Total posts: 2,186
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Claymore to rifle?
False equivalency fallacy
Typical
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
>
@Double_RSo you've managed to explain why we should define a zygote as a human life. Now please explain why we should regard the zygote as a person with all rights equal to a fully formed human.....................because it's a human life.A human with life. If we shouldn't regard it as a person with all rights, then we shouldn't regard anyone with rights.
😂😂😂😂
It’s not [a] human (being). And it never will be.
Potentiality ≠ actuality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
It's not Pegan human sacrifice like stuff, but it is sacrificing a human.Therefore, it's human sacrifice.
Look up the term sacrifice. You’re wrong.
Still using incorrect term to get your poorly argued unsubstantiated position on abortion across. 🤦♂️
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You gonna bitch at GP like you do me? If not, you’re a hypocrite. If you do, you’re still a hypocrite.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh look, another female believing she’s a man attempted to concoct a shooting
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Abortion is Human Sacrifice by Definition
By your fictitious definition, perhaps; but not by any factual definition.
That’s what real human sacrifice is about, and abortion isn’t a part of it.
Created:
Posted in:
does not make those sales = [a] human being.
Samples.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Pregnancy ≠ infant (a born, young baby)Well, the word pregnant doesn't = infant, but a pregnancy holds a zygote, embryo, fetus, which is a living human.
And yet you likened a pregnancy to an infant by your own wording: “Basically abortion comes down to two sides. Either you think that a mothers' right to her body is more important than the life of an infant. Or you think that an infant is more important to a mothers' right to her body. ”
Also, I used the term pregnancy vs pregnant. Context matters, YFL. Something you have yet to learn since being here, no matter how many times I correct you in this specific debate/discussion on abortion.
Lastly, a zygote, embryo, fetus… neither of which = an “infant.” So just admit you were wrong in your failed use of terminology here.
Uh, that’s not how human reproduction works. The male gamete is what causes successful conception. Her egg doesn’t do it on its own.Context matters.Women don't create the baby (fetus, embryo, zygote) by themselves, but if they involve themselves in consensual sex, then they are letting a male, impregnate them, or giving them access to their egg.Consent is making a choice (choosing).
You lecturing me on context is just rich, laughable, and obscene.
Not all women engage in consensual sex. That is just a fact of life. And I am not talking about rape here. There are cultures where women are coerced into sex under obvious duress.
Not all pregnancies are “consensual.”
Either way, it is within her body and as such, it is of her body.Can people own other people?In other words, is it right for one singular person, to own another?Let me be clear with my wording. Is it ok for a living human to own another living human?
Complete and utter NON SEQUITUR argument.
A girl/woman being pregnant has nothing to do with slavery and/or involuntary servitude. Such an ignorant comparison on your part.
“Let me be clear…” A pregnancy is WITHIN a girl/woman’s body…it is NOT external like you clearly characterize.
Try again, little one.
The pregnant girl/female has personal liberty and legal rights, the pregnancy has neither.I thought you said pregnancy doesn't equal infant.Did you mean the infant doesn't have any rights?
Reading comprehension matters, 🤦🏼♂️
Your retort is yet another non sequitur argument.
[a] human life = [a] human beingNope.Human Life (lets break it down):Human: "relating to or characteristic of people or human beings:" From conception, the zygotes DNA is human.Life: "the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death:" Conception is literally the start of life.So, from conception, a zygote, embryo, and fetus are a human life.
Uh, yeah… [a] human life does in fact = [a] human being. By definition.
From conception, the zygotes DNA is human.
Being human in origin (DNA), does not [a] human being it makes.
Blood and/or other organic material found at a crime scene later tested and determined to be “human in origin” does not make those sales = [a] human being.
You also begin with the term human life, which is a single term, not two, as you proceeded to define separately.
Look, kid you have a lot to learn. Most of which involves linguistics. You clearly do not know how to define let alone understand terms that you try to use in these debate/discussions.
Slow down. Do more research. You have potential, but as of late you are consistently SUCKING at the abortion debate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bella3sp
Glad we can find some common ground on some topic(s).
There [may] be more…time will tell.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
The mother does not have a right to kill a human life that is not part of her body, that she caused to exist.
Again, language matters. Your language is way off and disingenuous.
[a] human life = [a] human being
A pregnancy is NOT [a] human being
And she didn’t cause anything.
This is just another epic fail on your part to address abortion here at DART
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Agreed. The church and any parishioner there has lost their goddamn minds!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
The mother caused the creation of that life
Uh, that’s not how human reproduction works. The male gamete is what causes successful conception. Her egg doesn’t do it on its own.
And the conception is 1/2 her genetics and the other half, the baby daddy donor’s.
Either way, it is within her body and as such, it is of her body.
The pregnant girl/female has personal liberty and legal rights, the pregnancy has neither.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Pregnancy ≠ infant (a born, young baby)
You really need to use correct terminology when addressing this topic. Thread after thread you keep getting corrected for bad wording.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Okay the black community has a problem with crime. Do we really need 3 threads a day on it or can we just keep the black people violent threads to perhaps a reasonable one thread a week?
🤦♂️ I haven’t started a new thread about anything to do with black Americans for quite some time. So this allegation is absurd, as is the request.
FFS, why don’t you hurl this at IWRA for his spamming the forum with one Trump obsessed thread after another.
Created:
-->
@badger
So we are all agreed that this particular user is a low IQ racist.
You couldn’t successfully debate your way out of a wet paper bag without 💩 ad hominems whilst trying, but in the end failing to get out.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
None of you proved me wrong on the subjects of race that o engaged in. And you couldn’t source correct a box of chocolates.
The subject of race is a main course at the table of real life discussion outside of DART. Does that make everyone in the world racist jsut because they’re passionate about the subject? According to your (il)logic, it does. Reality check: it does NOT!!!
The fact that you and others cannot stand the truth about race, culture, crime and the law just goes to show why race relations is a main course at the table of reality. The denialism and victimhood mentality keeps it there.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
The difference is, said schizophrenics tend to not want to embrace who they are.
“The difference is, said gender identity disordered person tend to not want to embrace who they were born as by choice.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
Transgenderism is an illness of the body.
Wrong. It’s of the mind.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yeah, done on purpose to see if Neanderthals like u clowns are paying any measure/level of attention.!!
Don’t come back with “yeah, sure!” BS when I myself have corrected not only you, but many others before you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Then prove me wrong.Proven to me you’re not a child molester
Easy.
you’re inability to prove me wrong
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
The whole purpose is this site, is to argue with each other,
No shit Sherlock.
But when you have a super majority, to include @PREZ-HILTON adding to the demise of this site, well, you reap what you sow.
Created:
-->
@badger
thought army men were supposed to be tough guys.
Don’t know what your are talking about, but I am tougher than you…POG!!!!
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
Getting heated and debating the merits respectfully are two entirely different things..
Try again.
Created:
Posted in:
Bragg could not even cite the ACTUAL statutory law that Trump violated.
Created:
To Whomever it may, even remotely, concern in charge of DART:
I have been debating and engaging others on the internet since 1995. Long before this page was created, and probably long before any of you were itching your daddy’s pants. To date all I can say about this site, upon reflection of reading some members posts by those concerned about the longevity of DART, is that it does not surprise me how hypocritical most are here.
While I admit I have been direct, forward and sometimes harsh…BUT it was only in RESPONSE to those who attacked me. It is common for those emotively driven vs those possessing actual emotional and intellectual intelligence. I will not name names of the latter, but the names of the former are patently obvious.
When I start new threads, it is based on easily verifiable facts. But do those who disagree with me verify or disaffirm those facts that I claim? No. I just get dolts like IWantRoseveltAgain calling me a “dummy” or a “moron.” I get Double_R creating one strawman after another. I get others coming one fallacy after another. Idiots deficient in linguistically skills. Reading Comprehension. Academic experience. Emotional and Intellectual intelligence.
Then we see something called “MEEPS” about changing or updating or enforcing Codes of Conduct at DART, yet to date from when I signed on to present day, there is no such thing as a COC. It may be written, but it clearly is not enforced in the forum.
I’m willing to scale back my reactions to childish members. Quid Pro Quo. If you stop the attacks to begin with. Hold everyone in the forum to the same standards in the debate section.
So, what will it be those in charge of DART? Enforce the COC or let the forum destroy the basis of DART in its entirety?
Ball is in your court.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
This case is clearly a political witch-hunt against a political opponent in the next election.But didn’t Trump try to spark an investigation of Biden in Ukraine in his “perfect phone call”?
Everything that has happened to date supports Biden’s involvement in Ukraine you “moron.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Biden personally signed off on the raid at Mar-a-Lago.That’s a lie. “Nothing matters unless it can be proven”
OK.
Then prove me wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
First…screw your genetic fallacy attempt to raise the 🤚 to the following:
Fact is, Jesse Waters blew this indictment BS out of the water.
Created:
Posted in:
Wow…shit is getting deep.
Biden personally signed off on the raid at Mar-a-Lago.
Biden sent Matthew Colangelo to work for Bragg, carrying the crap used by Bragg to reignite dead charges against Trump.
This case is clearly a political witch-hunt against a political opponent in the next election.
Anyone who says otherwise is a flaming denialist. An ignorant denialist.
Created:
Posted in:
The 34 count indictment was a weak ass nothing-burger!
Bragg will likely face charges for disbarment for using a convicted liar as the core of the basis of the charges; charges for which even the DOJ and FEC turned down, among others.
All this political circus shit show is doing is guaranteeing Trump the 2024 election.
Even the liberal media isn’t buying the crap Bragg is peddling.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Larry Elder and the Epoch Times. What an idiot.
Can’t discredit the professional analyst, so you retort with a genetic fallacy.
Go figure.
You’re spot on with the psychological projection.
“What an idiot” you are.
Created:
Posted in:
Evidence of mass (global) poisoning by China and Governments the world over with the fake vaccine:
Edward Dowd, expert in analytics who demonstrates by excess deaths
Edward Dowd, expert in analytics who demonstrates by excess deaths
His book outlining his and his company’s findings has not been debunked, just ignored.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Non sequitur 🤦🏼♂️
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Have you heard of, let alone read the following books yet:
What is a woman? By Matt Walsh?
Irreversible Damage: The transgender craze seducing out daughters. By Abigail Shrier?
The Abolition of Sex: How the “transgender” agenda harms women and girls. By Kara Dansky?
If not, you should.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Quoting out of context, typical.
You left off sociopathic with that psychological projection.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
>@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Then explain how women, for example, have reported new medical health issues never experienced or diagnosed with until they got the jab!?!Why has there been a huge uptick in adverse events being reported?Why have young adults been dropping dead?women? What women? How many? 5 or 5000?young adults dropping dead?
Just as I thought.
Your sociopathic psychological projection has come full circle.
What’s your favorite term? Dummy? Moron? Either way, both fit you to the proverbial “T”!!!
Created:
Gonna vote, NAY.
That is, if I even get a vote.
Seeing as the Hilton is also a violator of the COC himself.
Rules for thee but not for me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
-->
@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Going for the ad hominem vs addressing the boy’s argument. Classic intellectual cowardice.So if you not one of the three mentally challenged, ---or all three--, then that only leaves ' mentally disturbed ' about LBGT and perhaps cultist Trumpeteer troll with some degree of insanity issues. Ok.Mentally challenged --check--Mentally deficit --check--Mentally handi-capped --check--
This is the second time you are putting forth psychological projection.
Clearly you are emulating others of the DART clique here so you can stay within the “it” crowd here. Pathetic.
Try using your own brain, if you have one, and exercise a little humility and integrity for fucks sake. 🤦🏼♂️
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Then what is it? I asked you whether you even believe you are yourself right, to which you responded no.
Strawman fallacy 2.0
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
He’s also unemployed and living on disability from the government
If you’re getting even $1 from the Department of Veterans Affairs Benefits Administration, be it disability or pension, you’re a bloody hypocrite.
If you’re getting even $1 from any department/branch of the government, again, you’re a bloody hypocrite.
If you intend to collect even $1 from any department/branch of the government, to include the VA (health care included), then you’re a bloody hypocrite.
Being retired =/= unemployed. “Moron”!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>The so-called CV19 vaccine is the most recent example.What a moron
Then explain how women, for example, have reported new medical health issues never experienced or diagnosed with until they got the jab!?!
Why has there been a huge uptick in adverse events being reported?
Why have young adults been dropping dead?
Yeah, I’m in the know and pay attention to the lies and misinformation being put out by the government of an untested (properly under the guidelines everything else has prior to the so-called pandemic), unrefined, and unapproved cocktail of engineered crap claimed to counteract another engineered pile of crap; unlike you and your ilk.
There is also a reason some of the companies involved had to have their shots halted or stopped completely for some age groups.
And I’m the moron. 🙄
Created: