Shila

They can't complain if they're left outside in the cold without food either. Still people are allowed to keep dogs as pets because the possibility of abuse doesn't give you the right to prevent all relationships.

Relevance?

Have you made ntioned to the Muslims in Israel's government? Or would you rather just take a top post about Judaism and show the intellectual laziness of conflating it with Israel? 

Listen let me know when you have a point and can remember the context of your own statements.

And?

A stereotype is a local truth applied to a larger group predictively. It is a lazy shorthand which is often wrong. Group trait assumptions are generally wrong. 

All my girlfriends (14 of them) preferred small to medium.  OMG, you aren't on the show 1000 lb. Sisters are you?

And?

So would you suggest that I, because I am a Jew, am stingy? If not, then it isn't a proper stereotype of Jews, just a biased judgment of some people who happen to be Jewish. 

It is considered abuse if you leave your pet outside in the cold.

Yes I know, that was the point.

Potential for abuse without ability to file a police report is irrelevant. There was a much more verbose exploration of this failed argument near the start of the this thread.

The biggest or "real" reason why the Germans hated the Jews began in World War 1. During the war, German citizens bought war bonds. However, the Jews bought gold instead. After the war, the German economy collapsed and the only thing to trade that was worth value was gold. The Jews didn't support the war effort, and after the economy collapsed they purchased up all the businesses dirt cheap. This enraged so many Germans, that the Nazi movement gained support, so many people supported seizing the wealth of the Jews, because they felt it was swindled from them. The "war machine" put Germans back to work, and as their military research and arsenal grew, so did Nazi rhetoric and Germans felt emboldened to "punish the Jews" and things snowballed from there.

Shila, please do me a favor and please do not post in any threads ive started and please start by not replying to this specific post/message by me #45, or anyone in this thread. Back off/take a hike please

Most advanced Robot is about Robots perception of environment using GPT-4 { a drawback to inventers of the robot }

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIxSON5l9Ec

Though one might argue the human body is not a tool. . .

Is it not material, material sculpted constructed, cared for?

So by "is in no position to complain" you meant "can't call the police".

Irrelevant.

They can't complain if they're left outside in the cold without food either. Still people are allowed to keep dogs as pets because the possibility of abuse doesn't give you the right to prevent all relationships.

Sex is male or female, you are referring to sexual intercourse

Approximately 60 million die each year, come what may.

To be replaced by approximately 140 million.

I'm not sure if that is civilised or not.

More of an inbuilt necessity.

I literally already pointed out the problems but here is the raw numbers broken down showing the inferiority of socialized medicine.

https://fee.org/articles/if-american-healthcare-kills-european-healthcare-kills-more/

The only reason why drugs are addictive is because we have been psyopped into thinking that addiction is even a real thing. They first tested this to the Chinese in the Opium wars and applied it h

"What if" indicates a thought exercise

By the same token, we can say that protestantism and judaism were important for the birth and development of capitalism and that's been pretty good for the world but religions are not perfect. These religions have a dark side as I said it in another thread. So, what you said is somewhat coherent but I need to check it more carefully. It would be helpful if you give your source.

Genuine question. Not getting at anything, I have no point to make. I’d like to hear why people dislike Jews.

USA did a backflip into a 3rd world Putin style dictatorship with fake elections.

Russia launched ICBM today into Ukraine

Those are some of the most expensive missiles.

One could say, Russia is getting a bit desperate. They dont have great number of those missiles to be using them in a local war like that.

This would be Russia's biggest defeat ever, but once Trump comes to power, he will give up on Ukraine.

I’ll steelman you and say you’re talking about the Abrahamic god that’s been around for about 4000 years. Whilst modern humans have been around for about 300,000 years. Unless you’re a Young Earth Creationist. There’s been many other religions alongside/older than the Abrahamic faith with large numbers of followers. No, God is not universal. There’s documented tribes that are/were close to isolated who fell under atheistic (lack belief in gods). 

Though i’ll hand it to the Abrahamic faith that they have some good human stories. Even though many of them are copies from other philosophies/religions. 

, I just dont see how am I more evil than Hitler

Trump should donate 90% of the money he stole from George Snuffleupagus.

It's not addictive. That's a psyop

So we need to see the democrats stand up to the leftists in their own party in order to trust them with a single payer solution. We also need to be able to trust them to put people first and not be needs who try to quantify the value of a human life with their healthcare rationing proposals. 

Ideally everyone is a smoker, not some chain smoker who cant breathe, but someone who can enjoy a cigarette a day with their evening coffee and relaxation.

Think of it this way. There is no evidence for the non existence of the spirit of God. There is no known evidence for the non existence. There is none. So why believe the subject is non existent anyway?

You shouldn't when you remain neutral or agnostic.

The burden of proof’s on existence, or ‘what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all?’

Where would it end if people were justified in killing people who disagreed with them and were classified as evil.?

I think that's a relevant point. However what if we can clearly differentiate between evil and good and only allowed people who accurately determined if somebody was evil was killed?

Let me know what you think.

Ok do you believe the spirit of God as mentioned in John 4:24, exists?I’m 

Are Muslim countries more prone to violence? - SAGE Journals

place in Muslim countries, and they all involved Islamist insurgents. The same was the case in 2011. For 2014 the fraction of conflicts occurring in Muslim countries was lower (60%), but still way abo...

Wikipedia

Religious war - Wikipedia

A religious war or a war of religion, sometimes also known as a holy war (Latin: sanctum bellum), is a war

In that case, I'd hope it would expose the bad colleges while showing the merit of the good ones. With acceptance rates out the window, the burden falls on colleges themselves to generate good results.

It's because you are a performer 

Caitlyn Clark disagrees. As one of the very few good white WNBA players, it's clearly due to her skin color.

If you say so.

It appears that  in the other 3 gospels that verses 9 - 20 were much later additions.  Which , it appears, to have ignored the warning in  Revelation about adding or taking away from scripture, if my memory serves me ?

The famous sex researchers Masters and Johnson [1,2] have concluded that size of the male penis can have no true physiological effect on female sexual satisfaction. They base this conclusion on their physiological studies that show that the vagina adapts to fit the size of the penis. Because of this vaginal adaptation, they refer to the vagina as a potential space rather than an actual space. Thus, despite the worries of many males about the size of their penis, Masters and Johnson concluded that any size penis will fit and provide adequate sexual stimulation to the female.

false premise.

I think individuals and groups by nature and nurture, have more or less advantages, depending on their environments.

You are being disingenuous. The John verse mentions nothing at all concerning the Judas kiss only that Judas "stood there with them" saying nor doing anything. But it dose clearly state that Jesus identified himself twice!

John 18.

4 Jesus, knowing all that was going to happen to him, went out and asked them, “Who is it you want?”

5 “Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied.

“I am he,” Jesus said. (And Judas the traitor was standing there with them.) 6 When Jesus said, “I am he,” they drew back and fell to the ground.

7 Again he asked them, “Who is it you want?”

“Jesus of Nazareth,” they said.

8 Jesus answered, “I told you that I am he. If you are looking for me, then let these men go.”

It can hardly be the case that Jesus would have needed to identify himself twice if  Judas had already done so..... and no mention of a sword being drawn and ears being chopped off.  So Its either  that  Matthew's, Mark and  Luke.s that are correct and John is wrong or John is correct and the other three gospelers wrong.  So one is contradicting the other/s

Not sure  how I would describe myself . But I have read and studied the bible for over 40 years. ....... and I know you haven't.

That is why you cannot explain away those contradictory verses (of which there are many) . 

Would you like to explain away  these contradictory verses for us as you often claim to be able to do?

Are these biblical comments true or false?

Jesus either identified himself the night of his arrest or Judas identified Jesus with a kiss. Which is it?

The women spread the word of the empty tomb or they didn't. Which is it?

I would definitely believe in God if I saw him immediately cease the blowing of the wind, trouble is, for such a large claim as that, I feel like more than one account is needed. In many cases, however, the Bible just states crazy things that don't make any sense, and don't have historical evidence.

Was becoming a trans a way to escape being tiny?

Maybe.

Oh, I understand what you are saying now. I thought you were referring outside of the Gospel. I apologize for the misunderstanding. The term "Christian" does not appear in any of the Gospels. The Gospels primarily recount His teachings and actions, which occurred before the term "Christian" was coined. Since the term "Christian" refers to followers of Christ and emerged after His death and resurrection, it wouldn't have been relevant during His lifetime or in the narrative of the Gospels. The term "Christian" first appears in Acts 11:26 to describe Jesus' followers in Antioch. This makes sense because Acts documents the growth of the early Church after Jesus' ascension.

Future generations are indeed lucky. I wish I was born 200 years later. But then again, I might be immortal given how I am different from all other people and I seem to have not aged at all for past 10 years. So I might still get to see all the wonders future holds.

In first-world societies, the gradual decline of religion as a cultural cornerstone with objective, constant values has left a void that individuals and communities instinctively seek to fill. People seek to fill this void due to the inherited biological herd instincts. Religion provides not only a sense of meaning and purpose but also a framework for gratitude, humility, and civic moral responsibility (basic herd maintenance.) As these traditional systems of belief have all but faded, particularly in secular, affluent societies like the USA, the cheap replacement is vapid virtue signaling as a new form of "moral expression." It prioritizes external validation, with individuals projecting their alignment to manufactured social causes or ideals only to gain approval. This fundamental shift in the basis of "morality" is the reason for the weak moral fiber of society. One way this is manifested is how easily people will become both "pro war" and "Anti war" at the whim of a few memes within the same year. A person grounded in a firmer base of morality would have strong convictions that wouldn't flip flop so much.

In all these cases, most of them which actually exist, over-promising success while ignoring necessary prerequisites undermines credibility and exposes the institutions as exploitative.