Total posts: 2,182
Loser!
What are you 5?
Created:
Posted in:
An astronomically small percentage barely worth noting.How could this possibly be used as proof of a God?
I'm sorry, I didn't see your post on this. Same goes for yours though.
Created:
I would debate you IwantRooseveltagain, but you have very immaturely blocked me. So maybe instead of blocking me, you could unblock me, and debate against these topics, like a rational human being.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
@Best.Korea
Ok so Best. Korea filled in 0.000657843267876567865 % of the circle
And FLRW filled in 90% of the circle.
Let me ask you a question FLRW. You think, that out of all the knowledge of the universe, you know 90% of it? Thats a large claim, but it is still usable.
Let me rephrase what the circle represents. The circle represents all knowledge. Everything that could ever be known about any subject. All the sciences, all the arts, etc.
So, you guys put in a percent, that isn't fully 100%. So, you guys are admitting, that there are still things out there that you don't know. You just haven't discovered those things yet.
Therefore, could God not exist, in a dimension, that you haven't discovered yet?
Answer: Yes.
So, anyone who says they are an atheist, and agrees to this example, is not an atheist, but an agnostic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
We can't be responsible for the actions of the people who came before us.
That would be like me saying my dad murdered someone, therefore I should be in prison.
Created:
Read the first source again. The man stormed a public meeting and was arrested. I don't agree with the fact that he should be labeled a domestic terrorist, but this doesn't prove what you are saying.
Actually, that is misinformation. Watch the video of what happened.
You should probably read those sources. None of them claim that "All white people are born racist, and we have to teach them to not be racist."
Look up Critical Race Theory. Something that Democrats are pushing to be a course in Colledge Campuses'.
I think it's pretty disingenuous to assume most members of the democratic party supports pornography in schools, based on the fact that some extreme members of the LGBTQ+ community are depicting pornographic scenes in children's books.
This is what the parent reads from the book.
"We're each busting a load in this bottle. If you don't cum, you have to drink it," she read aloud.
"I learned about masturbation two years ago, kind of by accident. No one ever told me what it was," the book continued, diving into a segment in which the protagonist remembers the time he discovered a pornographic film his father had hidden in the house."
"I learned about masturbation two years ago, kind of by accident. No one ever told me what it was," the book continued, diving into a segment in which the protagonist remembers the time he discovered a pornographic film his father had hidden in the house."
"Oregon schools in the North Clackamas District contain books with pornographic imagery, including imagery of sex acts, according to an online portal schools use to track books available for children to take out at their libraries.
Schools around the country use the program Destiny to track books taken in and out of its library. Fox News Digital obtained screenshots of inappropriate titles and books on gender ideology at most of the district's schools.
Destiny listed books in at least three high schools, Milwaukie, Adrienne C. Nelson, and Clackamas high schools that actually contain depictions of sexual activities, including oral sex. Some images are so graphic that they are being withheld from this story.
A mother in Oregon pulled her children out of the schools as a result of what she believed was indoctrination in Oregon schools.
"It's not about how I feel. It's about that the laws are being broken," Kristen Stevens told Fox News Digital. "Children are being exposed to sexual content at an age that they're not developmentally ready to be exposed to this. It actually can cause PTSD in a lot of these children.""
Schools around the country use the program Destiny to track books taken in and out of its library. Fox News Digital obtained screenshots of inappropriate titles and books on gender ideology at most of the district's schools.
Destiny listed books in at least three high schools, Milwaukie, Adrienne C. Nelson, and Clackamas high schools that actually contain depictions of sexual activities, including oral sex. Some images are so graphic that they are being withheld from this story.
A mother in Oregon pulled her children out of the schools as a result of what she believed was indoctrination in Oregon schools.
"It's not about how I feel. It's about that the laws are being broken," Kristen Stevens told Fox News Digital. "Children are being exposed to sexual content at an age that they're not developmentally ready to be exposed to this. It actually can cause PTSD in a lot of these children.""
Democrats support the LGBTQ+ community, and this is what they are pushing in schools. It's not just extreme groups. It's the group as a whole.
Created:
Posted in:
I am a Christian, so I think I speak for most Christians (at least the real Christians) when I say that we don't hate the LGBTQ+ community. We just disagree with them.
Some stereotypes of the church today, paints a picture of the church, acting as if all LGBTQ+ peoples are to be hated upon, and discriminated against. But this stereotype is not true with the majority of Christian churches today.
As Christians, we base all of our teachings on the Bible. So, using the Bible, we can argue, that true Christians who believe and read God's word do not hate the LGBTQ+ community.
Luke 6:27-32, “But I say to you that listen, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you. 29If anyone strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from anyone who takes away your coat do not withhold even your shirt. 30Give to everyone who begs from you; and if anyone takes away your goods, do not ask for them again. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you. 32"
John 4:20, "If anyone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen."
Leviticus 19:17-18, “You shall not hate your brother in your heart, but you shall reason frankly with your neighbor, lest you incur sin because of him. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord."
These verses from the Bible show that God teaches to love your enemy's and people you don't agree with. Not to hate them. But don't hear what I am not saying.
God also teaches to be wise with who you spend your time around, and that we can still disagree with people. There can be disagreement without hate.
2 Timothy 2:15, "Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth."
Romans 14:1-6, "As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions. One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand. One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. ..."
This verse especially shows what God is trying to tell us. He says "...the one who is weak in faith, welcome him..."
He also says "...Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him."
He tells us "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand." As in, God will judge them in the end. It is not our job to judge them for what they have chosen to do.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
Not much doubt that Trump is guilty of these, just based on Trump's own White House Staff testimony and what was done in public. These crimes alone make Trump unfit for any elected in office in our democracy.
We're not a democracy. We are a federal republic.
Created:
Posted in:
Ok here is another argument for God's existence.
I have one question for all of you. Just answer this one question, and I will continue with my argument.
Imagine I draw a circle on a white board.
The space inside the circle represents all knowledge.
It contains Physics, Chemistry, etc.
Even knowledge that we are still trying to find, exists in this circle.
Now I ask you this question. If I gave you a pen, and asked you to fill in how much knowledge you think you have/know in the circle, how much of the circle would you fill in?
Just answer me that.
Created:
-->
@BearMan
yo when tf did they say this
What do all these books have in common. They support the LGBTQ+ agenda, which democrats also support.
who said that?
who said this?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
I would love to debate on morals as well. But I will be countering your claims on the forum.
Yahweh is portrayed as quite evil in scriptures and even admits to it in Job;2,3.
Well, I have actually learned this story, and the story is about God testing Job, using the Devil. He has the Devil go in and take everything away from Job, but in the end, Job stays faithful to God, showing God that Job is a very faithful servant, and worthy being an evangelist.
Who in their right moral mind would see such a character as a good God?
God is good.
Christians do, as they sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to God's plan.Satan and Eve become the heroes of the story.They keep the plan on track.
Sin was not the plan for God.
I get this specific question a lot, that kind of pertains to your question:
If God knew that Adam and Eve were going to sin, then why did he not stop them? Did God want sin to enter the world?
The answer is no. God only did not stop Adam and Eve, because he wanted to truly love them, and have them truly love him in return. So, he gave them free will. Love is not real love, unless it is free.
The only command that God gave them, is to not eat the forbidden fruit. If they did anything else besides that, it wouldn't have been sin, because they wouldn't have known better.
God only kicked them out of the Garden, because they disobeyed his one rule, and they had sin in their hearts. So, they could no longer be in his presence.
You may be able to prove Yahweh exists, but you can never show that he is a good source of moral law.
He is a good source of moral law. Everything he says in the Bible, has never been morally wrong.
People will try to take bits of scripture to prove he is morally wrong, but they don't read the whole story, and the whole point.
On Jesus dying for Christians from a moral perspective.It takes quite an imagination and ego to think a god would actually die for us, after condemning us unjustly in the first place.
Well, he did. He wanted to be with us. But we couldn't because we were full of sin. So, in order to counteract that, God came down in the form of a human, lived a sinless life, and died for all of us sins to prove that we could be without sin, therefore all we need to do is ask him into our hearts and we can be with God.
Christians have swallowed a lie and don’t care how evil they make Jesus to keep their feel good get out of hell free card.
God does not send people to hell. We are already on our way to hell. But if we accept him as our savior, he saves us from that eternity.
It is a lie, first and foremost, because, like it or not, having another innocent person suffer or die for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.
Yes, it is. So that is why God came down, and died for us, by his choice. That is why it is so beautiful.
Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
If you read the whole story, then you will realize that what God is saying in this instance, is a son is not subject to his father's crimes. Each person will be judged on what they did, and not what others did.
"“Suppose there is a righteous man
who does what is just and right.
6 He does not eat at the mountain shrines
or look to the idols of Israel.
He does not defile his neighbor’s wife
or have sexual relations with a woman during her period.
7 He does not oppress anyone,
but returns what he took in pledge for a loan.
He does not commit robbery
but gives his food to the hungry
and provides clothing for the naked.
8 He does not lend to them at interest
or take a profit from them.
He withholds his hand from doing wrong
and judges fairly between two parties.
9 He follows my decrees
and faithfully keeps my laws.
That man is righteous;
he will surely live,
declares the Sovereign Lord.
10 “Suppose he has a violent son, who sheds blood or does any of these other things[a] 11 (though the father has done none of them):
“He eats at the mountain shrines.
He defiles his neighbor’s wife.
12 He oppresses the poor and needy.
He commits robbery.
He does not return what he took in pledge.
He looks to the idols.
He does detestable things.
13 He lends at interest and takes a profit.
Will such a man live? He will not! Because he has done all these detestable things, he is to be put to death; his blood will be on his own head.
14 “But suppose this son has a son who sees all the sins his father commits, and though he sees them, he does not do such things:
15 “He does not eat at the mountain shrines
or look to the idols of Israel.
He does not defile his neighbor’s wife.
16 He does not oppress anyone
or require a pledge for a loan.
He does not commit robbery
but gives his food to the hungry
and provides clothing for the naked.
17 He withholds his hand from mistreating the poor
and takes no interest or profit from them.
He keeps my laws and follows my decrees.
He will not die for his father’s sin; he will surely live. 18 But his father will die for his own sin, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was wrong among his people.
19 “Yet you ask, ‘Why does the son not share the guilt of his father?’ Since the son has done what is just and right and has been careful to keep all my decrees, he will surely live. 20 The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."
Deuteronomy 24:16," ``fathers should not be put to death, neither by the testimony, nor for the sins of the children; and children shall not be put to death, neither by the testimony, nor for the sins of fathers; but every man shall be put to death for his own sin by proper witnesses. ''"
The same goes for the verse above.
For all we know, man is the only sentient life and able to have or know of concepts like time, space, spacetime and reality.
I agree to an extent. We are the only sentient life in this reality.
But doesn't that surprise you?
That we alone are the only sentient life out of the trillions of systems in the cosmos?
I could go on, but I would save it for a debate, if you are willing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
Would you consider accepting a debate?
Created:
Posted in:
How many Gods exist?
One
Are any more good or more evil than Yahweh?
More evil, but not more good.
Same question for Jesus.
Same answer
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
I have read your argument, and I would love to go more into depth with you on it. Would you consider accepting a debate?
Created:
They incorporated his words into their logo. You can Google it.
Yea...they did. Not Trump.
How much did the National debt go up under Trump? More than anyone ever? 8 trillion in 4 years and he never broke 3% annual GDP growth.
I have already argued this with you, but you seem to not get it.
"Instead, his budget estimates showed that he would actually add at least $8.3 trillion, increasing the U.S. debt to $28.5 trillion by 2025.1 But the national debt reached that figure much sooner. The national debt stood at $19.9 trillion when President Trump took office in January 2017, and it reached a high of $27 trillion in October 2020"
Ok, but let's look at how it grew before him.
"The largest number comes from calculating how much the debt increased during Obama's two terms. When Obama was sworn in on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt was $10.626 trillion.1 When he left office on Jan. 20, 2017, it was $19.937 trillion. It explains why some would say Obama added $9 trillion to the debt."
So, Trump raised it by 8.3 trillion, but Obama raised it by 9 trillion. And I know what you're going to say.
"Well, Obama had two terms, so if Trump had two terms, then it would have been 16.6 trillion."
Well, we don't know that, because he didn't serve two terms. So, you can't assume that.
Oh, and a million Americans died of Covid thanks to his bungled, incompetent response.
More died under the Biden Administration, then under Trump.
Here are just some of the things he did to better America:
"10. He enforced President Barack Obama's red line against Syria's use of chemical weapons. When the regime of Bashar Assad used a toxic nerve agent on innocent men, women and children, Trump didn't wring his hands. He acted quickly and decisively, restoring America's credibility on the world stage that Obama had squandered.
9. He has taken a surprisingly tough line with Russia. Trump approved a $47 million arms package for Ukraine, sent troops to Poland's border with Russia and imposed new sanctions on Moscow for violating the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
8. He recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Four American presidents promised to do it, but only one actually did. This is why the American people elected Trump. He does what he promises to do, for better or for worse — in this case, definitely for the better. Even Jeb Bush tweeted his approval.
8. He recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Four American presidents promised to do it, but only one actually did. This is why the American people elected Trump. He does what he promises to do, for better or for worse — in this case, definitely for the better. Even Jeb Bush tweeted his approval.
7. He withdrew from the Paris climate agreement. After George W. Bush pulled out of the disastrous Kyoto treaty, U.S. emissions went down faster than much of Europe. The same will be true for Trump's departure from the Paris accord. Combined with his approval of the Keystone XL pipeline and opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploration, Trump is helping usher in a new age of American energy development.
6. He got NATO allies to kick in $12 billion more toward our collective security. Decades of pleading by the Bush and Obama administrations failed to get NATO allies to meet their financial commitments to the alliance, but Trump's tough talk and reticence to affirm America's Article V commitment did the trick. NATO is stronger as a result.
6. He got NATO allies to kick in $12 billion more toward our collective security. Decades of pleading by the Bush and Obama administrations failed to get NATO allies to meet their financial commitments to the alliance, but Trump's tough talk and reticence to affirm America's Article V commitment did the trick. NATO is stronger as a result.
5. He has virtually eliminated the Islamic State's physical caliphate. Trump removed the constraints Obama placed on our military and let it drive the terrorists from their strongholds.
4. He admitted he was wrong on Afghanistan and reversed Obama's disastrous withdrawal. In a rare admission, Trump declared: "My original instinct was to pull out ... But all my life, I've heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office. ... A hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum for terrorists."
3. He enacted historic tax and regulatory reform that has unleashed economic growth. Trump signed the first comprehensive tax reform in three decades and removed the wet blanket of Obama-era regulations smothering our economy. We are now heading into our third consecutive quarter of above 3 percent growth.
2. He is installing conservative judges who will preside for decades. With his appointment of Neil M. Gorsuch, Trump secured a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, and he is moving at record pace to fill the federal appeals courts with young conservative judges.
1. He, not Hillary Clinton, was inaugurated as president. Trump delivered the coup de grace that ended the corrupt, dishonest Clinton political machine."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Nothing about my argument claims to have determined where the singularity came from. My claim, which is simply an acceptance of the scientific findings, is that the universe came out of the singularity.
Listen carefully:
When you use an argument, like the singularity, to counter my argument that is called being a hypocrite, because you can't explain the beginning of it, just like you claim I can't explain the beginning of my argument.
For at least the third or fourth time now... I don't.Why is this so difficult? Do you not understand that sometimes the best (and correct) answer is "I don't know"?
Because you can't. And that is my point. You can't explain what started time, because you don't know.
When you say something can't come from nothing, what are you calling nothing? To put it another way, whatever nothing is, is there any possible intersection between it and reality?
What do you mean, what is nothing. Nothing....is nothing.
Nothing: not anything; no single thing
And no there isn't any possible, natural intersection between it and reality, because something, cannot come from nothing, unless some being, or thing that is not natural, caused it to be there. So, there is a possible intersection, but not a natural one.
So when we ask if something is possible we need to clarify which definition we are working with.
I'm clarifying that it is logically possible, which it is.
Anyone can have an explanation if we accept the idea that explanations can just be made up
Christianity wasn't just made up. It is based on historical facts, and others, that we can use to prove the existence of God.
Created:
Posted in:
I think your problem is that you don't like trans people, not that you live factually.
This may surprise you, but I have many friends that identify as trans. They know I don't agree, with the way that they live their lives, but they get past it, because that doesn't define our whole friendship. I like all people.
The most important point is that we respect it. Even people who don't believe in God respect Christianity, so I believe the least we can do is respect trans people.
This is actually false. The Trans community actually has mocked Christianity and done nothing to respect it. The Bible explicitly is against the idea of a man becoming a woman and vice versa. And the Transgender community has tried to change Christianity, to fit their insane ideology.
Now this is not to say, that we shouldn't accept these types of people in our churches, but we shouldn't be supporting it, because the Bible explicitly says against it.
Leviticus 18:22
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin."
(NLT)
It takes no extra time, no effort to be kind and respectful towards people. I don't know if you are religious or not but I want to address the common claim that "it is against Gods wish to call trans people other than what they were born as". It is not our duty to judge, it is only to love. God is also the only one who can judge, it is not your place to think otherwise.
Find me one place in the Bible where it says that explicitly.
If you are having trouble to understand the trans experience, think of it like a name. Names are not essential to living, they are not backed by science but they enrich our lives and make people feel comfortable.
Facts don't care about your feelings. People these days don't understand that it is not a nice peaceful world out there, it is harsh and mean. People especially in America don't get that, because we are coddled by all of our riches.
They are also imbedded in human culture, just like the concept of gender. Please do not mix up sex (biological) and gender (mental), I am afraid it is high school level knowledge that these two are completely different.
Ok, though I don't agree with that point at all, let's go with it for now.
There are 2 biological sexes.
Gender is "a social construct" therefor we can add, genders as we please. Now correct me if I'm wrong on that front.
If someone can just randomly add genders, then there is an infinite amount.
And so, people are expected to respect the LGBTQ+ community, by acknowledging all of those genders that people choose from.
This is why all the way up until now, the social norm has been two genders, because again, facts don't care about your feelings.
I honestly don't care if someone wants to identify as a bird, or the opposite gender, but it becomes a problem, when you expect me to change my way of thinking, just so you can "feel included".
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
When you put red ants and black ants in a bottle nothing happens. When some asshole comes and shakes the bottle they kill each other. The bottle shakers are the problem. Do you shake the bottle? You are the problem. You are the racist.
What experiment are you referring too?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BigBuffMan
No ones life is made harder by saying trans or cis and the majority of people only use these terms when they are relevant to the conversation, e.g when discussing trans issues or in a medical context.
Tell that to the people who want to live by fact and not fiction.
I could use adjectives for myself like Strong Sexy and Smart if I feel like I identify that way.
Does that mean we have to add a whole new kind of people that identify a certain way?
Created:
And why is Donald Trump so appealing to overtly racist groups such as the Proud Boys and the KKK? Are they hearing a dog whistle that you seem to be unaware of?
Where did you get that info? LOL
Oh yea...your bias for Trump probably just told you that lie didn't it.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
And I have to admit, Trump has said a lot of racist things over the years, but does that really make him completely racist?
Being racist means: a person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
A lot of people have proven Trumps racist remarks to be more of a political move, rather than an actual racist remark.
Yes, he has said some compelling things. And I don't agree with a lot of what he said. But his work as president was spectacular.
So, give me one example of Trump doing one deliberately racist thing towards another race. Not stating something racist, but rather doing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BigBuffMan
I think you misunderstand. We ARE just using man and woman, but trans and cis are also adjectives we can use to describe certain people. It is like you saying we shouldn't say 'tall men' ever because just saying men makes peoples lives easier. Tall is an adjective just like trans or cis.
Tall man is still using the word man.
A trans person is a person that feels that they are a different gender.
Cis people are just strait people.
They still fall under the category of man and woman.
Trans men are still women, and Trans woman are still men.
Cis men are still men, and Cis women are still women.
You could say that someone that calls themselves a, let's say a Trans Woman, is just a man, who feels that they are a woman. Adding an extra category is just playing into the illusion, that there are more than two genders.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
To some degree, I support this. Abusive and neglectful parents ruin their children's lives. I wish interventions happened more often and the foster care system was fixed.
Don't hear what I'm not saying. I'm not saying teachers should try to help kids, IF they are in an abusive situation with their parents, but I disagree, with the fact that schools and teachers, should teach, and give students things that are not part of the curriculum, and not letting parents know certain facts, that could help save the kids life.
Examples like not letting parents know that a child is on hormone blockers, that could cause harm to them.
Another example is teaching pornographic material to kids, that has nothing to do with school curriculum.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
While the advertisement did not directly call for the execution of the teenagers, the text did make clear that Trump was voicing his opinion because of the attack on the jogger. Surveying the demise of “law and order” in New York City, Trump wrote, "At what point did we cross the line from the fine and noble pursuit of genuine civil liberties to the reckless and dangerously permissive atmosphere which allows criminals of every age to beat and rape a helpless woman and then laugh at her family's anguish?”
He just had a strong opinion on the topic. His only fault was that he was quick to accuse. No racism involved.
how he was one of hillary's donors of many thousands of dollars only when she was against obama.
This proves nothing. He was against Obama, and she was against Obama, so he donated to a cause he sought worthy.
Just because he ran an election against her years later, doesn't mean him agreeing with her is only because he is racist.
Created:
I don't believe Trump is racist in any way.
Created:
Trump is racist.That is a pure fact.
How so?
Created:
All white people are born racist, and we need to teach them how not to be racist.
Communism isn't bad. We will just rename it to Socialism and try to push it in the USA.
Joe Biden is not mentally ill.
We need to focus on the planet more than our economy.
Joe Biden fixed gas prices.
If you don't agree with us, then you're a misogynistic racist, sexist, homophobic, fatphobic, terrorist.
Two-year-old's are smart enough to understand if they are Gay or not.
Gender reassignment surgery and hormone blockers are completely irreversible.
Trump is racist.
Our borders should stay open, because people need to have the freedom to come and go as they please.
School teachers should have more say over kids than their own parents do.
We should support pornography in our children's books.
Gender is a spectrum.
Created:
Posted in:
But you just told me it was a problem for white males, especially in schools. Make up your mind, which is it?
No, I was defending the point, that all white males aren't subjected to privilege.
Created:
I think you should stick to debating other kids.
Nope, I've tried. There either all stupid, or just don't do their research.
I have to admit, some of them are still better than you.
Created:
How so dog?
Please stop.... just stop.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but it isn't a problem.
Created:
Listen bud.
At this point you have lost the argument, and you have nothing left to argue. Let's bring this back to the topic of your forum. Why Trump did his worst to ruin the economy.
What evidence do you have of this again?
Created:
Fusion will be great. In fact they just had a big break through on the science in California this week. She was on MSNBC. YOU WOULD NOT SEE HER ON FOX NEWS. But the scientists are still saying it will be decades before we can use it for energy
Fusion will be great. And I know about the big break through.
Also, I don't watch Fox.
Created:
No, that’s another right wing lie. I was wondering when you would regurgitate that little nugget.
Well......no it isn't. Even the CDC admitted it.
Read the article next time bud.
Created:
Ok, so that’s 72,152 more than you said. Big difference. We lost 54,000 Americans in the Vietnam War.
72,152 compared to 1,076,549 is about 7.2%
I would also like to add, that there have been recorded cases of false Covid deaths. Meaning that people who died in things like car crashes, and things like that who had Covid at the time, counted toward the Covid death count.
Created:
So you believe minorities think they are superior to white people? Which races have been saying they are superior to the whites in your school, besides the other white males you spoke of?
A lot. Mostly all of them. There have been some acceptations, like my black, Asian, Latino, friends. But other than that, you would be surprised what happens in schools now. I have a first-person perspective.
Merriam Webster defines Racism as:
"behavior or attitudes that reflect and foster this belief : racial discrimination or prejudice"
So yea a lot of that happening at our schools.
Created:
Health departments banned gatherings of certain sizes at church, funerals, sporting events, concerts, restaurants and more and made wearing masks mandatory.
Really, because my church still went on as normal. Some people just went online, because they themselves were afraid.
I only wore masks when I went shopping. I didn't wear them out anywhere else, and no one said anything.
Sometimes they did in some public spaces. You lie.
First off, all, you remind me of El from Stranger Things, saying that.
Secondly, yes, sometimes that was the case. Sometimes.
Created:
"The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide with about 675,000 occurring in the United States."
And only 6.6 million died worldwide from Covid. Big difference. 44 million more people died from Spanish flu than Covid.
Out of 1 million US deaths, how many were young (under 55) with no serious underlying health conditions?
1,004,397 people died from Covid 50 years and up as of Dec. 7, 2022. Only 72,152 died from Covid 49 years and under. Not even 100,000.
Created:
MASKS were mandatory then and they are were mandatory for Covid
Only if a private business said so. Otherwise, public areas didn't have mandatory mask restrictions.
Shots were mandatory in these old Supreme Court cases and they were constitutional for Covid.
Only because the annual death rate, still to this day is so high. That's why they were mandatory.
That’s a lie. You’re AFU kid. Your “could” and “want” are AFU.
Ok bud.
Created:
Republican U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy, a doctor who tested positive for the coronavirus earlier this year and has since recovered, seemed almost at a loss for words in a Twitter video he posted Tuesday night about Letlow’s death, stopping at one point before saying: “It just, just, just, just brings home COVID can kill. For most folks it doesn’t, but it truly can. So, as you remember Luke, his widow, his children in your prayers, remember as well to be careful with COVID.”
Yes, you found one of the rare cases. Good for you.
I'm talking about overall, not every single case.
Created:
The population of the U.S. during the Spanish Flu varied between 103,208,000 - 106,461,000. And 650,000 people died from Spanish Flu in America.
The population of the U.S. during Covid varied between 329,500,000 - 331,900,000. And 1,100,000 in the U.S. died of Covid.
You have to put the population, into perspective if you are going to compare.
But overall, more people died from the Spanish Flu/Influenza than Coronavirus.
The Coronavirus mortality rate was 2.40%, while the Spanish Flu mortality rate was 2.50%.
The highest risk population for Coronavirus was 60+ with comorbidities. The highest risk population for Spanish Flu was 25-40 years old.
the Supreme Court set precedent that the government could make people get vaccines under certain circumstances i e they want to go to public school, health workers etc.
Thats not what the government wanted to do for Coronavirus. They wanted mandatory vaccines, and mandatory face masks.
And speaking of masks, masks did nothing to stop the spread of Coronavirus.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision in Jacobson in Zucht v. King (1922), which held that a school system could refuse admission to a student who failed to receive a required vaccination.
They have that authority, but they didn't use it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BigBuffMan
I think labels such as 'trans' and 'cis' are useful in medical contexts but for trans people it can help them connect to a community and can feel empowering. Of course, this is up to the individual and for the average conversation you should just refer to trans women and cis women as women. As a rule of thumb, the terms trans and cis should only be used when they are relevant. For example, you wouldn't address Angelina Jolie as a 'brown haired woman' every time you mention her, the same way you wouldn't address a woman as 'a trans woman' or 'a cis woman' when talking about her when it is not relevant to the conversation. Trans woman are woman firstly, and trans secondly.
...or we could just use man and woman to make everyone's lives easier.
Created:
Posted in:
Think about this:
We are all actually in Area 51, and Area 51 is the way out.
Thats why no one is allowed in there.
Created:
definitely be losers without being subjected to racism.
Umm......that's definitely wrong.
Take it from me. I am currently in high school, in this generation. Especially now more than ever, white males are being subjected to racism, especially in schools. Even white males are being racist to, white males.
Created:
No, I’m agreeing with you. stupid white males like yourself can definitely be losers without being subjected to racism. You’re proof of that.
So, all white males are stupid?
I guess Albert Einstein wasn't smart after all........
Created:
Plus we have all these white losers who weren’t affected by racism but are still doing poorly. What about them?
Trust me, you don't want to get into that argument. You will be embarrassed.
Created:
All I have to ask you, is what could of Trump done better, to deal with Covid?
Force everyone to wear masks wherever they go? There wasn't a significant enough impact of people dying from the virus, that could force the supreme court to make a decision like that. Or force people to get vaccines.
I had Covid too. The surprising thing though, is that I didn't even know I had it. My whole family went in for a test, and I had it. But I never felt sick during the time I got it.
A lot of other people felt that way too. It only severely affected people with other extreme medical conditions.
And I am not anti-vaxxer either. I have all of my shots. But my family didn't get the Covid shot, because the government was trying so hard to make it a priority. Me and my family weren't about to let the government force us to do something we didn't need to do.
So, answer my question. What could of Trump done better?
Created: