Total posts: 9,115
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I think when you make trade, you have to offer something, some sin
Nope, just your undying loyalty.
AI is a good way to get info, but it often refuses to provide info about satanism other than classical Christian bias, but will provide info about many other dark Gods
Most of your knowledge will come from revelation but it is still useful to read things like what I mentioned and ofcourse from those like Madam Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley.
I think if you arelooking at prayers you are headed the wrong direction. What you should be focusing on is mentioned in the satanic Bible. Reread it. Higher magic can displace prayer. LaVey is atheistic but for higher Magick he is a good starting point. To go deeper into lesser magic the satanic witch might be a good starting point for inspiration despite it being written. For women. However law of attraction practitioners and Khaos magicians pretty much teach all you need. LOA is the right hand version of higher Magick. Khaos Magick is the left hand version but it is the same thing.
LaVey us correct that some of it is just psychodrama but he is incorrect that it is only psychodrama.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
So I was a new user once. My debate was immediately accepted by tophatdoc. My resolution was that republicans and democrats are the same exact thing. I lost. No big deal. My 2nd debate was with whiteflame who started th same day s me over the HPV vaccine
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Besides, ever since I started worshipping dark Gods, my knowledge has greatly increased.
Yes, that is what happens. You get knowledge. Rapidly. It's the Faustian bargain. This doesn't surprise me though this tells me your are being honest about your worship of. Dark gods.
Thats interesting, but worshipping yourself does not exclude worshipping Satan
I guess that's true but I see no point in it. What does Satan really urge you to do? Have good hygiene, accept responsibility for yourself, act with honor. Have a will to power. None of those things he demands requires worship.
Have you read the foundational texts that most people entering Satanism read?
Might is right, The Satanic Bible and Atlas Shrugged?
Have you went on the pirate Bay to recover documents from former members of the Temple of Set?
Have you looked into the Order of the 9 Angles to see how you can shortcut enlightenment?
I know each journey is unique but where are you at?
Created:
Posted in:
Look at my 2nd debate after returning. I half assed my arguments. That is a much better alternative to having a noob accent their debate and forfeit every round
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You seem to have lots of experience with worshipping Loki.
Not really worship. More like a partnership.
I dont have as much experience, but after worshipping Satan and waking up at 3 to pray to demons, I think this will go just as well.
When Jews and the Neo Jews conquer old gods become Satan. It is more like a pantheon of God's. The original Satan was Enki, set came later and an alteration of Set is what gave Satan it's name. Later on the God Pan was brought into he pantheon by Christians and the horns of Satan were added .
A lot of Luciferians think they are satanists or new age or even christians, and they will worship angels or demons. Pray to them, do rituals, make sacrifices.
If you re on the right hand path you are probably a luciferian not a Satanist.
The egregore of Satan does desire worship, but not worship of him or of demons. Satan wants you to worship yourself. The biggest holiday for satanists is not Halloween but their birthday.
The left hand path requires a lot more than the right hand path to reach enlightenment. At a certain point in your development both paths start looking the same. It's a matter of whether you want to start killing off pieces of yourself to reach enlightenment or if you want to start integrating different parts of yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Also, I pray to many Gods, so if one harms, the other helps, like the cycles of good and evil.
I said he would help but you wouldn't like the way he helps and the o ly God more powerful than him is Yeshua.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
Please respond to the above post where I state it is not gay to suck dick for the LULZ.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
So you're not gay if you're a male who can genuinely transition your gender before having sex with a male?
Yes the Frog God Kek is th same way. Frogs can be either gender.
If loki took human form and swapped genders he would be more like Blaire White than Dylan Mulvaney.
Ultimately correct. You get a pass for being gay if you transition your gender. Before fucking another man.
By that logic he's not zoosexual either since he was a mare at the time.
Correct
More importantly is the attitude. If loki transitions to trick a king into fucking him, he might transition back to a male afterwards and mock the king for being such a faggot. This is not something that is compatible with the more serious principles of the LGBT movement.
Hell loki might even transition to a male while still sucking the kings dick and then call him an effeminate faggot.
I wouldn't even consider that gay since he is only sucking dick for the LULZ
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Burning living babies being legal is an easy argument to make. Pinker makes very good arguments for infanticide and he does so well that any prochoice advocate unless they are really familiar with pro life arguments will struggle to debate a person who is advocating for infanticide based on Pinkers arguments
Created:
Posted in:
That's what the site evolved from. DDO was originally just a platform with the debate section only to be used by 2 college kids to practice debate . It later became popular and added a forum section and then a polls section. The o ly thing holding the site back now is just bad SEO. We should have a politically incorrect section hidden from the clear web and then a lot of focus should be on creating backlinks
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You better be careful. Read my above post. If you gain Loki's attention he will turn your world upside down. You will be stronger for it and better off in a spiritual and mental way. He will bring you to your knees. I would tread carefully and consider apologizing to loki and removing this post so that way he decides to spare you from the chaos he has planned for all who call on him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Which goes well with the previous theme of communism for Korea
Loki I would consider more of a right wing entity. When I say I was a Satanist at one point Loki us considered as being included in the Pantheon of God's Christians have referred to as Satan. Heath Ledgers joker embodies that spirit as does Harlequin.
Donald Trump as the 2016 republican nominee embodied the spirit as does the Frog God KEK.
It's a force that comes to upset the world order whether it be the God's who misuse their power in the heaven or kings on Earth.
Chaos works to overthrow irresponsible leaders such as the Washington elite, howeverbhe also trengthens us . Batman's loki got him to be more adaptable. To break rules to do whatever it took to become stronger and more effective.
When I became a Satanist at one point I zoomed into the egregore of Loki. I wanted to be wiser and stronger. Loki said to me "are you sure". I said yes and please pproceeded. I found myself in jail for old warrants and when I freed myself and took care of that somebody robbed a hardware store and I crashed the my car into their truck. It caused me to kill the person in the truck.
I started having wild swings. Being blessed with lots of money then poverty and repeating cycles.
I had a child. I saw a cat outside and it was negative 10 degrees and the cat always greeted me. So I am like you can stay in my house 3 days but then you will be thrown to the street . The first day in my house it gave birth to 5 cats. I named one of the cats Loki.
So Loki will destroy you to build you up. He was summoned in 2016 to overthrow the owl God and his evil minions. He will overthrow the current order and more importantly have fun doing so.
Thre is a reason clown world is in the common vernacular now.
Also for anyone wondering, Loki is not a gay tranny but he is using them to bring chaos and make the United States as well as the world a better place.
Created:
-->
@Statichead
To start off, I think that both the Israeli militaries and Hamas are completely at fault.
This is the type of shit people say to minimize just how bad hamas is and things suck for Palestinians right now but they by and large support hamas to a large extent and I do remember that these are also the same people who were seen on TV dancing in the street after they learned that the Twin Towers fell.
The civilized world needs to give the savages 2 options.
1. Become civilized and peaceful people
2. Welcome a painful death
This is the options the Apache had who were randomly killing British settlers in America. They kept randomly killing, raping and kidnapping settlers as well s fellow native American tribes and so they chose to be eliminated essentially.
Now I personally think number one is possible but it isn't going to happen by denying the savagery of the people and turning the other cheek. Israel is going to have to take an active role in helping Palestinians get there. We essentially left Dresden alone, we left Hiroshima alone as well as Nagasaki and these are civilized people so they rebuilt better than ever, but the Palestinians are not civilized so they are incapable of recovering from less damage than was caused to Hiroshima, so unfortunately Israel is going to have to guide them into doing it and perhaps be a bit fascist so they can remove the antisemitism taught to Palestinian kids in school and by cartoons in television. If the Palestinians want to be antisemitic they will need to get it straight from the Quran
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I think pat Buchanon did. I wanted to suggest one of his books, but only death of the west is available on youtube.
I am 2 hours into the book. I wanted to just listen one hour at a time instead of all at once for the Sowell book just so I can digest what he is saying.
I remember these arguments he is rebutting in hour 2. Not all from the opposite angle. It was a time ever I was moving from being a liberal to a libertarian so kind of a I'm a Flux phase.
I can say though that I was fully fascist as a liberal and I don't even think me as a liberal could stomach the modern democratic party because thy went beyond how fascist even I was.
I wanted to ban cigarettes for example. Just an outright ban, fuck your freedoms. I would have wanted to ban guns entirely. I was opposed to abortion even as a liberal. I was like it's one thing to take somebody's freedom for heir own good but murder is a step too far.
Yeah so as I was becoming more liberal and less of a fascist liberal I remember Maki g arguments that we need to arrest terrorists that we should treat them gently when in prison and I would have also advocated for just disbanding our nuclear capabilities. I really wish somebody would have given me this book when I was in that phase embarrassing myself
Created:
Posted in:
Some of these controversies he brings up I completely forgot about .
Here is one that he mentions that I agreed with when I was a brain dead liberal.
He mentioned that liberals wanted to treat terrorists like criminals and not enemies of the state and actually go over to Iran and start arresting Al queda and bringing them to the United States for trial. It is embarrassing that I believed that
Created:
Posted in:
I just noticed you were female. If you identify as heterosexual you should already know I am being honest here
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
Studies that actually test for attraction prove my theory that all women are attracted to other women.
Honestly go on lezbian Twitter they all claim to fuck heterosexual women . Better yet gey a girlfriend and see if they are down for sex with another woman.
Perhaps something g is wrong with me where I only attract lesbians but damn 30 in a row with one exception and all but the one exception being the one to push for a 3some with some random casual friend they have been fantasizing about. I mean we have a clear pattern here. I am sure other guys with experience on the site can speak up to confirm this is universally true and I a not lying
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yes
Created:
neither of whom are true to the actual ideals the parties uphold.
So pragmatists instead of ideologues.
.
Within those pretending to support your cause are people voting in men in need of geriatric care on both sides
What's with the casual ageism this election cycle. There is nothing wrong with their ages. One has dementia and I guess the criticism of the other is that he is a blow hard. The blow hard would have been a blow hard 20 years ago as well. It has nothing to do with age.
Niki Hailey could probably beat Biden as long as trump didn't sabotage her. Trump can't beat biden.
No she can't. If she won I would not vote 3rd party. I would vote for Biden. I think many people are like me. She is an actual fascist . I know liberals like to throw that accusation around at every republican but finally when you actually get the one in a million repu lican who is actually fascist the demo want to witch sides and vote for her.
She wanted to require ID for americans to go online. Ban social media platforms and she wants to increase military operations overseas. This bitch is evil and probably the only Republican that could get me to vote Biden.
Created:
You made a thread that it was a disgrace and reflected poorly on her that she was going to lose the seat. She can't win with you. If she loses it is reason to mock her and if she wins it is reason to mock her. I think you would be happy that a pro life person was going to be RNC chair
Created:
-->
@Double_R
If a video talking about teaching your children to be accepting of others has you so triggered that you would post it here as support for what you are against, then why on earth would I take your word for it when you tell me about the evils you're fighting against?
7 of those people have been found to be on sex offender registries after this gained popularity attention. Why do you want children Tobe accepting of pedophiles?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
the VP's role is mostly ceremonial. It's just to make sure they counted right. He does not have the power to deny the results of an election.
So what law forces him to even show up to the event. You said Donald Trump broke the law by sking hin to abstain, so if it is just ceremonial why do you think it's an act of treason to abstain from the event? What part of the law explicitly states it is ceremonial?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
I just talked to an ex who is a lesbian now. I told her my theory. She said that I am not wrong. She said that half the girls she has sex with are heterosexual
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
It probably wouldn't help that I don't believe in demons or anything associated anyway. But, of course, people can use language to manipulate others. We agree there.
It doesn't matter what you believe. The points how those in power many of whom are occultists thinks.
Bisexuality hasn't been expanded, it just means people who are attracted to both genders. And, as I pointed out, "queer" has always been used to describe bisexual and gender non-conforming people for about as long as it's been used to describe gay men.
Nobody considers women bisexual for being attracted to women also because it destroys the point of making a semantic difference between bisexual and heterosexual women since all women are open to sex with other women. My wife isn't a bisexual for engaging in threescore where she performs cunninglingus on other women and gets off on it, nor does it make the woman in bed with us a bisexual either. The way it is used in common parlance (not dictionary) is to mean somebody who has relationships with other women and men that extends beyond the bedroom activities.
I am also glad you found a person defining queer in the 1960s that was different from the common parlance at the time.
Now, I'll finally address your claims about female sexuality: Most women are straight, and don't have sexual or romantic attraction to other women (studies show around 81% of women experience exclusive attraction the opposite sex
I am going to say something that is slightly disgusting. Before I do let me say that the women who claim exclusive attraction are most likely lying. It's silly.
I haven't kept numbers but when I try to recall how many I typically lose count around 30. Only 1 wasn't open to eating out another woman.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Are you being serious first you say this in response to Trump stating the election could be overturned
why would they have that power? That doesn't even make sense. It would mean that a government could just refuse to hand over power after losing an election
Then in your very next response to me you say this
the courts absolutely can overturn the results of an election. And trump and his allies tried this. Every single case was a failure because there was never any evidence of voter fraud.
----------
What? He already tried. He was part of a scheme to send a slate of fake electors
Alternative electors and there is precedent
tried to convince his VP to illegally refuse to acknowledge the results of the election
Citation needed for the exact law that explicitly states the VP has to certify the election and no one that gives him authority to certify the election does not count.
judge yes, congress no. And they tried to convince a judge there was fraud. But there was no evidence of fraud. Trump's own investigators told him there was no fraud at the time. And years later, there is still no evidence of fraud.
Which classified document that Trump saw and you didn't see do you disagree with? Please cite the specific classified document that can't be revealed in court due to national security reasons?
Trump is just hiding the evidence for it? That is cult level of cope.
This is like stating Trump is hiding the real killer of JFK just because there're still classified documents about the JFK case. That's not how classified documentsget declassified. It isn't an ego thing there is a process.
There were trials. If he had evidence, he would have presented it at trial. But in every single case they failed to provide a shred of actual evidence. That tells me the evidence does not exist
Why re you setting yourself up to backpedal? What happens if I do show you a shred of evidence for the theory of election theft?
You know that a single strand of evidence would not convince you of election theft. I also sense you are losing g weasel terms and would back pedal with proof of election theft by just saying you define theft differently.
Let's see though. Let me present a single strand of evidence and see if a strand of evidence is enough or if you were being dishonest
The strand of evidence
Now is a single strand of evidence en9ugh to change your mind or is your criticims of zero strands of evidence pointless?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
He doesn't. You know that, I know that. It's best to just make fun of it. He claimed that a massive election fraud would allow the government to suspend the election rules.
It's hibestly dumb to disagree that congress can't vote to cancel the results of an election due to fraud or that the courts ha e no recourse.
He doesn't mention suspending the rules. He merely stayed that should say the hypothetical example where say a hacker literally erased all votes against one side in an election that yes the government be it in the form of judges or congress can erase the results. Nobody actually thinks that is a suspension of the constitution, qnd literally nobody cried about it when AL Gore made the same argument and kept demanding recounts so he could delay the process long enough to get judges to agree to overthrow the election.
You can say that you disagree with his analysis of a lot of fraud despite you not having access to the confidential information He does. However I think uou know that in a deo.ocratic Republic the rail guard to protect us from. Fraudulent election results can not be single handedly done by the president. He needs a bunch of democrats to agree with him, many of which likely did but preferred Biden s a president or didn't think that Biden was enough of a security threat to justify undermining public faith in election integrity.
Created:
Posted in:
The reason when older we experience time slower is an illusion
I mean yeah. Certai ly the earth is not spinning around at a significantly different speed than years prior
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
This isn’t a mystery, there is no man behind the curtain. We can see how these trends evolved through writing and the words of the people who inspired those changes. The motivation is largely that these demographics wish to label themselves in the same way groups who are not marginalized can label themselves
So to correctly understand your claim. You claim language has not changed in even a single artificial way that was top down as opposed to more naturally.
Your second claim here just to understand it is that it is these communities themselves changing how they are referred to, to spite white people?
That reality is if whites called blackest African Americans 50 years ago that perhaps they would prefer to be called pizzas now or some other random word?
We are also going to ignore the fact that white people are on behalf of others telling them how they should feel about words like oriental or negro?
So to disprove your claims it seems like just need to find one instance of a top down manipulation of language..is this true?
Would this be a way to keep someone from identifying more with their occupation than their loyalty to the occult?
Perhaps in self help communities, and perhaps that was not the best example but there are often double meanings in the occultism, language effects how we perceive society. If you change the language than you can change the perception of yourself towards the world which can bring about changes to your world.
It also applies on a larger scale. If you can get a bunch of people to use words differently or to apply different definitions to words intuitively., than you can change those people's perceptions of the world. If everyone perceives the world differently than the world in fact changes.
Ideally though as a magician you remove certain types of words completely from your vocabulary. The word "am" is one but other things that mean essentially the same thing. This guy I think has 3 or 4 videos in a series that could give you an overview.
We don't advertise that we are occultists or satanists especially those in politics. We signal it. I personally am not an occultist and am explicitly telling you that, but if you look at my first year or so of posts on DDO you could if you know what you are looking for see my manipulation of language.
Now Foolish Fish who I linked to only goes over the personal usage of language I believe. There are certain occult concepts I can't even tell you about now. It requires deep study. It requires buying rare books that are out of print and go for $500 or more or it involves joining secret societies or communicating with demons to learn some of this.
I personally wouldn't tell you too much because I have been warned about sharing secrets with the uninitiated and a lot of it is pointless without foundational knowledge anyway.
I can tell you that the manipulation of language seems intention to me ND this thread was originally about things involving the woke movement. I think as far as the woke movement is concerned they admit it is intentional. They openly day how we use words can affect reality which is why they attack incorrect language with terms such as "ableism" or "micro aggression" . They believe altering language will alter how minorities and the handicapped are seen and cause them to have an easier life.
In this thread I pointed to the overgeneralization of words for the mot part to be more inclusive of people in the LGBT community. The expansion of terms like queer or bisexuality to include more people. I can tell you why this is done on one level anyway.
It's done because of a mind virus called "let's normalize". It's when you add the term "let's normalize to abnormal things"
"Let's normalize men seeking therapy when they are depressed"
The left is essentially saying "let's normalize being queer" you can only do that by creating 75 genders and dividing everybody among them and shrinking the definition of heterosexual. Everyone knows that gender and sex are a spectrum. We consider most of the spectrum or did to be heterosexual. They have expanded the definition of queer to include more of the spectrum and used the term cisgender as a type of pejorative. It's the one incorrect gender so now kids will furiously search for one of the 75 genders to describe themselves as. It's easy for females because a lot are tomboys but nearly every female has some sort of sexual attraction towards other women.
The reason you would want to expand the definition from their perspective us because the more people who see themselves as LGBT the more accepting of Trans individuals or homosexuality the community will be as a whole.
So at least in this instance I don't think the word play over race is the same. I think the word play with race is silly and keep commenting on it and perhaps dragging the conversation off course by flipping my main point to cover that but it isn't what I am referring to with the LGBT movement.
It should also be pointed out that culture kind of flows downstream you have these academics in their ivory towers and you can read their books on this exact process and why the expansion of the term is important and people will laugh and say it is just some Crack academics but the academics influence "thought leaders" who influences people who consume a lot of low brow content who then influence their friends and neighbors.
This is why the USSR during the cold war focused most of their efforts not on propagandizing the general American public but academics. They knew their influence over larger society
Darrell Berry coined the term “social media”
Great, I knew somebody had to invent the term.
but has been used against anyone who present themselves in a particular way in regard to their gender expression, gay men, bisexual men, etc.
You think my opinions are born from personal experience and I think yours are from brainwashing that tells you that your grandparents and previous generations were all rabbit racists who lynched black people for the slightest infractions and didn't want to share pies with them.
It's of no use to speculate where we each collected our biases. My envisioning of you and your envisioning of me are perhaps useful when communicating with each other but are very unlikely to reflect reality. We can schedule a zoom call if you want to see if our impressions of each h other are correct but I would prefer we just stick to facts and acknowledge that we both likely have biases that effect our thinking and one of the reasons we expose our thinking to criticism is to work through these biases.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
For example this is from december 2022 "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”
Did you know that the constitution allows martial law?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
I also find that I now require less sleep overnight.
I heard about this phenomenon so perhaps that will recover some time
Created:
Posted in:
I don't know if you guys have noticed but time is relative. We experience it slower as children because one year at 10 is 10% of our lives so it feels so long. When you are 20 it feels shorter but still long at 5% of your life.
Every year you are alive is a year that goes faster. Now at 40 a year feels like a month and 80 it will likely feel like a week. Assuming I live until 80 and with the years feeling progressively faster, it means I might have 10 years going by my childhood perception left to live.
However many years you feel like you have left is mot likely a going to feel like a lot less than they actually are. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/time-perception-aging_l_63973dc2e4b0169d76d92560
Created:
NDEs have been replicated in experiments on Nasa Astronauts. Why would they appear to happen to oxygen deprived astronauts nowhere near death?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
Do me a favor. I am not trying to get the last word in. You brought up a lot of great points and gave me a lot to ruminate on. I can't put in the same amount of effort towards the conversation as you so it would be bad form for me to keep talking without given your arguments as much consideration as you give mine. If we are going to continue the conversation I think we need to narrow it to a single point. Once that point is exhaustes I don't mind revisiting the rest.
It looks like you took issue with me claiming the change of language was some sort of manipulation. You stated it happened naturally or as a response to marginalized communities taking ownership of the words that they are referred to as.
I dont think you addressed what I said about the language seeming to change faster now than it did in the past which was one of my premises.
My other premises are probably just not going to be extrapolated because I was into Satanism for so long as well s the occult and so I am kind of aware of what alterations in language can do and am kind of picking up on that.
For example a lot of occultism would not say a phrase like "I am a fireman" when describing their occupation' they would say "I fight fires"
There I hundreds of things we do with language in plain site and I am willing to write a post on some of how occultism and word choice works but it is a hidden Premise I held which is potentially not fair to explain one of my reasoning. Not that I believe the language manipulation is from occultism only that they seem to intuitively recognize some occult principles around language and be using them, and I don't feel like the language alterations are natural. Even when the term "social media" came out is seem contrived and the term seemed pushed more by mainstream media than a bottom up approach to language that is more normal
Created:
Posted in:
I am not even going to reread what you are responding to. I forgot what I even posted. I just know when I judge debates I will not punish for gish gallop unless the person doing it is called out by their opponent. However merely calling the out is not enough they need to explain to me why I should punish their opponent for it
Created:
-->
@Double_R
And since you really need me to explain my comment further, I was merely expressing why I (and I assume most liberals) tune you guys out when you talk about this - because we've seen this nonsense before. But go on and provide that example. I look forward to being enlightened.
II don't want to be disrespectful but I stopped reading here because I provided an example and you just said "outlier" I could provide 10 more and you would say the same thing. I find it hard that this thing that has been all over the media you haven't seen because right-wing sites will actually show pictures from the books. All I can think of is that you are a partisan hack that only follows left wing sources.
I also want to be fair because you are here an exposing yourself to the other side, but I just see this stuff and it's in my memory bank. I don't feel like spending 30 minutes on Google finding examples that I think will get called outliers. It's not something I am particularly passionate about. I think exposing kids to porn is unethical but I also think you know that parents are not going to be getting upset over a book that has gay characters. You know it goes beyond that.
This stuff has been everywhere. I think you re aware of he indoctrination taking place and being disingenuous when you claim to not notice that California is passing laws that allow teachers to socially transition children or noticed that youtube is getting millions of views from a song about how "Yes we are coming for your kids". https://youtu.be/ArOQF4kadHA?si=FwcFYnbNJfOG3Zwt
I am sure you have seen children shows that are now shifting to promote trans ideology.
I mean sure we know some of the outrage is manufactured but when you have even lifelong libtards like Bill Mahar noticing. Well then maybe you should think for yourself that maybe there is something to it.
We can debate whether a comic book depicting oral sex between 2 men is porn. Maybe you will say no, I think it is. However I know. Didn't see the shit when I was in school. I checked out books on religion and occultism and of various political philosophies. Nobody cared vecause it wasn't degenerate.
Nobody is trying to prevent freedom of expression or reading books that have various points of views. Parents are just asking that their children are not exposed to smut. Different people have different values. You don't want your kid hearing that Jesus died on the cross for his sins in school and I don't want mine picking up a book in the school library where I have to explain an image he is swwing of 2 guys sucking each others cocks, or even descriptions of that.
We live in a multicultural society and one culture is asking not to be violated and we respected it when we banned creationism and prayer times in school and we should also respect it when it comes to these books. You want to focus on the word porn and play semantics. It doesn't matter if it is technically porn. What matters is having some level of respect for other members of the community.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Did you know that Christians when they have sex also put their penises into women.
I guess the real difference between Christian and non Christian sex is that it spreads less diseases such as Aids and monkey pox.
I guess the real difference between Christian and non Christian sex is that it spreads less diseases such as Aids and monkey pox.
Created:
I would teach sex Ed the way it is I would oppose showing 8 year olds porn or transing them behind their parents back like California schools do
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bronskibeat
So, you don’t want to be asked, you just want people to assume and call you what they want? That's doesn't really make sense, you're doing a little jumping around here.
Correct. It would b nice if they assume in an accurate fashion but I will point out that it is retarded to think somebody born in America with no indications of having citizenship elsewhere is somehow Japanese.
I don’t really know what you’re saying here but, the “BLM riots” accounted for about 7% of BLM protests and demonstrations. Meaning 93% were peaceful. A lot of positive came out of the movement. BLM protests addressed genuine concerns of the black community, not "made up" concerns.
Lol okay. It was people blaming police for social problems in black communities that the police have no control over and the spreading of myths like hands up don't shoot.
I loved the images of burning buildings of these 93% peaceful protests while news reporters were reporting with the building behind them burning calling it peaceful.
There should be a couple of things noted here. 1. You let this conversation drift beyond pronouns
2. The peaceful protestors were obviously used to cover for the rioters. They are legitimately there as distractions so people can say "97% weren't rioting just being a distraction to aid the rioters by monopolizing police presence and attention"
The same grace is not extended to the people on January 6th by the way
3. These weren't legitimate black issues. The Jewish ran BLM movement was requesting for the elimination of funding for police# reduced police presence in communities that need it the most, and for police to be more gentle.
There is a difference between “favoring” your own race out of a feeling superiority, and “favoring” your own race
There really isn't nice try. Favoring your fellow Jew or black or white over less qualified candidates when hiring is racist no matter what.
you feel that the majority of society unfavor them and you’re trying to balance out the difference. The playing field is not level
Racist whites literally use the same justification for favoring their own kind, but atleast they admit being racist.
The Quran says no such thing. You’re probably referring to hadiths, of which there are thousands, and not all Muslims follow the same (or any) hadith texts.
The Quran literally does but you re correct that people have different interpretations. Thanks for saying people interpret things in different ways captain obvious.
African-Americans were more likely to consider racial diversity important when watching a film, and less likely to believe there is a sufficient enough of racial diversity within acting roles: https://morningconsult.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/190124_crosstabs_HOLLYWOOD_Adults_v1-1.pdf
It literally doesn't shock me that a group that is 13% of the population but has like 33% more of the roles or more in Hollywood has been brainwashed by the left to think they aren't represented.
The last 5 supervowls probably had 80% white audience and yet nearly 100% of theon stage talent was black, but these people don't get enough celebrities representing them. They have to be at least 33% of the leading roles in Hollywood films as well.
Are "Proud-Americans" stupid?
Probably but it's beneficial to society to have some level of group identity and its probably best to do it at a national level.
so naturally, people will favor their experience in a particular city/town/state over another and would identify the ways in which living in a particular place informed their values and character (which your environment will have direct impact on).
Good for them. That isn't a logical way to approach things. They should probably do a cost benefit analysis on the cultural values they are accepting.
Teachers are more likely to label black students as troublemakers than they are white students with the same number of
That's likely because the black students with the same amount of infractions are bigger troublemakers. Studies have also shown teachers are less likely to give black students infractions for the same incidents. You won't label the less infractions as racist against whites because of your presupposition though. So if a teacher writes up 100% of a white students infractions but 50% of a black students and they have the same number of infractions than you have the black kid asthe bigger trouble maker. Also this wouldn't accou t for all the stupid shit the kids do that can't really be used to discipline them.
Researchers reported that teachers asked to rate students’ academic abilities scored Black children far below white peers with identical scores:
I can't click on links and simultaneously reply due to a bad internet connection. I will click on this link later.
Black students are more likely to attend schools with inexperienced or low-paid teachers.
Yeah it's not due to white people thinking black people it's due to the fact highly skilled teachers when given the option will go to places which are safer and with parents not as likely to go into defensive mode when you call them up to try and get them to discipline their children for their in school behavior.
You're basing your opinion, not on data or any kind of research, but on a youtube video. You're arguing that white people are less likely to discriminate, but should discriminate? Again, lots of jumping around happening here.
I said white people are less likely to be racist. I gave you an alternate explanation why blacks would get less help in emergency situations and it's because they are statistically more likely to be a threat to those helping them. The video I showed you is one of millions I could where this type of erratic behaviors in emergencies that male emergencies worse can be seen.
Compared to white people, black people are less likely to receive preventive health services and often receive lower-quality
Okay nothing I denied and probably is explained less by your hypothesis that doctors are racist and more to the fact that black people usually are poor meaning they have worse health insurance, go to overrun free health clinics and delay going to the hospital longer when suffering. That's black actions not white actions causing worse health outcomes.
A substantial number of white laypeople and medical students and residents hold false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites and demonstrates that these beliefs predict racial bias in pain perception and treatment recommendation
I don't even know what you are talking about here. Like the belief that black people feel less pain? That doesn't seem like a belief a medical professional would have. If they recieve less pain medicine for being more stoic than it isn't that medical personnel are being g racist it is that they are taking the stoic demeanor to mean they aren't in as much pain as some cry baby white person.
Black and white lenders were not treated the same even when equally qualified
Doubtful, you literally fill out a form online where an algorithm decides whether you can get money or not. This is not the 1950s where people show up to a bank and beg a bank manager. I have literally never asked anyone for a loan in person.
Black boys raised in America, even in the wealthiest families and living in some of the most well-to-do neighborhoods, still earn less in adulthood than white boys with similar backgrounds
The article I was ale to click on it said the differences are often attributed to the black person scoring lower on tests. Therefore they are less competent and their bosses most likely pick up on it. The objection to this rebuttal was that women outperform their test scores so it can't explain the differences among white and black men. It's a nonsense objection to the rebuttal because women in general are more social creatures better at navigating social situations. Meaning they aren't outperfor.ing due to the same type of competence but because they are incredibly competent at navigating social situations. I can tell you that when I was in sales, it was unnatural and hard for me to get as many sales as my female coworkers. Every female that went into sales where was killed it, meanwhile most men failed and the ones that succeeded usually were still less competent because of the social aspect than women who worked half as hard, and if a woman worked just as hard as me she would outperform me by a significant amount. The study just doesn't prove what you think it does.
Black employment in the testing sector is suppressed in the absence of testing, a finding which is consistent with ex ante discrimination on the basis of drug use perception
Can you just explain what this means? Like the people who administer Comptia exams? What does testing sector mean? And why would drug use perception stop a person from hiring somebody? If you smell like weed I won't hire you personally but other than that you need to literally fail a drug test before I would deny you employment for something like that.
I fid respo d to this stuff but honestly I am not sure what you are arguing. I think for the most part we agree about disproportionate outcomes for African Americans. We likely just disagree with the cause of the reason and especially the solutions to the problemss
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Probably because this is to many (myself included) a silly issue to be elevating in our politics. I've never in my life met anyone who thought it would be anything but outrageous for an adult to show someone else's child porn,
And yet there are thousands of school administrators doing it everyday and then when conservatives make laws to prevent it, the left throws hissy fits.
If it is rare, what is with the backlash against schools that choose not to have porn available for children?
I've also seen what many conservatives are calling porn. In some cases it's just a guy dressed up in drag.
There it is. You literally defending showing children porn by downplaying it as books about drag queens and not what it actually is in most cases. Visual depictions of sex meant to arouse children. It's the reason why many of these parents are censored in these meetings when they start showing images from these books.
a collection of isolated incidents right wingers are using to craft a picture that isn't real
How many isolayedincidents do you need to make it a pattern and why attack laws that prevent teachers from showing kids porn if it isn't common or the intent of the left to do so?
Beyond that Don't talk to me until you watch ops documentary. It's ridiculous that I can listen to 10 hours of the lefts best arguments on a weekly basis but you refuse to watch a single 2 hour documentary
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Should the constitution be terminated?", I disagree with Trump.
Trump isn't really a conservative but it's pretty obvious that the left is a larger threat to the bill of rights. the bill of rights being the most important part of the constitution.
I dont Trump has really stated he wants to suspend the constitution despite his hot take on some things. I guess the accusation comes down to the fact that he disagreed with a lot of people about what the constitution gave Mike Pence th authority to do. It also seems that the left has acknowledged he is correct because the changed some laws (the rhetoric thy use is strengthened" to ensure that the law is more Lear on the issue. To me that is undermi ing th constitution if constitutional scholars are in disagreement over what the VP is allowed to do and especially if the laws see altered so they are more clear on the matter.
Created:
-->
@thett3
Yes by the definition of “book bans” these people are using like 99.99% of books ever published are “banned” because they aren’t in some random school library. Meanwhile these same people support the actual censorship of “disinformation” and “dangerous ideas”
This is why I stopped being a libertarian. The libertarians will see this hypocrisy and help the left meet their objectives meanwhile there is no leftwing equivalent that helps conservatives. Liberal bills in congress are almost always passed unanimously by democrats, while when you watch Cspan, conservative bills usually have a good 10 l% or more conservatives defect. Then they cry that liberals always win.
Created:
Why are your citations mostly links to the exact same Wikipedia article? It's weird.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
So why is it worse for a white person to have fathers who are drug addicts than whites? Does a white 9 month old baby have more control over whether their parent is a drug addict than a 9 month old black baby?
Created:
Posted in:
Russia would at least have more cannon fodder to throw at Ukraine if those fetuses weren't aborted
Created:
Posted in:
This is why people need to give the bird to banks and use crypto in their own physical cold wallets.
What happened is straight fascism and if I was a conservative and saw this happen to liberals it would wake me up to who the true bad guys are and I would immediately switch sides.
Created:
Why do you hate black people? Lots of marginalized people have similar struggles in childhood so what is it about black people and other poor people who face hardships?
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I don't have a problem with parents objecting to their kids being shown highly inappropriate sexual content at schools, I have an issue with people acting like these extreme examples are really the norm, and acting like this is some kind of plot by liberals to sexualize your children so that they can... well... whatever batshit crazy conspiracy plot follows from this.
The point to sexualize them is about spreading Marxist ideology. Marxists are against the traditional family unit because it gets in the way of making the government the authority. The same reason for the anti religious impulse.
Why do I know this? I was a Marxist. The criticism isn't of all liberals. The criticism is mostly of the cultural Marxists. Although a lot of times I use the term liberal because it seems like when liberals speak against this sort of cultural Marxism than other liberals turn on the , I would say most liberals.
Here are some examples
Jordan Peterson- is a liberal but liberals think of him as a bad person because apparently he doesn't want to use people's preferred pronouns
J.K. Rowling- very far leftist who liberals turn on because she doesn't buy into the woke agenda.
The guy who wrote the Bell Curve, legitimately a Marxist who was pointing out IQ dufference so governments would know where to pool their money to help the largest amount of people.
It's over And over and over. So it's natural to think that if every liberal who speaks out on the woke agenda is basically tossed out of their own movement by fellow liberals than apparently most liberals view liberalism as being pro woke agenda.
I watch bread tube and I never see these people criticize showing children porn. They usually ignore these "book bannings" or label them something they aren't.
Created:
-->
@thett3
Good luck to you. You honestly should have a large amount of kids if you can. I have 2 and honestly should have had 4 l promised myself bo new kids after 40 though because of increased issues with babies born even to older fathers and this is even among older fathers who impregnate younger women.
40 was my cut off, and I don't have the right partner anyway. Essentially I am only with her because I think leaving her would put her in a position where she is unable to provide high quality parenting to my younger son. She has shitty decision making skills and isn't capable of making as much s me so getting rid of her would likely cause her to start fucking some white trash person, immediately moving in with them and not going g through the proper vetting process before exposing my son to him.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
What? Who did that?
I am an idiot. The post was there the whole time. I think it is post 22
Created: