Total votes: 15
PRO forfeited every round
PRO provided better arguments with sources
CON capitulated in Round 3
No significant differences in conduct, legibility or sources. If there was a point for entertainment I would give it to PRO for his interesting phrasing sometimes.
Reason for argument point:
*In the comments *
Even though PRO forfeited 2 rounds, CON didn’t capitalize and failed to present anything in rebuttal
The leaf is superior for combat situations because it helps with the actual combat not just merely escaping like CON pointed out or trying a fancy uppercut.
I guess this is a situation where there's no true winner and loser so a tie looks good to me
Forfeiture
PRO did not engage with any arguments
1. PRO’s source is not reliable
2. PRO’s whole case is a subjective opinion, copied and pasted from a random person’s comment on Quora
3. PRO does not give any analysis to what he presented
4. PRO’s argument does not address “Anyone who is not a Christian” but only some atheists
5. PRO fails his BOP
Insufficient evidence from PRO
Both forfeited after the introduction
Full Forfeit