Total posts: 2,182
-->
@Stephen
You certainly are behind in your bible studies, aren't you? "The goal" is, everlasting life. John 3:16
No, the goal is a relationship with God.
John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his own begotten son, that whoever shall believe in him, shall not perish, but have eternal life."
Stop it! It is all about self preservation and securing your place in the here after in the presence of "the lord". Mathew 18:3. John 14:2.
Nope. People think wrongly of heaven and hell.
Heaven is a paradise, but the way you describe it is in God's presence eternally.
The gift of heaven won't be worldly things, but eternal peace and love. All of the things we do in heaven won't be like what we do on earth at all.
It will be infinite praise and worship. Infinite love and peace.
Hell is not a punishment for sinners, rather it's a place for the ones who rejected God on their own accords, and hell is separation from God.
So, all of Gods wonders, will be gone. Everything that he has ever created good, will be gone.
"They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might" Matthew25: 46. " 2Thessalonians 1; 9
Yes.
"They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might" Matthew25: 46. " 2Thessalonians 1; 9
Separation from the presence of the Lord = eternal destruction, because that is separate from Gods creation.
And I believe that I am correct in pointing out to you that you have posted your thread in the wrong sub forum. It should have been posted here>>>
Thank you for letting me know.
I was doing a bunch of political forums and must have just forgotten.
Created:
Some Christians are blinded by new teachings in the modern church, that strive to exploit God for financial gain.
Some think:
If I believe in God, go to church, and ask him to forgive me every time I do something bad, then I will go to heaven.
This is false.
The goal for Christians isn't to go to heaven. It is to grow a relationship with God.
The end goal is not safety for self, but relationship with the creator.
Hell is separation from the creator, not a punishment.
You chose.
Created:
Posted in:
Hitler promised his people that if they let him rule, that he would:
Save the forests.
Save the trees.
Fix the climate.
Make life better for everyone.
Bring world peace.
Save the world.
Sound like someone you know on the WEF (World Economic Forum)?
Created:
In a world where if you say the wrong things politically, you disappear...............
In a world where prejudice from 75 years ago, from people who aren't alive anymore is still held..............
In a world, where children and parents are indoctrinated by lies from government....................
In a world, where everything is controlled by the government................
In a world, where children are exploited for entertainment................
In a world where people dress up as animals......................
This describes both the Hunger Games and the USA.
Created:
Posted in:
Making life harder for the 11 million undocumented immigrants based on drug cartels that are out of their control is group justice. Group justice is bad, whether through reperations or deportations. Deporting an undocumented immigrant who did not sell fetanyl won’t help the fetanyl crisis get resolved.
True, but you're assuming that we know everyone's specific backgrounds.
Some of the "immigrants could be drug cartel members getting through the border."
Let me ask you this:
To solve the school shooting problem, should we have more security in the schools?
Most of the students are just trying to graduate and are not a threat, but you still have to take precautions.
It's the same deal with the border.
Yes, most of the immigrants are probably good people, but we still have to take precautions.
The border crisis right now is proof that we need precautions.
The fentanyl crisis happens to of happened very closely to when Joe Biden took restrictions off of our southern border. Because it makes it easier for the cartels to get in.
And it's not like immigrants can't get into our country. There is a legal way to get into our country. It takes some time, but it's not like we are locking these people out.
There have been enough undocumented murderers that have been found (and should be put to death for murder) for me to think that the undocumented can be prosecuted if they harm someone else in the US.
If you are born in the USA, you immediately have documentation.
Give me one example of an immigrant with no documentation whatsoever that was caught using DNA analyzation.
A lot of the undocumented can’t afford it because it costs I think tens of thousands of dollars to go through legalization fees and if you don’t have a job to begin with, you can’t afford it. Remove the buerocratic waste, and you will get the undocumented to afford their legalization (which wouldn’t be needed if not required by our many state government). How about let the counties decide their own undocumented policy. An undocumented immigrant can settle in a blue county, afford the legalization fees, get legalized, and settle in any red county?
If you can't afford something, that doesn't mean that you can do illegal things to get what you want/ or need.
We can't do anything about the corruption in other countries except help their country out.
We shouldn't have to take down our own safety precautions just to help other nations people.
Now don't get me wrong, it's not that I hate people who want to come to the US, but in the end, it's the American people who come first, and you can't just jeopardize the American people for other nations people.
The best we can do to help other nations peoples, is by sending out our support to them.
Not jeopardize our own people.
They will get jobs as long as they don’t have welfare. I support eliminating welfare for the undocumented 100%.
Ok, well that's a start in the right direction, but they still should be documented. No one should be living in the U.S. without any documentation.
Most counties that border Mexico vote blue.
Yes, but this doesn't prove anything.
Immigrants tend to move away from the border further into states like Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California.
California is obviously blue, because of..........certain people. So that's not related to the border.
That leaves Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico.
Texas and Arizona are red states, and New Mexico are blue states.
And given Texas's size, I think that it is safe to say that they red outdoes the blue.
War on drugs. Making it harder for people to get access to weed has caused them to do to shady dealers to get their weed, which was often laced with fetanyl. If the war on drugs ended, you would get more legal weed, but since the weed is obtained at a drugstore instead of a shady dealer, people get safe weed. This is how Portugal eliminated their drug problem; they let people get safe drugs at regulated stores.
But you have to put into account the coincidence of the border crisis, and the fentanyl crisis, happening at the same time.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
Just trying to protect them.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Trump tried to cancel this, but it never passed.
Even if it did, the safety audit that Trump cancelled was not for that type of train.
Created:
We should combat Gender Dysphoria with love and compassion, not drugs, and surgery.
As of right now, people are saying the best way to combat Gender Dysphoria, is to take a bunch of drugs and hormones', and get a bunch of surgery, which doesn't make sense, because it is a mental illness, not a physical one. We have no evidence for this claim, and there are other ways to combat it that have the same effect, without cutting off body parts, and taking drugs.
Especially for kids this should be the case, because the drugs used during "transitions" are the same ones given to pedophiles.
We should not castrate children. We should not cut of body parts of children. We should not give the same drugs to kids as we do pedophiles.
As for adults this should be their decision, but doctors instead of using greed and money as an agenda, should promote facts and do their job in providing the best solution possible, and giving the patients other options.
We live in a world where people are starting to think the best way to fixt gender dysphoria (a mental illness) is to physically cut off body parts, take out organs, castrate people, and give them drugs to stay on for the majority of their lives.
This is not a solution, it is a bandage. One that is slowly degrading, and dying.
Using other solutions like gender therapy, where someone can get help with love and compassion to combat this mental disorder instead of drugs, would be a better solution.
Now, I'm not saying that we should make gender transition surgery, illegal, I am saying that it should be illegal for children under the age of 18, and doctors cannot be biased when giving options to their patients.
Mental illness is a real thing, but the solution is not to remove pieces of one's body, especially children.
Created:
Some people want to blame Trump for the derailment in Ohio. And to that I say........how? They say, it's because Trump tried to pass a bill that caused the standards on certain cargo trains making them more unsafe. But the thing is, the train that derailed were not the ones Trump lowered the standards on. And even if they were, it still doesn't matter, because that bill never even passed.
Created:
How much money exactly has he “taken away” from our border?
Helping Ukraine increases our security by showing dictators around the world that if they start a war of aggression, the international community will respond and take action.
It's not about maintaining security, it's about protecting the American people, before sending another message to other countries.
If you defend other countries and can't even defend your own, what does that say about you?
Created:
Joe Biden, instead of helping out with the crisis in Ohio, and our Southern Border has decided to go over to another country and pledge 100 million more dollars to help Ukraine.
In total, he has spent 75 billion on Ukraine, and actually taken away money from our border, and reduced the amount of safety there.
So, all in all, he has endangered our country, while strengthening another.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
So go after the drug cartels, not the undocumented, who probably have nothing to do with drug cartels.
We have to remove the problem from the U.S. does not do something to chase them.
Letting the undocumented in, would do just that.
So go after the drug cartels, not the undocumented, who probably have nothing to do with drug cartels.
Yes......Americans. Who have been documented to be born in the U.S.
American records usually don’t contain any DNA. There have been plenty of undocumented immigrants arrested for murder or rape (and they should get killed for THAT crime, but their documentation status should have nothing to do with it.)
Yes, they do.
You can't find someone who doesn't exist on any records in the U.S. just by DNA analyzation, and other things.
We should fix our problems by going after the root causes (fetanyl dealers) and not side effects(more undocumented immigrants).
I halfway agree. We should go on the offence (the fentanyl dealers) and play a good defense.
Most immigrants aren't bad, but we can't take any chances until we have assured the fact, that the dealers are, gone, but guess what? They will never be gone, because of corruption.
If good people/immigrants really wanted to come to the U.S., they would be willing to go through the paperwork.
I wouldn’t worry about it. I’d welcome the extra taxpayers into the country to boost GDP and to make it easier to pay off the debt.
It's definitely something to worry about.
Probably over 95% of undocumented immigrants have nothing to do with fetanyl. Our immigration policy should keep the cartels out and let everyone else in. If a cartel comes to America, they get killed, making them less likely to come here.
Yes, but when you have an open border, like we do now, then it's kind of hard to do that, don't you think?
Also, cartels are smart, they will find another way.
Our best and most safe option is to have an actual border and have immigrants who really do want to come into the country do the paperwork.
If you're going to be part of a country, you should at least be a citizen of it.
You talk about immigrants helping to pay off debt, but that won't work unless they are citizens.
I said COUNTIES that border Mexico tend to vote blue. Texas is a red state, but the counties that border Mexico that Texas owns are blue.
Not true.
Not the exact number, but around 60 are red, and 20 are blue.
In general, counties that border Mexico vote blue because they have expierienced the undocumented first hand and they can confirm they aren’t a threat.
How do you explain the fentanyl crisis then?
Created:
Remember when Joe Biden couldn't define America.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Yes, this is true, because of human nature.
And human nature is to sin/be violent.
But this does not mean we should not at least try to stop violence.
Created:
Posted in:
Words.
No pictures unless I'm daydreaming.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Law enforcement uses DNA and cameras, if ANYONE commits a victim producing crime in America, law enforcement finds out and there is prosecution.
Yea, but you can't link DNA to anyone who you don't have any U.S. records of.
And it's not likely that immigrants would do this, but drug cartels would.
You can have health DNA on file and still not be documented with the federal government. This doesn’t justify deportation.
Again, you can't link DNA to someone who doesn't have any American records.
You obviously don’t want fetonal in the country, but the solution is to replace ICE with FCE (Fetonal Control and Enforcement). Their job is to go after fetanyl dealers while leaving the undocumented that have nothing to do with fetonal (the majority) alone.
Our solutions to our problems should be to live with our problems.
It should be to take out an irradicate those problems, depending on the danger it causes.
We shouldn't have to have a job where people go after and chase fentanyl dealers in our country. We should get rid of it entirely. Make it illegal, except in certain medical treatments, that are approved and monitored by doctors.
I don’t think you have to worry about the undocumented breaking into people’s homes on a large scale.
When you have about 1 million - 2 million people coming over the border every year, then you probably should worry about that.
Again, most of immigrants are nice, but we can't just assume they all are. Cartels still exist, and bad people exist, we can't just forget about them.
But they are some of the bluest rural counties in the country. This is often because they expierienced the undocumented first hand and they can confirm the undocumented aren’t a threat.
Ever heard of a state called Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, or Arizona?
Even Canadian borders, like Idaho, Montana, North Dakota.
These are all red states.
Created:
Your calling Trump supporters stupid, yet forget that there are black Trump supporters, so your calling black people stupid.
Gotcha B****
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
When that group is a group of friends, that’s true. When that group of people is an entire country, I don’t see the point in excluding anyone.Can you be specific with the legal reasons, safety reasons, and health reasons?
Legal reasons:
Right to vote
Investigation of homicides
Law enforcement identification
Health Reasons:
Doctors and medical workers won't be able to access your medical history if you don't have any identification in this country.
Safety reasons:
Law enforcement need to identify people.
That's pretty self-explanatory.
The point in excluding people, is because terrorists and bad people exist. Also, drug empires as well. You need to take precaution in order to keep people safe from these types of things, therefore you need identification.
The vast majority of the undocumented don’t break into houses where they are not welcome. But if they break into an owner’s home without his consent, the owner should get a shotgun and protect his property.
Yes, but again people aren't always nice.
A person should use a shotgun to protect their property, but precautions should be in place in order for a homeowner to not have to do that.
It's the last line of defense. Not the first line.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
You know I don't read your posts Brother D.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Define masculine hands. I’ve met girls with bigger hands than me and I’m a guy (I still have a 6ft personality). I think hand size has more to do with your height; I’m pretty short. My mom has veiny hands. She’s cis.
"In human hands, the relative lengths of the second and fourth fingers differ between males and females. In males, the second digit (2D, or index finger) is usually shorter than the fourth digit (4D, or ring finger), whereas in females the index finger is generally equal to or longer than the ring finger"
How so? They look small and thin.
A lot of men are small and thin.
I'm talking about body structure.
He can't change his bones.
If you dig him up 100 years in the future, then his bone structure will be male, and scientists will identify him as being male.
Furries are distinguishable to foxes. Not every transwomen is distinguishable to a cis female.
What makes a Trans woman?
Is it simply identifying?
Or getting all the surgery finished?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Why should one need to be a citizen to live in the USA?
Really........
In order to be part of a group, that group has to accept you first.
Many reasons, for legal reasons, safety reasons, and health reasons.
I don’t see the issue with open borders for the households that want it. If you don’t know anyone that’s undocumented, you wouldn’t want them in your house; that’s fine. But if you have a parent that’s undocumented and don’t want to be raised by a single mother (family values), you are going to want your undocumented father in the house.
Houses can be broken into, and houses are not countries.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
When he was undocumented, would you have deported him? If the answer is yes, he would have never been able to buy Twitter and protect free speech.
If I had that authority then I would.
It doesn't matter about buying Twitter.
I think that it was a great thing that he bought Twitter, but I still would have deported him, because he didn't have American documentation.
He was a non-American citizen living in America.
You didn’t answer the question: What is the point of kicking out undocumented immigrants?
It's pretty simple, and yes I did answer.
If you want to live in the USA, you have to be a citizen of the USA. And in order to be a citizen of the USA, you have to have U.S. documentation.
If we didn't have documentation for immigrants, and people who don't have citizenship, then why not just have open borders?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
Look up:
Alex Kompothecras
Jessica Mulroney
Peter Hunziker
Craig Gore
Hartley Sawyer
Adam Rapoport
Taylor Selfridge
Etc.
All actors and celebrities who were fired for being politically incorrect.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
It’s a deep voice for a woman, but some cis women have deeper voices than others. Occasionally I hear a masculine voice, but it’s rare and some females I met have comparable voices.
You also have to look at masculine defining features.
Look at his hands. Those are very veiny masculine hands.
Look at the body type. His body type is very masculine.
I can put on fake fox ears, and a fox tail, but that doesn't make me a fox.
I can also put on a fake vaginia, and breasts, but that doesn't make me a woman.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
You both posted something along these lines, and I'm curious, because this "politically incorrect" fear is a little nebulous. Like let's say I'm at my job and I call a colleague a racial slur, should I be able to be fired?
Saying a racial slur is not being politically incorrect, it is just being plain rude. It would cause disruption to your work and probably annoy your boss, all because you decided to say something rude and racist.
In the end, those type of decisions should be made by the boss.
Also this is why we have HR.
Presume I work for a private company. I guess I'm curious as to where you mean the line is between politically correct vs. incorrect, and how such a criteria could ever be written in a sensible way in an employment agreement. What's something you think is politically incorrect that might get you fired?
We are not saying people should be fired if they are politically incorrect. We said people should not be fired if they are politically incorrect.
If you look it up, a lot of cases of actors, music makers, and employees are fired or "let go" for being politically incorrect to one political party.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
What’s the point of FORCING people to be documented? Elon Musk was undocumented for the longest time, and if he wasn’t deported, he would never be able to buy Twitter and protect ma FREE SPEECH from the socialists that previously ran Twitter.
I won't defend Elon Musk. He should of been documented. Now he is.
We can't change the past. I don't see how this is a point.
What’s the point of excluding the undocumented? The unborn don’t have American citizenship either, but I wouldn’t kick them out of the country over it (or abort them either).
Well if the mother is documented, then you can't because the baby is in the mother. So to kick the baby out, you would have to kick the mother out.
The unborn have nothing to do with this.
If you are born in America, you are an American citizen.
But being an American citizen doesn't give you value.
You have value from conception.
See the dilemma here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
No you do not. You care about your status and anything that appeals to that. Everybody does
I care about logic and reasoning, and using to find successful tools to better society.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Humans want to know what's good for themselves and their family, they do not care about the facts or logic behind it
I am a human, and I care about facts and logic.
A lot of humans do.
Created:
Posted in:
Who says? And since this surgery doesn’t affect anyone else, why don’t you mind your own business? Leave it up to the child, the parents and the doctor(s) they are using. You know, Freedom.
Who says? We literally don't have enough research on gender reassignment surgeries'.
It does affect other people, because if someone is psychologically hurt, it can affect others.
Children don't have the maturity, or the brain power to make those type of non-reversible, life altering surgeries.
If a parent truly loved there child, they wouldn't let their child be an experiment.
And I'm pretty sure the doctors who do these types of surgerys know the risks, and don't care, because of all the money that they are making.
Freedom doesn't mean doing whatever you want. It means being able to make whatever decisions you want, may that be legal or illegal.
But you do think it’s fine for parents to indoctrinate their children into Christianity, another silly religion, because few people would choose to follow religion if it was introduced to them as adults, right?
Not a silly religion.
Christianity teaches moral truth.
Moral good, is good right?
Well if Christianity is preaching moral good (which it is), then that proves that it has a lot of benefit.
Children who grow up Christian are more likely to not commit violent crimes, be more wealthy, and have a better life.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405_2
I don't think Russia poses too big of a threat, because of the fact that they can't even take down Ukraine, and almost 150,000 Russian soldiers have died because of the attack.
China does worry me more, though but with NATO, and all of our allies, it shouldn't be that big of a problem.
We definitely are going into WW3 in the next 10 years no doubt, but I don't think we need to prepare for doomsday.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
If you fired every unvaccinated person from their job, the unemployment rate would skyrocket. It’s not worth raising the unemployment rate to 8% from 3% over a vaccine mandate. I don’t want to pay for the unvaccinated people’s welfare.I don’t think a company should be allowed to fire you for ANY of the following reasons:1) Your unvaccinated2) Your LGBT3) You post politically incorrect things on the internet (or if your super woke; I don’t want AOC supporters fired from their jobs).4) You are undocumented.5) Your race, religion, or genderWe need to make it easier to get jobs to minimize the welfare state.
I agree with most of this
You shouldn't be fired for:
1.) Being unvaccinated.
2.) Being Gay/Lesbian, or Trans.
3.) Being politically incorrect.
4.) Your race, religion, or gender.
But when it comes to documentation, I belive at the minimum, every American citizen must have documentation, to prove they are American citizens. If anyone who is living in America is not an American citizen, then they shouldn't be living in America, because if you live in America you are an American citizen, therefore you must have documentation proving you are an American citizen. Visitation is different.
Created:
Posted in:
Very interesting. So children should be subjected to indoctrination. But parents can’t approve amputation under any circumstances? Even if a doctor thinks it is an appropriate step to save the child?
I will answer your question.
Parents should have the right to indoctrinate their children, because they are the parents, and they brought this child into the world.
What crosses the line, is when the parents do something to their child that puts them at risk.
We don't have enough research that can prove Gender Reassignment surgery does not cause any risk.
We also don't have enough research to prove is does cause risk.
So what we should be doing is testing the long term effects of this type of transition, and the psychological effects of it.
It's would be the same thing as a parent letting their child smoke.
Let's make an example:
If a parent lets their parents smoke then they are risking their future psychological state, and physical state.
Yes they have the right to indoctrinate/persuade their child to do things, but not things that put the child at risk.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
I honestly wasn't surprised.
The only posts he makes is about whining about Trump, and calling people racist.
He is the definition of a far leftist.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
YOU can hear the voice being masculine. But I can’t. It’s high pitched.
Well.......then I guess that's on you then. Anyone with a functioning brain could hear the masculinity in his voice.
People can deny that they do, but they still do.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The issue is when pro life conservatives (who think abortion is murder), vote for a guy who is the father of an aborted baby (but he says pro life things). If you want to vote for a Republican that’s married to a guy, I have no issue with that. If you want to vote for a Republican candidate who is married to a guy and wants gay marraige banned for other people, I do have an issue with that. Matt Schlapp’s anti gay comments that were followed by him sexually assaulting a man. Now if he wasn’t married to someone else, if he was fine with others doing it, and if it was consensual, I wouldn’t have an issue with it. But it’s none of these, so it’s hypocritical.
I agree, but again, not all conservatives think this way.
So when you say the conservative movement, what your really saying is I don't respect the conservatives who contradict what they preach.
You can't disagree with a whole movement because a couple of people are incompetent in that movement, but you still agree with the basic values.
If you don’t look at issues through a partisan lens, you’re an independent. Most Americans are independents by this definition. But most of our politicians aren’t; they just say what the base wants to hear instead of coming to their own conclusions.
I agree.
This is why I like Trump, because he says things no one expects him to, and speaks his mind.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
the marketplace of ideas does not exist. Humans are not that rational
You would be surprised how rational humans can get.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
You always have to ask each individual what they believe.
Someone might be a conservative, but have some differing viewpoints, from the main conservative movement.
They would still hold more conservative values, but they would also add their own opinions as well.
For example, I know a lot of conservatives who make exceptions for abortions in the case of rape, and incest.
I know a lot of conservatives who are pro-gay marriage.
When someone says that they are a conservative, that doesn't mean that all of their thinking has to line up with a strict guideline.
Everyone should have their own opinion on things, and that is a good thing. That's called using your American freedom of speech.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
I’m no biology expert, but my guess would be a cinder piece of cartilage that is surrounded by a cylinder piece of flesh that is near the middle of the body.
Penis: "the male genital organ of higher vertebrates, carrying the duct for the transfer of sperm during copulation. In humans and most other mammals, it consists largely of erectile tissue and serves also for the elimination of urine."
If the standards don't live up to that, then it isn't a real penis.
But if you had no idea Lux was trans, you would think Lux is a woman.
Not necessarily. You can even hear the masculine sound in his voice, and other traits that he has, that shows he has a lot of biological male character traits.
Again, this does not refute what I said. He is a Trans-woman, not a woman.
Lux is a biological man, but society should treat them as a female because I can’t tell Lux apart from a generic cis female.
Really? The voice does not match the face at all, nor does the body.
Isn’t a vagina just a hole? And I heard gender surgeries inverted the dick.
Vagina: "the muscular tube leading from the external genitals to the cervix of the uterus in women and most female mammals."
Again, if it doesn't live up to these standards, then it is not a vagina.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
There is nothing wrong with this. The "market place of ideas" is a fat cope and has never existed. Either enforce your beliefs or someone else will.
There is a difference between promoting, and enforcing ideas,
And denying anything that opposes your ideas, even though it is right.
The marketplace and selling products are significantly more different when it comes to laws, and bills passed.
Created:
Because dummy, it takes years to pass laws in Congress.
If they even made an attempt to change that law.
If the Biden Administration was really worried about the disasters that might be caused because of this, then they would have made it their first priority to start enacting passing this law. They didn't even make an attempt to fix it.
It's equally both the Trump and Biden administrations fault, because Trump made the stupid decision, and the Biden didn't even attempt to stop it.
There resolved. Both sides are wrong.
Created:
This is just all an attempt to try and defend what Tucker Carlson is going to release about Jan. 6th.......
Created:
No one is going to take you seriously when you pull crap like this dude.
Almost every topic you have made, has been beaten with logic and simple statistics.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Actually Trump caused the accident. His administration rolled back the rule on trains carrying flammable liquids, stating that the cost of the new braking systems outweighed the benefits of accident prevention. The Associated Press found that the Department of Transportation during the Trump administration underestimated the future damages of derailments during its analysis by more than $100 million.
Liberals always find a way to blame Trump.
Lets not forget who is the Department of Transportation Secretary.
Pete Buttigieg.
If Trump's administration rolled back this rule, then couple of questions:
1. Why didn't the Biden administration fix this problem?
2. Why didn't Pete Buttigieg fix this problem?
Let's also not forget that ever since Pete Buttigieg became the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, there have been crashes, derailments, and fires all over the country.
Trump isn't even the president anymore and hasn't been for 2 years. If this decision by his administration was problematic, then the Biden administration should have done something to fix it, with the two years that they have had to do so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Elliott
True, but it's a different kind of humor.
Trump is funnier because of the way he speaks.
Biden is funny because of the fact that he can't speak.
Created:
Ok, so obviously you have no idea about what is going on in the world.
The Biden administration has not sent any help at all, to our southern border or East Palestine Ohio, but instead Biden sends himself over to ukraine with a 500 million dollar check, to help them with their struggle before the American people.
The Federal Government wouldn't even do anything about Ohio, but Trump knew this so took it upon himself to go to East Palestine Ohio, and when he did that, the Federal Government freaked out because they didn't want him to have all of the glory, and decided to start helping.
Trump knew that the Federal Government would only help if he made an appearance their. I know he knew this, because from a video inside of McDonalds, he says that exact thing.
So by Trump simply going over their, Trump has helped the American people more in their time of need, than Biden has.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
China is likely to completely overtake the US in the military strength.
I doubt it.
We have seen in recent years (the Russian and Ukrainian war) that simply just manpower is not as big of a factor as it used to be.
Firepower with new weapons is what wins wars nowadays.
The U.S. has far superior firepower than China.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Well, if China takes over the world or destroys in by 2049...I'm good with it. I'll be almost 80 by then. I'll just go out in a blaze of glory, taking a few CCP soldiers out with me.
LOL.
Same here brother.
Not going to be 80, but still going out in a blaze of glory.
Created:
Posted in:
That’s bullshit. Wokeness encourages us to acknowledge the reality of privilege, bigotry, and racism and the negative impact it has had and continues to have on marginalized groups of people.
Why must we marginalize ourselves based soley upon the actions of those who no longer are alive?
Created: