Shila

Yes they were in plain site if that's what you were asking though it  was dark and when there were eyes on them they seemed to go dark.

He believes cisgender men experience hormonal cycles like women. That’s why these cycles have been described as “man-struation” or the “male period.”

So I am manstruating.

Another answer that tells you nothing because it could be CIA drones or some other organization. So she isnusing weasel language to not admit anything. And to be fair if she reveals classified information she can go to prison so I understand why she would. The point is that you don't want to take her denials too seriously 

Don't you know what a Zedku is?

If this isnt period, I dont know what is.

It looks like Iran has declared war on the United States or that somebody wants us to think they have so I would expect a war with Iran shortly after Trump takes office, which means it's likely in the best interest of the United States to keep Russia tied up in the Ukraine so expect increased action there as well.

Of course, Tao teaches that humans should abandon competition.

But humans dont understand Tao.

Competition is equal to self-destruction. Its not beneficial.

Me: I post 10 threads supporting an assassin

Remy: I am going o see if he would support a murderer by tricking him with A Trump question.

Bro I admitted it. No need to trick me LOL

Get into his circle pretending to be a reporter interested in his philothranpic efforts, gain an interview and then PEW PEW, or poison a coffee and get away.

If you're going to that much trouble, why not go after the company itself, not an individual CEO? Record them admitting to illegal activity, get records exposing how they deny claims, etc. If the CEO is dead, you can't subpoena him.

Well, other universe is probably much better.

How is it different?

1. If Trump shot someone, then would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer. 

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

2. What if Trump said he could shoot someone and not lose voters?  Would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer. 

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

For me, the answer is a no, both ways.

Thinking Person X did not commit murder is different than saying if Person X committed murder, then it should be legal for them to do it.

1. If Trump shot someone, then would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer. 

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

2. What if Trump said he could shoot someone and not lose voters?  Would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer. 

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

For me, the answer is a no, both ways.

The people still voted for Trump. So the voters voted yes to both your prepositions.

Not every MAGA voter is aware that Trump said he could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and he wouldn't lose any voters (especially if you exclusively only watch Fox News).  I feel like giving the benefit of the doubt.

Now ethics will guide us instead of money.

A Zedku for Wylted

Like fuck,

Dream on,

Bang bang,

Capitalist gone,

So.

Bring on another.

And when they're all dead.

Let's have

An ethical dictator instead.

Like fuck.

If the person dies out of neglect it is still manslaughter. 

I doubt it; I neglect every kid in foster care that I didn't adopt; it doesn't mean I did anything bad.

With healthcare, where?

Did you know that regulations and subsidies exist?

"The earth supports a human population of nearly 8 billion people. The highest number since creation. This would not be possible if mutual respect and civilization didn’t exist." 

And as history shows,  tens of millions of people are periodically  wiped of the face of the earth by a few thousand or less people.

1. If Trump shot someone, then would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer.  

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

2. What if Trump said he could shoot someone and not lose voters?  Would you still vote for him?

Don't dodge the question with a politician like answer.  

Answer yes or no; a politician dodge would be assumed to be a yes.

For me, the answer is a no, both ways.

Not really true, there is still a lot of economic interventiomism. 

With healthcare, where?

So this is how you track down a CEO. I did it yesterday to prove a point. I know you brought up personal security as a barrier but then you just social engineer your way into their inner circle and you can still do that in a somewhat anonymous way, but also keep in mind they are probably only taking security to public meetings and such, probably not to walk them from the car to their office though if they are a high level target, hopefully their office building is surrounded by security and man traps that scan for weapons and make sure everyone who is there is authorized to be there, but in many places this isn't done.

Wrong. Trump is an American patriot and Jan6 was awesome. I dont GAF that some chubby CEO died.

Ok...? 

Sure, you can be pro 2A; but I'm saying on the economy (which healthcare is a part of), to support a violent revolution to get universal healthcare is fiscally left wing thing.  

Don't call yourself fiscally right wing if you want government run healthcare.  It's not an insult; many people are fiscally left and that's fine; but be honest; that's all.

Does this plan involve magic perhaps?

I am no snitch. You'll find out later

The most current situation is a billionaire that is a serial killer.

Letting someone die isn't killing.  Otherwise, any politician that started a war is guilty of murder (including Trump).

Hello, I'm Lucifer Morningstar!

Well, at least monkeys do not like to be peed on. A tape of Donald Trump allegedly confessing that he enjoys being peed upon during sex (or watching others do so) “probably does exist”, according to former British intelligence agent and Russian specialist Christopher Steele, despite the former US president’s repeated objections that it doesn’t.

By endorsing the shooter, you are willing to support violence to achieve universal healthcare.

Don't call yourself fiscally right wing; you're not.  That's fine if you're upfront with it; but then don't be agreeing with Trump on tax cuts for the rich (because that's what makes universal healthcare impossible).

Best wishes to you as well,

And yes, I do feel added to in concepts and viewpoints.

12.10.2024 05:29PM

--> 

@WyIted

"Well congratulations, you got yourself caught. Now what's the next step of your master plan?"

Crashing the economy 

With no survivors. Now ethics will guide us instead of money

I see, so the genius plan: 

Step 1: is murder a CEO and get caught

Step 2: Crash the Economy

Step 2 is a pretty good trick, maybe you can provide more details that will explain how a guy in jail crashes the economy.   

Does this plan involve magic perhaps?

Don't you think that if assassination is on the table then it may encourage future CEOs to act ethically and just deny fraudulent claims and maybe let the doctors decide what is best for their patient? 

"Well congratulations, you got yourself caught. Now what's the next step of your master plan?"

Crashing the economy 

With no survivors. Now ethics will guide us instead of money

The bulk of Ukrainian territory was forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union, or USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), and by 1922 Ukraine became the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (UkrSSR). Then the USSR  sanctioned the requisition of all surplus agricultural products from the rural population, resulting in economic collapse.

Not sure. Whatever makes the tummy not hungry, I guess.

Hitler only started killing Jews on mass scale once allies bombed German cities and killed hundreds of thousands of German civilians, and supported Russia and total war against him. He did ask them "Do you want total war?".

Nothing wrong with that either chud

If only there were a way in which the American people could decide which party should take the lead.

Regardless though, if one has the 'means to separate the sexes, I think it better to separate the sexes.

So, getting caught was part of a genius elaborate plane, kewl.

Hmmm, let me see who I believe in?

Killing him as a child would not have stopped the Holocaust. Someone else would have followed through with it.

It was his idea.

A mud cookie (Haitian Creole: bonbon tè, lit. 'earth cookie', pronounced [bɔ̃bɔ̃ tɛ]) is a famine food that is eaten in Haiti by children or expectant mothers.[1] They can be found in slums like Cité Soleil. Dirt is collected from the nation's central plateau, near the town of Hinche, and trucked over to the market (e.g. La Saline market) where women purchase it.[2][3][4] It is processed into cookies in shanty towns such as Fort Dimanche.[4] First, the dirt is strained to remove rocks and clumps.[4] Then, the dirt is mixed with salt (and/or rarely sugar) and vegetable shortening or other fat.[2][5] Next, it is formed into flat discs,[2] and dried in the sun.[5] The finished product is finally transported in buckets and sold in the market or on the streets.[3]

Hitler mostly killed Russians and Jews.

I get Paul Mescal every other day tbh. Michael Fassbender an odd time. My mom gives me Tom Cruise who she's a total fanboy for in general which is probably my fave. I don't look like him though.

I'm probably a fairly handsome guy but I look like a bum. 

Because killing Hitler saves the people he would kill in the future, while killing a CEO means he will be replaced by another CEO. I think you can pretty easily call Hitler the "root cause" of the Holocaust, while all we can really be certain of is that the CEO was the face of the company and approved policies that killed a lot of people, hence bearing the blame for most of them while the board falls under much less scrutiny. A better comparison might even be killing the CEO as a child, if that retroactively prevents UHC from growing. At this point in his life, much of the damage had already been done. Also, Hitler started a war, which makes him a legitimate target for being shot per international law, while the CEO can only be legally punished through the court system. 

And besides that, it's not "so many people" who were against the CEO being shot. Almost everyone is cheering for the shooter. As for the small amount who are against it, I suppose they'd rather live in a society where healthcare claims are denied than a society where healthcare claims are denied and assassinations are legitimized. If intentionally denying legitimate claims was a capital offense and the CEO was executed through the court system, that would be very different. I can't blame everyone else though, because not everyone has time to care about society and most would rather that someone responsible for a lot of deaths is punished regardless of how.

For the human sex organ,

I'd assume it's either our imagination influenced our choices in mates during evolution,

Or just same as other animals that possess exaggerated body parts that influence their mating rituals, just the luck of the draw.

I just got the link from a random guy on discord but a lot of people are passing it around

So probably site:debateart.com/debates "Daniel Penny' 

Or whatever you are looking for

Luigi is white.

He is now, but prior to his righteous act he was Italian.

Bucky was close, but he should’ve aimed higher—right at the banking system. That's the real "grunch" pulling the strings.