TWS1405_2

--> 

@<<<TWS1405_2>>>

There are lots of tools that are easier to use than a gun, yet you idiots focus on the big bad ugly black piece of iron.

How many people were mass-murdered by poison in last 10 years?  I think your  a Trumpeteer troll at best, and at worst  ____!____

There is ugly at DArt and most of it comes from the cultist, Trumpeteer nutters.  My guess is that your a Trumpeteer ergo some degree of the nutter insanity involved. Old news

-> 

@YouFound_Lxam

That's my basic belief. 

We all have mental challenges in life.  We understand your mental issue regarding LBGT and other.

There are professionals who can aid you, and better than average, everyday Josephine. 

> 

@<<<TWS1405_2>>>

Again, why are you here at DART?  Troll. 

To remind you that guns make it easy to kill people at A} close distance away

--> 

@<<<TWS1405_2>>>

Oh, so you are saying 

Mental disorder 

Mentally challenged 

Mentally handicapped  

..." someone who is mentally handicapped is not able to learnor develop skills at the same rate as most other people because they have a problem with their brain. It is now considered more polite to say that someone has a developmental disability or that they are learning disabled. "...

Why are you qualified to question his existence on a site where free expression ought to be encouraged, or anyone at all?

• That is the white supremacist's signature move- when you can't compete, de-legitimize.
  

Why are you qualified to question his existence on a site where free expression ought to be encouraged, or anyone at all?

That is a different topic unrelated to the thread.

I have always wondered what stupid people think about guns.

Then I read DoubleR's opinions on them.

I wonder no more, as now I know. 

Whether these bullet cause fatal injury is primarily dependent on the actions of the user.

 Oh yeah, this is where the "responsible gun ownership" mantra kicks in, you guys have been chanting that for decades. Just take a look at the numbers, you guys suck ass at being responsible gun owners.

While it is true that the LGBTQ community may have a shared set of experiences and perspectives that are influenced by their sexual orientation or gender identity, this does not qualify as an ideology in the sense of a set of beliefs or principles that govern the actions and goals of a group or society.

MIrriam-Webster's definiton gets you no closer to making LGBTQ an ideology  

You’re not using the correct definition of ideology, yet again.

When defining words, good debaters strive to use dictionaries with a reputation for objectivity.  Bad debaters start with the definiton they want and look until they find a definition that reinforces their bias.

The Cambridge Dictionary defines IDEOLOGY [noun] as "a set of beliefs or principles, especially one on which a political system, party, or organization is based."

The Heritage Foundation was "founded on February 16, 1973, by Paul Weyrich, Edwin Feulner, and Joseph Coors. Growing out of the new business activist movement inspired by the Powell Memorandum,  discontent with Richard Nixon's embrace of the "liberal consensus" and the nonpolemical, cautious nature of existing think tanks"

The Heritiage Foundation is not an objective source and was, in fact, founded as a deliberately subjective response out of frustration with non-polemical DC think tanks.

Heritage Foundation does not pretend to be a dictionary or to provide objective defintions of words.  No worthy debater would rely on your custom-built definiton of IDEOLOGY.

You just proved my point. 

Maybe you aren't Roosevelt but the fact people think you are should tell you how stupid you look in just about every interaction. 

THESIS: LGBTQ is an idealogy that goes against science.

P1: An idealogy is a belief system, political philosophy, or worldview.

P2:  LGBTQ is not a belief system, poltical philosophy, or worldview.

C1:  Therefore, LGBTQ is not an idealogy

LGBTQ includes people embracing every possible belief system, political philosophy, and worldview throughout history but does not, can not, represent any particular belief. 

Everytime one of you dimwitted white supremacists loses control, Wylted gives me a blowjob.   He's trying to improve web traffic on the "Raiders of the Lost Ark Priniciple":  everybody loves watching a NAZI's head explode.

With a gun all it takes is carelessness.

What about Lionel Tate? He killed a six year-old girl with whom he was playing. He was trying out wrestling moves which resulted in brutally battering the young girl, subsequently leaving the girl dead. Was that intentional or careless? Do we ban or prohibit the WWE, NXT, or AEW? 

I half think him and Roosevelt are the same people. Their mentality is exactly the same. They both pretend to be former government one a cop and one pretending to be former military and I believe they both claimed that despite having 2 digit IQs they worked hard to be millionaires. 

What specific experience are you talking about? Having unusual sexual desires? That's not even part of the definition of "trans" (although definitions and that movement have a complicated relationship).

Black people are coming, run and hide, run and hide!

I like watching dumbass racists blather on about thier bigotry and then call it an "intellectual discussion",  it just cracks me up.  

Oh, so it only matters if it can be proven. But not in a court. Just proven. Brilliant. You idiot.

Nobody really gets the context of this post. 

OMG, ARE YOU STUPID.

THIS IS THE QUOTE. RIGHT HERE. SEE IT ABOVE.

> 

@oromagi

No, it's you who missed the point. Dogs don't have ideology. 

• The animal analogy was mine. To claim that I missed the point of my own analogy is to demonstrate that you are not following the argument.
  

I put your tag on the wrong quote. I knew I was addressing TWS, hence the reply was addressed to him.

The only thing that matters is what can be proven. NO ONE can prove such an asinine absurd claim as that. 

You guys get butt hurt thinking these companies are making political statements that are opposed to your politics, but that is not what they are doing.  It's about economics, not politics.  They are simply marketing and maximizing revenues, only making economic statements. 

-->

@<<<TWS1405_2>>>

• thought you said the only thing that matters is what can be proven in court
  

Nope. Never said that.

Another lie

Your post located at #57 

  Homosexuality is no more common place than transgenderism is. LGBshave consistently been less than 4% of the population in this countrypre-covid. Trans, less than 0.5%.

• I guess you don't understand that 4% is 8 times larger a number than .5%?
  
• Homosexuality and transgenderism describe two different evaluations.
  
•  According to a recent systematic review, an estimated 9.2 out of every 100,000 people have received or requested gender affirmation surgery or transgender hormone therapy; 6.8 out of every 100,000 people have received a transgender-specific diagnoses; and 355 out of every 100,000 people self-identify as transgender.
  
• Surveys in Western cultures find, on average, that about 93% of men and 87% of women identify as completely heterosexual, 4% of men and 10% of women as mostly heterosexual, 0.5% of men and 1% of women as evenly bisexual, 0.5% of men and 0.5% of women as mostly homosexual, and 2% of men and 0.5% of women as completely homosexual.
  

There is no “gay”, no more than there is a “trans” gene. 

• Fact-based science says otherwise.  
  
•  "there is substantial evidence for a genetic basis of homosexuality, especially in males, based on twin studies; some association with regions of Chromosome 8, the Xq28 locus on the X chromosome, and other sites across many chromosomes.  Starting in the 2010s, potential epigenetic factors have become a topic of increased attention in genetic research on sexual orientation. A study presented at the ASHG 2015 Annual Meeting found that the methylation pattern in nine regions of the genome appeared very closely linked to sexual orientation, with a resulting algorithm using the methylation pattern to predict the sexual orientation of a control group with almost 70% accuracy."
  
• Studies conducted on twins suggest that there are likely genetic causes of gender incongruence, although the precise genes involved are not known or fully understood. One study published in the International Journal of Transgender Health found that in 20% of identical twin pairs, if one twin was trans, the other was as well, compared to only 2.6% of non-identical twins where this was the case; researchers attribute this to their shared genetics
  

It’s all genetic defects/abnormalities in the brain compounded bysocial contagions that push impressionable people over the edge into thatmadness. 

• Unscientific, fear based assertion.  Oh those scary emotions!
  

I mean really, we all have the capability for sadistic violence,but we choose not to act on it for all the right reasons. 

• Super creepy super false claim.  I don't know anybody within my freinds and family with a capacity for sadism or violence.  I'm pretty sure that's just a MAGA thing.
  

There has never been a human society/culture where only one genderevolved let alone survived without reproduction (which requires the othergender) to present day.

• Unreasoning idiocy.  There has never been a human society/culture where left-handed people alone survived but you'd be a fool to  claim that left-handedness is therefore a perversion of nature.
  

No one needs to be a biologist to research, learn and stateobjective observable facts. 

• So you are claiming that people's genetic makeup and sexual attractions are observable facts to you?  I think you're delusional.
  

Only bigot here is you, clown.  I never argue from emotion.Never. Ever. Ever. 

• You are obviously distraught.  I recommend you see a doctor on that "sadistic violence" problem of yours.
  

 There is no comparison given the fact that you’re using the wrongdefinition where this discussion is concerned. 

• You are  fallaciously stereotyping LGBTQ  as an ideology just as much using your defintion (sic) as mine.
  

we recognize the emotion amongst our species. Doesn’t mean we goup to other people and squirt our eyes at them 

• You mean crying?  I've definitely seen humans cry before.
  

Squint, the iPad autocorrected to squirt. Animals, like cats,squint as a form of showing affection or approval (like smiling).Again, another example of your lack of reading comprehensionskills. 

• You just admitted that you typo'd and then blamed my comprehension for your fuck up?  Boy, that really does make you a special kind of asshole, doesn't it?  
  

Normal human beings do not go around smelling other human beingsbutts when socializing with them.

• So when someone asks "who cut the cheese?" you are so literal a thinker than you think they actually mean fromage?
  

• Mainstream science strongly disagrees.
  

Cherry picked, emotively drive, and subjectively inferred opinionsyou mean. Of course these type would disagree. 

• I am not surprised that you despise Science.  
  
• WIKIPEDIA:  "While some people believe that homosexual activity is unnatural, scientific research shows that homosexuality is a normal and natural variation in human sexuality and is not in and of itself a source of negative psychological effects."
  

It is patently a false equivalency fallacy.

• Humans are evolving animals.  Animals are also evolving animals.  
  
• Seems quite equivalent
  

 Other species are irrelevant. They don’t possess sentience likehuman beings. They operate on innate pleasure principles, they don’t thinkabout it, they just do. 

• Sentience is not the only adaptive trait in humans, nor can humans evaluate the degree of sentience in other intelligent species.
  
• Humans operate on innate pleasure principles, just like other animals.
  

Comparing Capitalism to the ideology of the LGBTQ+&-😛 is a gross falseequivalency fallacy. 

• Obviously true, because LGBTQ is not "a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of a group" it is an actual descriptor for that group.  No evidence suggests that all members of that group share one characteristic manner of thinking" and to make any such claim is classic stereotyping: the logical fallacy of the bigot.
  
• ANOTHER EMOJI!  Oh shit, three emotions in one post!
  

The context in which I gave the term despise clearly meant as it is defined here: to regard as negligible, worthless, or distasteful. No emotion.

• Speaking of reading comprehension, here is how your source, Mirriam-Webster advised you to use the word DESPISE
  

Choose the Right Synonym for despise

DESPISE, CONTEMN, SCORN, DISDAIN mean to regard as unworthy of one's notice or consideration.
DESPISE may suggest an emotional response ranging from strong dislike to loathing.

despises cowards

CONTEMN implies a vehement condemnation of a person or thing as low, vile, feeble, or ignominious.

contemns the image of women promoted by advertisers

SCORN implies a ready or indignant contempt.

scorns the very thought of retirement

DISDAIN implies an arrogant or supercilious aversion to what is regarded as unworthy.

disdained popular music

• Did you read this part of your chosen definition or did you just flip through definitons until you found one that didn't  use the word FEELING?
  
• CAMBRIDGE: to feel a strong dislike for someone or something because you think that that person or thing is bad or has no value
  
• OXFORD: feel contempt or a deep repugnance for.
  

It is patently a false equivalency fallacy.

• Humans are evolving animals.  Animals are also evolving animals.  
  
• Seems quite equivalent
  

There’s that awesome display of lack of reading comprehension skills 🙄 

• Oh shit.  More emotions.  WIKIPEDIA:"  The primary function of emoji is to fill in emotional cues otherwise missing from typed conversation"
  
• The "emo" in emoji refers to emotion
  
• The facial expressions are meant to convey emotion