Total posts: 2,033
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
You are losing me because you seem to be asking me about something which is evidently obvious. Allow me to show you how I view your question and you can tell me if I'm mistaking your intent.Let's substitute "wife" for God. I know you'll say my wife is physically here, but hold on, that is irrelavant to my argument.How do you distinguish between God conceptually and God which you claim isn’t conceptual?
No I wouldn’t. That’s it. Your wife isn’t an abstract (apart from how she’s defined) unlike God which is completely abstract.
Well first. I know which things in my mind are MY concepts. I made them up. I remember making them up. They did not exist until I made them up. They don't change unless I change them. They never surprise me, or deviate from my conception of them.Now God preceded me. He doesn't follow what I think He should be. He surprised me, I constantly have to adjust my conception of Him to keep it accurate.
Would you consider him genocidal then?
Likewise, I have a concept of my wife in my mind. But she sometimes surprises me by being different from my conception of her. I know the concept of her in my mind is NOT her, no matter how accurate to reality it may be.
I’m sure there’s actual philosophical terms that we’re discussing, but it will probably take too much time for me trying to find what they’re called.
You would agree your wife isn’t abstract though apart from how we define her, correct?
So asking me how I can tell the difference between my concept of my wife and my actual wife is, well, weird. Only a person with a tenuous grasp on reality would have any problem distinguishing.
To me your wife is your wife (by definition) and I know she isn’t completely abstract unless she’s a fictional person.
Because you're a strict materialist atheist, you probably God has no interaction with me that I can perceive. This is not true.Did I misunderstand you?
Okay can you tell me what interactions God has with you? I assume It will be on par with your wife.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
You just quit cold turkey? By the way the substance of LSD is non-addictive. And from what I’ve read cocaine isn’t an easy drug to get addicted to.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Okay well let's talk about this then the concept of God must be older than 2000 years if there were people worshiping gods in the bronze Age which was 3,700 years ago. Jesus is 2,000 years old other religions including the god of Abraham are older than that. If you can't figure out what people are saying or you don't understand the concepts involved in religion in general don't freaking come here and argue about them. The concept of God is much older than 2,000 years old and if you don't actually believe that then you are an idiot because there is actually archeology that supports the fact gods were worship longer than 2,000 years ago whether the gods exist or not they were worshiped so the concept existed.
There we go. Though you’re treating the Abrahamic God as if it’s not the same god throughout Christianity, Islam, Judaism.
Created:
Have you guys heard of LOVEINT? If it’s easy to get away with that shit, imagine what other creepy stuff they get up to.
Who watches the watchmen?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
The concept of God is sourced in the mind of a man. All concepts are. God isn't.
That didn’t answer my question. I’ll be more precise. How do you distinguish between God conceptually and God which you claim isn’t conceptual?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
It went from nothing to nothing, you think what I said is complicated? Man are you going to have a tough life.
No, I think it’s oversimplified.
I never said life was easy, I said it isn't complicated. Ya'll seem to think because something is hard to do makes it complicated. Its hard to dig a grave but it aint complicated. Its hard to get up every morning and go to work but it aint complicated. Its hard to deal with assholes but it aint complicated.
You’re just talking in oversimplified generalisations.
What grave would you be digging? Don’t lie and say you know the methodology of gravediggers. It’s more complicated than you would think.
I agree with the getting up and going to work part unless there’s underlying conditions which would make it more complicated.
What if the asshole is your boss and you need to figure a way to manoeuvre around him or her? Again, it becomes more complicated. Not everyone has an option to quit.
Yes it takes one second to stop using drugs, the fact it is hard and that you suffer is irrelevant, it isnt complicated.
And you know how drug addiction works in all its nuances? I doubt it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
They aren't joined and need no separation.
I’ll put it another way. How do you distinguish between them?
You sure post like you do.
How in the world do you extrapolate from what I say that I ‘lump theists in one big pile of illiterate, mentally ill, mentally incompetent human beings.’?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I didn't care if you believe its true or not what you need to do to be accurate. If you're just going to make stuff up then you're not even addressing the material. You're just saying what you're saying to be antagonistic without being accurate makes you look stupid. It's like talking about the stay puft marshmallow man's role in the Harry Potter books yeah it's all fiction but you look dumb as hell saying it.
I don’t know where to begin. How does your analogy apply to what I said? Do you think when I was talking about God I was only talking about Jesus? No I wasn’t. Bad analogy by the way. It would have been within one fictional universe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Nowhere in Christian beliefs does it say God came into existence 2,000 years ago. It says Christ was born 2000 years ago. If you can't understand the difference between the two concepts you shouldn't be here discussing them with people. It has nothing to do with Christian's beliefs it has to do with being accurate to the myths involved in the Christian religion.
Are you saying for me to debate christians I have to coddle them in acting as if their myths (written 2000 years ago) are true? And you think I treat them worse? Plus how does that work?
How about I give you a clue to prove me wrong as a “non-christian”… There are archetypes in Christianity far older than said religion.
And honestly theists before atheists. Don't pretend you don't lump theists in one big freaking pile of illiterate, mentally ill, mentally incompetent human beings.
I don’t. What’s your deal?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
For a pagan, you’re very defensive of Christian beliefs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Full quote:
Someone who says “life isn’t complicated, it only takes one day to change it.” is obviously ignorant due to lack of nuance.
It’s obvious sadolite did not take into account the plethora of life defining situations which can be controlled, but are difficult.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ethang5
Seems to me that it is the concept of God that people hold that he views as relative. Why you would assume he meant that God is relative is quizzical.(Sorry TS. I know you were trying to point out some other truth to him.)
How do you seperate God from concept?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
How about this? try and prove that the concept of God has existed for more than five minutes.
Time is relative to the observer. For me the concept has existed longer than 5 minutes. Are you saying God is relative?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
Another trick question. Gee people are busy today aren't getting cleverer and cleverer.Take out the "no matter what" bit and I would answer I am in the God is good camp.You would need to define what good is before adding the rest.A measure of good would be helpful as well.According to humanity without God, God can be good and bad.According to humanity with God, God is among other things the measure of good.I take the view that God not only defines what good is - but is the very essence and measure of goodness. Hence God is good.Yet on that basis good is anything in accord with God's honor and worship. It is good to love one another. Yet it is also good to hate evil.It is good to punish evil and to punish sin - even by death.On the other hand, if good is defined by humanity with the measure being "whatever the current culture by majority rule thinks is good", then God is not always good. If the current culture holds the view that abortion is good then God is not good. If the current culture deems polytheism and polygamy is good, then God is not good.The definition of good, obviously from a human perspective is subjective and fluid. It might remain conservative for lengths of time, for instance - pedophilia is unlikely to be considered a good for some time, although I suspect that as the culture becomes more fluid and as it takes on board more and more the Kinsey Report, then even this so called evil will become good. Like other things, it only takes time and enough people to say - let's let us be what we want and things will like they have in the past with Aristotle go back to it. The same with slavery. Slavery changes its meaning every so often.
By my estimate God has only existed for about 2000 years. Try to think that through.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
It went from..
life isn’t complicated, it only takes one day to change it.
to..
Here is all you have to do to live in todays world. Get at least an 8th grade education, then get a job, find a place to live, go to the grocery store to get food, do your laundry, pay your bills, buy cloths with what you have left over. That is all you need to live. Everything else is a luxury.
What’s the coherent point you’re trying to make, if there is one?
What about substance abuse? Does it just take one day to change it? What does it take?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
Oooh a trick question.Didn't I already answer that question?Hmm - you will find it is CIRCULAR REASONING. also known as an axiom.
I’m guessing you’re in the “God is good no matter what” camp?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
I agree.But this is a discussion website.And your comment had obvious implications.
Just not what you were asserting.
So even if you weren't implying that they should.....Why did you suggest that someone perhaps didn't "challenge yourself at all".
Someone who says “life isn’t complicated, it only takes one day to change it.” is obviously ignorant due to lack of nuance.
My question was only relative to the necessity of challenge.....Which was a statement undeniably made as a considered proposal on your part..
This isn’t a great hill for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Saying someone does not do something doesn’t inherently imply they should.
This is my response.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Why should Sadolite challenge himself, if he is content with what he has?And I'm not sure that your driving analogy is at all equivalent.Could you please elaborate?
I’m not telling him to do anything.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Our subconscious.
Life is a pretty big category.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Why challenge oneself.If challenging oneself, challenges contentment
Why drive oneself.
If driving oneself, crashes a car.
I find both equivalently nonsensical. Can you please elaborate?
Created:
If so, the wiki article of kin punishment needs to be updated.
Original wiki entry: Kin punishment is the practice of punishing the family members of someone accused of a crime, either in place of or in addition to the perpetrator. It refers to the principle of a family sharing responsibility for a crime committed by one of its members, and is a form of collective punishment. Kin punishment has been used by authoritarian states as a form of extortion, harassment, or persecution. Countries that have practiced kin punishment include pre-Christian European cultures, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and non-Western cultures including China, Japan, and North Korea.“
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
And I said something along the lines of ‘congratulations I guess.’ I’m 95% sure it was you.
But anyway my point still stands, life isn't complicated. I know, been alive for almost 60 years and nothing about those 60 years was even remotely complicated to understand or deal with.
Either you have superhuman intelligence, or you don’t challenge yourself at all. Which do you think I’m willing to bet on?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I recall you making an atheistic argument about Santa Clause/Christmas. I told you that could apply to Christianity. You agreed. Then I asked if you became atheist. You more or less said yes. I forgot where we had the conversation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Is that how you became atheist, or was it more complicated than that?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
The date keeps getting pushed sadly. But as long as it’s ready.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
Great Question. Nowhere in any type of observation do we see evolution jump from one kind to another. Yes, we see evolution leap in abounds between ordinary species. But over kinds? It just does not happen. To jump from lion to giraffe would be helpful. To see it jump from mosquito to Chicken would be helpful. Gee to see it even happen between ape or chimpanzee and human - the so called closest relationship to humanity would be nice. But it does n't.Magic. Absolutely it is magic. jumping between species - to evolve to what we are today. Yes that is magic.
Think of evolution as a big family tree. Lions and giraffes have a common ancestor going back millions of years. You can see this in the genetic and fossil record. In the future they may evolve similar traits to one another, but a lion won’t be a giraffe and a giraffe won’t be a lion. This same rule applies to every other animal switch you want to see happen. They’ll be new animals never before seen on the planet.
I am not sure what university you went to- - but the Big Bang theory is more than just history. It is the very start of our universe. Nothing was there - and then nothing exploded. For no apparent reason. that is magic. How else could we possibly describe it?
I didn’t go to university. What do you take me for, a nerd? The Big Bang Theory is all about the early history of the universe which includes the very start. But not what caused it.
Thousands of years ago you would be thinking the same thing for all sorts of natural phenomena. Volcano erupts, must be the volcano god, earthquake quakes, must be the earthquake god, Lightning strikes, must be the lightning god, etc, etc, etc.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
Isn't the theory of evolution just magic?
It might seem like magic for a Young Earth Creationist. What’s magical about it?
Or the big bang for that matter? First there was nothing - and then nothing exploded for no particular reason.
The Big Bang theory is about the history of the universe in its early stages. Not what caused cosmic inflation.
Scientists will admit they’re not certain. It’s okay to admit when you don’t know.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Nonetheless...What is the difference between predictably unpredictable and predictably predictable.So I would further suggest that if someone is predictably unpredictable, then they are also predictably predictable.In so much as their unpredictability is predictable.
I say for someone to be unpredictably predictable you would need to first speculate various incorrect outcomes. That would be the difference.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lit
The bible tells us that man was created in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:26-27), yet something must have happened to man's reflecting image, perhaps in the fall, because when we get to the NT there's an obvious emphasis about 'putting on the new man' and 'becoming a new creation' (Ephesians 4:24; Colossians 3:10), and that Jesus himself is the exact image of God (2nd Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:15; Hebrews 1:3). Considering we aren't all children of God (John 1:12-13), hence needing to be born from above (John 3:3), our image in its current state must be askewed in some capacity.Something to also keep in mind is that man is spirit, soul and body (1st Thessalonians 5:23) and it is the Holy Spirit that is the promise in the Church Age (Acts 1:8), and not the Holy Soul or the Holy Body. Those two parts of man are apparently still alive, but living in the dark (Matthew 7:13; Matthew 10:28).What does being in the image and likeness of God mean to you and how much should we consider ourselves to still be in his image?
Was man created in the likeness of God, or was God created in the likeness of man from a bygone age? Would you worship a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, filicidal, genocidal, infanticidal god? Reform, reform, reform.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I’m curious. What science have you been following?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
You’re not following the science. You think the vaccines don’t help fight against contagion, in fact you think it’s more harmful than the virus.
don't kid yourself
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Probably something to do with Emergency Use Authorisation.
In terms of a market point of view, logic dictates the first company to declare side effects is at a disadvantage regardless of statistical likelihoods. It would create more anti-vax rhetoric IMO.
In terms of a market point of view, logic dictates the first company to declare side effects is at a disadvantage regardless of statistical likelihoods. It would create more anti-vax rhetoric IMO.
Created:
Posted in:
Greyparrot, you blocked me. Why would you want to inhibit the expansion of your portfolio in the marketplace of ideas? This is a long-term financial disaster.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Interesting. Do you consider yourself better at remembering sequences of numbers than the average joe because of this necessity?
No. I have average memory when it comes to numbers. I was just trying to explain the level of difficulty.
My oldest friend has something similar but he never let it stop him- was an editor at Fox News then a lawyer for the FBI- gets other people to do his reading for him now.
Yeah, most people I’ve heard of with literary issues tend to have bad reading rather than writing. I’m the other way around. Also I’m mostly right-handed, though I hold my cutlery left-handed, which I find kind of interesting psychologically.
I myself have been rather hard of hearing since I was three or four. Good enough to hear the television but totally useless in any kind of bar or restaurant. I needed years of speech therapy.
I’m not sure it’s a hearing issue, as in your ear doesn’t pick up curtain vocalisations. I think it’s more how the brain interprets it.
Unless you’re physically deaf.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
I don’t know. You have been sounding a bit hysterical lately. Maybe a break would be good.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Are you just going to link shitty videos?
What does it mean to own money if it’s illegal for an individual to light it on fire?
Created:
Posted in:
Does planned obsolescence fall under broken window?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Is there any scenario where Demand-side economics does not suffer from the broken window fallacy?
When taxpayer money is spent on the development of technology to keep ahead of various issues.
I don’t know, I have a rough understanding of it.
Created:
Posted in:
Imagine each word being a sequence of numbers you have to remember. That’s the level at which I view spelling without auto-correct. Though it’s not exactly a one to one comparison. Luckily I had good reading tutors growing up. Not even sure if I technically have dyslexia.
Anyway, that’s an insight into a learning disability for ya.
Created:
Posted in:
And The Handicapping of Right-wing Audiences by Conservative Commentators.
I’ve been seeing a lot of conservative commentators defending the Cuomo’s because “they’re family” or some other deflection.
Does any right-wing people here disagree with Chris Cuomo being fired? And why is that? You guys care about truth, right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Out of curiosity,Are you an Antinatalist?Something even 'more than that?Or do I misread, your post?
I was being metaphorical. I meant it in a totally ideological sense.
Anyway, Poly was implying I didn’t have the balls to say it. I took that as a challenge.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Nope it's 100% atheist and proud of it. Like I always say you all want us dead and gone. He just has the balls to say it. Must be that because you're so close to monotheism you carry that same mindset.
I want all of you dead and gone just as I want all of us dead and gone. Atheism shouldn’t even need to exist.
Created: