coal's avatar

coal

A member since

3
3
9

Total posts: 1,950

Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
Why are you maintaining your vote on Lunatic (TUF)?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
I note as well that Oro's vote on Danielle makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
With Sui removing his vote from Ragnar my prior concerns about potentially accidentally ending the DP too soon are abated.

I replace my vote on ragnar, accordingly.

VTL Ragnar 

We should still not prematurely end the DP, but as noted previously I do not see objectivity flipping town as indicating Ragnar is not scum which is why I thought lynching Objectivity before Ragnar was futile.  


Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@sui_generis
What about what happened made you no longer vote for Ragnar? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Please finish.  The rest is short and I want to know what, if anything, you think about Objectivity's modkill and what implications it has, if any, to what should be happening.   That should take 25 mins at most. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Danielle
I'm gonna keep my vote on Ragnar but feel strongly about Sui and Oro contributing before this day phase ends. 


I am still willing to VTL Ragnar though I need to reevaluate since one of my working theories for the scum team was Ragnar and Objectivity.  With Objectivity flipping town I need to reassess, though as I previously said Objectivity's affiliation isn't per se indicative of Ragnars and that is just one of three options.  The other potential options are Ragnar and Oro, and Ragnar and Sui, as you seem to be thinking also.  

But if I am wrong then my adding the vote to Ragnar at this time puts him back at L-1 (I think) which could prematurely end the DP, and for that reason I think the more prudent approach is to keep things as they stand now while further discussion develops.  I also do not want Ragnar at L-1 before Max has read the full DP, and I want to see how other people respond to Max.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Have you finished reading the DP?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
I am kind of leaning towards no lynching now with Objectivity being vanilla. Part of my read on Ragnar had to do with them being potential scum buddies. While the remaining points on Ragnar still hold true, I am not sure I want to risk a mis-lynch at this juncture. 

Unvote. VTNL

It is way too early for that.  I will UNVOTE for now, but saying that we're just going to VTNL is premature.  

What do you think of the fact that Max thinks we are scum buddies?

rofl 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Note for the record I am replying to 472. 

Further note for the record that your town meta requires many things.  At least one of those things is to be active and engaged.  At least one other is to be posting fairly insightful reads and moving the ball forward.  I don't see the utility in elaborating further because it is really at that low level of resolution that your pre-entry tonight play was inconsistent with your town meta.  There are more specific things I could say but I don't care now because you're doing what I think you should be doing, and I took a chance on TUF's suggesting that there was a good explanation (independent of mod psych) that I shouldn't be pursuing your lynch.  Plus other better options presented, hence the vote count.  

My thinking on you has clearly changed just as it did with TUF, but do continue to post these stream of consciousness updates.   This is helpful for me to understand what you are thinking and why at various points of the game. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
Good.  Your point on Oro is also well stated, but Oro actually took a position whereas Ragnar did not.  I also have much lower expectations of oro than I do of Ragnar, who is a sophisticated and experienced player.   Oro may be that, but I don't have any independent knowledge of that.  

I maintain my town read of you.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lucky
I don't think modkilling Adam was fair.  He obviously didn't know, and if he had have known would not have done that.  Now town is down another player and even though he was a vanilla townie this is highly prejudicial to the town. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
But if we reach the end of the DP and the wagon remains, you prefer to hammer Ragnar than go to a no lynch?  You are willing to commit to this?  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Please continue to post those stream of consciousness updates like you have been doing as you read.   That is helpful. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lucky
Thank you.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Please lord, do not take his case at face value without reading the context. First of all much of that is built on his lack of understanding. A big part of it suggests that I was "afraid" of pressure because I asked Danielle what her intentions for pressuring was, given she listed a bloc of four people. She later admitted she was looking for character claims and didn't realize that this was a themeless game. Zaradi should know this, but still based a case around mis-representing my "What are you pressuring for" as me being overly defensive, or scared of pressure lol. 
We are also not lynching you today.  I think Max should come to the same conclusion I have come to on Zaradi's case for at least the same reasons.  
Created:
1
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
I too am getting "un-informed" vibes, considering he still think him and Dani are the most scum read people in the game. I figure his scum buddy might have at least told him that wasn't the case. 
Yes I agree and we are not lynching Max today.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Edit to correct a typeo.

Ok, that is helpful.  Read what I wrote in 448.  There is no way in my view you had read enough of the DP to know what was going on when you wrote 443 and the fact that you posted clearly from a position of having not read the DP suggests an UNinformed perspective.  As scum you should have continued to lurk and made a more calculated response rather than post the response you did.  So yes I am not even considering VTLing you at the moment.  If you're scum then you're going to be more methodical and not take the risk of speaking without knowing what you're wading into, but if you're town you have less to hide.  You also didn't beat around the bush.  So I can see where you are coming from as town more easily than I can see you writing 443 as scum.  I am not town reading you, but I'm not scum reading you at this point either. 

Read the DP and update your thoughts.  I would like a list of reads and a statement of why you think those are your reads.  Indicate your thoughts on the Ragnar lynch.  

Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
Ok, that is helpful.  Read what I wrote in 448.  There is no way in my view you had read enough of the DP to know what was going on when you wrote 443 and the fact that you posted clearly from a position of having not read the DP suggests an informed perspective.  As scum you should have continued to lurk and made a more calculated response rather than post the response you did.  So yes I am not even considering VTLing you at the moment.  If you're scum then you're going to be more methodical and not take the risk of speaking without knowing what you're wading into, but if you're town you have less to hide.  You also didn't beat around the bush.  So I can see where you are coming from as town more easily than I can see you writing 443 as scum.  I am not town reading you, but I'm not scum reading you at this point either. 

Read the DP and update your thoughts.  I would like a list of reads and a statement of why you think those are your reads.  Indicate your thoughts on the Ragnar lynch.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
Airmax's last post is very defensive, though he also goes on the attack to some degree with veiled threats that, I think, once he reads the DP he will likely re-evaluate.  In his post he makes some allusion to having sort of read the DP but this post suggests that he in fact has no idea what is happening, and likewise does not realize what has happened up to this point.  That is consistent with his claims of working all day, and reaffirms my judgment that he was not the ideal candidate for a lynch today.  He is also active now to at least post a multiparagraph response to a fairly aggressive activity prompt, and willing to take the risk of sticking his neck out even though he has not read the DP.   That suggests an uninformed perspective.  He has no idea, it seems, that I did not pursue his lynch.  That is, unless it turns out that he tells me he had read the DP in totality before posting 443 in which case I will need to consider further.  In any case this confirms my thinking that Airmax was not the best lynch, as is evidenced by the fact that I did not pursue Max's lynch despite expressing a willingness to do so. 
Created:
2
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@airmax1227
When you wrote 443, were you posting after having read the DP or only after having come in and read only my prompting you to post? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
That is a good point. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lucky
#440 is not a vote count. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Which post was Ragnar's last response to you, just so we are on the same page? 

Thank you for the other link.  That is helpful.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
@Objectivity
@Zaradi
I'll tell you where I'm at with Ragnar and why; make up your own mind and tell me whether you agree.   

On a very high level, Ragnar has shown the least interest of anyone here in posting reads, reading and engaging with the DP, and sorting scum and town from one another.  Adding to that the fact that he is not engaging with anyone, his thought process isn't even evolving; it's not even happening, which raises the obvious question of why.  Why isn't his thought process evolving and why is the only actual scum read he has made being based on OMGUS logic against Sui?  Looks to me like it's because he knows, which is why his reads aren't evolving as the facts develop. 

The reads he posts, few as they are, are not even reads but summaries of activity which look more like he is trying to appear to engage in pro-town actions but he can't get past the fact that he knows the affiliations and he has other things going on.  He says he is willing to sheep you or Danielle, and that would be very convenient if it turned out that either of you pushed a mislynch.  If you're right he gets the credit for being on the lynch; if you're wrong he claims that it was you guys and not him that made the error and he uses the fact that he was sheeping to avoid suspicion on him.  Except that's not how it works.  If he was sheeping you because he actually agreed with your reads/analysis then that would be one thing, but he isn't saying that at all.   He is saying that he town reads you both and so he is therefore willing to let you two take all the risks without him independently contributing.  That is classic scum behavior.  

Ragnar's first post is 34, wherein he posts nothing, and then posts less than nothing in 42, where he says that there is one person he can guarantee is not town.... someone who is not even in the game.  To his credit, nothing had really happened thus far but he also wasn't doing anything to make anything happen.  He's just kind of there.  Making his presence known, and nothing else.   Vote count at 51, Ragnar is still doing nothing.  I prompt him at 64, and nothing.   Vote count at 76, and 84, and 101....  nothing.  No posts other than pulp.  He is not active or engaged.  He is not invested in sorting town from scum, or even participating in conversations.  

It takes Ragnar until 113 to do anything even semi-substantive.   He posts a read list that does not take positions but does not take a hard position other than to say that he is "scum more often than not".  I thought that was actually pretty funny, but it felt like WIFOM.   Very subtle, funny, playful... but not moving the ball forward.  He acknowledges this in his post by saying "not the best, I know".   Why isn't he posting a list of reads to let people, in particular me, know what he is thinking?  It's because he isn't reading the OP and therefore doesn't have thoughts on the game's progression.  The reads were superficial and he missed several critical details, which I think you noted.  Ragnar said that I didn't even know if I was town or scum; but I clearly said that I was only tempted to not read my role PM.   Moreover, Ragnar list of "reads" isn't even a list of reads.  It's just a non-committal summary, largely wrong, without even a statement of affiliation for anyone.  There is no read on Danielle.  He simply notes that TUF's posts 6 and 14 are "worth reviewing" and while that is a sort of alluding to an FOS, he doesn't even come out and say it.   He leaves it there.  He similarly is just summarizing Objectivity's posts, your posts, Sui's posts, and Oro's posts and does this with like one line of analysis.   So I am now trying to figure out why even post it?  I've seen Ragnar's town play, and while I think I've seen his scum play, this isn't his town play.  He usually has narrow and fairly precise insight with reads.  I am not seeing narrow or precise insight.  I'm not even seeing insight.  I'm seeing a list of reads that does not even reflect that he is reading the DP.   That kind of apathy suggests an informed perspective to me, and therefore suggests that he is scum.   He also doesn't even read Airmax but VTL's him in 114, only after Sui had VTL'd Max, and repeats the prior mistake where he claimed I said I didn't read my role PM in 122

More than 100 posts pass before Ragnar is heard from again in 262, which was another nothing post.  But 269 is important:

I'm a firm believer in there being two types of scum. There are mafia who are forced to be scum, and townsmen who choose to be scum. Getting rid of the first is how the game is won,  but removing the second isn't so bad.

Of course I did not know you were at work. Sorry about that, i did not mean to be an ass. I'll keep your schedule in mind the remaining days.

Unvote
So Ragnar is saying what the thinks town should be doing, albeit in a vague and sort of noncommittal way, but he is doing nothing to either generate activity or enable the the identification of town and scum players.  He is just lurking.  He is not posting analysis.  He is not asking questions.  He is not trying to figure out who is town and who is scum.  Presumably because he knows, which is why he is so easy to explain away scummy behavior of others (i.e., Airmax) so as to avoid the indignity of being caught on a mislynch and potentially exposing himself to subsequent pressure?  Remember Ragnar is unvoting Airmax at 269, and continuing to explain away more potential scum behavior (even if I think the assessment is wrong) at 310 and 317. 

But where are his reads?  He is vaguely responding to questions, explaining away why he thinks other people's potential scum reads are not scum, but he isn't even willing to take a firm position on who is town and who is scum, more than 300 posts into DP1.   Ragnar first posts a list of reads at 331, at exactly 1:20 PM by my clock on DART, just about 45 minutes after I prodded him here.  So he is lurking, not posting reads, and avoding taking a position on anything other than suggesting why people are wrong about who is scum up until this point.  He replies to Danielle agreeing with me that he needs to post reads.

In 331, Ragnar is still not doing anything useful.  In fact he is only saying that he would be willing to sheep you or Danielle, so he is going to have you two blaze the trail while he follows.  Excellent scum strategy.  If you're right he looks pro-town while knowing you're pushing mislynches, but if scum he can say "I was just sheeping Dani and Zaradi!"  Potentially he is setting you up for a mislynch because if you lead a wagon and are wrong, it's not hard to figure out what comes next.  This is especially important where you led a wagon on TUF, which is one reason why I think the potential that Ragnar and TUF are both scum is very very low.   I also think there is no chance of Ragnar and Danielle because Danielle is town.  The only scum read he makes is on Objectivity, who if it turns out flips scum this could be a very convenient way for Ragnar to put distance between him and objectivity.  But still, he VTL's Sui for reasons that begin and end in OMGUS.  This is not the kind of analysis I expect from town Ragnar; this is the kind of analysis I expect from scum Ragnar who knows who is town and scum and who is having a hard time ignoring the fact that he knows the affiliations.   

That was the point at which I was willing to VTL him for death. 

#421 is what I want you and others to weigh in on.   I mistyped earlier. 

Same with Max, Sui, and Oro.  I want all of you to weigh in on whether you agree with what I said in 421, or disagree, and why.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Danielle
I am pretty convinced you're town so I assume you would agree with most of what I said. No worries. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
yes
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
I especially need you to weigh in on Ragnar's lynch.  To the fullest extent possible, indicate whether you agree or disagree with the points I made in 224 and why.  If you disagree with them I specifically want to know why.  I want to know if you are willing to hammer Ragnar, and why or why not.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
I need you to weigh in on Ragnar's lynch, since I don't think you're presently voting for him.  I need to know if you agree with what I said in 224 or if you disagree and why, for each. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lucky
MOD:  POST A VOTE COUNT.

ALL - 

DO NOT HAMMER UNTIL MAX WEIGHS IN ON WHAT IS HAPPENING, AND AFTER LUCKY POSTS A VOTE COUNT!!!

IT IS CRITICAL THAT MAX WEIGH IN ON THIS LYNCH BEFORE IT HAPPENS, IF IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

nac 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
I just want to know whether you agree with what I said, whether you disagree with it, and why for each.  If you agree, I want to know why.  If you disagree I want to know why.

I also want others to weigh in.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Thanks, but please explain whether you agree with what I said in 421 and why.  If you disagree please explain why.  I need to know where your head is at on this. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
I want everyone's thoughts on the Ragnar lynch, as well.  Not just Zaradi's. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
If we lynch ragnar and he flips town what is your next move?
That will depend on who is on the lynch and where they fall in the wagon. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
I'll tell you where I'm at with Ragnar and why; make up your own mind and tell me whether you agree.   

On a very high level, Ragnar has shown the least interest of anyone here in posting reads, reading and engaging with the DP, and sorting scum and town from one another.  Adding to that the fact that he is not engaging with anyone, his thought process isn't even evolving; it's not even happening, which raises the obvious question of why.  Why isn't his thought process evolving and why is the only actual scum read he has made being based on OMGUS logic against Sui?  Looks to me like it's because he knows, which is why his reads aren't evolving as the facts develop. 

The reads he posts, few as they are, are not even reads but summaries of activity which look more like he is trying to appear to engage in pro-town actions but he can't get past the fact that he knows the affiliations and he has other things going on.  He says he is willing to sheep you or Danielle, and that would be very convenient if it turned out that either of you pushed a mislynch.  If you're right he gets the credit for being on the lynch; if you're wrong he claims that it was you guys and not him that made the error and he uses the fact that he was sheeping to avoid suspicion on him.  Except that's not how it works.  If he was sheeping you because he actually agreed with your reads/analysis then that would be one thing, but he isn't saying that at all.   He is saying that he town reads you both and so he is therefore willing to let you two take all the risks without him independently contributing.  That is classic scum behavior.  

Ragnar's first post is 34, wherein he posts nothing, and then posts less than nothing in 42, where he says that there is one person he can guarantee is not town.... someone who is not even in the game.  To his credit, nothing had really happened thus far but he also wasn't doing anything to make anything happen.  He's just kind of there.  Making his presence known, and nothing else.   Vote count at 51, Ragnar is still doing nothing.  I prompt him at 64, and nothing.   Vote count at 76, and 84, and 101....  nothing.  No posts other than pulp.  He is not active or engaged.  He is not invested in sorting town from scum, or even participating in conversations.  

It takes Ragnar until 113 to do anything even semi-substantive.   He posts a read list that does not take positions but does not take a hard position other than to say that he is "scum more often than not".  I thought that was actually pretty funny, but it felt like WIFOM.   Very subtle, funny, playful... but not moving the ball forward.  He acknowledges this in his post by saying "not the best, I know".   Why isn't he posting a list of reads to let people, in particular me, know what he is thinking?  It's because he isn't reading the OP and therefore doesn't have thoughts on the game's progression.  The reads were superficial and he missed several critical details, which I think you noted.  Ragnar said that I didn't even know if I was town or scum; but I clearly said that I was only tempted to not read my role PM.   Moreover, Ragnar list of "reads" isn't even a list of reads.  It's just a non-committal summary, largely wrong, without even a statement of affiliation for anyone.  There is no read on Danielle.  He simply notes that TUF's posts 6 and 14 are "worth reviewing" and while that is a sort of alluding to an FOS, he doesn't even come out and say it.   He leaves it there.  He similarly is just summarizing Objectivity's posts, your posts, Sui's posts, and Oro's posts and does this with like one line of analysis.   So I am now trying to figure out why even post it?  I've seen Ragnar's town play, and while I think I've seen his scum play, this isn't his town play.  He usually has narrow and fairly precise insight with reads.  I am not seeing narrow or precise insight.  I'm not even seeing insight.  I'm seeing a list of reads that does not even reflect that he is reading the DP.   That kind of apathy suggests an informed perspective to me, and therefore suggests that he is scum.   He also doesn't even read Airmax but VTL's him in 114, only after Sui had VTL'd Max, and repeats the prior mistake where he claimed I said I didn't read my role PM in 122

More than 100 posts pass before Ragnar is heard from again in 262, which was another nothing post.  But 269 is important:

I'm a firm believer in there being two types of scum. There are mafia who are forced to be scum, and townsmen who choose to be scum. Getting rid of the first is how the game is won,  but removing the second isn't so bad.

Of course I did not know you were at work. Sorry about that, i did not mean to be an ass. I'll keep your schedule in mind the remaining days.

Unvote
So Ragnar is saying what the thinks town should be doing, albeit in a vague and sort of noncommittal way, but he is doing nothing to either generate activity or enable the the identification of town and scum players.  He is just lurking.  He is not posting analysis.  He is not asking questions.  He is not trying to figure out who is town and who is scum.  Presumably because he knows, which is why he is so easy to explain away scummy behavior of others (i.e., Airmax) so as to avoid the indignity of being caught on a mislynch and potentially exposing himself to subsequent pressure?  Remember Ragnar is unvoting Airmax at 269, and continuing to explain away more potential scum behavior (even if I think the assessment is wrong) at 310 and 317. 

But where are his reads?  He is vaguely responding to questions, explaining away why he thinks other people's potential scum reads are not scum, but he isn't even willing to take a firm position on who is town and who is scum, more than 300 posts into DP1.   Ragnar first posts a list of reads at 331, at exactly 1:20 PM by my clock on DART, just about 45 minutes after I prodded him here.  So he is lurking, not posting reads, and avoding taking a position on anything other than suggesting why people are wrong about who is scum up until this point.  He replies to Danielle agreeing with me that he needs to post reads.

In 331, Ragnar is still not doing anything useful.  In fact he is only saying that he would be willing to sheep you or Danielle, so he is going to have you two blaze the trail while he follows.  Excellent scum strategy.  If you're right he looks pro-town while knowing you're pushing mislynches, but if scum he can say "I was just sheeping Dani and Zaradi!"  Potentially he is setting you up for a mislynch because if you lead a wagon and are wrong, it's not hard to figure out what comes next.  This is especially important where you led a wagon on TUF, which is one reason why I think the potential that Ragnar and TUF are both scum is very very low.   I also think there is no chance of Ragnar and Danielle because Danielle is town.  The only scum read he makes is on Objectivity, who if it turns out flips scum this could be a very convenient way for Ragnar to put distance between him and objectivity.  But still, he VTL's Sui for reasons that begin and end in OMGUS.  This is not the kind of analysis I expect from town Ragnar; this is the kind of analysis I expect from scum Ragnar who knows who is town and scum and who is having a hard time ignoring the fact that he knows the affiliations.   

That was the point at which I was willing to VTL him for death. 


Created:
1
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
Does Lunatic do this as scum? I don't remember anything about Lunatic's scumplay 
No but I think that earlier in the game it was obvious enough that Objectivity maybe needed some coaching in how to play that TUF would have taken the initiative.  The alternative world where TUF just allows Adam to go about wetting the bed like this seems really unlikely to me.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
I'm not volunteering for anything, I am just saying that by the logic that you, zaradi, and TUF have I should be the first lynch, not Ragnar. 
I am just going to note that this is exactly what I would expect you to do as town or scum while cornered and this is further reason why lynching you today is not helpful for me.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
According to the logic of YY, Zaradi, and TUF, I should be the lynch for DP1 since I am the safest bet.  TUF thinks its either me and zaradi or me and ragnar.  YY thinks its me and ragnar.  Zaradi thinks its me and TUF.  I am on all four of those lists.  Just lynch me then if that's what you think.
I don't think lynching you yields as much information as lynching Ragnar would.  I also think Ragnar is more likely scum than that you are.  The scum could also be Airmax and you, or Airmax and Ragnar.   If we lynch you and you flip town that doesn't tell me who the other two are.  I don't see a way at this point at least how lynching you helps me figure out who the other scum is, because my scum read on you is conditional on Ragnar being scum; not the other way around.  

Likewise, you are posting and Ragnar is not.  You are posting and Airmax is not.  Regardless of whether you are a common denominator on possible scum teams, it is the team leader whose lynch will prove more useful.  

Moreover, if you are town then while I expect scum will be on the tail-end of your lynch, scum will be able to come up with several objectively good reasons why they VTL'd you so they can hide behind what is really nothing more than OMGUS reasoning for why they pushed a mislynch.  

So I see no real utility in lynching you at this point.  DP2, we will see.  DP1, the lynch is Ragnar.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
If both potential scum teams include me, why not lynch me first?
Are you volunteering to be lynched? 
Created:
1
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
If TUF was Adam's scum partner I would expect that Adam would be being coached on what to post in a way that was not so self-evidently an issue.   
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
I think if Objectivity was on the scum team with TUF we would not have seen a post like 328.   The team I think is most viable at the moment is Ragnar/Objectivity.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Interesting you think I am "tunneling" him rather than the other way around. I mean I just said he was the least strong scum read out of the three. And if you are accusing me of OMGUS, that is also wrong. My scum read on zaradi is that his behavior seemed contrived from the get go (my very first read mentioned this, though you somehow mis-construed it for a full on town read). Then when I challenged him to elaborate, he doubled down and focused on just me. Seemed like he was more interested in saying "fvck TUF for daring to say my reads are contrived" and the full case (built on mis-representations of reality and lack of reading) was essentially to fulfill his confirmation bias of having already stated he thought I was scummy and not wanting to back down from it. His intentions don't seem like he's open minded to hunting scum, and his vision is narrow. 
Also realize I am not scum reading you at the moment.  I am not fully committed to a town read, but you are looking more consistently defensive from a town perspective rather than defensive as scum from a town perspective based on your activity after I initially VTL'd you following Zaradi's case made against you.  It is looking to me like you and Zaradi are now potentially both town. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Interesting you think I am "tunneling" him rather than the other way around.
I didn't say Zaradi wasn't tunneling you.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
I am increasingly willing to entertain a Ragnar/Objectivity scum team.  Not sold on this yet because I still think that this is clueless townie play, which is not scum indicative, but the harder I have to think to explain things away and the more often I have to do it the more willing I become to entertain the lynch because there comes a point where the scale between clueless townie and clueless scum tips in favor of clueless scum.  Independently of the foregoing in 328, Objectivity's posts are starting to look coordinated with Ragnar's.  Not sure if I am only seeing what I want to see though.  I will think more about this.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
He has not really done much to generate discussion so far outside of trying to bus me in the last page after he has faced intense pressure
Just so we're all clear this was in 328.  

Also if you edit a post it's a mod kill.  Realize that.  


Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Lunatic
Anything's possible. The two scum teams I mentioned are based on my current feeling that objectivity is scummier than almost any town player, and the connection I made between Ragnar and objectivity because Ragnar basically gave a non-read on him, which is something I imagine scum would be likely to do on accident to make it seem like they are actually making a read on their scum buddy. Zaradi's my least strongest scum read, but in the case ragnar is town my best feeling is it would be objectivity/zaradi. Though I place objectivity/ragnar higher atm.
Kinda feels like you're tunneling Zaradi, just so you know.  I town read him and I still don't really understand why you're not town reading him other than that he wrote out a case against you.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
He has not really done much to generate discussion so far outside of trying to bus me
- Objectivity 328

Is this a slip?
What are you thinking is a slip?  Explain. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
and I am worried about looking scummy bc I don't want to be mislynched, pretty straightforward 
I have no idea how to check likes.  Presumably there is a way to figure that out.   I want to know who liked your post, and if it was Ragnar.  If it was Ragnar then he is still lurking and that is just raising all the red flags.

Please figure that out.

Also continue to post reads as I instructed in 199.  I need to continue to understand where your thinking is and whether it changes, and why.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
I note I am still not satisfied with Objectivity's reads and I want him to continue to post detailed lists of the same and reasons for them as the DP continues. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Objectivity
Obviously this post is only going to fire TUF up more because he will think I am scum buddying with Ragnar but w/e 
Someone "liked" your post.  Who was that person?

Also explain to me why you are so worried about looking scummy. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Themeless Mafia 1 - Day Phase 1
-->
@Zaradi
Zaradi correctly noted in post 371 that I made a mistake in post 279.  

In post 279, I forgot that TUF and lunatic were the same person.  So, I amend that prior analysis as follows; recall I was responding to Zaradi's post in 273:

I will address the more pertinent ones here.  I agree that TUF's post 181 raises several questions, some of which your response identifies.   I think 191 also raises similar questions.   Specifically, in 191, TUF characterized Dani's list of candidates to investigate further as a "convoluted pressure group".  I have a hard time understanding why that group is convoluted.  The group Dani identifies in 179 is Ragnar, Oro, Lunatic, and Airmax.  

TUF was defending himself in 181, which means that he had at least some reason to be defensive as Dani FOS'd him.  Still, TUF was defending a group of three others.  I still do not understand why TUF was defending Ragnar, Oro, or Airmax.  I do not believe that Airmax's inactivity is per se not indicative of affiliation, either.  Despite the fact that TUF was defending himself, to some degree, it makes less sense why he was defending Ragnar, Oro, or Max.  Moreover, if TUF is town then he should be willing to pressure at least one of that group, and he should have a preference for which among the group is the best candidate or he should be suggesting another option based on a set of reads wherein he identifies a more ideal candidate for investigation/pressure.   At that point in the game, TUF had not done so.  

Instead, in 181, TUF is doing one thing that matters and not doing two things that matter.   The two things he is not doing is even entertaining a willingness to investigate/pressure while in the same instance he is not suggesting another alternative outside of that group.   As town, if TUF has a better idea of who to pressure then he should be speaking up; identifying someone that is not in that group.  The one thing he is doing that matters in 181 is he is casting doubt of the very utility of pressuring/investigation in the first instance.  You identify this, correctly, as well, and seem to understand the implications to the degree that you are at least willing to state it.

In my prior post I claimed that both of you could not be scum.  So, there are three possible worlds: TUF is town and you are scum; TUF is scum and you are town; or you and TUF are both town.  The first and the third options become less viable, considering TUF's more recent activity I discuss above; which means that the world I am thinking about now as being the most likely would mean that TUF is scum, but that also would mean you have to be town.  So as town, what I would expect you to be doing is at least catching most of the obvious things, and moving the ball forward.  Independently of your past interactions with Oro, it seems like you're doing that.  The events as they develop also look consistent with my past thinking that you both cannot be scum because you are hard scum reading TUF now to the point that you want him to be at L-1, which is not something I expect scum to do.  You are also willing to lead the wagon here whereas you beat around the bush with Oro.  I think you are saying that you are more confident that TUF is scum than you were that Oro was scum, and more confident that TUF is scum than that either of Objectivity are scum.   (Here's something that's lingering in the back of my mind, though.  I think as well you seem to have been demonstrating the most interest of anyone in actually getting something useful out of DP1; difficult as that may be.  I think there's two possible reasons for that.  More on this tomorrow.)

So there's a huge contrast between what you're doing and what TUF is doing.  I am open to revisiting my town read on TUF.  As of 278,  Danielle VTL'd Ragnar, Sui followed Danielle.  The only other vote on the board is yours, after TUF unvoted in 154, which I note is the first instance where my thinking on TUF became less certain.  I asked others to post insight on why they thought my town read on TUF was wrong.  Admittedly, it wasn't a strong read but one of instinct.  I have a lot of thoughts on 154, but I've said enough for now.  
At the time I was willing to VTL TUF but now I am not because of his subsequent activity.  The list of reads I posted does not change based on the revisions to my analysis in 279. There, I posted this list of reads:

Lunatic - Potentially scum
Ragnar - Potentially scum 
Max - Potentially scum 

Objectivity - Uncertain; needs to post more and respond to my prior post 199
Oro - Uncertain; seems like clueless town

Zaradi - Potentially town, subject to events NP1 and DP2
Sui - Potentially town 
Danielle - Town


My current reads, however, are as follows:


Ragnar - Probable scum 
Max - Potentially scum 

Objectivity - Uncertain; needs to post more and respond to my prior post 199
Oro - Uncertain; seems like clueless town

Lunatic - Uncertain; leans town. 

Zaradi - Potentially town, subject to events NP1 and DP2
Sui - Potentially town 
Danielle - Town





Created:
0