Total votes: 4
Argument - Both sides presented a good argument, however Con dismantled points well, with overall stronger rhetoric.
Sources - This clearly goes to Pro due to his use of several peer reviewed sources. Con used little to no sources.
Legibility - Pro's R1, while having good substance, had very clumped together points. Felt like I had a stroke 2 paragraphs into reading the argument. Fortunately, this got better throughout the arguments Ultimately, this goes to Con for having very organized rhetoric throughout the debate.
Conduct - Both sides held a respectful debate, nothing really came across as dismissive, or disrespectful.
Overall, both sides should be commended for their efforts.
However, my vote leans more towards Con due to better overall arguments and legibility.
Though I feel like bleaching my eyes out with sulfuric acid after feasting my eyes on this most atrocious debate, Con stands as the clear winner.
In R1, Pro beings with bouncing his nuts on Con's, "4head", and standing on business, making Con aware that he CAN and WILL take his momma.
But Con ain't no bitch, he vociferously and most ruthlessly exposes - "Except Pro is a virgin with no game, who needs my mom’s approval because his own wife won’t put out for him.".
But... this was not enough for Con.
Con comes back for a 2 piece combo: - "Allowing his Queen Guinevere to check me out. It is then that she realizes his pint-sized genitally afflicted Napoleon complex is nothing compared to The Sword of Lancelot. So we decide to mate, and she realizes my pull-out game is so strong that I become her new King.".
The Sword of Lancelot, wielded like the Blade of Olympus, is meticulously stabbed through Pro's queen, with a pull out game to match.
Con stands as the clear champion of R1.
R2 - R5
The initial fire of the debate began to decay. Lancelot battled with a mastery of precision, while Pro counters by - " I pull an Indiana Jones and put a cap in his ass".
Lancelot had overall better and more entertaining narratives.
Hence, my vote hailing him as true victor.
Brief exchange between father and son. No debate between both sides.
Both sides presented a painful debate with no citations or clear definition.