Indeed. Black IQ is 85, Latino is somewhere in the 90s, White is 100 (we are the baseline), and Eastern Asian is over 100. Other Asian groups are lower. Here are country averages:
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/average-iq-by-country/
I completely agree. Taxes, guns, and abortion are all super important topics to me. But it is so boring to repeat the same sources and points over and over again. Arguing about tax codes is dry af.
The country with the strongest economy in the world is garbage right now? Just because we don't tax the hell out of businesses and producers for the economy to make everything from healthcare to college free, doesn't mean our country is garbage.
I find your allusion to fascism in America laughable. Could you perhaps provide evidence that isn't an opinion piece?
You mention Mexicans voluntarily leaving...Still, there are hundreds of thousands of them caught trying to hop the border[1]. Their country is corrupt as hell and is run by drug cartels. That is why they are leaving and coming to a place that actually has jobs. Sure, it is more expensive to live in a First World country, but you can make more money here.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/politics/southern-border-migrants/index.html Increase in illegal immigration.
We are 15th in the world for best cost of living. Italy is 27th. Mexico is 68th. They are much lower because jobs over there pay much less and there are less jobs in general. https://www.worlddata.info/cost-of-living.php
However, for those that still hate America despite reality, they will not be missed.
Observation? Interrogation? Pretty hard. I feel like this is gonna go back to a previous annoying discussion we had. The intentions exist, whether or not we know them.
People should mainly be judged on what they intended to do. For instance, I don't really consider socialists bad people because generally are trying to get the best outcome for many people. However, I judge the actions of stealing money through excessive taxes immoral. Actions of people can be bad, but they don't have to be bad people.
Lol okay. I never really understood these debates about being gay to be honest. At least policy-wise. I could see an argument like "Catholicism should allow gay marriage" or something, but this is just dumb.
Looks as though they may have ulterior motives, but that doesn't mean that their research is necessarily false. If Wikipedia can be trusted, they seem like a-holes.
My stance is that there is a genetic aspect and that it correlates with race. I don't intend on making sweeping conclusions. There are smart and dumb people of every race, but the relative success of certain regions of the world gives basis to my claims. Also, the effects of the Flynn Effect were considered when calculating IQ for the Minnesota study.
I think that environment is also a big factor. Poor people generally have a lower IQ. People raised in richer countries also have higher IQ than their birth country's average. I believe that some countries/people may be poor because of low IQ, but they need to do more research on that hypothesis of mine.
The fact that IQ scores vary widely based on region. Eastern Asians have highest IQ, then Europe/America(America's has gone down with all of the immigration), and African countries tend to have very low IQ averages.
Also, the Minnesota Transracial Adoption study, which had kids of different races adopted by upper-middle class white families.
Why did you concede? You could downplay that one point instead of conceding the whole debate. Also, you said the struggles were "severely comparable", not the same. It could be argued that it was one of the very few ways in which they differed.
That makes some sense, but there is a little detail I feel was missed. Your definition says that " Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences or the competition in market economies".
It states that the right-wing believes in naturally occurring difference caused because everyone is different. The KKK wanted to enforce differences in an unnatural manner.
Perhaps a debate on this some day. I am not too informed on the matter as of now- just curious.
Indeed. Black IQ is 85, Latino is somewhere in the 90s, White is 100 (we are the baseline), and Eastern Asian is over 100. Other Asian groups are lower. Here are country averages:
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/average-iq-by-country/
lol
Yes white men have a mental imbalance.....
Black men don't have higher testosterone and an average IQ of 85 or anything.....
I completely agree. Taxes, guns, and abortion are all super important topics to me. But it is so boring to repeat the same sources and points over and over again. Arguing about tax codes is dry af.
Hehe. Fair enough.
Gun ownership
No, just in general.
What is your actual position?
The country with the strongest economy in the world is garbage right now? Just because we don't tax the hell out of businesses and producers for the economy to make everything from healthcare to college free, doesn't mean our country is garbage.
I find your allusion to fascism in America laughable. Could you perhaps provide evidence that isn't an opinion piece?
You mention Mexicans voluntarily leaving...Still, there are hundreds of thousands of them caught trying to hop the border[1]. Their country is corrupt as hell and is run by drug cartels. That is why they are leaving and coming to a place that actually has jobs. Sure, it is more expensive to live in a First World country, but you can make more money here.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/politics/southern-border-migrants/index.html Increase in illegal immigration.
We are 15th in the world for best cost of living. Italy is 27th. Mexico is 68th. They are much lower because jobs over there pay much less and there are less jobs in general. https://www.worlddata.info/cost-of-living.php
However, for those that still hate America despite reality, they will not be missed.
That is a more efficient way to do it. There will be some discrepancies because people make mistakes.
Observation? Interrogation? Pretty hard. I feel like this is gonna go back to a previous annoying discussion we had. The intentions exist, whether or not we know them.
How do you judge people?
Kinda hard to rephrase.
People should mainly be judged on what they intended to do. For instance, I don't really consider socialists bad people because generally are trying to get the best outcome for many people. However, I judge the actions of stealing money through excessive taxes immoral. Actions of people can be bad, but they don't have to be bad people.
It makes sense to judge actions by consequences, but judge people by intentions.
And dude, you have won debates before.
There is no race profile indicator. How are they voting white?
Not sure if child or troll
Lol okay. I never really understood these debates about being gay to be honest. At least policy-wise. I could see an argument like "Catholicism should allow gay marriage" or something, but this is just dumb.
Ez dub :/
Lol, got 'em.
I like how you were "begging for votes" as you were in the lead.
In what ways is Trump a... ahem.... "jackass"?
Why are you rooting for Joe Walsh?
Exactly. You can't be generous with other peoples' money!
Saying Republicans are responsible for wasteful spending is really calling the kettle black lol
Yeah, American media hates him, which is to be expected. He is right-wing after all.
Well, Brazil has a nice new change in management. Bolsonaro is awesome!
Obviously. Don't see millions of Brazilian immigrants trying to hop our border, now do you? ;)
Pro has that EZ dub in my opinion
Concession? Sad
Yeah, we crackers are a scourge. All we do is rob liquor stores while drinking fried kool aid and collect our food stamps.
Ever heard of an elephant gun? I'll mess with that "beast" >:)
https://youtu.be/s1j6WqEKHFE
lmao! You monster!
Those animals have nothing on turtles!
Why isn't your profile pic an elephant?
It seems Alec's parents are being rude and not letting him help. Ramshutu gave up after round 1 and Virtuoso was never involved.... :/
Looks as though they may have ulterior motives, but that doesn't mean that their research is necessarily false. If Wikipedia can be trusted, they seem like a-holes.
I will look into the Pioneer Fund, but I haven't known the SPLC to ever tell the truth.
Also, could you elaborate more on how the bell curve plays into this and "biases and conflicts of interest"?
My stance is that there is a genetic aspect and that it correlates with race. I don't intend on making sweeping conclusions. There are smart and dumb people of every race, but the relative success of certain regions of the world gives basis to my claims. Also, the effects of the Flynn Effect were considered when calculating IQ for the Minnesota study.
I think that environment is also a big factor. Poor people generally have a lower IQ. People raised in richer countries also have higher IQ than their birth country's average. I believe that some countries/people may be poor because of low IQ, but they need to do more research on that hypothesis of mine.
The fact that IQ scores vary widely based on region. Eastern Asians have highest IQ, then Europe/America(America's has gone down with all of the immigration), and African countries tend to have very low IQ averages.
Also, the Minnesota Transracial Adoption study, which had kids of different races adopted by upper-middle class white families.
In your professional opinion, who has the easy W in this debate?
Orange man very bad indeed. REEEEEE
Religion and Politics isn't as bad as orange man!!!!111!!
Would you consider me racist if I thought it was partially genetics and partially culture/upbringing?
You mean statistically provable generalities about races?
Welcome back!
If you realize that Republican policies are closer to Jewish teachings, will you convert? :^)
Why did you concede? You could downplay that one point instead of conceding the whole debate. Also, you said the struggles were "severely comparable", not the same. It could be argued that it was one of the very few ways in which they differed.
Trying to get someone to accept this again?......
That makes some sense, but there is a little detail I feel was missed. Your definition says that " Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences or the competition in market economies".
It states that the right-wing believes in naturally occurring difference caused because everyone is different. The KKK wanted to enforce differences in an unnatural manner.
Perhaps a debate on this some day. I am not too informed on the matter as of now- just curious.