Total posts: 6,283
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
When I used Governor, it was a Mafia role
But it STOPS the lynch, doesn't redirect it
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@SirAnonymous
Lol y'all need to read up on your roles
Governor stops the lynch from happening completely, he doesn't redirect it
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
We can still go with your POE. Caroler not claiming only really means that there may be some suspicion on you, but given your play and claim, I'm not scum reading you, so I see no reason to worry
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
@SirAnonymous
I am not the Caroler
But you're right that him claiming would help with POE
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@SirAnonymous
@Zaradi
If Caroler doesn't claim this DP, what's your recommended course of action
Since Pie will probably be absent once again
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
If Caroler doesn't claim this DP, what's your recommended course of action
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Nah, he is guessing that there is one scum in Supa's list and 1 scum outside of supa's list.
You believe that Supa's list is or conditional, so you believe this is true as well
Created:
Posted in:
Singularity is going to have steam coming out of his ears
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You literally said that Zaradi and yourself and Supa are town
Wut
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Lol that makes no senseSA's list can NOT claim to have ANY scum in it for sure, while supa's list can conceivably have all the scum and at least one. You're making zero sense.
Supa: Pie, Zar, or Sir are scum (I'll go ahead and assume it's only one)
You're confirmed
SA's list: Grey is confirmed, and one scum is in Supa's list, which MEANS one scum is between Ragnar and Speed
The ONLY reason not to believe SA's is if you think that BOTH scum are in Supa's
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
And again, I literally don't care which list we do. I just want to make sure we're lynching scum, which I currently believe to be Ragnar
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I don't care if it's one or two either. My point is that you're completely reliant on Supa's list while ignoring SA's, but if Supa's is true, then so is SA's. It makes no sense to dismiss SA's like you're doing
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Caroler would die then, and we might be able to get extra resultsHold up, why can’t be confirm Supa if we get the caroler to claim? If no role exists then he’s clearly lying and scum
Kinda like Bullish's comedian shenanigan
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@Vader
Are you saying drafter doesn't follow the role list?
There's no reason to assume Supa didn't mean at least one, and we can literally ask him lol
Besides that, SA's list is STILL TRUE if Supa's is Or conditional. In fact, SA's list depends on Supa's being Or conditional
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Firstly, Supa's isn't an Or either, because the role list states that caroler says "AT LEAST ONE of which is Mafia"
Secondly, SA's list LITERALLY DEPENDS on Supa's, meaning if you believe Supa's to be true, you believe SA's to be true
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
@SirAnonymous
Like I said, if Sir wants to lynch you, I will as well, but I don't know why we would when lynching Ragnar yields pretty much the same results, and our scum read on him is stronger
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You're still ignoring that this leaves one scum between me and Ragnar, meaning I know that Ragnar is scum because I know that I'm town
Which means Ragnar flipping scum essentially confirms me as town
So you're not making sense right now
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
I was thinking about it and kind of see where he's coming from
He doesn't necessarily scum read Ragnar (or myself I guess?), so any attempt to lynch someone not on the poe list seems like scum trying to avoid lynching themselves or their scum partner
That still ignores your poe scum list though
Created:
Posted in:
Look scummy to you*Follow the list, or look scummy, it's no skin off my back.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What is this sentence trying to say?Yeah, you don't have the excuse for claiming the idiot card for not narrowing the POE in supa's list.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
If you want to lynch Pie, I'll go along with you
Created:
Posted in:
It's at least one is scum. Maybe both are in his list, but we have no way of knowing that, and I don't scum read any of the people in Supa's listRagnar is not in Supa's list, We shouldn't be lynching Ragnar today.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
If we do Ragnar, Pie, Zaradi
Then we should catch scum (it can go Pie, Ragnar, Zaradi as well)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Yah I really don't like this. If speed were town he wouldn't have a preference between pie or ragnar.
That makes no sense. I've scum read Ragnar since about the end of last DP, but all we have on Pie is inactivity + Caroler results
Of course I prefer Ragnar
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Why don't we simply finish Ragnar today, and then go with Supa's list
Created:
Posted in:
If we're going with Supa's list, I would do Pie (inactivity), Zaradi, then Sir
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
@Zaradi
Could be only even nightWe have no claimed "caroler", who's had a night phase to do shit already. It's not "illogical" to wonder why we're only now receiving results on it, when we could've had this last DP as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
WhereFirstly, you said Zar when you meant Ragnar.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
No reason for you to claim, not no reason for the lynch
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@SirAnonymous
Oh oh...looks like someone is waking up.
Lolllllllll, Sir read the post again, I was talking about you claiming, not the lynch
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
What's the motivation behind lynching Ragnar? I'm not opposed to lynching him, but I would like to hear your take on it. Also, I'm waiting to see if anyone has any results before I vote.
Not sure about Zar, but his posts feel manufactured. In fact, when Zar was telling him that scum uses a mask and filters what they say, versus town who just says whatever, he didn't respond
Besides that, I've modded a game where he was Mafia, as well as played in games where he was Mafia. Last time, I correctly predicted that he was scum, so going with my gut again this time seems wise
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Just no reason. With the claims so far, my guess is that there are one or two power roles left. If anyone extra claims, that significantly helps scum narrow down who it is at this stage
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
@Zaradi
I see no reason for extra claims this DP, we can lynch Ragnar and move on
And to Zar, we have no claimed informational because, if they exist, they have chosen not to claim yet. That's up to their discretion
VTL Ragnar
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
No and noDo you think I should claim? Do you have any results?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Ragnar has played somewhere like 3-6 games, and I think all as Mafia
I wouldn't call him inexperienced
Created: