What are you talking about? Newton's law of gravitational attraction is objective because any person anywhere can use the equation to accurately describe and predict the attraction of gravity. We can calculate mass and distance. Therefore, we can calculate gravitational attraction.
In order for something to be objective, It needs to be determinable independently and it's truth value doesn't require any kind of emotion or personal feelings. Newton's laws of gravitational attraction fit every single criteria of objective.
What? Induction totally relies on past data to make predictions about the future and acquire knowledge.
I know, I didn't claim certainty. Induction deals in probabilities based on past evidence.
Paragraph 2
Because induction doesn't need certainty to have knowledge or to say something will probably be the case in the future.
Apologies, in my round 2 I meant to say "...and thus have no moral responsibility."
Alright
What are you talking about? Newton's law of gravitational attraction is objective because any person anywhere can use the equation to accurately describe and predict the attraction of gravity. We can calculate mass and distance. Therefore, we can calculate gravitational attraction.
In order for something to be objective, It needs to be determinable independently and it's truth value doesn't require any kind of emotion or personal feelings. Newton's laws of gravitational attraction fit every single criteria of objective.
Define subjective, because I would say it's objective, insofar as it's intersubjective
It probably didn't happen.
Maybe, games arent really expensive, and lots of schools already have laptops, tablets, or computer labs.
I would give arguments to pro.
I'm flattered, I'll read it after work.
I really just forgot about this one. Gotta vote bump it so people see.
I just like to have a little info on my opponent's angle. Not gonna just walk into a trap if I can help it.
I am interested, but it feels too iffy not having any idea what you're going to argue, so I'll probably pass.
Too bad this guy didn't bring it.
Hiroshima was chosen because of it's military significance.
Thank you for your vote
I have a feeling your opponent may not come back.
Thank you for voting.
Vote bump
My thought was just that it shifted the resolution a little away from the desired topic, what the bible says, not, what the bible is likely to say.
But it doesn't make much sense to have a debate about what the bible likely says. It either says or it doesn't say once you look at the text.
You should take "likely" out of the resolution. Either it does or it doesn't, really.
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
No problem
Vote bump
https://tiny.cc/Kritik
Was there a better method? I mean, it worked didn't it?
Netting positivity is prudent, but has nothing to do with morality, that's why I asked if he's arguing that it was unethical or imprudent
Because I wouldn't say it was ethical, but I'd say it was prudent.
Do you want this to be an ethics debate or a strategy debate?
Why did you have to let us down?
Vote bump
Vote bump
Chess is the ultimate logic game. Logic is a skill that belongs in every other skill
Please consider voting.
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
Vote bump
I think he actually retired in 2016. Maybe he did not go back to fighting.
Cyborg Santos
Vote bump
Anyone else want to vote?