VonKlempter

I haven't nominated a debate or a thread though, but I might vote for one later.

No worries.

He must be one of my favourite debaters on the site, with an undefeated record of 86 debates won out of a total of 86 debates which he participated in. Furthermore, he is wholly dedicated to the site.

He may not be the best debater on the site, but I think that he is very much underrated. He is an extremely friendly guy, and would certainly be willing to help others on the site  out.

He also may not be the best debater on the site, but has proven his capacity and dedication as a moderator, and has given DART a very responsible moderator who does his work for free.

I may nominate forum threads and debates later on.

Plus, 'mistreatment of civilians' is considered a war crime.

The Geneva Convention lays down that civilians are not to be subject to attack. This includes direct attacks on civilians and indiscriminate attacks against areas in which civilians are present.

The law of war rests on five fundamental principles that are inherent to all targeting decisions: military necessity, unnecessary suffering, proportionality, distinction (discrimination), and honor (chivalry).

I remember you saying that Ragnar had beat you a couple of times back when you guys where in Debate.org.

To quote Wikipedia, "  Jehovah (/dʒɪˈhoʊvə/) is a Latinization of the Hebrew יְהֹוָה, one vocalization of the Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), the proper name of the God of Israel in the Hebrew Bible and one of the seven names of God in Judaism." 

To follow ebuc's format:

Mentally - 8/10

This Coronavirus thing is driving me mad.

Physically - 9/10

2 hours of exercise each day.

Emotionally - 9.5/10

I'm alright, but there again, quarantine is driving me nuts.

No rules in war itself, except war crimes. However, what you use to win a war isn't supposed to be used during peacetime, and not banning these landmines would certainly cause a substantial amount of civilian deaths after the war.

However, the book itself may not have been written by Sun Tzu himself.

"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles." So you're trying to get information from every debater on the site and analysing them? Or are you reading finished debates to "know the enemy"?

*thought

Look here, if you're unhappy, why don't you keep your mouth shut? Because I see nothing wrong, and if you're offended in some way or other, then stay out, I never did ask what you though of it.

No problem! And by the way, I appreciate how you manage to come up with interesting forum topics.

Excuse me?

Winston Churchill was after Napoleon's time.

Napoleon was also the one that would've invaded Egypt if Admiral Nelson hadn't stopped him.

First, sir, I would appreciate you using proper sentences, making it easier to understand. Second, take the Peninsular War and the War of the Sixth Coalition, Napoleon was the "person or country that attacks another first." And third, whatever century he lived in, he would still be ultimately the aggressor, after refusing to release the British colonies.

Look here, sir. I see that you're extremely sceptic, and I don't despise Pyrrhon, mind you. However, you cannot deny reality, you cannot ignore facts and speak of a fantasy. The Haitian Revolution was a successful revolt conducted by black French slaves against French colonial rule in Saint-Domingue. Plus RM's article, so you can't dispute that. You also can't dispute that the Jews sent to prison camps were not German, because they were. Civilian deaths happened in 99% of wars, and all are simply accidental, or simply a country seized by maniacal values' failed attempt to fight to the last man standing. While I do accept the fact that every human is entitled to their own opinions, I also do know, and you should know also, that you can't deny the facts shoved under your nose in black and white.

I do not want this to be a heated and rude bicker, and if you feel offended sir, sorry about that. However, I'm presenting my own opinions, and hopefully this can be an interesting discussion instead of a locked thread that gets us both in trouble.

Civilian deaths caused by the enemy is not intentional, however, Napoleon's genocide of his own countrymen was.

What he wants you to believe is that he gassed enemies, because of the Haitian Revolution conducted by the black French. However, they were still French, and Jews in Germany were still German, and so in that context, Napoleon is no different from Hitler.

For the gassing.

Greatest admirer, you can't deny that.

You guys asked for proof? RM has already presented you with it.

I pretty much agree. Though I do admit that Napoleon was not a Fascist like Hitler or Mussolini, he was a villain, and a villain very much like Hitler, mind you.

Napoleon gassed rebellious blacks in France.

But the teacher has no say in which student to expel?

I agree. I really appreciate his professionalism, his dedication, and his effort when handling a wide range of situations. 

I don't very much agree. He had the same intentions as Hitler, and yet you despise Hitler and call Napoleon, who inspired Hitler, a "good guy". Why is that?

Real sad, that's what I'll say.

For simpler reasons, I've seen debaters waiving to allow the Contender to present arguments first. To explain, you may find many debates (Or at least a few) where the Instigator is debating for the Con position. However, it is a widely accepted fact that the Pro position should present their arguments first, and so the Instigator waives the first round, as per the status quo.

Alright, you're welcome.

If I may suggest, I realised that after completing the required task for a medal, it takes an extremely long time for the information to be refreshed, and it takes about an hour to earn a medal. So, it would be really interesting if you managed to make the medals more responsive.

I'd accept it as Pro, but since, as the contender, I have to argue against what I think profitable, I'm not accepting it.

Post the link to any debate requiring a contender. No troll debates allowed. Here's mine: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2028/the-military-tactics-in-the-chinese-treatise-the-art-of-war-is-applicable-to-modern-warfare

The moon has been on lockdown for centuries. I wonder why nobody has created a forum post about that yet.

1. Why the blazes would he convert to Taoism?

2. Why did he leave the site, even if he's Taoist now?

I understand, thank you for your explanation.

What do you mean by "run" the world?

Oh, thanks.

What do you mean by "run" the world?

I don't really like online classes, to be honest.

Do you have any idea why RM left?

Wow

"The Old Testament contains the sacred scriptures of the Jewish faith, while Christianity draws on both Old and New Testaments, interpreting the New Testament as the fulfilment of the prophecies of the Old." [https://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/old-testament-vs-new-testament/]

 Something that serves as a sign or evidence of a specified fact, event, or quality, but in this case the live of Jesus Christ.

Thanks.

Yes I do. How do I join?

Goodbye, nice knowing you.