank whatsoever on a trial run. I am unsure why anybody here trusted Wylted over me but they did. Do what you want, I am tired of begging. I just had to get this off my chest as I agree with the issues of the website and how ugly it looks to others, it's what I've been saying for so many god damn years.

It was fun while it las-

na, it was stressful and addictive.

But fuck me, it was an emotional journey few can fathom a simple tiny website could give you. This trained my brain in multiple ways. Thanks for that.

Wylted, you are a prick I have no respect for but I was truly outplayed by you in that election by your slimeball dogshit strategy and I thank you for humbling me. You are a force to be reckoned with not because you are smart but because you see things others don't, you see logic where others see chaos and mystery. You must have had an interesting brain to experience in life, fellow madman.

Barney, you are the true alpha male of this website, even Wylted knows it and is working well with you I see.

The rest of you were not worth mentioning, know that and earn your relevance. Good luck.

I would not be against a 'smaller, lighter' league like they have in boxing and such, for all sports.

As in Asian and smaller white and black men and women competing in a different league to the taller, bigger ones.

Well as you put it, there are objective reasons to generally avoid Asians on quite a few sports teams or individual pursuits unless they're a severe exception.

Being taller, thicker-wristed+ankled and other things help.

Only the results count, being bigger can help (not an innuendo)

This website really is going to the gutter. I FEEL SORRY FOR WHO REPRESENTS US.

slurs and abuse all over these days

I will go quiet, as Robert Greene taught me.

Be proud of your colleague. Look how he speaks.

Keep digging.

This site is simply devolving into degenerate trolling and gaslighting from actual people in authority positions here.

It is sad and pathetic. Even as a debate this dude first pretended he had multiple transgender friends defending his use of 'tranny' then said he thought his singular transgender 'friend' was dead but was surprised the friend is alive.

What even is this thread or bew CoC about defending? Seems like abuse to me.

I am done replying to this, you can feel free to lash out all you want. It is after all your only strategy. In this entire thread and that thread you never once gave a source or example backing up that tranny is not a transphobic slur.

can you show us your transgender friend who approves of the term tranny please.