bmdrocks21

Yeah a lot of cops really are trigger happy r*tards, some of the more egregious police shootings were of white people (think Daniel Shaver, or that white kid who was shot for answering his front door holding a Wii remote.) Whether or not black people are more likely to be unjustly killed, I don't know. It definitely seems possible to me that they are, but the media/establishment narrative is so often wrong, and many of the prominent examples have turned out to be outright hoaxes, so I don't know. Either way, being pulled over by the police needs to be viewed as a hazard to be survived. 

The cop thing is hard because I don't want to stigmatize the police and I do think the vast majority of them are good...but as a civilian, I have no way of telling the bad apples from the good ones. I don't think the police indiscriminately gun people down, but clearly some police get spooked easily and are always given by judges and juries a very wide latitude in their abilities to use lethal force. In effect, it isn't that different. And while it's true the world is more brutal than liberals want to admit (think of the "why not shoot him in the leg?????" nonsense), SWATing people just isn't a thing in other developed countries...some reform is definitely needed. In a more just society the police that killed Daniel Shaver would hang. 

Historical oppression resulting in a cycle of poverty contributes to the crime and misery. Sorry, but it does. However it's role is greatly exaggerated, and tens of millions of people of all races (including the vast majority of poor blacks), survive poverty without becoming violent criminals. Violent crime is the fault of the choices of violent criminals. Full stop. That said, we do need to do what we can to break this cycle--if ACTUALLY helping black people came at someone else's expense (like fake band aids such as reparations and affirmative action) things would be more morally grey, but fortunately, the exact same policies that will help working class whites, hispanics etc are also the policies that will most help black people.

And yes...there is a genetic and cultural component to group differences, and denying that is just anti-science. But our society doesn't give a fair shake to working class people, and cultural changes since the 1960's have wreaked havoc on the lives of low socio-economic status groups. Charles Murray's book "Coming Apart" really delves deep into how these changes negatively effected working class whites. We can, and should, do better for everybody. You're right that disparities will probably always be chalked up to racism...the alternative is just too painful for a lot of people. But those charges of racism seem a lot less potent when the life story of the average black person is one of upward mobility and opportunity as opposed to poverty. I think a lot of the vitriol in our society is coming from our economy becoming more and more zero-sum.

Yes, there are anti-human forces at work here that want us reduced to consumers. It's horrible what our society has done to women in particular, almost every young woman I know is profoundly miserable and a great number are mentally ill, needing an intense cocktail of drugs to cope with what is materially an extremely comfortable life. Maybe I'm just being sexist, but I think hyper capitalism is harming women a lot more than men even if they are increasingly "winning" the competition.

I can tell you're very hurt/resentful at the anti-white/anti-male rhetoric that's ubiquitous in our society. I am too...but I've also come to just roll with it. It comes from a place of ignorance and projection, basically everyone who is into that sort of thing is severely mentally ill, trying to cope with their inferiority complex by inflicting their own misery onto other people. Don't let them. Above all, they're people to be pitied, as contemptible as they may be. They are immiserated cucks for global capital.

Mentally stable leftists may occasionally criticize whites (and we aren't above criticism, nobody is) but the vitriolic hatred is reserved exclusively for the miserable. It's all well and good to argue against this sometimes but don't dedicate your life to it.  The lion should not concern himself with the opinions of the sheep. Also almost all anti-white POC girls exclusively date white guys??? I don't really get it, human sexuality is weird, lol...but clearly there is a LOT going on under the surface here.

A lot of the studies “proving” that are funded by the Pioneer Fund, which is essentially a pile of racist money intended to use science to put lipstick on a pig. Unfortunately there’s a lack of genuinely academic research on the subject due to ethical concerns and also due the political situation making it a “third rail” for researchers. Though, observations like the Flynn effect and the Minnesota twins study suggest to me that any genetic thing that might be going on is not a very substantial factor comparatively.

I didn't read your posts back to me yet but I will at some point, probably. 

lol the public school system spends a tiny part of that per person per year.

Anyone who says that they'd rather be born into a poor white family than a wealthy black family is out of their mind.

That train left the station DECADES ago. People like my parents are just completely screwed in this country now. And to be perfectly honest, much as it pains me to admit that leftists have a point, its not a lie to say that discrimination caused a lot of black families to miss the boat. But pointing fingers does nothing. The way to help black people is the same way to help poor white people, hispanics, etc...it's the preservation and return of decent paying blue collar jobs and a manufacturing economy. Germany does it, we can too. 

Ever noticed how the people parroting the white privilege stuff never propose any serious policies? That's why. There is a set of policies that would help the black community (and non upper middle class+ people of all races), but unfortunately they would decrease corporate profits. This is why corporations are behind all of the identity politics stuff. Man, isn't it amazing/libtard bullshit (depending on your persuasion :) ) that the NASDAQ is considering requiring minority board members in order for companies to stay listed? So convenient that we are talking about this instead of the gigantic wealth transfer from Main Street to Wall Street as COVID eliminates small business in this country!

There's also a classist element to it. Upper middle class liberals of all races love nothing more than to sneer at culturally prole whites about their "privilege", especially if they're actually poor. Telling someone whose barely been scraping by since 2008 after their towns factory closed about their "privilege" is just a slap in the face, which everybody knows. The humiliation is the point. 

dont even get me started on mass immigration lol. Just TRANSPARENTLY a ploy to lower wages and break worker solidarity. Despite everything it still shocks me that the left actually goes along with it

And to get at the subtext of your post...yes, there is a point where achievement gaps simply can't be blamed on racism, and while its unpleasant it's important to recognize that so we don't just litigate the past forever. Culture isn't the reason that the NBA or top runners are overwhelmingly black. Sorry everyone, but there are genetic differences between different groups of people. But there are things we can do to help black people that also help people of all races. We have no reason to be enemies, and becoming so is only helping wall street/the top 1%

And liberals would howl that those not rewarded are stigmatized and harmed by not being rewarded. They would claim racism. And in the end, they would force the government to reward every immigrant simply for being an immigrant, not for any good behavior.

Your defensive response toward the white guilt narrative should help you to understand why taking responsibility doesn't gain popular traction in groups. Nobody wants to take the blame. The reality is that the conditions within the black community are, to a certain extent, attributable to racism but are also attributable to other factors within the black community itself. I do think that out of wedlock births is a significant problem. Consider, however, that the children born in to those situations have done nothing to cause them. They are not to blame for that in any way. They are also not to blame for the disparities in education funding which are attributable to the property tax collections. Housing in black communities is of lower market value and the property taxes used to fund schools in those areas is consequently lower. They will grow up within a culture that, to a certain extent, glorifies criminal lifestyles, rejects education and where credibility is given by showing a readiness to resort to violence. It is reasonable to expect a significantly greater number of adverse outcomes when you run children through that environment. Yes, there is choice, but there is also pressure to make certain choices. The responsibility that we should expect people to take for making certain choices should be mitigated by the pressures people are faced with in given situations. As to whatever adverse impacts racism may be having, it is something that should be tackled. Racism does effect outcomes. It isn't entirely clear to me to what degree internal vs external problems are causing adverse outcomes, but in the end it doesn't really matter.

As far as immigration goes, I have mixed feelings. The capitalist (and almost dead but still hanging on libertarian) in me is very pro immigration and property rights. If a business owner wants to provide a job or rent his property to someone from Guatemala, who am I to stop him? Why should government interfere with peaceful commerce? On the other hand I do acknowledge government has a role and arguably a responsibility at regulating commerce for the good of its citizens -- that's how property rights are allowed to exist in the first place. So I am not some close minded nitwit who parrots talking points from the far left. I just so happen to believe immigration is a net positive per my own experience growing up surrounded by them in NYC, and being the daughter of an immigrant myself. I have bias but unlike most people I am very open to persuasion. 

My partner has an interesting take on the immigration problem that maybe I'll get around to explaining later if I feel up to it. 

Lol you think this is a "gotcha" moment but it's actually funny.  You have to KILL to hunt, correct? So the purpose of guns for hunting is to kill. Thanks for reiterating that. And yes you can shoot at targets for fun, but the purpose of guns is to kill so much so in fact that if the gun was faulty and not capable of killing, it would be considered a design defect + design failure. 

That is 100% false. I am a gun enthusiast. I own several guns and would have more if my state allowed it. My wedding cake literally had guns all over it.

You keep repeating the same irrelevant thing. You have a right to own a gun, but you have no right to have a gun made and sold to you. The constitution says nothing of the sort.  If a gun manufacturer didn't want to manufacture guns any more and decided to shut down along with all other manufacturers, and you didn't know how to make a gun yourself, then guess what? YOU HAVE NO GUN and your "right" to it means nothing. Distributors have a right to discriminate who they sell to so long as it does not fall within a protected class. 

Again you can disagree about what I'm proposing, but you clearly don't understand what I'm talking about. You should think more about it first before forming an opinion. It might actually be something you agree with considering it acknowledges the government has no right to stop you from self defense.  I know you hyperpartisans obsessed with taking down the lefties are incapable of thinking without shouting at "the other side" though. 

The only reason you said "lol" after pointing out that sovereign nations have immigration laws (which I've obviously never denied) is because I made you look silly regarding your ignorance of the 10th amendment. 

Your exact words were: "No, immigration law is federal in nature. I see you try to play the federalism card when convenient, even though it doesn’t apply." Then I explained exactly why my point about state's rights does apply, which is because this issue got brought up to the Supreme Court and they ruled that California didn't have to comply with the feds contrary to the position you keep taking. 

I have no idea why you mentioned SCOTUS doesn't hear most cases "tee hee" because that has nothing to do with... anything.

Deluding yourself into thinking that Democrats want rapists and criminals among their own children and society is an astonishingly stupid take. You partisans frothing at the mouth over hatred for "the other side" sound absolutely insane saying things like this. Not only is it mind bogglingly dumb to suggest people are A-okay with murderers roaming free -- and nobody has ever said that, so it's just  another thing you completely made up -- but it also makes no sense to suggest we should assume people who stay in the country illegally (i.e. non felonious criminals) are going to rob and kill people. That's ridiculous fear mongering. I hope you're not actually that ignorant and afraid. 

And no Biden didn't "change his mind" so you're wrong again. He has always said he wanted felonious immigrants out, and in fact Trump used Biden's anti immigration stance against him in the debate when he commented that Obama + Biden's administration built the cages and presided over mass deportation. So conservatives can't have it both ways and highlight that Obama/Biden were anti immigrant in their policy and then at the same time try and portray them as open border enthusiasts. I mean I guess you can try, but I'll call it out as nonsense as you can see. 

Your argument is that black people blame white people for all of their problems. Here is the quote you provided: “There are fewer than 1% of black female professors in the United Kingdom … The findings show that for changes to be made, the embedded structures of racism and white supremacy need to be dismantled in preparation for an education system that is based on equitable practices and processes.” This statement makes one singular observation about one specific subject - the lack of black female professors in the U.K. - and therefore in no way, shape, or form comes even CLOSE to proving the monumentally broad statement of white people being blamed for all black people's problems. All this does is highlight exactly what I said about teachers discussing the ways history has impacted present day society. 

You gave a statistic about 16% of STEM workers being brown. That doesn't prove anything about racism being "imaginary" lol what? And what does this prove about "white people being blacked for all black people's problems?" You're just throwing out useless statistics at this point. 

"An Associated Press analysis of available death data found that black people constituted 42 percent of the victims, doubling their share of the populations of the states the analysis included. In Louisiana, more than 70 percent of the people who have died so far from COVID-19 were black, more than twice their 32 percent share of the state’s population, and well above the 60 percent share of the population of New Orleans, where the outbreak is worst. In New York, African Americans comprise 9 percent of the state population and 17 percent of the deaths."

"When pressed on whether these “underlying health conditions” are “rooted in years of systemic racism,” Cassidy responded: “That’s rhetoric, and it may be. But as a physician, I’m looking at science.”
Without question, African Americans suffer disproportionately from chronic diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, lung disease, obesity, and asthma, which make it harder for them to survive COVID-19. But if Cassidy were looking at science, then he’d also be asking: Why are African American suffering more from these chronic diseases? Why are African Americans more likely to be obese than Latinos and whites?"

"If black people receive inferior care from hospitals and doctors, are black people to blame? If black people are less likely to be insured, are black people are to blame? If hospitals in majority-black counties are overloaded with coronavirus patients, are black people to blame?"

First off minimizing the impact of horrifically racist Jim Crow laws by saying "muh Jim Crow" as if it's not significant is really childish and speaks volumes. Secondly you can't deny the existence of Jim Crow nor the impact of Jim Crow, which is why you are bringing up the fallacious red herring of other things you find to be problematic. They may be significant and problematic as well,  but that doesn't mean Jim Crow wasn't. 

Thirdly you're just flat out wrong again because all of those things are factored into analysis about crimes and livelihoods among people living in inner cities.  No one denies that fatherlessness factors into crimes nor that most crime occurs among certain communities. I'm guessing you are completely unaware and ignorant to the mountains of research on those very topics, but yes, they exist and they are talked about quite a bit.

This looks like something Trump's minions would write in Fox News.

According to G. Elliot Morris, if we ran every election since 1980 using proportional electoral vote distribution, all the races would be perceived as much closer but the only outcome that would have flipped would be Trump/Clinton 2016

You can cut the bullshit with the false equivalency between immigrants pre-FDR and immigrants post FDR as if there is no difference. 

If only Roman history was required reading instead of some fucked-up dated poem on a piece of French metal.

Yeah, they migrated here.

It's convenient that you linked to a graphic behind a firewall, but beyond a cute cartoon photo we can defer to what the Biden campaign has actually said about what he wants to do in his first 100 days.  They released a joint statement with Latino Victory Fund committing to a total moratorium on deportations during his first 100 days as president, and said efforts will be narrowly targeted to those who commit a felony offense in the United States or who present a national security threat. In fact there was a famous clip of some immigrant confronting Biden asking him if he would stop all removals, but Biden refused, saying he’d prioritize deporting people who committed felonies or “serious crimes” instead. The guy objected, and Biden flippantly responded “You should vote for Trump" which became a viral clip. 

But yeah, no, there's no evidence Biden or Democrats have any interest or desire to keep felonious or violent criminals in the U.S.

As I said: you have absolutely, positively, undoubtedly, not one iota or even scintilla of any kind of verifiable proof or justifiable evidence at all whatsoever that liberals or college professors "blame white people for all their problems." You want to talk about BUZZWORDS? Lol you literally just repeated the nonsense you said before. You predictably responded with nothing but more of that paraphrased rhetoric that I said you couldn't substantiate. And you didn't. And you can't.

That's because nobody "blames white people for all their problems." They just explain why the effects of slavery, Jim Crow and racism have a ripple effect that permeate in different ways (albeit watered down over the years) throughout society. People's complete and utter failure or refusal to recognize that and accept the facts, research and anecdotal experiences that are presented doesn't make racism an imaginary boogeyman, just FYI.

I'm pretty sure you don't know anything about me or what "cards" I play and when. Another thing you don't know is the law lol. The 10th amendment of the Constitution says that states do not have to enforce federal laws, which is why some states legalized pot even though it is federally criminalized (the feds can still enforce federal laws within those states). In fact, this past June the Supreme Court refused to hear Trump's challenge to the state of California’s sanctuary law. You must have completely missed that, but it was a great win for state's rights.

No, although depending on how litigious one is they can try. Knives are not as dangerous as guns though. Guns are designed specifically to kill. That's their purpose.

So yes, in short there is absolutely a legal basis for what I'm suggesting. You can disagree but you'd need to understand tort law first.

You have no reason to believe that Hispanic immigrants won't assimilate. None. All evidence points to the contrary.

A landslide victory is not indicative of righteousness. It's also pretty amusing to see you lament partisanship while you have taken such a hardline stance against the left lol.

Probably not. The majority of the party is pretty moderate, so much so in fact that Bernie Sanders lost in a landslide to a dinosaur like Joe Biden. He is considered a moderate with a history of bipartisan sponsorship. AOC and "the squad" are in the minority. They are considered political outsiders and hate the likes of Nancy Pelosi whom they see as an establishment hack. Most Dems are corporatist and economically moderate, though they do want government healthcare. So do Republicans according to polling. It's true the Dems might move the country left on some things but I don't see the Green New Deal or anything like that happening.

Yeah, you're probably just bigoted and don't realize it or want to admit it. The fact is there is absolutely nothing stopping grown men from going into the bathroom with little girls now. If anyone has an intent on raping or harming a little girl they can and will, and no bathroom policy will stop that. Period. Thinking some little sign on the door will stop them is as insanely stupid and naïve as thinking a "no guns" sign will stop criminals from carrying guns. 

In reality the "men" who use women's bathrooms often look and dress like women. They go in a private stall (unlike men's bathrooms, you don't watch anyone piss). This is safer for them than being in the men's bathroom considering there is a history of trans people being assaulted and harassed by grown men. There is no history of little girls being harassed and assaulted in the women's bathroom. There's a history of them being assaulted and raped in general, but when people tried to talk about that it got ridiculed as a liberal crybaby movement (#MeToo) cuz rape only matters if it happens in a bathroom apparently. 

This is just your opinion and has no factual basis.  The country was founded by migrants

Can you show me where he said that?

No, that is a blatant misrepresentation (paraphrase) that you completely made up. Literally. No teacher in the history of college has ever said that, you have no proof that anyone has ever said that, yet you will stand by that indefensible and unsubstantiated falsehood just because it suits your narrative of wanting to hate liberals for whatever reason. What does get taught in college are the ways slavery, Jim Crow, and subsequent racism have had an undeniable impact on black people's lives. Obviously that should be taught because it is relevant to our history, culture and society. Perhaps the (somewhat obvious) reason American slavery gets prioritized in our education is because we live in the U.S.

I don't know what you're referring to about "white people raising black power fists" since the beginning of the year. I know that after a police officer murdered George Floyd in the middle of the year, a lot of white people showed support and advocated change to the criminal justice system. I'm not sure what you think that proves.

They are a Sanctuary State meaning they don't go out of their way to find illegal immigrants, but that doesn't mean they welcome or want to keep violent criminals so that doesn't really prove anything. Besides, you don't believe the citizens of California should get to vote on the laws that govern California? Interesting.

Big Pharma has settled billions of dollars worth of lawsuits regarding the careless distribution of drugs they manufacture. Gun manufacturers can be held liable in a similar way if their products get into the wrong hands. We have a constitutional right to bear arms, but we don't have a constitutional right to buy a gun. The court could easily say manufacturers of dangerous products (like guns) have a responsibility to ensure those products are not abused by requiring stringent background checks and other barriers of purchase, again like opioids and other prescriptions.

That's a pretty nonsensical position considering the U.S. is a nation built by immigrants. After slave labor helped make the country rich, immigrants made it thrive throughout the Industrial Revolution. The country has always been a melting pot with more immigration than anywhere else in the world since this country's inception. Do you not believe the U.S. is great and hasn't been great this whole time? Which country is better?

Even if you wanted to delude yourself into believing harmony could be achieved with one homogenous race and religion (despite how many times that's been disproven throughout history) we know white Christians in Vermont are much different than white Christians in Mississippi. There is absolutely, positively no one or right way to be American or define what America has "always been." So that's really just hyperbolic 'love it or leave it' nonsense.

Which crap is that? I think it's stupid to be hyper-partisan and cheer against a political party like it's a sports team. Liberals are not wrong about everything. An example of how stupid it is to devote yourself for/against one political party is to look at how much the GOP has changed just in the last 4 years alone. They've done a complete 180 where they used to be for free trade; now they're pro regulation and tariffs. All of their pro capitalism rhetoric went right out the window and most Republicans are too ignorant to have any clue what they're even cheering for.

Another example is how Republicans were firmly against increasing the deficit and would not increase spending at ALL when Obama was in office. When Trump was in office, they did another 180 and voted for the exact same things they voted against when Obama's administration proposed them. So really people just like hating shit for the sake of hating it and start yelling like monkeys. They don't even know what they're talking about half the time. I think it's pathetic to take sides like that as both parties tend to be right/wrong on various things.

It's interesting that Bernie and AOC have somehow come to define the Democrat party even though most Dems are more moderate. That's how Republicans aimed to win their political races in 2020: scaring people into thinking the Democrats are now bonafide socialists. It's not true but it worked like a charm so it was a good strategy. I'm personally not a fan of socialist politics myself. I am a fan of inclusion and non discrimination. Obviously it doesn't matter to any sane or decent human being which bathroom someone chooses to pee in, so I don't hate on Democrats for stuff like that.

and one party has large support for hate speech, that would be the much bigger issue. 

I think most people support common sense gun control. There is a difference of opinion of where that line should be, but i think most people can agree that having to pass a training course and a background check is reasonable. But the republican party tries to obstruct any kind of reform at all.

yeah, the republicans. They love those gun toting "proud boys" who try to attack and kill protesters

The fact that republicans hate a word they don't even understand is the much bigger issue.

none of these things are differences in basic values. Xenophobia isn't a value. both sides are against (or at least claim to be against, the republicans seem to cheer it on) violence in the streets.

They differ in certain policy goals. How much gun control is the right amount? No one thinks they should be handed out on the street to every person that comes along, virtually no one thinks all guns should be banned. So everyone agrees some amount of gun control is needed, it is just how much that is at question.

the issue is not that there are fundamental differences in basic values, it is that polarizing language is being used by both sides to try to play up this divide. The leadership of both parties want you think that the other side is the "other". They are unreasonable and want to destroy your way of life, etc. That way you have no choice but to support them, even though you likely don't agree with alot of the things that leader wants to do. It is a political tactic, and it is causing huge damage.

Lol @ liberal teachers telling white people to hate themselves. File that under "stupid shit Republicans whine about but never happens." Please note that being a drag queen is pretty rad (they have great comedy shows), being a makeup artist isn't a bad thing, and being gender confused is a sad reality that has nothing to do with being liberal -- they just don't shame you for it. Caitlyn Jenner is a conservative.

Do Democrats advocate keeping violent criminals in the US? I haven't heard of that; they're usually looking to protect Dreamers and such.

I also think weapons should be easier to get under certain circumstances (i.e. tort reform that makes it possible to sue gun manufacturers for negligence the way you can sue the manufacturers of other dangerous products). But that of course would make it easier for everyone to get guns, including "degenerate" groups or more dangerous folks like terrorists and ANTIFA.

And speaking of degenerates, what does "not living in a serious nation" mean? Sounds like some people hate America! If they don't like it, maybe they should leave?! Perhaps go to a less expensive country with a lower tax rate. The options are: Mexico, Thailand, Singapore, Poland, Kenya, Albania, Latvia, the Czech Republic, Ukraine and Hungary. Which one would you choose? I'd probs pick one of those cuz the only other options are way too liberal - Canada and New Zealand.

I agree rent control is pretty dumb, but it doesn't actually increase homelessness just because prices go up and rental vacancy goes down. I know that sounds counterintuitive but they've done research on it. Usually it protects the poorest and most vulnerable while fucking over the middle class, as many policies do. Womp womp.

Hey why do you hate liberals so much? Just curious.

Black judges can be racist too. Actually they have been proven to be racist. A 2010 study I read a while back took fictional robberies and put them in front of judges to determine sentences. So mock sentencing basically. The only thing that differed was the race of the robber, it found that even black judges sentenced black people longer. So this is the same fake robbery (judges think it's real obviously) but one variable changes, the race of the fake perpetrator, and the trend persists even with black judges

• Any slave attempting to run away and leave the colony (later, the state) received the death penalty.
  

packing the courts with right wing judges so they can make the courts swing the law to the right even though that is not what the people want. That is undermining democracy.

The republicans used political games to pack the courts with right wing judges. Now the democrats are thinking of doing the same. But in your mind the republicans are fine, but if the democrats do that, that's wrong. That is some hyper partisan bullshit

there is some twisted logic. Having everyone's votes count for the same amount is a "power grab". having rural people's votes count for way more than urban people's votes is totally fine though....

lol just because someone disputes something, doesn't mean they are right. I can dispute that the moon exists, but that doesn't change that it is there. Biden won, that is extremely clear. Trump can dispute all he wants, he's an idiot.

this says alot about the republican party. They recognize they do not represent the majority of americans. They know that they are attempting to force a minority of people's wishes on the majority, and they are ok with it. They actually enjoy it. Its a bit perverse.

That happens now. The only states that get paid attention to are the swing states. Any state that is "safe" is ignored. All the system does is change which states get ignored.

yes. California has more people than many countries.

California has about 40 million people. That is about 12% of the US's population. they have 55 of 538 electoral college votes. that is a bit over 10% of the electoral college vote.

Iowa has 3.15 million people. That is about  0.95% of the US population. They get 6 electoral college votes. That is about 0.11% of the electoral college.

So yes, California should have a bigger say in the electoral college than they do. A vote in california is worth less than a vote in Iowa.

ok. so the republicans refused to allow a sitting president to pick a supreme court judge, which is not illegal, but extremely unusual and their reasons for doing it were lies. They then rammed through a supreme court judge like a month before losing an election. Also not illegal, but still pretty obviously playing games with the system. 

Some dems want to expand the court, which is not illegal.

So the republicans playing games with the courts to undermine democracy is totally fine with you. but if the democrats try to respond suddenly it is totally unacceptable. That is some hyper partisan bullshit. 

the electoral college is an antiquated system which is designed to make some people's votes matter more than others. It is, by design, a discriminatory system. Even with that system, the dems won. If the dems want to get rid of the electoral college, why shouldn't they pursue that?

they did win. both by millions of votes and by the electoral college. 

Metro Detroit has full control on how to deal with local crime and local teacher's unions, so it's really hard to blame whitey.

What do you mean it is expensive? Detroit has self-segregated for years.

Illegal aliens compete a lot with high school dropouts in the labor market. Rates for general labor aren't sufficient for a man to be marriageable right now.

Other policy suggestion might be to reduce financial barriers to obtaining marketable job skills. Trade schools can allow people to obtain reasonably good blue collar incomes with minimal education cost in terms of time and money. Training for truck driving, handy man type work and the like perhaps should be subsidized. It's a lot more cost efficient than subsidizing the arts or bloated university budgets that study simply for the sake of academic interest rather than meaningfully improving lives. The student loan system is a joke, really. People get, effectively, a credit card to spend on education. They end up spending it on educations that don't give them good incomes, and then they can't pay back the loans. The winners are the schools. The losers are the students who wasted their time and are now deeply in debt, sometimes for life. The government ends up eating the losses.

How    Long   Is    a    Piece   of   String?

Cool, and to address your question, yes, there is undeniably systemic sexism in the US against me. Actually, systemic sexism against men is stronger than systemic racism against black people.

Remember when I stated that black people got sentenced 20.4% longer relative to white people, well for men, they have to endure sentences which are 63% longer than their female counterparts.(I know my link is a 538 article but it summarizes a 2015 study from Michigan state university)

In short, I have always contended that both systemic sexism and racism exist in the courts.

The data suggests that ~42% of the observed difference between white and black infant mortality is being caused by racism. It's time for those babies to shut up and start taking responsibility!

There is no point. "Racism" is a product of having differing non-European groups involved with other racial groups. Even in their homelands (such as Kenya), Africans still complain of other Kenyans racially discriminating against them. In Singapore, Chinese have to be legally forbidden from spreading Chinese supremacist mantra, in order to maintain the peace.

It's fascinating that in some leftist's minds they can house this complete contradiction: cultural differences should be celebrated but cultural differences don't matter. This isn't even to delve into the fact that some cultures are objectively abhorrent, such as some parts of the extreme Islamic world wherein women are stoned to death for being raped (for dishonoring the family), or in parts of Uganda where they believe witchcraft is a real thing https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-02/witchcraft-child-sacrifice-uganda-victims/11248026 . 

Yes, there doesn't seem to be an end for the degeneracy and awful decisions the government is willing to tolerate. Kind in mind that this issue is exacerbated by the tax-payer having to prop these irresponsible people up.

Learned helplessness is a pathology.

If anything, Africans and Hispanics receive, overall, favorable handouts from the government (for example, getting into universities with lower SAT scores through affirmative action) https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/12/17/affirmative-action/