TheUnderdog

Hamas, communists, fascists, nazis, crusaders, jihadists... oh we're full circle since Hamas are jihadists

You mean Kyle Kulinski.

Do they now? "Follow the science"

They care about facts.

So you don't have to (TM)

Anytime they are wrong, they change their stance.

Consider emulating "them", then you might be worthy of being emulated yourself.

Listening to the oral arguments today and there were two things I really found jarring, wondering what your perspective is on these.

Then you are mentally disabled because I showed you a lie you spread in exacting detail and you did not care nor retract.

My fact check is that you are:

The primary point is that his brain is broken and if that wasn't a problem they wouldn't be hiding it and the drugs they use to tease moments of clarity out of it.

Your brain may as well be broken for (apparently) not seeing the difference between prescription high-level stimulants and food.

somebody asks Biden point blank if he's taking drugs to mental acuity and to provide a blood test before going on stage.

You spread lies, it's not good to follow your example.

Most would take it as a joke, and it's known that coffee does not temporarily alleviate symptoms of Dementia or Alzheimers.

But you are nuts, and this is another reason why liberty and modular independent government is so important. You're insanity should almost exclusively damage your own life, not mine.

Because your insanity is a threat to my life, you are a threat to my life, and I need to prepare to neutralize that threat as it manifests through government.

It is a great irony that you would mention Jan 6 as supporting factor for your insanity when that is a counter-attack made necessary by insanity like yours.

You are lost to civilized discourse already, you can't dangle yourself as bait for compromise.

People raised in dictatorship will likely have Socialist ideas, and many other you would consider anti-freedom ideas.

Its not about them being wrong, but its about them being able to deny your society of migrants, something your society needs to survive.

People dont move to USA just for values.

 If Biden admitted he was only coherent while on powerful stimulants, he would never have been unduly elected.

I read that and literally choked while eating lol

People raised in dictatorships are more likely to support bad ideas, even if they move to USA.

also countries can restrict their citizens from leaving and deny USA of migrants.

Also, many enemies of USA might enter USA if 50 million migrants enter every 40 years.

No, my goal is not to change your mind. It's to debunk bad logic by identifying fallacies and pointing out absurdities.

Taxes

 endless accumulation of debt

 an out out control southern boarder

But Pew Research is Leftist propaganda

rofl aderol and food, what's the difference?

What a joke the user base of this site is.

A new study on Fox News has shown that on average, Trump supporters who classified themselves as “mega fans” and joined in one or more caravans had an average IQ of 74.

Choosing the lesser of two evils is not an endorsement of that evil.

First of all, we’re not responsible for illegal immigrants, we are responsible for US citizens. 

 Another factor you are ignoring is that when you deport someone that person has the freedom to decide where they go next. They can hide, they can run, they can face the threat against them. They are free.

When you imprison someone they are not free. You are locking them in a cell where they do not have a choice what happens to them.

So isn’t it better to argue that conservative beliefs are not bigoted, as opposed to accepting as a premise that they are bigoted in order to accuse the left of trying to silence conservatism?

Yes, for now. Population doesnt decline immediatelly with lower birth rates, since life expectancy is increasing which covers for lower birth rates, and you also have migrants.

However, life expectancy doesnt solve low birth rates, but just means that you have more old people who are mostly burden on society.

In Japan, child births are almost non-existent. But people have freedom not to have children, and its unrealistic to think that all people wont use the freedom they are given.

Well, you can import population from countries that dont have freedom, but then you are faced with the problem of your population being replaced by people who maybe dont share your values, as they were literally raised in dictatorships.

Plus, you need to import a lot, about 50 million to make up for current 170 million women's lack of reproduction, and you need to do so every 40 years.

1.78 is far below replacement levels, and any country which embraced so much freedom has never seen an increase in birth rates.

Population of USA is about 340 million with 170 million women.

Having more old people is also bad for society because old people cant reproduce and just drain resources.

If I locked you in my basement without feeding you and you starved to death, I would rightfully be charged for murder.

Deportation =/= Murder.

Why do conservatives love to conflate bigotry and conservatism to then turn around and play the victim?

1.78 is below replacement levels.

China was a shithole too worse than Afghanistan, but thanks to lots of population it became a superpower.

People have a right to do with their platforms what they will. You are free to disagree with them, but you don't get to infringe on their free speech by telling them what they must allow on their own platforms.

That's exactly how it works now, so what's your issue?

But we're not talking about any individual, we're talking about a blanket policy position.

You're assuming people vote based on policy, which they absolutely do not.

Most people have no idea what the policies of their stated candidate are (ask Trump voters what he plans to do)

 And swing states will oppose it even more fervently because they are the benefactors of our current system. 

people are always going to act within their own personal best interests.

Both of your examples are pre January 6th and more importantly, pre overturning of Roe v Wade. 

Joe Biden was very popular until he started running

They wont tho, as they have been consistently falling for past decades and even when government pays people to have kids

There are countries where women are forced into marriages and those countries usually have high birth rates, like Afghanistan.

Freedom of individual is simply less important than society's survival, since if society collapses, then you lose individual freedom regardless.

Yeah, I think internet and porn also has effect.

If not punishing rape increases birth rates, then its different. 

Thats why I think if rapist causes pregnancy, then he shouldnt be punished as much because pregnancy is beneficial for society.

What people are doing is refusing to give a platform to those spreading such lies. 

And again, any attempt to change that is the opposite of free speech because people have a right to use their free speech to say "you're not spreading this garbage on my platform".

If there was a good answer to that question half the country wouldn't believe the election was stolen.

If you are truly open to hearing every perspective and every angle, and you verse yourself in understanding logical fallacies and other manipulation tactics, you make yourself as difficult to be manipulated as one can be.

The reason there are so few options is because there are only a few individuals out there that have a real chance of winning the voters over. 

 If only the blue states did it then that would increase the odds of a third party winning one or two of the blue states thereby handing the presidency over to the republican candidate. 

Clinton was winning every poll heading into November 2016, we all know how that turned out.

People think he's asleep because that's what Fox news tells them to believe

as the birth rates are getting lower under current system.

Right, so what is your issue?

we live in a society inundated with people who do not accept being rational as a priority. 

The only solution is for people to wake up and realize they're being manipulated.

People who choose not to have kids are literally destroying society.

Society cannot survive if people dont have kids.

 then maybe marriage is a better option so they can raise the kid together.

Again, the two parties loath each other, they're not working together on anything.  Even if they were, the point of working with someone else on anything is so that both sides can benefit. Politics in terms of elections is a zero sum game. There is no such thing as working with your opposition for a mutually favorable outcome.

And even if we set that aside, the way to nullify third party candidates is to elect popular candidates. It is only when voters don't like either choice that third parties become a factor, so this "plot" would be self sabotage.

"Elites" don't choose the nominees, the voters do. 

States decide how to run their elections, not the federal government. 

Wow, you're taking the most serious responsibility on earth and acting like it's on par with operating the fryer at McDonald's.

The elites never chose Trump, in fact they all hate him. 

You said Biden underperforms which you cannot say because Biden hasn't ran since 2020, so you're just making stuff up.

Free speech means the government cannot stop you from speaking your mind. It does not protect you against criticism from the rest of society, if it did that would be the opposite of free speech because you would thn be taking away the right of others to speak their minds in opposition.

 A lie repeated often enough will be believed regardless of it's merit, it is not a solution to allow people to spew bullshit and then come from behind them to try and clean it up.

 so those who dont procreate should be considered similar to murderers.

If you're dumb enough to think democrats are ok with executing babies after birth, there is no debunking it. 

What on earth are you talking about? Who's censoring you?

You can't seriously believe this. Not only does this make absolutely no sense, bit it's just factually wrong and I already explained why.

Correct, which is why I support ranked choice voting 100%. But that's not our system so until it is we have to deal with the system we have.

 Please respond to the points I made.

None of them had a serious shot of winning the White House. 

people want someone who has shown that they can get the job done.

Just because I agree with you on some policy positions doesn't mean you're qualified to hold the nuclear codes.

Right... Which means the "elites" didn't pick the nominee, the base did.

the point is that if someone wants to take political office and make decisions on behalf of the people that they be accountable. 

 If Clinton won in 2016 women would still have control over their bodies, as just one example.

And if elected again he will take an axe to every political norm we have on steroids, because unlike in 2016 he has an entire movement behind him to fire every civil service worker in the federal government and replace them not with people who are loyal to the constitution, but loyal to Trump himself.

If you understand anything about why the United States has always been the envy of the world, then this isn't a contest.

The polls are close right now but Biden is quickly overtaking Trump as people as starting to pay more attention

Plus democrats have outperformed in nearly every election over the past two years. 

No matter who the candidate is they're going to get hit with an onslaught of attack ads and propaganda. 

People will believe anything they want and what they want is to believe their political opposition is worse than they are. 

 Personality I would rather visit Paris then Jamaica.