Instigator / Con
16
1411
rating
11
debates
13.64%
won
Topic
#1674

Is gender a social construct?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
15
Better sources
6
10
Better legibility
5
5
Better conduct
5
5

After 5 votes and with 19 points ahead, the winner is...

PressF4Respect
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
35
1523
rating
10
debates
50.0%
won
Description

No information

-->
@PressF4Respect

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/21/Appeal-to-Authority

Literally your entire case.

-->
@Zaradi

How so?

-->
@PressF4Respect

You got so lucky that there wasnt really any debate to be had. Your case was abysmal.

-->
@Dynasty

In the end it doesn't matter

-->
@Username

I said that they are related to each other.

-->
@Dynasty

And I saw one sentence answers. If you are not actually bothered to spend the time to present an argument for the following rounds don't bother.

-->
@Dynasty

goo goo ga joob

-->
@Walrus

Are we new here?

rubbish and a real scientist will say so social science isn't science

-->
@TheRealNihilist

I said "However, not every difference between men and women are socially constructed, but rather have they origin in human biology."

Error

Meaning if Con accepts Pro's definitions Pro would have conceded the entire debate to the other side
Even though this is well weird of making an argument as in defining yourself to win, Pro's appeal to authority is better than contradictory arguments.
With nothing to rebut from Pro he had nothing to say to Con apart from giving a response to the one line comments

Fix

Meaning if Con accepts Pro's definitions Con would have conceded the entire debate to the other side
Even though this is well a weird way of making an argument as in defining yourself to win, Pro's appeal to authority is better than contradictory arguments.
With nothing to rebut for Pro he had nothing to say to Con apart from giving a response to the one line comments

-->
@Dynasty

If you actually don't care about debating, don't bother creating debates. It is that simple.

-->
@Dynasty

You keep repeating that like a mantra. I get that.

If they are related, they are not the necessarily the same, therefore why cant 1 of them be a social construct?

Can you connect the "they are related" back to the topic?

-->
@Nemiroff

I said they are related to each other.

-->
@Dynasty

If sex is biological
And you admit gender is not the same
Then how do you conclude that gender must be biological?

Couldnt it be a social construct that is related to a biological feature, but not the same as it?