Relationships are not meant to be artificial, as the name "artificial intelligence" implies. They have always biologically been a way to bond with one's significant other, and primarily reproduce. This angle that personal connection, from human to human, can be created artificially using technology is unrealistic, unethical and damaging. AI is a great tool but ethics and appropriation are to be considered, especially with revolting stances such as this.
Got exams, but I'm down to debate this w u after.
I couldn't read the first debate w a straight face. It's like one of those absurd advertisements u would hear on gta radio chats. Won't lie tho, - "No drama. Doesnât get jealous. Doesnât need expensive gifts. Doesnât judge your habits." is tempting lmao
GGs. Just to let u know, I didn't deliberately forfeit. I fell very ill for a month, and so I couldn't be present. Not to take away from your argumentation, I find it somewhat funny that you chose to argue a after 3 consecutive forfeited rounds. One for the ego ig.
Points that I couldn't include in my 2nd argument:
As said before, AI was initially made to be an assistant, not a 1 on 1 teacher. Though it can provide assistance in answering questions, it is prone to make mistakes.
AI can also answer questions inadequately, as it may answer the question on a more complex/higher level of definition that the student may not need to know due to his/hers level of education. These flaws in AI can hinder the understanding and confidence of the student, as the student may not comprehend the answer and perceive that he/she is not capable of understanding such concepts.
"It is common sense that you cant memorize 1 million sentences."
"Common sense" is purely opinion based in the majority of cases. If you want to make a claim then support it with evidence. You cannot just state a percentage statistic, let alone such a significant one, without evidence to support your claim.
It can be seen as a disadvantage. You crammed a quantity of points without supporting them, leading me to attempt to disprove every single one for the debate. This would take more than 5000 words. No worries tho, I just found out u can't change the words so it's alright.
Please increase word limit if you would like to continue this debate, as opposing your large argument which such limited space was a disadvantage, and I did not have the space to write other points which I needed to write. Thank you
(I could not fit the sources into my debate, as the limit didn't allow them to)
(I also had to use an online tool to shorten my argument because Sun wouldn't change the word limit)
do ur side of the debate, just a minor mistake
mb, im doing multiple debates. I posted on the wrong one
Ofc you don't. I don't expect somebody with an awareness of a brick to cop on to what I'm saying
Relationships are not meant to be artificial, as the name "artificial intelligence" implies. They have always biologically been a way to bond with one's significant other, and primarily reproduce. This angle that personal connection, from human to human, can be created artificially using technology is unrealistic, unethical and damaging. AI is a great tool but ethics and appropriation are to be considered, especially with revolting stances such as this.
Got exams, but I'm down to debate this w u after.
I couldn't read the first debate w a straight face. It's like one of those absurd advertisements u would hear on gta radio chats. Won't lie tho, - "No drama. Doesnât get jealous. Doesnât need expensive gifts. Doesnât judge your habits." is tempting lmao
I'm good now, thanks for asking. dw abt it
GGs. Just to let u know, I didn't deliberately forfeit. I fell very ill for a month, and so I couldn't be present. Not to take away from your argumentation, I find it somewhat funny that you chose to argue a after 3 consecutive forfeited rounds. One for the ego ig.
It was. Goodluck
We'll see. I'm new to the platform so idk
Sources that support my 2nd argument.
https://summer.harvard.edu/blog/5-tips-to-retain-what-you-learn/#5-Active-Learning-Techniques-You-Can-Use-Today
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751860/
https://kidshealth.org/en/teens/how-much-sleep.html
https://www.indegene.com/what-we-think/reports/understanding-science-behind-learning-retention
Points that I couldn't include in my 2nd argument:
As said before, AI was initially made to be an assistant, not a 1 on 1 teacher. Though it can provide assistance in answering questions, it is prone to make mistakes.
AI can also answer questions inadequately, as it may answer the question on a more complex/higher level of definition that the student may not need to know due to his/hers level of education. These flaws in AI can hinder the understanding and confidence of the student, as the student may not comprehend the answer and perceive that he/she is not capable of understanding such concepts.
"It is common sense that you cant memorize 1 million sentences."
"Common sense" is purely opinion based in the majority of cases. If you want to make a claim then support it with evidence. You cannot just state a percentage statistic, let alone such a significant one, without evidence to support your claim.
It can be seen as a disadvantage. You crammed a quantity of points without supporting them, leading me to attempt to disprove every single one for the debate. This would take more than 5000 words. No worries tho, I just found out u can't change the words so it's alright.
Please increase word limit if you would like to continue this debate, as opposing your large argument which such limited space was a disadvantage, and I did not have the space to write other points which I needed to write. Thank you
Sources for my argument:
https://kidshealth.org/en/teens/how-much-sleep.html
https://www.indegene.com/what-we-think/reports/understanding-science-behind-learning-retention
https://www.isppcenter.com/blog/how-posture-affects-the-muscles-in-your-neck-and-back
(I could not fit the sources into my debate, as the limit didn't allow them to)
(I also had to use an online tool to shorten my argument because Sun wouldn't change the word limit)
Can u change the limit of words to 10000 rather than 5000, just gives more leg room to add points. Thanks
sure, please do on this topic
I request that I may oppose this