Shila

Oh hello fauxlaw.

I don't know who said this, but someone on here perpetuated the rumor that you had passed away. I don't know who.

I havent heard of DeepSeek, but I dont have great confidence in Chinese technology. I mean, their TikTok was made specifically to dumb down masses. Their habit of eating bats and other animals who carry viruses gave us covid.

I'm sorry, but I would never welcome or shake Hitler's hand. If Hitler wants the Whitehouse, I do not give my approval or salute. Biden should never have approved. It's equivalent to aiding and abetting criminality. That makes Biden as much of a Hitler in intent. This is how evil thrives, when Biden caves in to evil.

OMG

This was the outcome of a belief based system.

So you still don't know why he is suing. That was the original question. Suing to get attention and publicity is not a valid reason as you stated.

Blacks are considered a net liability to the world. They receive the highest global aid yet Africa is a basket case leading in rape, AIDS, Crime, Corruption, Starvation, Diseases and failed states.

I assume that Shila's last name is Armfield?

. If the evidence supports a position of 50% confidence, then that 50% is simply belief. Faith is what would fill any remaining gap between that point and any level of confidence one might have above 50%.

Love can also be defined biblically as one who obeys the commandments of God. If that is a reasonable definition, then God showing justice to the wicked is actually love. Whereas if he just let them do whatever they want without regard to how they hurt, then that would not be love.  Hence, I don't see a contradiction, on a number of levels. 

Try harder.

Back atcha.

I'm not familiar with Christ saying only the dead can forgive [Jews, or otherwise], but I'm very familiar with a repeating theme of our necessity to forgive others, and to do so repeatedly

For North Korea or Russia?

North Korea is now protected from any US invasion. Thus, now it can move to liberating South Korea from American imperialism.

Now if you're scared to call a cis male gay for doing whatever sexually with a trans female, that cis male wants to know, it's disingenuous to avoid answering the question.

Well, all men would be given virgins in paradise, and a martyrs in islam would be given as well. But about Taliban in Pakistan is different story and it's general rule for martyr and about anyone Else or some specific group no one can guarantee and even them being on right path. Jihad or wars in islam are always defensive battles to protect innocent Muslim. Islam do not allow offensive battles to be more clear about who could be eligible for martyrdom.

*Quack quack*

Nobody waters a lawn in California these days, not even with cheetoes in the belly.

So you still don't know

I still ask the individual legitimate questions to get the logic.

 I am very selective with what I post.

That’s… *Looking around the forums*…  a bit hard to believe…

God uses angels as his messengers.

Well this where one needs to read carefully to what is being conveyed and by whom.  God HIMSELF give the command  to Abraham but the angle stopped him? Why didn't god stop Abraham himself?  There is no mention of God sending the Angel to top Abraham.

Why's that?

Thar's fine, grass is rarely greener on the other side, unless you are on a golf course.

So do you go about doing things you don't believe in?

Why would you do them when you don't believe in them?

The fact that faith and belief resulting from evidence can coexist is irrelevant. The existence of one does not negate the existence of the other nor does it make the other any more or less reasonable.

It was an angel that stopped Abraham from sacrificing Isaac. Not god. Hence I asked, makes one wonder who  is actually in charge.

When I was 12, all the guys in class were very much watching porn and talking about sex. They did make comments on teachers, but only on the hot ones tho.

I was just curious about how does he explain the change in teachings.

Well, that's because most of this is said when arguing between or against Christians who believe the Bible doesn't contradict.

So if a belief is 50% justifiable and you do justify it to whatever extent possible. How did you justify those 50%? By Some evidence?

The current bible has no reference to reincarnation because it was removed but there are some hints that lead us to think that reincarnation was a Christian doctrine at the beginning. "Now the Pharisees who had been sent questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” John 1, 24-25. In that verse, Elijah had already long died but the Pharisees asked if John the Baptist was him. It's not a direct reference to reincarnation but I think we all understand what the pharisees tried to say.

If you mean the processing; yes, I agree. But the observation of experience [by our various senses] is focused mostly on the body exterior, or more than that, off-body completely, let alone rarely internal.

You can't choose to believe you can fly. What you can do is act like you believe something, and ultimately you might be able to convince yourself on a surface level that you believe it

But he did command Abraham to sacrifice Issac.

Genesis22 :2 Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.”

It seems that it was only the intervention of an "angel" that stopped him doing the deed. Makes you wonder who was really in charge at times? Such is the ambiguous nature of the BIBLE. 

This is god once again stamping his authority over his human creation and demanding that we fear him, Shila.

4 wives max, but 98% only have one. And no body is allowed to have relation out of marital bond. So you can say majority have only 1 body count with Thier spouse and no cheating is allowed. So first wife must knows for other.

Also, if you care about harm, you also have to care about harm which happens to pedophiles due to ban, which then makes your argument self defeating.

I'm just saying I knew of 12 year olds that were into their teachers. Maybe you can't relate to that, don't know nothing about that. 

Do you think 12 year old young men are into grown teachers?

Is that creepy?

see, even Lincoln supports lawful immigration and lawful deportations.

It's just what happens when your a penguin troll 

Yes, on the occasion, since the atonement had to be a supreme, personal sacrifice, I believe Father, by choice, if not obligation, withdrew such that no physical or spiritual sustenance would be supplied by Father, or angels, around him as he willingly completed his purpose for being here - to atone for our sins, our suffering,, physical and spiritual, our doubts, and all things that detract from  our physical and spiritual potential perfection.

It's no longer Jan 11

Cheetoe nazi is alive today

So you don't know.

Trusting prophets is akin to trusting scientists.

Otherwise, I perceive eternity to be a boring place to be if God not only knows all, but has experienced all. What does he do the day after that achievement it reached? I do not believe we start over from scratch. What's the point of that?

You know that B.K is playing you, don't you?

You can still do it. 44.5 % of the population are available.

Being atheist or agnostic doesn't mean being inmoral. Even in ancient greek people had moral.

I would never desire a harem but for a dream it's totally acceptable.

the first time a former U.S. president has been convicted of a crime....and then got elected with a larger mandate than the guy who beat him.

So now he is the first present day president.

The Catholic Church’s teaching on original sin does not oppose Christ’s infinite atonement—it reveals why we so desperately need it. As St. Paul explains (Romans 5:12–21), sin entered the world through one man, and all humanity inherited a wounded nature, lacking the communion with God once enjoyed by our first parents. The Catechism (CCC 404–409) clarifies that this “original sin” is not our personal guilt but the transmission of a fallen condition. Christ’s redemptive sacrifice, offered once for all, overcomes this estrangement: by His Cross and Resurrection, He makes possible our restoration to grace, ordinarily conferred through Baptism. There is no contradiction. Does that clarify things?