Total posts: 6,283
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Any others could pass, but oro? He's almost definitely not scum...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I don't really see a problem with wagoning? If I agree with someone then I'll vote the person they're voting...I shouldn't have to come up with a completely independent reason
That said, the vote does need to be properly explained
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Doing that over the course of 12 pages is not beneficial to me 😑
However if you could summarize it in one post or direct me to one post, that would be great, I keep getting confused with all this reading
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Lol I was about to make an analysis argument on balance but I realized you were right
UNVOTE
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@drafterman
Ok just STOP please
You're not supposed to convince EACH OTHER that you're scum, because that's obviously not gonna happen lol, you're unnecessarily filling up the DP, convince OTHER people
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Lemme catch up on the DP, but I was mainly on Wylted because of balance, unless Press is lying
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Lol I'm not gonna ban you xD
I'll talk about that style to my fellow peeps, not a bad idea
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
So ignore him like I do 🙂
But yeah personal attacks like that lead to warnings, sorry
Created:
Posted in:
For everyone's reference, I'm ignoring Wylted, if you're confused why it looks like I'm not responding, just waiting for something to happen
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Was just thinking about how he's so concerned about sheeping but he wants people to do it here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
<3I don't think I could have picked a better person for the forums than Speedrace
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Why would he be town confirming people then...if he really is a PGO then he's inherently being anti town because he might've town confirmed scum by now
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Gotcha, so mostly his use of the lynch as town cred...I feel like I trust you a bit more because you aren't constantly claiming that you're drafter is Mafia, instead just relying on your reasons
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Wylted
His logic for trying to lynch Lunatic is incredibly flawed. He talks generally about him but gives no specific arguments and he's mostly sheeping, plus a cop, a watcher, a vig, AND a tracker? I just really doubt that balance, it would be 4 very powerful roles against 3 Mafia ones
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Can you reiterate why you scum read drafter lol, I've been reading for like 15 minutes and I forgot
I find it unlikely that he would be A MAJOR bus of Sir like that... He's smart enough to know that trading a Mafia for being town read is a net loss
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Mostly post 44 and 50
That wall of text point he made is actually pretty relevant
Created:
Posted in:
Just caught up with the DP
I was originally going to vote Lunatic based on Drafter's analysis, but now I'm confused. We have a watcher, tracker, AND a cop? I really think that someone is lying. The way that Warren has messed up twice now with Oro's NP results pretty much confirms his role. That means we know that Wylted HAS an active role, just not what role it is
And then Press' weird behavior DP was extremely confusing since now he's actually confirming people, and I find it very unlikely that scum would risk fake town confirming people
So that really just leaves Wylted. Besides that, Lunatic has been contributing more. I want someone to go over my analysis here to see if they agree or not but right now I'm leaning towards Wylted the most
Created:
Posted in:
Site MVP
Virtuoso
Member of Honor
Supadudz
Top Forum Post
Goodbye (the one RM did)
Best Mafia Game
Pokemon
Most Liked Member
Blamonkey
Trending Topic
bsh1 resignation
Funniest Members
Rookie Of The Year
Semper
Quality Forum Poster
SupaDudz
Created:
-->
@Mharman
That would be smart 😂😂
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Christen
You're an amazing person 🙂
And I'm a he
And all of the above contributed, it wasn't just one person that got it locked
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
The amount of dedication you're putting into an issue that is so small tells me that you're mad. You can't just assume I said that because you disagreed with me.
You ignored every salient point in my post so I presume you aren't paying attention, as well.
Actually I didn't, but if you're so adamant, outline them as bullet points. I definitely didn't ignore anything though.
I presume that the reason bsh1 selected you as a moderator is because of the fact that you are a child and would be disinclined to challenge him.
Lol, and you said you're not mad?
Some people who perceive you as cow-towing to their complaints will like you, but most will resent you -- and you don't want that to be the case.
I really don't care. It's a website. I have no stakes in it. Anyone who attacks me for a decision that isn't mine is clearly ignorant, so I have no reason to care about their opinion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
@A-R-O-S-E
I don't have one; at least it doesn't seem to be related to being a visitor
It's about my love for crosswords
@oro Stanley Hudson
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
There are no personal attacks though, except against me. >:(
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@coal
Firstly, you sound mad. Calm down, it's not that deep. Secondly, it wasn't even my decision. I participated, but it wasn't my idea and I wasn't the biggest advocate for it.
A personal attack is not, and will never be, discussion of factual information.
No one said that it is? So I'm confused why you're saying this.
There is a further practical consideration to this as well: you do not have the power to, nor will you or any other moderator, ever be able to "end" a conversation on a salient topic of community interest by merely locking a thread.
Did we say we wanted to end the conversation? NO. Literally no one cares about that conversation. It's purely about the multiple reports that we received specifically from that thread. It has nothing to do with the topic of the thread; you could make a thread titled "Chocolate is amazing," and if we got multiple reports from it, we would probably consider locking it. Is that because we hate chocolate? Of course not! I love it. But we can't just ignore the reports.
You seem to be taking this as a personal attack against you. It's not that deep.
There is an additional point of consideration, too: member complaints do not equate to inappropriate conduct.
I've never said that it did.
Created:
Posted in:
Really sorry guys but I've got college stuff due tomorrow night and this is pretty distracting. Gonna try not to be on here so pls no lynch for inactivity. I'll try to get on tomorrow morning
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
It only confirms as town if he's a weak hider...I know that much from my MCU game
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I did neither of those, Supa did thoughWhen somebody did something and says they didn't or somebody doesn't do something but says they did the odds are good they are scumming.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I've already messaged Warren about it, he said he corrected it for you...meaning I am telling the truth
Created:
Posted in:
That wasn't an OMGUS, I didn't see his vote when I was typing ;-;
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Supa
Warren would've gotten the names confused, meaning Supa lied about visiting Drafter
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@drafterman
I'm dead serious, I've got no reason to lie. Warren messed up :/
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Warren has made a colossal mistake then. I'm dead serious, I visited drafter. Please let Warren get on before hammering me. I think he got his S's confused ;-;
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
That's actually a decent point...but still doesn't make Lunatic scum if A-R is town
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
That makes no sense because Lunatic could be a town with a bad read...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
My role means there's either a watcher or tracker. It would be slightly unbalanced to have that and a cop
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Visiting does literally nothing. No motivation to visit any specific person
Created: