Probably. I am not sure why I did this. Possibly because I cut and paste from my word processing program where I had highlighted con's position in bold and mine in italics.
It is only ironic and ridiculous for someone with racism in their heart to think such a thing. Non-racist people would not attempt to bring any race into disrepute.
I don't agree that the statement is a truism. But I am having trouble understanding your point. What do you mean we begin to exist to exist - not to non-exist. That seems to be inconsistent with death, unless death of course is simply a means to another location. But it does not sound like you are suggesting that.
You also indicate that validity is not justified just because something is natural. Surely, that needs to be qualified? Who determines what validity is in that case? Surely if something has started to exist - it has a valid reason to exist. Otherwise it would not exist. I am considering arguing the contender's point but I suspect we are moving on different trains of thought.
The reason I reject the opening line as a truism is based primarily on my religious conviction that God made all things and he made all things good. This may or may not be a reason for debating you. Given that you wish to build up a general wealth of knowledge based on your fallacy, it might not be a constructive discussion. PM if you wish to discuss this further.
Probably. I am not sure why I did this. Possibly because I cut and paste from my word processing program where I had highlighted con's position in bold and mine in italics.
I apologize if it offends your senses.
With all due respect, you do not know anything about me. You have made assumption after assumption.
It is only ironic and ridiculous for someone with racism in their heart to think such a thing. Non-racist people would not attempt to bring any race into disrepute.
After reading your debate here, I am even more convinced that the Left are the most racist people on the planet.
I don't agree that the statement is a truism. But I am having trouble understanding your point. What do you mean we begin to exist to exist - not to non-exist. That seems to be inconsistent with death, unless death of course is simply a means to another location. But it does not sound like you are suggesting that.
You also indicate that validity is not justified just because something is natural. Surely, that needs to be qualified? Who determines what validity is in that case? Surely if something has started to exist - it has a valid reason to exist. Otherwise it would not exist. I am considering arguing the contender's point but I suspect we are moving on different trains of thought.
The reason I reject the opening line as a truism is based primarily on my religious conviction that God made all things and he made all things good. This may or may not be a reason for debating you. Given that you wish to build up a general wealth of knowledge based on your fallacy, it might not be a constructive discussion. PM if you wish to discuss this further.