crossed's avatar

crossed

A member since

2
2
6

Total votes: 3

Better arguments
Better sources
Better legibility
Better conduct

RationalMadman Participated. . So Ratman interpreted success as whoever destroys America better.Because all of the presidents are selected. If any of this is true which a lot of it is.Simple proof being Most of our president are related. Only 1 president is not related.If ratman is correct. Trump Job would be to pretend to be good and fighting the corruption. then at the end of it stab us in the back. Not to bluntly be evil like Obama was.Trump has done little to nothing wrong yet. But that is my viewpoint. Anyway Ratman participated. Thus he wins

Created:
Better arguments
Better sources
Better legibility
Better conduct

reason for decision
con defines immorality as something you do that harms other. This was impossible for con to meet because homosexual acts have harmed other people. given the definition all pro had to do was say homosexuality harms people in any way and that would be enough to win.

pro uses three points to support his claim. One being homosexual act cause aids and homo acts transfer them. his second point is people get aids from needles. the third point being the emotional pain from a wife finding out her husband is gay. Con does not object to the definition of immorality. Which was his downfall because he was unable to prove that homosexual acts do not cause harm to others and thus pro met the definition of immorality And con ignores the needle point. mostly focuses on the transferring aids thing.

pro says
"It has broken homes, devastated wives, confused children and has led to widespread AIDS all over the world

con says
AIDS is also spread by heterosexual sex, and by blood donations. Does that mean that heterosexual sex and blood donations are immoral? Furthermore, homosexuals can easily avoid getting AIDS during sex by simply using a condom. Homosexuality itself is not the cause of AIDS, unprotected sex with strangers is.

all pro had to do was prove it harmed people. he proved it harmed the wife's and children emotionally. con does not respond to the emotional pain. so pro proved it harms other was met.

same with the needle

Created:
Better arguments
Better sources
Better legibility
Better conduct

prescription medication is poison

Created: