Total posts: 2,186
Posted in:
This is the most intelligent position taken to show no gun law would have ever stopped this, or any other mass shooting, period!!!
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Reparations won’t work, and it is unjust. It’s divisive.
Created:
Posted in:
Biden makes false claims about the second in the wake of this mass shooting by a trans mental basket case.
Trans activists have been making supportive statements for the shooter, that trans, the oppressed, are fighting back.
Matt Walsh has an excellent breakdown of the threat of the ideology of transgenderism.
Created:
Posted in:
This is the comment of a simpleton
Says the simpleton.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
@Melcharazagain. everyone is ignorant.Um, that’s dumb. What is that, some kind of Zen philosophy?
No, you’re dumb.
(Know = educated)
I know a lot about the law, more than you; I know a lot about mental illness as I minored in psychology and study/refer to the DSM when helping veterans, more than you; I know a lot about a lot of things; but I know little to nothing about a lot of things too. Everyone is ignorant to varying degrees wholly dependent on their education, and what subject matters they have studied in depth, either personally or academically.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
Yawn. 🙄
Created:
Posted in:
I am surprised IWRA hasn’t complained that certain news outlets, local law enforcement, et al have been caught “misgendering” or deadnaming the dead psychopath confused woman (aka transgender male)
Paul Watson covers the really bizarre and sick 💩 here
Pretty disturbing how some libtards were more worried about the misuse of pronouns when describing the shooter than the dead adults and children. 🤦🏼♂️
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Liberals middle name is "contradiction" and a nickname is "hypocrite"!!!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
See. There’s that deflection and shifting burden of proof with a non sequitur red herring fallacy. Loser incel troll that you so clearly are. Prove me wrong.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Stolen valor larpingWhat proof do you have of this?
What proof do you have that you’re not one. Eh!?!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
No. That’s not it. You’re here to be the obvious troll that you are.
You contribute nothing.
All you do is call everyone a moron and ignorant because f every subject under the Sun you bring up claiming to be the pseudo know-it-all expert thereof.
You’re clearly not interested in a legit discussion.
You lie when caught. Deflect your burden of proof onto others.
You commit one fallacy after another relentlessly.
You’re a waste of everyone’s time here.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Why are you here at DART?
Seriously. Inquiring minds want to know.
Asking for a friend.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
this lunacy.This lunacy? I’m sure you would have said the same thing about blacks and whites marrying each other and gays being acknowledged as real.
What does any of those non sequitur arguments have to do with the price of tea in China!?! 🤦♂️
Because you’re an idiot.
I (we) know you are.
He killed himself because he needed treatment, not affirmation.He had depression because of the way he was treated as a child by other children and ignorant adults.
Wrong. They were depressed because they were not normal like everyone else and found it difficult to socialize with peers. This depression coexists with anxiety. Two common mental disorders found to overlap with gender dysphoria.
Political abuse of science is emerging again on the issue of gender dysphoria in adolescents.Don’t forget refusing to acknowledge their new name or pronouns too. You don’t want people to think you’re liberal or worse, you have a brain.
Screw their new fake name and idiotic pronouns. Treatment doesn’t pander and virtue signal, affirmation does, and it gets these disturbed people killed.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Only ignorance on display here is from people like you and those who pander and virtue signal to this lunacy.
He killed himself because he needed treatment, not affirmation.
Affirmation is what kills. And it is about to kill Jazz Jennings.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Political abuse of science is emerging again on the issue of gender dysphoria in adolescents.
We find that easing access to cross-sex treatments without parental consent significantly increases suicide rates.
State and federal governments should reverse the push to make puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones more widely and readily available to minors.
Created:
Oh look, yet another post by IWRA about Trump. 🤦♂️🙄🤦♂️
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
It was intentional, DbAs!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
>
@Greyparrot@<<<TWS1405_2>>>OGP....Orange raccoon dogs have a toxic bite.Thats why I dont let ADreamofLiberty { promoter of violence } or TWS { sic-n-head } get near me. Both are toxic to mental and physical health of others here at DArt.
And we will all be laughing Our asses off when this frivolous lawsuit political witch hunt goes south, all the way to China!!!
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
@IwantRooseveltagain
name one case the Clintons had a court overturn their attorney/client privilege.You mean name a rigged court that didn't respect established legal precedent for the Clintons?
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
0. Who said anything about race? You specified that african americans have higher rate for single parents.
Reading comprehension problems? I did. You did. We both did. 🤦🏼♂️
1. Why are you adding new links to the same study that you posted on your website? I literally quoted your citing. I provided a link that counters their peer review, criticising the review looks at crimes that decreased overall but the actual age range that would have been affected by abortion increased.
I am not adding new links “to the same study that (I) posted”! I am responding to a post YOU MADE with further evidence discrediting your illegitimate interpretation of that which you read and commented on with cherry-picked quotes.
2. We should also consider how the population over all has still grown. 30 % of the population today is not the same as 30% of the population in 1990. 30% of population is a lower quantity in 1970's than 1980, 1990, 2000. So even if you see 5, 10, or 15% decrease, the increase in population can mean there is still the same quantity of individuals commiting the crime.
Argument of irrelevance and appeal to ignorance. Not to mention a non-sequitur.
3. Somehow you forgot about having multiple factors, which you just preached about. Thanks.
I forgot nothing. You’re ASSuming. Again.
4. No abortion has not reduced crime.No evidence for it.And lets consider this. There are millions of abortions since roe vs wade. Possible 50 million. Out of that entire population, (Ill be generous) about 30% is associated with potentially commiting a crime if they were born.That leaves 70% that would not have done shit.
Yes, abortion does reduce crime and it has been concretely established with evidence you are ignoring. You’re just being a denialist.
Providing your evidence to substantiate the 30% reference. Until then, you’re just full of desperate 💩!
But this is to deliver a point. We have to take out the portion caused by rape, medical reasons, etc. where cercimstances would not have changed. Even with that in consideration there is a larger portion of a given population advocated for aborting for the sake of a drastic smaller portion that might become criminals.
Prove it.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
BWAAAHAAHAAA!!!!
No, the Clinton’s still hold this privilege/status. They are but poster child’s for this moral/legal offense!
Soon, Sleep hair sniffing creepy Joe Biden and his son Hunter will be the sequel poster children.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
“It has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with culture.” ~ https://youtu.be/qSmiZCQP58o
“"It's a very simple theory. Unwanted children are a tremendous risk for growing up and having criminal lives," said Levitt. "With the legalization of abortion, many fewer unwanted children were born, therefore, the children who were most at risk for being criminals -- they were never born." ~ https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=1843646&page=1
“Legalized abortion appears to account for as much as 50 percent of the recent drop in crime.“ ~ https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_201975.pdf
“…children who lack these relationships, like those without fathers, are at a higher risk for criminality.” ~ https://www.lansingattorney.com/blog/2015/06/are-fatherless-children-at-a-higher-risk-to-commit-crimes/
Abortion HAS reduced crime. And it isn’t just that fact that goes into the entirety of the problem of criminality.
But the fact remains that for every abortion where the child would have been either abandoned or without a father in the home, that is one less highly potential juvenile delinquent turned career adult criminal that society has to deal with.
Created:
For a misdemeanor, you cannot stop the statute of limitations.
Even for a minor felony, it’s a gross stretch.
This case is purely political and EVERYONE knows it, both Ds and Rs and liberals too. All of been hitting the airways (MSM, social media) and expressing concern over this NY DA’s negligence of his own state’s violent person crimes just to fulfill some personal/political vendetta against Trump.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
The only real crime that matters is the crime of being a threat to Democrats.
👏👏👏 💯
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
I think TWS stands for some kind of mental health disease. Sad :--( Maybe a grand jury composed of health officials can make and assessment of persons mental health."..
Typical retort from one who cannot make a legit argument, substantiate said argument, and work to provide better, more well-grounded arguments against another with whom they disagree with. Classic ad hominem, one after another and another and another…no substance to the topic at hand, just consistent personal attacks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
My reply was a direct reply. It contradicts the findings you cited because neither of you took those real world factors into consideration. 🤦♂️
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
You apparrently dont understand what a grand jury's purpose is.
No, I only serves 3+ years as the grand jury coordinator for a large country in Oregon. So no, all that experience working in a DAs office and stepping in as the GJ coordinator when she went on vacation or was sick made me understand nothing about GJ.
Get the fuck out of here you ignoramus!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
That’s probably the most intelligent comment/reply you’ve made that I’ve seen since you signed up at DART.
BUT… those stats/reports always forget two things: single motherhood and culture. The two driving forces that create crime perpetuated by fatherless children. The black community is the shining example of that fact. If black girls/women didn’t get any abortions, the less than 0.5% of black males in this country that commit over 50% of the entire nations violent person crimes (murder, non-negligent manslaughter, etc) would be 10x(+) that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
This case is nothing. It’s political fodder. Period.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Lol. I called it.
What, you being a flaming ignoramus with a lack of requisite reading comprehension skills? Yup, you sure did call it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Here is your site's about page. You forgot to complete it.
More asinine ASSumptions about someone you don’t know.
I didn’t forget anything. I jsut haven’t done it yet. I’m obviously in no rush to, since I quite clearly focus more on the posts than worrying about sensitive people like you who would stalk/troll the “about…” info in order to commence with your childish ad hominem arguments.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
False equivalency fallacy.
Appeal to ignorance.
Appeal to emotion.
Non sequitur
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
The site itself is still a person giving an unsupported opinion where the author assumes the conclusion.
🤦♂️ there is a very distinct difference between an objective and subjective opinion. I assume nothing. Everything I wrote of is objective backed by factually accurate data.
You're still exhibiting denialism and making excuses.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Your links provide an opinion that is the same as yours from earlier. Neither link provides actual facts let alone works cited for substantial evidence for why anyone would believe it. I feel dooped and fooled just for providing you benefit of doubt. I bet I got a virus now.
Talk about blind deaf and dumb.
Easy to claim No facts given. Harder to prove. Both are laced with nothing but factually accurate data. Also with cited sources too.
Classic intellectual cowardice denialism.
You couldn’t successfully argue your way out of a wet paper bag, much less correctly identifying it as even being a wet paper bag.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
The words NAIVE, IGNORANT, SURROUNDING do not appear in either article.
No shit sherlock. They’re alternative adjectives aptly used to describe that which is being described in the article that doesn’t use those terms that mean the same thing that they’re describing without using those terms.
This article mostly says the opposite of TWS's claim.
No, it doesn’t.
Clearly you suffer greatly from a lack of requisite reading comprehension skills.
Awesome projection though.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Nope. Not once.
Drug Suppression Team. Drugs. Moron. Your favorite term. Drugs. Like cocaine. Marijuana. Heroin. So on and so forth. Followed up on hot piss tests. Drug buys. 🙄
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
An early stage fetus does not in any meaningful way qualify as a “human life”. Your entire argument here is based off of semantics and technicalities.So in this regard, abstinence is no different. Your point here is that the potential of the fetus to develop grants it rights, but that potential was there before that point. It’s just a question of where you decided to draw the line. Conception is a nice and neat place to do so for the sake of argument, but there is nothing meaningful at this point to point to. It’s just a useful place to make your argument sound legitimate. You only see conception as the irrefutable beginning of life because you are already pro life.
Well said.
Created:
Posted in:
Liberals are more naive and ignorant of their surroundings and the "real world" than conservatives.
Conservatives are more aware of their surroundings and prepare for the worst while expecting the best.
Their philosophy, better to have and not need than need and not have. Liberals never have. They're basically sheep being led to the slaughter because they don't fear what they cannot see or perceive in the real world.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Never stood a gate. I spent more than 3 years on the Drug Suppression Team under C.I.D. You know, the Army's version of NCIS.
You're just jealous.
Typical incel man child.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Typical loser attacks, deflecting from your losing childishly argued position.
I'd run circles around your sorry ass. Airborne all the way!!! HOORAH!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Lol.Look in the mirror.I already provided a dictionary definition earlier to another poster
So you didn't even bother looking at either link I provided to my arguments regarding abortion. Go figure. Typical intellectual coward move.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Still a stupid non sequitur and false equivalency fallacy. Ignorant embarrassment to the Marine Corp.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Asinine childish strawman fallacy laced through and through with ad hominem Attacks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
I've already provided more than definitions but actual fact-based accurate data regarding this debate.
And...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
No. I became prolife because the science behind "a new human life begins at conception" turned me in that direction.
Classic ignorant conflation of cellular life vs personhood. Not the same thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Starting your post complaining about laughter means you have no premise(s) for yor (sic) conclusion and (sic) no basis to actually argue a given point.
No, it means I have no tolerance for immature individuals who come off as pompous as you continue to do; it detracts from anything you think you may have to say. Which is not much of anything at all given all the appeals to emotion and ad hominem arguments you toss out there, clearly hoping something eventually sticks.
Please (sic) instead of just providing circular arguent, (sic) provide a definition for "human being."Id (sic) take (sic) any dictionary at the moment.
Look in the mirror.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
It was Paula Jones Clinton paid $850k to. Not the BJ intern. My bad.
Created: