Total posts: 2,182
Posted in:
-->
@Melcharaz
you are missing what im saying. you are unable to process what i said. perfection doesnt mean sinlessness.
Perfection means to be without flaw.
And sin is flaw, yes?
So, to be perfect, you must be without flaw/sin.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Melcharaz
can you back that up with scripture?
Matthew 5:48
"Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect."
read what i posted above that. #47
Ok lets look.
jesus explains later. perfect like God is perfect, he does good to all people. Good and evil.perfect in attitude and obedience. perfect doesnt mean sinless, it means you are doing something the rightest and bestest way.matthew 5:43-48james 3:1-2
This is true, and doesn't contradict what I said.
In order to get into the kingdom of heaven you have to be perfect.
But no one is perfect so how do people get to heaven?
Simple answer. Jesus died for all of our sins. Which means that when you accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, and Love him, then, all of your past, present, and future sins, are paid for meaning when you enter the kingdom of heaven, you are perfect (without sin), because God paid for it.
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
I am not saying 2mg always kills people.
But with the fentanyl and the other conditions that he had, its safe to say that fentanyl played a role in his death.
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
2 mg of fentanyl can kill people though.
Fentanyl is a very deadly drug.
And that along with all of Georges other conditions makes it likely that it was his cause of death.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Is a false claim. Drugs and alcohol usually dont fix any problems. They usually increase problems greatly.
No. Drugs are in medicine, but medicine can still be abused.
Reassignment surgery is solely based off of how someone feels, and has nothing to do with any physical disability.
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
Just because fentanyl has these side effects when overdosed doesn’t necessarily mean that George Floyd overdosed. He was understandably panicked, which makes it hard to breath and stresses your heart, he also had Covid.
It only takes about 2 mg of fentanyl to kill a person.
Now George did not have this much in his system, but that, and combining him having Covid (as you claimed) and his pre-existing heart conditions, along with the fact that he was resisting arrest (putting a lot of strain on himself) has the right combination to kill a man.
A combination of Covid, Fentanyl, pre-existing heart conditions, and the resistance is more evidence of his death, than a report where he couldn't breath, and the officer had his knee on his neck.
There was absolutely no injury to the neck, and if there were circulation cut off, then it wouldn't of taken 9 minutes for George to be unconscious, it would only take 30 seconds.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
That's not what being a Christian is.
I suggest you take a deeper look into Christianity.
Created:
Posted in:
If someone in a state where abortion is illegal gets an abortion, then they are charged.
The only reason we don't have a lot of examples of this, is because in states where abortion is illegal, abortion clinics are shut down, therefore the only way to abort is to self induce.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Who decides what is justice? And how can we trust that person?
This is why we have debates and arguments for certain viewpoints.
Wokeness preaches, that your inherent opinion is wrong, because mine is the superior one.
When it comes to politics I think liberals and conservatives are both equally needed.
Liberals create new ideas for the times where we need a new solution.
Conservatives conserve old values for times when we need those old solutions.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I believe that a person who has "the desire to be mermaid when he is not" does not have a very high suicide rate and depression rate that changes when the desire is fullfilled.
With this logic, you could argue that giving drugs to someone who desires it, will fix there problems.
Same with alcohol.
Sometimes we desire things that are not good, necessary, or beneficial for us.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh really, and they are charged with murder? Name one case then. Name one woman who has been charged with murder for getting an abortion using a doctor.
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
He was not really showing any behavior that is indicative of a high dose of opioids. He was more fidgety, speaking quickly, and stimulated. People usually do not act that way.
I would beg to differ.
"Fentanyl works by binding to the body's opioid receptors, which are found in areas of the brain that control pain and emotions. Its effects include extreme happiness, drowsiness, nausea, confusion, constipation, sedation, tolerance, addiction, respiratory depression and arrest, unconsciousness, coma, and death."
"Similar to other opioid analgesics, fentanyl produces effects such as: relaxation, euphoria, pain relief, sedation, confusion, drowsiness, dizziness, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pupillary constriction, and respiratory depression."
Fentanyl puts the victim into somewhat of a confused relaxed state, even though they are dying from the inside, which in the police cam video, George Floyd seems pretty calm up until he is removed from the car. Then he is in a confused and sick state. Then he becomes unresponsive and is failing to breath.
Also lets not forget that the main reason for death when someone takes fentanyl, is respiratory failure, which is how George Floyd died.
Yes of course fentanyl can cause those issues. All opioids can. So can Covid though, especially if your airway isn’t fully open. Do you have any evidence fentanyl was active in his system at the time of arrest?
Mass amounts of evidence of fentanyl was found in the car they found George Floyd in.
Fentanyl did play a role in his death for sure.
it’s not that the officer completely cut off his blood supply. It’s that he was inhibiting it enough to cause problems because he did it for so long.
That's not how blood circulation works.
The cops in this video used the least amount of force that they could and according to law enforcement, they could of used even more force, and it would have been considered ok.
You have to understand that police officers are trained to be ready for any type of situation. They didn't know if he might of been on drugs and unstable. They didn't know if he had a concealed weapon on him, and they didn't know if he was perfectly fine. They have to be ready for any situation, and with the level of resistance that George Floyd showed, the officers had to use more force to bring him down.
Let's also not forget that George Floyd himself asked to be laid down on the ground. He was not pinned.
George was a big guy and when a big guy is resisting arrest, you are going to need to use excessive force for your safety and others.
Drugs could’ve easily played a role, but that’s not the best course of an argument.
I think it is a perfectly rational argument.
Fentanyl was found at the scene, and George Floyd died from respiratory failure (which is an big effect of fentanyl).
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
Ok well with a cut off of circulation, at the absolute longest, it would take about 30 - 45 seconds until the victim goes unconscious. At the longest.
Yet George Floyd is heard and seen concise for about 5 minutes.
As for George Floyds trouble with breathing, I think he actually couldn't breath. But not from the officers knee on the neck.
Too much fentanyl can cause these respiratory problems as well.
stupor, changes in pupillary size, cold and clammy skin, cyanosis, coma, and respiratory failure leading to death.
Created:
-->
@Mps1213
This is true, blood chokes do cause death with no apparent physical injury.
But after about 10 seconds of this blood choke, George Floyed would have already been unconcise.
Yet for about 5 minutes while being pressed down on, George continues to yell and speak.
Can you explain that?
Created:
-->
@b9_ntt
That is the answer.
The bible might not explicitly say Mary is the descendants of these people, and joseph of these, but using some common sense, we can work out that both Mary and joseph had sides of the family. And those sides of the family were read aloud in the bible.
It's just basic common sense.
The bible doesn't explicitly say you must not watch porn, but it implies it.
Same goes for this.
Created:
Posted in:
Wokeness is all about social justice. It's about recognizing and addressing issues of inequality, discrimination, and oppression in our society. And on the surface, that may seem like a laudable goal, right? After all, who could argue against justice and fairness for all?
But as with so many things in life, the devil is in the details. And when it comes to wokeness, those details are deeply concerning. One of the main problems with wokeness is that it is often based on a highly distorted/narrow view of reality. Woke individuals tend to see the world in terms of power dynamics, with certain groups (such as racial minorities, women, and members of the LGBTQ+ community) being viewed as victims, and other groups (such as white men) being viewed as oppressors.
This worldview is not only simplistic and reductive, but it also leads to a lot of division. Instead of focusing on what unites us as human beings, wokeness encourages us to see each other primarily as members of different identity groups, each longing for power and influence.
Another problem with wokeness is that it is often accompanied by a kind of moral absolutism. Woke individuals tend to believe that their views are not only correct, but that they are the only views that are morally acceptable. This leads to a chilling effect on free speech and open discourse, as anyone who dares to voice a dissenting opinion is immediately branded a bigot or a hater. There is the matter of wokeness' practical effects. Far from promoting true social justice, wokeness often leads to the opposite. By promoting a culture of victimhood and resentment, wokeness discourages people from taking responsibility for their own lives and encourages them to blame others for their problems.
Wokeness may have started out with good intentions, but it has turned into a dangerous and destructive force in our society. We need to reject its narrow-minded and absolutist worldview, and instead focus on what unites us as human beings. Only by doing so can we hope to build a truly just and equitable society.
Created:
Posted in:
It’s not murder you idiot. We arrest murderers in this country. Has anyone ever been arrested for getting an abortion in the last 100 years?
Yes, in the states where abortion is illegal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Women have aright to do whatever they want to their body's.
But they do not have a right to murder.
Created:
-->
@b9_ntt
Mom and dad have different sides of the family.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
Being perfect is to be without fault, to have lived without any sin.
No one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are perfect.
And no one is perfect, so how do we enter the kingdom of God?
Well, when we accept Jesus as our lord and savior, and make a relationship with him, then his blood on the cross pays for all of our past present and future sins, so that when we die, we will be perfectly cleaned by his blood.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
@Greyparrot
Again, I am not saying that this goes for all women, and all men.
I am saying that objectively this is what innately attracts women to men.
Of course, now a day, there are more stupid people, and they tend to fall for the stupid tricks of others.
But internally they know that they are not attracted to these types of people.
For women who are attracted to evil men, I think it has to do with the woman's lack of adventure or risk in her life.
And as for men who fall for evil women, it has to do with loneliness in his life.
But I am talking about if you are a man that is trying to attract a good woman than these are the traits you must hold.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You are plain wrong. Your definition of a man isn't wrong per se, but it gives off the vibe of a typical good guy cuckservative. "Man up and take responsiblity"
What is wrong with a man taking responsibility, and to go even further, why wouldn't a man take responsibility?
Men aren't the ones who are supposed to be talking about their feelings to everyone. They are supposed to suppress those feelings, for the greater good of others, because a real man is the one who cares for others over himself and does his best to lead them. A leader isn't supposed to go to therapy, or cry to his followers about the troubles in his life. He is supposed to lead and help others with this struggle. Men are leaders, by instinct and that leadership quality and ability is why we suppress our emotions more.
Now it's of course not bad to have emotions, and it's not bad to express those emotions to others, but in a world, where your masculinity is determined by your ability to suppress your emotions, you have to live and thrive with it.
Being a man is about leading, and leading comes with a cost.
A true leader won't whine and complain about his or her emotions. They will instead hold them back for the greater good of others.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You are dead wrong. Most women chase the bad boy chads then blame the men for the woman's bad instincts.
Most good women wont. The woman you don't want in your life, will chase after that kind of crap.
But the real true good women will admire this type of stuff.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
men want sex because they know it will grant them respect. Literally everything for men is respect, honor, and dignity.
I agree.
But a true man should not seek out these things in a way that makes him overconfident.
Now confidence is good and is a great thing for men. to have.
But having too much confidence can lead to pride and boasting. Those are aspects of a lot of men that is not attractive to women, nor friendly to other men.
A man should get respect, honor, and dignity from the things that he has done in his life, over things that he accomplishes. Not just simply because he demands it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
I suppose that's the fundamentals but all men essentially want respect, and they want to be dignified in something that is MUCH larger than them.
Yes, men want respect. Men also want sex, but they have to work for that. Same goes for respect.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Are you describing a man or a catholic man?There are three different types of man, as far as I'm concerned, the alpha male, the sigma male, and the beta male. I guess you were describing the last one, but the other types of man have other concerns rather than the family and the like.
The whole "Sigma, Alpha, Beta Male" thing is just basically horoscope like zodiac signs for men.
I am describing what a man should look like and act like in my opinion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Are you describing a man or a catholic man?There are three different types of man, as far as I'm concerned, the alpha male, the sigma male, and the beta male. I guess you were describing the last one, but the other types of man have other concerns rather than the family and the like.
The whole "Sigma, Alpha, Beta Male" thing is just basically horoscope like zodiac signs for men.
I am describing what a man should look like and act like in my opinion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You know nothing about women. Even their friendships are competitions. I compete with my friends sure, but i don't revolve everything with them around competition.Women are so competitive that they will even sync up their periods with close friends to avoid them stealing their man. They try to put dress their friends, out socially maneuver. While men just enjoy the company of friends.They are ruthless and will cut down their friends the second they walk away, unless their normally state is interrupted by a patriarchal society.
Are you suggesting that women are more competitive than men?
Again, I'm not saying women aren't competitive, but men are more often more competitive than women.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
They are treated like would-be criminals and are often poor due to their ancestors being slaves. For several generations after slavery was abolished, racism was still fully rampants in America if we stick to the US but also in Europe etc.
Actually the reason for blacks being poorer than the average white person is not because of a history of slavery.
It's a history of culture, because of laws that were passed that incentivised women for divorces. And a lack of a father figure in the home causes a culture where sons and daughters don't have a father like figure to look up to.
out of curiosity, if someone is wealthy due to inheriting from a slaver's chain-reaction wealth, should that be taken from them towards reparations or not?
All the money from slaves have been spent, or processed throughout the course of history in some way.
The person who owns that money did not enslave anyone, so no it shouldn't.
It's not their fault.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
that when there is no reason to improve something, refine it or change it,the man will still push to evolve and change it
So to be a man, you must strive to evolve and change things that have no reason to change?
Is that what you are stating?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Read what I write a bit slower before replying, trust me you will realise your error in the second half of your post.
Could you elaborate on the second half.
Before responding I read it over a couple times and didn't fully understand.
Please let me know my error in reading your post, and elaborate on what you meant.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I said rage and agony amongst blacks towards slavers. There is a rage among them that is often demonised because you don't understand what they're furious about.
Most modern day black Americans today don't understand either.
Because they didn't experience slavery, or true oppression.
Your don't share the same feelings as your ancestor's.
I think this movie showed both feminist and racial double standards throughout history and the rage attached in a very brilliant masterpiece.
The movie was a disgrace to the historical continuity.
You really felt the rage build in you and joy as they sliced up the slavers, in my opinion. It's very easy to go 'omg pacifism' until you see what they're up against and that violence felt like the only option.
No one today who was born in America has experienced slavery, therefore don't have a reason for violence.
Also violence towards whom? Slavers? Well there all dead, so thats not gonna be a problem.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
All men have a choice to become a slave to those instincts, or to make their life choices outside of the pressures of biological instincts.Feminism has taught men to do this.
What would be the solution to not become a slave to these instincts.
Men have the instincts, to support women and children, not persuaded by the basis of feminism.
Modern day feminism is meant to demonize men and demoralize men.
If a man has a desire to support a wife and child, that isn't driven by feminism. That is his innate instinct.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
You did not describe men from the side of reality or how men themselves actually feel they are. You are trying to say men 'should be' this way but your justification is that it's their destiny to be that way, which is untrue if not all of them are that way.
I am using evolutionary and biological history and fact, to persuade this idea of what men should be.
Now not all men are this way. That is a fact.
I am simply explaining what a man should be rather than what all men are.
What makes a man a man overall is that when there is no reason to improve something, refine it or change it, the man will still push to evolve and change it, the woman will maintain it. In my opinion this is the biggest thing that makes a man a man as opposed to a woman that I have seen during my own life.
This confuses me.
What makes a man, is when the man can't improve anything?
If that is the case, then no one is a man, because every man has something to improve always.
Now the desire to improve, fix, and upgrade, are masculine traits that men do have, as well as some women, but I don't think that is what defines a man.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
You are not prepared to be in a relationship if you think this is true.
Men do tend to have a more competitive and aggressive nature though.
Now this doesn't mean men should strive to be aggressive and super competitive in every aspect of their lives, but it is a fact that men do tend to be more competitive and aggressive in nature.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
By its medically accurate term…zygote.By its medically accurate term…fetus.
Yes of course.
But what are they?
It's not part of the woman's body, so it's not the woman's body.
And if it isn't part of the woman's body, then logically it has to be another living organism.
And if it's living then that means it has the potential to grow.
And with that potential to grow comes out a human.
So, by definition a fetus or zygote is a human.
Yes it is. If it is within her, attached to her, feeding off her…it is “biologically” a part of her body.
"It is simply untrue that the unborn child is merely “part of the mother’s body.” In addition to being genetically distinct from the time of conception, the unborn possesses separate circulatory, nervous, and endocrine systems."
No, it biologically isn't.
In the woman's body, not a part of it.
Capability (potentiality) =/= Actuality. Never has. Never will
But:
Potentiality = Possibility.
And if there is a possibility of human life, then by definition, doing anything to that possibility is the killing of a possible human life?
Is it better to let something try to live, instead of not giving it a chance at all? And in doing that we have to consider those fetuses/zygotes humans.
At birth, yes. Never before birth.
But life begins at conception.
And it is a human driven life (in other words) if left to its natural processes will create human life.
Not a baby, but a viable fetus. Because medically that is what it is. A viable fetus.
So, would it be ok to hurt or do anything morally unethical to that viable fetus two days before birth?
No, it’s not [a] person, not until birth (be it natural or by C section).
Is potential human life ok to harm?
Created:
Posted in:
"Bring your arguments to the moral perspective. Then you will succeed."
Created:
Posted in:
What makes a man?
It's a question that has been asked for centuries, and there are many different answers depending on who you ask.
But in my view, being a man means taking on responsibility and shouldering the burdens of life.
Now, let me be clear. I'm not saying that women are not capable of taking on responsibility or shouldering burdens. Of course, they are. But in general, men tend to have a more competitive and aggressive nature, and I believe this comes from our evolutionary history as hunters and protectors. In order to be a man, you must be willing to take risks and face challenges. You must be willing to work hard, to be disciplined, and to persevere through difficult times. You must be willing to put the needs of others before your own and to make sacrifices for the greater good.
A man must also have a sense of purpose and direction in life. This may involve a career, a family, or a larger mission to contribute to society. Whatever it is, a man must have a reason to get out of bed in the morning and to work towards his goals with passion and determination.
A man must be able to form and maintain strong relationships with others. This includes friendships, romantic relationships, and family bonds. A man must be able to communicate honestly and effectively, to listen to others, and to show empathy and understanding.
Being a man is not just one thing, but a combination of many factors. It's about taking on responsibility, working hard, having a sense of purpose, and forming strong relationships. These are the qualities that make a man and are essential for living a fulfilling and meaningful life.
What do you guys think?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
🤦🏼♂️ Another “person” is not involved. The ONLY person involved in a pregnant girl/woman is that girl/woman.
Then what would you call the zygote or fetus?
It is biologically not part of the woman's body.
Yet has the capability to be its own person.
Personhood is NOT established until birth. That is a resolved and undeniable fact of social-psychology but more importantly, THE LAW!
The law is also not always correct.
Personhood is defined when a person starts to exist correct?
So, if birth is the defining factor of a person, then what would you call the baby, who is in the womb 2 days before birth?
Is that still not a person, and right to kill?
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Oh did she hurt some of your racist ancestors? My apologies she should have let the slavers and rapists thrive in Africa just to make cunts happy.
No.........historically she traded with white Europeans.
And guess what she was trading?
Slaves.
Hmmmmm......interesting.
It is implied in the movie that the king who let her rise alongside him (they didn't have the word queen then and they were not together in that way) had been negotiating and trading with the slavers before she said enough is enough.The movie shows something way beyond that. I think a lot of people today do not comprehend why there is deep rage and agony amongst blacks. This movie shows what ne er ever got proper justice done for.
Yea......in the movie. Hate to break it to you, but movies don't always tell reality.
In actuality, she never ever tried to stop negotiating and trading with the Europeans, because that is what she did.
And there isn't any deep rage towards blacks, if that were the case, then slavery in America would still exist.
There have been movies made from a more sympathetic POV of Hitler btw, to show how the sensitive artist ended up as he did.
Those movies show what actually happened in history though...........they are historically accurate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
You couldn’t reproduce with the penis, but it’s still a penis so we can classify gender based on genitalia.
What makes a penis though?
If something that looks like a penis, can be classified as a penis, then you are going to have to go in nature, and classify a lot of things as penises.
No, a penis is a reproductive tool, that men have that is used in impregnate the women.
Also, a biological penis is one that you are born with.
So, if someone is not born with a penis, and they get one that looks but does not act like a penis, then it's not a real penis.
I would make that argument. It’s a better argument to make than claiming this person is a man:
It's easy to prove that he is a man.
He has the title of a trans woman, which in turn implies that he is not just a normal woman.
The only reason people put that title on themselves is because they are trying to prove a point.
Saying you're a trans woman, is the same as saying, I was born a man, but I identify as a woman.
So, if he is saying that he is a trans woman, then he is therefore admitting being born as a man.
He is admitting being a biological man.
Also how does getting your penis cut off make you a non-man.
Well, what does it make you then? A woman?
But according to you, women have vaginas so they couldn't be a woman either so......what are they.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
The Bible says stuff about getting treasure in heaven, attained only by selling all you have and giving it to the poor. If you perfer the heavenly treasure and believe God is real, you would act on it and sell all you have and give to the poor for the heavenly treasure.
Let's look at the scripture.
Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”
Using the word if implies Jesus is saying if you are to be perfect, then you would have done these things. Not that these things = riches in heaven alone.
Now following Gods will for you will get you riches in heaven, and if his will for you is to give all you have to the poor, then that will indeed get you riches in heaven.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Youins remember when you was learning us about Christianity Bubba?Well, turns out it ain't just for braggin, I hear tell it also is about how to treat others and what not, check it out.Leviticus 19:18, Matthew 22:39, Mark 12:31, Luke 10:27, James 2:8And theys more Bubba, ya'll should read the Bible and see.
Good, you quoted scripture.
That doesn't explain what you do to "celebrate diversity."
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Surpassed my expectations in every regard. Total. Fucking. Masterpiece.
How?
It made a bad historical figure look amazing.
It's like making the same movie but with Hitler instead.
You do know that in the historical context, that woman sold slaves to white Europeans.
The movie made her look like a hero.
Very historically inaccurate, and for the only purpose to be woke.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Son, we live in a worldthat has diversity, and that diversity has to be celebrated by men with principles.
Ok, I agree.
Go on.
Who's gonnado it? You? YouFound_Lxam? Society has a greater responsibility than racistscould possibly fathom.
I am not a racist for saying diversity is something we should not base a nation off of.
And why is celebrating diversity so important? Why can't we just accept the fact that we are all diverse and that, that is cool.
Celebrating it isn't bad, but when you put that over more important thing, then it becomes a problem.
You cheer for white supremacy
Nope. White supremacy is bad.
and you curse diversity.
Again, no. Diversity is good in many ways.
.You have that luxury.
What does this even mean.
I have the luxury to curse diversity and love white supremacy?
Because that makes total sense.
You have the luxury of not knowing what I know;
How is knowing less knowledge a luxury.
that tolerance,while difficult, is the right thing to do.
It's good to be tolerant. But when someone puts being tolerant over being nice to others, and only wants people to tolerate them, then it's not tolerance anymore, it's selfishness.
I'll be tolerant of what you believe, as long as you be tolerant of what I believe.
And if you can't agree with that then that is called selfishness.
And diversity’s existence, whilegrotesque and incomprehensible to you, is something to be celebrated.
Again, not saying it isn't. Diversity definitely should be celebrated. It's one of the many things that makes us human.
You don'twant the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, youwant to be a racist. You need to be a racist.
Again, not racist.
Decent people use words likehonor, equality, freedom. We use these words as the backbone of a life spentdefending something. You use them as a punchline.
You can't just have those words thrown out without something to base them on. I base them on America. What do you base them on? The pride flags?
We have neither the time northe inclination to explain ourselves to a man who rises and sleeps under theblanket of the very freedom that tolerance provides, and then questions themanner in which tolerance provides it!
Funny, because that is what the democratic party does, not the republican party.
You all relax in your houses, eating all your food, with your $1000 phones, and name brand clothes, and then have the nerve to go online and preach about how the planet needs to be saved and that feelings need to be spared at all costs.
YET
You guys don't do anything to make those changes, and instead yell at others to do so.
And let's not forget that it is the democratic party that defies America and wants to change it into what it was created for the opposition of.
Democrats are the ones that use their privilege to whine and complain.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
What do you do in your ever day life to "celebrate diversity"?
Or do you just yell at politicians, and people online to do it, while you sit around living your normal life?
Created: