LOL!
All this coming from the guy who is upset that his constant snitching and brown-nosing was insufficient to be rewarded the promotion of middle-manager.
Christianity threatens the same thing. If you don't accept Jesus as the savior, you can't go to Heaven. If you don't accept Allah as God, you can't go to Heaven.
The idea that one would willfully choose Hell as a choice if they knew it exists is completely absurd. People will be punished for eternity for believing in the wrong doctrine, do you now see why other people might take issue with that?
I don’t really take issue with the resolution either. It was just to provide context
This is actually a repeat debate, my preamble was just to clarify to voters what the discussion was about because the audience in the previous one found it hard to follow.
This debate was made to be intentionally absurd. The word and definition in the description are traditional interpretations of values that characterize masculinity.
Quality debate sites are far and few between from my understanding, if they even exist. My first time searching led me to choose Debateart since it was the only available one that was easy to search.
Use links for your sources too. When discussing the statistics of Portugal and studies from Dr. Craig, it saves readers the trouble of having to google search to verify your claims.
Refer back to this guide for your future debates.: http://tiny.cc/DebateArt
Attention, voters.
When you get to my final argument in round 5, I want to clarify that this paragraph is my own words despite the error of being highlighted in gray block.:
“The fact that many men would misinterpret this quote to mean violence means that the fault lies with the root. This quote leaves the responsibility of judgment to the husband to decide whether or not his wife is acting irresponsibly, and for a man that gets temperamental, he can invoke this quote to justify his violence.”
Would you like to vote on this? I don’t expect your vote on any of my other current debates, but I would love your insight on this one for sure.
LOL!
All this coming from the guy who is upset that his constant snitching and brown-nosing was insufficient to be rewarded the promotion of middle-manager.
Your level of self-awareness is admirable.
“You do YOUR DUTY and I shut up and accept what you do.
That is all you wanted us to be and all we are. You do your decisions, I inform and report”
So you’re an established snitch?
It’s too late to prosecute him. The Presidency grants him immunity.
Well played.
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
What’s the quickest way for a beginner to learn about Islam?
Is it as simple as reading the Quran or are there other study sources?
Too obvious to be suspicious.
We should report this.
Same character. But a very different version.
Christianity threatens the same thing. If you don't accept Jesus as the savior, you can't go to Heaven. If you don't accept Allah as God, you can't go to Heaven.
The idea that one would willfully choose Hell as a choice if they knew it exists is completely absurd. People will be punished for eternity for believing in the wrong doctrine, do you now see why other people might take issue with that?
We can clone you and when you do die, transfer your life essence into the clone.
Then you keep winning the presidencies forever.
You’re wasting your time.
Novice_ll will never acknowledge any mistakes he made. His default instinct is to report votes that go against him or label critics ‘confused.’
I don’t really take issue with the resolution either. It was just to provide context
This is actually a repeat debate, my preamble was just to clarify to voters what the discussion was about because the audience in the previous one found it hard to follow.
You are an awesome commentator.
Watching the video now and this detailed analysis is perfect. You have the right voice for this kind of thing.
Oh no
Well, I find your votes pretty insightful. I’d still like a vote from you on the Free Market vs Regulation debate if you’re cool with it.
If you do make a video, don’t even worry if you happen to show the names.
You can edit certain parts of the video to blur out names.
But I don’t really care if my username is broadcast in a YouTube video.
And YouTube has a strong anti-Muslim community, so it might encourage trolls to make sock puppet accounts to harass rayhan16.
If too much private info is made public to platforms like YouTube, doxxing becomes more likely.
That...could work.
I swear these aren’t my own expectations, the website is just very weird about vote restrictions.
They prefer it a certain way and are quick to enforce these standards
If you do vote, you’ll need a paragraph summarizing the position of both sides. Any shorter than that and the mods will delete it.
DM me if you would like me to provide more details about our arguments or you need me to review it.
Also, I suggest writing it in a google doc first and then pasting it because you can always rewrite it if the vote gets deleted.
Thank you for the vote!
Yeah, I’d like that.
I enjoyed reading both arguments so far. Will 100% be closely following this debate.
Your trolling is awful, but you really have a knack for comedy.
I read through the vote in the doc and found it both detailed and insightful.
Props to Yassine for keeping his composure.
This debate was made to be intentionally absurd. The word and definition in the description are traditional interpretations of values that characterize masculinity.
Resolution.
Quality debate sites are far and few between from my understanding, if they even exist. My first time searching led me to choose Debateart since it was the only available one that was easy to search.
This is going to be a difficult (maybe impossible, idk) position to win as Con.
Nobody can match Barney’s unbeatable style of Soresu.
Vote Con. 😎😎😎
Omg. That’s savage as hell.
You still did a pretty good job.
I’m open to debate drugs.
Oh no.
Bump
I voted based on who had the better arguments, not who I personally agree with.
You're making me think legalizing drugs may not be such a good option after-all.
This is STILL going on??
You got it
Wait, is that REALLY you??
: D
1. Evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang.
2. Evolution has nothing to do with cosmology or physics.
Don’t get your arguments from creationists like Joshua Feuerstein.
Use links for your sources too. When discussing the statistics of Portugal and studies from Dr. Craig, it saves readers the trouble of having to google search to verify your claims.
Refer back to this guide for your future debates.: http://tiny.cc/DebateArt
I don’t care about your guys’ beef.
But word of advice, don’t hash it out inside the rounds.
If you want to revote, you can always write a rough draft and run it by me before submitting it.
Ik reported votes can get annoying.
Great discussion, I look forward to having it again with you in the future.
Attention, voters.
When you get to my final argument in round 5, I want to clarify that this paragraph is my own words despite the error of being highlighted in gray block.:
“The fact that many men would misinterpret this quote to mean violence means that the fault lies with the root. This quote leaves the responsibility of judgment to the husband to decide whether or not his wife is acting irresponsibly, and for a man that gets temperamental, he can invoke this quote to justify his violence.”