Username

R2 Analysis?

ruh roh

This is absurdly hard to prove. Trump's racism is very much implicit rather than explicit (he's the president after all) so if I have the BoP anything I say could be countered by "well, this doesn't PROVE he's racist etc."

hmmm. I'll do some research. Interesting provided speedrace doesn't take it first.

In the end it doesn't matter

I think he was joking.

Okay thanks. Ill PM you with regards to this

What would the structure be?

Hmm… This might be interesting. I'm going to try to get a better understanding of the topic and maybe begin to formulate a case - after which I might accept.

I'd be curious to hear which specific lines stood out to out to you.

That's seemingly what happens when your need to insult overrides your need to make a constructive argument.

For future reference, this is a great reason not to take two debates at once. Unless that isn't the reason you're forfeiting. No hostility or anything, just a recommendation.

Shame - this could've been interesting.

Yeah, I guess so. I didn't mean it seriously anyways.

lol I wish youd messaged me this instead of giving him R2 args

And this is the line I said

"[RM’s kissing SupaDudz’s ass] like Dudz delivers his next paycheck,
Either it’s ‘cause he’s the judge or he hasn’t voted against him in a debate yet "

This was the line I was referring to:

"right on,
You type a lot like you'll come be near me, hurt me 'til I scream like a siren, but my screams to supadudz's ears'll be the mythical definition of what 'siren' is, he'll like 'em,
And just when you think that I'm past the brink of insanity with no resistance left to syphon, you'll see my name's no oxymoron I'll smile as dudz break the door down, and your mindless guise of being a lion comes to an end for it's your mind not mine that need's rewiring,"

Or sorry for phrasing it poorly if that sounds rude.

SupaDudz: I said that the other way around, since he was mentioning you in a positive way in a debate. Sorry if you took it the wrong way.

You really think that democrats' end goal is to take over America? That they have a more authoritarian trend than the republicans? That's absurd. I hope these views didn't have any effect on your vote for this debate.

Also I find it hilarious that you stopped posting when you were challenged.

I'm not. Why?

That may be true, I guess I just have a very thin concept of what adapting to global warming would necessarily be.

What would you say is an example of adapting to global warming?

just tagging you

Oh. How do I know you then?

Hey! Are you jzonda?

Can someone please remove or at least look at Raltar's vote please? It addresses a fraction of a fraction of the arguments

Arguments "God is real because the Bible says so you're ignorant if you don't agree" is the reason that people don't take theism seriously, as a theist.

It's an interesting idea. It might punish people who forum post a lot who mean no harm, though.

Yeah I just wanted to understand because i thought you were mad or something lol I guess not.

Thanks.

alright

"Armoredcat, I didn't say you insulted me. But just a quick look at some of the other comments here would easily reveal the person that I am talking about."

Ok idk why you're telling me this then.

"Regardless, if someone blocks you, the logical conclusion is because they don't want to talk to you. So why chase after that person and follow them around demanding answers? If someone has you blocked, leave them be. It isn't like it harms you at all."

I want to know what I did wrong is all. But you keep dodging the question.

"Armoredcat, ask yourself this; How did you even know someone blocked you, unless you tried to send them a message that failed to go through?"

Yeah, I did. Why else would I ask? You most certainly blocked me, and you're still dodging me as to why.

"So obviously, you must have done a little more than what you say..."

WHEN THOUGH? WHEN? You blocked me well before your response here.

"and when you follow someone around demanding to know why they blocked you (or insulting them for blocking you) that really should be an explanation in itself for why they blocked you."

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I genuinely want to know why you blocked me though, because if I'm doing something wrong you could just let me know. That's why. I literally had no animosity towards you before I found out you blocked me. I was actually going to message you because I wanted to see your Tumblr blog that you talk about in your profile. And also, I never insulted you.

I've literally objected to one vote on his debate, which the mods agreed was insufficient. I can't believe that he would be so mad that I disagreed with a vote he made that he would permanently block me. Like, seriously. This is a professional debate site.

I hope it's not because of my political leanings, but...

lol hes just not going to explain at all ok

yes but can you please explain why you blocked me

why did you block me lol raltar can you explain

Hey! I might accept this later on. I just want to formulate an opening argument first.

We've reached a new low of debate resolutions.

In a debate, you have to address the arguments presented by both debaters (which this time were null) instead of provide your own personal opinion. That's not how debating works.

You can't do votes like this lol

Thanks for voting! Glad to see this debate is getting attention, even if people think I lost lol

ayeeeee

we still got some time lol

Vikings will win. Trubisky is too inconsistient.

Imagine targeting a source for their political affiliation lol.

I'm all against police brutality and I acknowledge it's existence, but all cops are not pigs. Maybe it's possible that most joined law enforcement to, y'know, enforce the laws, not kill unarmed blacks for fun.

Didn't I vote on this lol?

> Fair enough. Yeah all cops are basically pigs. I don't trust the police and serious reform is needed

All policemen? No.

I would just let him cancel the debate, @Death23.

You'd save a lot more time for yourself by just moving and doing it again