Total posts: 2,186
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Listened to Ben Shapiro this morning unpacking this political witch hunt…the statute of limitations for both any possible misdemeanor and/or felony charge has long since expired.
This was a mere nuisance payoff. A NDA, basically. Money used from Cohen’s own HELOC account. Not trumps.
Clinton paid off Lewinsky a helluva lot more, as did that one former presidential candidate who screwed his camera woman and had an illegit child together while the candidate’s wife was dying of cancer. She got more than a million.
$130k is nothing but a just a nuisance payout to make her go away.
Only troll here is you. Your projection is duly noted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Starting your reply with “lol” …
You lost before you even began.
And you clearly don’t comprehend the distinct inherent differences between potential and actual organisms.
A zygote is not equal to an actual [a] human being.
Linguistically you epically fail, again.
So uneducated you are. As many you anti-abortion folk are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
2. What about something from 2008?[1] Keith L. Moore. Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology [Philadelphia: Saunders], 2008, page 2.Zygote/embryo are identified as a human being in this.
Problem with citing sources in this debate is that nearly every damn person, professional to layman, have a lapse in their linguistical abilities. Reading comprehension suffers. Logic suffers. Common sense suffers. Rationality suffers. Reality suffers. All supplanted by unchecked appeals to emotion with a flare of militancy.
When the term [a] is used, it is an identifier. A prefix or inseparable particle. When you put [a] before human being, you are clearly talking about you, your opponent, me, and anyone else reading this debate/discussion. We are human beings, [a] pregnancy is not.
Potentiality =/= Actuality. Never has. Never will. That is reality. Emotional appeals of idiocy =/= reality.
3. I also ask, what makes an embryo to not be a human?
Again, you are using [a]. Grammatical error. It is human in origin, just not [a] human (being).
4. We can see a change in opinion about what is or is not a human being after the push for abortion. Where the change in opinion is for supporting abortion. This should indicate falsification to justify abortion yes?
Fetal viability is the ONLY option/factor in the debate of abortion. Period.
Created:
Posted in:
How is a private contractual NDA transaction between consenting adults a crime?
This is just yet another distraction in a long list of distractions to keep the lenses off the Biden Crime Syndicate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
If u have to ask those questions, you’re a lost cause. 🤦♂️🙄🤦♂️🙄🤦♂️
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Ignorant non sequiturNo, it’s not. Stop with the greatest hits.I knew a racist like you could never say a black man is ignorant.
Yes it is. Fucking retard.
Your ignorant bitch about Trump has nothing to do with a decades old case involving OJ, where fucking every person on the planet knows he’s guilty as fuck!
And every single time you come back with the sophomorically banal “greatest hits,” just demonstrates what an ignorant dumbass you are.
Loser.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
The only thing that matters is what can be proven. NO ONE can prove such an asinine absurd claim as that.So OJ was innocent right? Let me hear you say that. Let me hear you say OJ didn’t kill his wife.
Ignorant non sequitur
Created:
-->
@DavidAZ
well said
Created:
This reparations BS is pure insanity.
A fringe element of blacks who want something, everything for FREE without a care in the world how the tab gets paid.
Lunacy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
"I don't know why conservatives are so pro electoral college. The electoral college is Affirmative action to states that can't attract as many people. If you want more voting power in your state, then your state needs to find a way to attract more people."
No, it's a checks n balances on the corrupt voting system that gets stacked by states with higher populations than others that could literally change the tide of an election. When a state life CA is full of morons, we don't need them voting to fuck this country up any further. It's precisely what saved America from the wicked witch Hillary.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
No one gives a 💩 what those two “think” or “feels” or “believes.” Same goes for you, clown 🤡!!
The only thing that matters is what can be proven. NO ONE can prove such an asinine absurd claim as that.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
No, it isn’t proof. Other than it is to YOU who is the moron.
You ignored the actual proof I gave demonstrating my previous statement about the FBI as being 100% factually accurate.
Loser.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Even your corrupt FBI declared as much.That’s a lie.
Oh really?
And this:
Just because a couple idiots got convicted isn’t proof of an insurrection involving hundreds upon hundreds of people who casually strike through the capital. Even being peacefully escorted by police.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
@DavidAZYou blindly follow the narrative.I don’t blindly follow anything,
Yeah, you do. Your little pocket is stuck in Mr Pelosi’s pucker hole and everyone knows it. Butt licker that you so clearly are. Hershey eater. Was that with, or without the nuts?
Oh, yeah, the nuts. Dylan Mulvaney’s nuts!!! 😂
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Tell me the sources you use for reliable information
Well, we all know you’re sucking Adam Schiff’s pencil dick and licking Schumer’s ass….so?
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Trump has been on both sides of thousands of lawsuits
List each one.
All “thousands” of them.
Otherwise, STFU you TDS whore!!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
<<<TWS1405_2>>>Even your corrupt FBI declared as much.That’s a lie.
Quoting out of context fallacy.
And it’s the truth. You fucking yellow-tailed denialist.
And that’s just ONE of countless sources backing up THE truth, and NOT your denialist lies.
Idiot.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
J6 wasn’t an insurrection ffs 🤦♂️ Even your corrupt FBI declared as much. And T didn’t launch anything.
Your psychological projection regarding being moronic is duly noted.
Created:
SF was a place in the country that NEVER had slavery.
Even the SF NAACP chapter is against such a ridiculous proposal. It’s all a farce.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
And you sound like a blathering idiot pedophile.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAAA!!!!!
You are NO biblical scholar here.
Your suggestions are pure BULLSHIT!!!!
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The left: We don't believe a zygote or embryo is a human being.Also the left: We support a woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion (but we want to reduce the abortion rate of zygotes)Me: If you believe that zygotes aren't people, why would you care what the abortion rate of zygotes is? If I kill a pig for meat, nobody (except vegeterians and vegans) cares about how many animals get killed for food, because it's viewed by the majority that farm animals aren't human. If you REALLY believe a zygote or even an embryo isn't a human being, why would you want to reduce the rate at which they get killed? They aren't human after all, so it shouldn't matter how often they get killed. Collect stats on it if you want for data's sake, but don't advocate for reducing the death rate of something you think is just a clump of cells.The right is consistent on this front. They believe a zygote is a human being so they want less of them killed. You can agree or disagree with that, but it's worth respect. The left isn't being consistent. They want to reduce the death rate of zygotes but they don't believe zygotes are human beings, so why aim to reduce the death rate of zygotes?
What a bunch of uneducated subjective emotively driven NONSENSE!!!
You know not what either side desires let alone is consistent or inconsistent with. And you certainly made no room for either side to be on the opposite side of the other. I am a staunch constitutionalist and an independent with conservative leanings. I am both prochoice and prolife. Pro Choice up to fetal viability, prolife once fetal viability has been attained.
A woman's personal liberty comes before a non-legally protected pregnancy. A woman is no one's personal incubator.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Created:
Posted in:
Kilmeade speaks with Matt Taibbi regarding the hearings and the facts uncovered by the release of the Twitter files and whistleblowers (even from federal agencies) who have spoken with him.
If you haven't been watching/listening to these hearings, you should.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Neither SO nor myself backed down let alone conceded.Is a false statement. When you failed to provide a counter argument, you conceded.
Ah but we both did…you patently ignored them, denied them, and put up the “don’t ✋ “ sophomorically banal retort.
Here end of the lesson.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
'Daftly' is not a state of being but an adjective. You meant 'daft'.Is TWS for troll white supremacist?
It was meant as an adjective to describe his foolishness, stupidness (so-called state of being), as he was so clearly clueless.
Thanks for demonstrating, once again, you don’t know the difference between an adjective and a noun.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I see you read my debates.
Barely a single one. Maybe a line or two to determine how/why you lost.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Have you not been watching or listening to the committee hearings where the two journalists have been questioned? You know, about the whistleblowers not only from within Twitter but also some federal agencies as well? 🤦♂️ FFS you’re sure daftly & clueless.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Fifth, your whole argument about big tech and censoring thought is just absurd and the Twitter files is a complete joke. This topic needs a whole other thread which I'm sure someone already started.
DENIAL DENIAL DENIAL DENIAL DENIAL!!!!!!!
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
God kills in order to increase life
BWAAAHAAHAA!!!!
BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
After being presented with logical arguments, you and ScepticalOne both backed down and conceded, both being unable to refute my arguments.
No statement regarding you and the use of the term logic (in any positive capacity) simply do not belong together.
Neither SO nor myself backed down let alone conceded. We just know when to stop beating the proverbial DEAD HORSE!!!
Your so-called arguments were not arguments, they were mindless rants with a lot of asinine Bible-Thumping.
Created:
-->@SkepticalOne@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Are false statements. The atheists dont have morality or logic. Thats why you two cannot possibly engage in discussion with me. You can only repeat refuted points and pretend like you are valid. You are not valid. It was already explained to you. You do not get to kill children. Is it really so difficult to understand that you are not allowed to kill children?It was already explained that the Bible has perfect moral system based on principles of protection and increase of life.You two prefer death over life. Thats exactly what the God will give you.
BWAAAHAAAHAAAAAA!!!!
Talk about projecting there, pion.
The Bible is bunk full of endless and relentless violence where even GOD itself MURDERED men, women, children and beasts when HE didn't get his way. Perfect moral system MY ASS!!!!
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Blah blah blah drool 🤤 slobber 🤤 blah blah blah. That’s all anyone sees with that retort.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Hey there chicken little, you’re still here? 😂
Created:
-->
@SkepticalOne
I can't tell if you're being serious or trolling.
Really? It’s so obvious he/she/it/? is trolling the f**k out of DART, yet again.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
The Bible is bunk and for ignorant weak minded people.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Not going to read your uneducated sophomoric cherry picking retorts, quoting out of context, straw-man arguments, and otherwise nonsensical drivel.
You clearly are not taking this debate/discussion seriously. As such, given your retort above, all you’re doing is behaving like a troll. As such, you’re a waste of my time. Anyone’s time for that matter.
Should anyone else care to reply to the factually accurate position(s) I made above, feel free to do so with zest and zeal. Just not the ignorant gibberish like observed above by BK.
Created:
-->
@hey-yo
Ignoratio elenchi 🤦♂️🙄🤦♂️
Created:
-->
@hey-yo
did. Just giving you chance to speak for yourself.
No, you did NOT!! The stupidity in your consistent retorts demonstrate that.
By meaning was plain and crystal clear. It b ended no further explaining. The fact that you kept asking for an explanation is proof in and of itself if your ignorance. Not to mention lack of reading comprehension skills.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, clown, I got my degrees from actual physical higher learning establishments. Not online.. so FO!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Context fallacy.
I have no idea what you're even talking about here, but suffice to say, my point was about his politics and his goal for making this country GREAT again.
Try again, pencil dick.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Few white people with college degrees are white supremacist. It’s the red necks, yokels and working poor that tend to be white supremacist because they have status anxiety.
And guess what (as you already know), I am college educated and hold two degrees. All in the legal arena. I know the truth. I've experienced the truth. I've lived the truth.
Former Officer Brandon Tatum has a much deeper understanding and experience with that truth than I ever will. Everything he espouses here, I've written of in college papers and put into application (by informing others in the chain of command) in my professional capacity for the betterment of the communities we served.
Created:
Posted in:
Why can't you just look at the evidence for yourself?
The manner in which he was LOVED by so many before he announced his presidential candidacy.
The manner in which the left reacted when he announced his presidential candidacy.
The manner in which the left reacted when he became POTUS.
The manner in which the federal government conspired with the MSM to undermine his presidency.
The manner in which the Democrats conspired against him and undermined him for four continuous years.
The manner in which the left orchestrated all the failures of the 2020 election, but claimed it was a conspiracy.
I could go on and on...
Yeah, Donald J. Trump is an unfiltered mouthpiece; but that is precisely what America needs. It's exactly why he got elected in the first place. People were tired of the DC Swamp. They still are.
Nothing DJT has ever done has been "unhinged," unlike Biden Inc crime family.
If you cannot see the truth of the way this world is headed, you're a lost cause. We all are if no one does anything to make the world a better place without the Democrats running it into the proverbial TOILET!!
Created:
If one cannot follow the EXACT tenants of their faith, group, organization, etc. to the proverbial "T," then yeah, they need to leave otherwise they are a living hypocrite to that which they profess to follow and adhere to.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WeaverofFate
The Bible's date of when the Earth/Universe is static. It was based on the time in which it was written. Science has disproven that. As it has disproven a great many things about the fables of the Bible.
When those who told then wrote the stories that we now find in the bible are looked back upon, we can explain and understand more about it than those who actually experienced hat which was described.
Ever read Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock? If not, you should.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Abortion is always wrong and should always be illegal and discouraged (sic)1) Today's people think they are very smart and specialSomehow, people these days have convinced themselves that they are very smart, even smarter than God. Their stupidity shows itself. When they talk about abortion, it is like they lose their brains entirely. They say: "abortion is good". Is a false statement. They are deceived by the satan. (sic)
First and foremost, your declarative statement here is hilariously ironic. As is the rest of your post laced with grammatical errors. And yes, I know, grammar doesn't define, credit or discredit an argument; but it sure does dismay people from taking you seriously if you cannot even write a grammatically correct sentence.
Second, this rant and rave has absolutely nothing to do with the topic/debate/discussion on abortion. It's nothing more than an ad hominem argument in a vain attempt to discredit others before they even get a chance to say their peace.
Third, you're one to talk about "stupidity," given your track record here at DART and excuses to deflect from your pedophilia ways.
Last but not least, abortion is good, and it is a factually accurate statement. Oh, and it is not "the satan," it's just "Satan." No "the."
UNICEF has been tracking/monitoring issues/matters that concern girls and women for some time, to include "Early childbearing can have severe consequences for adolescent girls." For them, abortion is good and very necessary. Adoption is not an option. Pregnancy wreaks havoc on a female's body, regardless of her age, but more so upon the youthful. Indigent girls or women have no business being pregnant let alone bringing another human being into a world already littered with degenerates and indigent orphans and unwanted children worldwide (in excess of 90,000,000)!!!!! Even actual born human beings have responsibility for further un-conceived human beings by maintaining the earth and keeping it viable for future generations, NOT by OVERPOPULATING the world and depleting its resources before future generations can be born.
2) There is no justification for abortionAbortion is murder. You have no right to kill your child. There is no situation in which it is justified for you to kill your child.
No, abortion is NOT murder. Period.
Murder is solely a felonious crime involving two (already born) human beings.
noun.
1. the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
transitive verb
1. to kill (a human being) unlawfully and with premeditated malice
Legal-dictionary definition of MURDER:
(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
As established by 1 USC 8, a "person", a "human being", a "child" and an "individual" as including born-alive infant, are defined as follows:
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or "extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.
(Added Pub. L. 107–207, § 2(a), Aug. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 926.)
Societal rules, policies, customs, norms, laws, etc. are all premised on a shared acceptable understanding of reality backed by pure logic and knowledge of that reality. As such, the social psychology of human society in the United States of America and the legal parameters used by local, state and federal governing bodies establishing clearly defined terms for the purposes of statutory law make it unequivocally clear that a pregnancy HAS NO RIGHTS! It is NOT [a] person. It is NOT [a] "child."
Even before 1 USC 8 was written, the 14th Amendment made it perfectly clear that before ANYONE was bestowed all the rights, privileges and equal protection of the law they must FIRST be either BORN or NATURALIZED.
3) They start making up nonsense excuses.The list of their nonsense excuses being:3-1) "What if a woman is raped?"No, you do not get to kill your child if you are raped. Being raped does not give you any special rights in this society. You do not get to kill anyone if you are raped. In fact, you should consider it enough that you arent (sic) forced to marry your rapist, and then you should move on with your life and raise your child which you are lucky to have in the first place.
But for the rape the girl/woman would never have become pregnant. All the girl/woman desires to do by her choice, a personal liberty that she has and the pregnancy DOES NOT, is to restore herself to the place/status she was BEFORE the violating rape. So yeah, she gets to terminate her pregnancy. It is NOT a fucking child.
Over 89-94% of ALL ABORTIONS take place BEFORE 14 weeks gestation, the majority of those are BEFORE 6 weeks gestation. Fetal viability isn't attained until 22-24 weeks gestation. NO "baby"/"child" involved in the overwhelming majority of abortions. Period. Fact. Period.
And to say a girl/woman who has been violently violated is "lucky to have in the first place" a pregnancy, is so patently misogynistic it's damn pathetic. But I am not surprised coming from a pedophile like yourself. First impressions are lasting impressions, and you first came here lambasting about having sex with children and the right of children to have sex with adults. So yeah, you're a fucking pedophile and it surprises me not that you're taking this IGNORANT position on abortion.
3-2) "Woman's body belongs to woman" (sic)That sentence makes no sense and is circular.The woman, who only exists thanks to God, belongs to God. The God, the creator of life, is also the owner of life. So (sic) when a God asks you: "Why did you kill your child?", what will you say? You thought it was a good thing to do? You thought that, after being gifted with life, you can use your life to take away life from others? You support death and God will reward you with death.
Of course, that sentence makes no sense and is circular because your dumbass fucking wrote it.
No one ever wrote such a grammatically incorrect statement, other than you.
An individual's body is their temple. One's temple is their property. Whatever happens externally or internally to it, by choice, is of their own choosing. That's why it has ALWAYS been called "personal liberty."
"Liberty is the right of a person to do as they please, assuming their actions do not violate any laws or infringe on the rights of others. What is personal liberty? Personal liberty's definition is the right of individuals to be free of arbitrary restraint or bondage. In short, personal liberty allows people to live as they choose without interference from others unless it is for a good, legally-established reason."
The legal definition of liberty is the right a person has to behave as they like, subject only to interference for appropriate government reasons (such as the protection of other citizens' liberties)."
"Although the traditional concept of liberty was freedom from physical restraint, the Court has expanded the concept to include various other protected interests, some statutorily created and some not.1 Thus, in Ingraham v. Wright, 2 the Court unanimously agreed that school children had a liberty interest in freedom from wrongfully or excessively administered corporal punishment, whether or not such interest was protected by statute. “The liberty preserved from deprivation without due process included the right ‘generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.’ . . . Among the historic liberties so protected was a right to be free from, and to obtain judicial relief for, unjustified intrusions on personal security.” 3
A girl/woman, as with any boy/man, maintains sole custody/control over their own person/body. Period. No girl/woman is ANY man's personal incubator.
3-3) "What if a woman's life is in danger" (sic)No, you do not get to kill your child if your life is in danger. What kind of a mother sacrifices her child so that she may live? The real mothers sacrifice themselves for their children. This should really be taught more, because people keep forgetting it.
Yes, she does, Potentiality =/= Actuality. If the woman dies of ectopic pregnancy, both die regardless. What a waste of the pregnant female's life who could logically and plausibly conceive again with a normal and healthy pregnancy, bringing another wonderful (actual) human being into the world. But according to your logic, fuck them both.
4) The modern society is a worshipper of satan (sic)After you have sacrificed billions of children to Satan, you should not be surprised when God destroys your society and replaces it with those who are worthy, noble and good. Your society, that supports corruption, gets more and more corrupt every day. With that, every day it gets closer to its own collapse. God will replace your society with society fit for service to the God, the society that doesnt (sic) kill its children and society that doesnt (sic) spill its own seed. Your time of judgment comes closer and closer. Be not surprised by the God's wrath which you caused. Did you not say before: "Where is God's punishment?"?
Bible thumping holds no weight in any debate/argument. Begin a proposition with a false premise, you conclude on an equally false conclusion.
In short, the only one in this thread that you started who demonstrated their stupidity, as you claimed it, is all on you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
The ability to read a language has absolutely nothing to do with being “a moral human being,” FFS. 🤦♂️ But your piss poor attitude and demeanor sure does. Hypocrite.
Created: