Total posts: 5,875
-->
@rosends
The excuse shield of non- judiasm is not as protective as you imagine.
The section of texts called "Writings" (in which Job is found) were written within an already extant construct of religion so their meaning has to fall in line with that idea.
Untrue. How would you know this? It is clear from the text that Job's friends did not share any already existing "construct" of religion as they disagreed fundamentally on doctrine.
Now, while resurrection (as I have said) might be found within Judaism as a structure, it is not found in those lines unless one reads in a theological interpretation which is not part of Judaism.
It is found in those lines. And the fact there are Jews who acknowledge this is proof. There is no reasonable criteria that says common language can only be understood by Jews.
For I know that the one who has redeemed me lives, and that he shall stand at the end day upon the earth:
And though after my death, worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though I have died and my body rotted already.
I'm saying nothing about Judiasm, but the idea IS in the text, whether Judiasm follows the text is their business, but their particular opinion of Judaism doesn't change scripture at all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
...why not use them when need be?
It is always liberals who think silencing and cancelling other voices is a "need be".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Lol. If you think posting to where you said "na-uh" is a refutation, I'm glad I didn't waste my time debating you. Grow up bonsey.
Created:
-->
@rosends
You have it backwards. It is scripture that defines the doctrine, not the doctrine that defines scripture. Judiasm does not define Job. Job defines Judiasm.
The idea is in scripture, and if Judiasm departs from that, then it is in error.
Job 19:27 - Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.
This is possible only if Job is resurrected after he dies.
Same as when David said he and his dead child would be reunited one day. Only possible with resurrection. Your allegiance seems to be more to the system (the law) than to the law giver. No system is superior to scripture.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
There was no greater exponent of jibberish, than President Orange.
Your biased opinion you're again conflating with reality. Just pretend that others don't exist between you ears ok?
And then there are certain Ark theories.
They aren't theories. Not out in the real world of outside your head, anyway.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
The FBI is not a credible accuser. If Jesus appeared to Trump, He would get accused of a crime by Democrats and hounded. Their TDS causes them to go after Trump, and his innocence causes them to have to settle for smearing his associates.
At least Trump's associates don't end up dead like those of a certain former president and very crooked first lady.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Our exchanges are usually tit for tat goading,...
I ask and you don't answer. Goading you to do what?
...interspersed with comment relative to the thread.
Of the two of us, you almost always are the first one to respond to my comments in threads.
We're as good or as bad as each other in that respect.
I disagree. But of course, no one is ever as bad as a liberal, to the liberal.
Nonetheless, in said thread....And relative to your uncertainty regarding when such a biblical flood might have occurred.
Please don't be dishonest. First, I corrected the poster that the flood was longer ago than 6,000 years. That shows certainty, not uncertainty.
No one has exact dates for events that happened thousands of years ago, not even your priest evolutionists. Don't be disingeneous.
I made pertinent references to how the geological time line and that of human evolution were unlikely to coincide at a point whereby the Earth might be entirely covered with water.....That is to say, before the formation of the continents and certainly before the development of homo-sapiens and the development of most of the creatures we see today.
That is if we pre-assume your narrative, which is what liberals do. They pretend their worldview is the correct one and expect everyone else to believe so too, and act incredulous when others don't take their narrative as a given.
There is no "time-line" for evolution or a global flood. You know this, your attempt here is pure pre-emptive fabrication.
You are clearly cherry picking unrelatable bits of scientific evidence, in order to overcome the improbability of an indeterminate biblical flood.
I am not now trying to prove a global flood. I have proven what the thread set out to do, proven that there is enough water on Earth for a global flood.
You want to now move to a global flood because you have lost on the thread's title topic.
Now...... A certain amount of responsive goading is expected
You call my answers goading because you never answer, and need an excuse for why you don't.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
No, you're just the hypocrite who went crying to the mods after the sick child rape jokes and mother insults. The fact that you think right wingers want to defund the police proves you're loony left.
Following me around claiming that I have been banned is as silly as following me around begging for a debate. No one gets banned because they don't want to debate you.
Really. Grow up.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
You seem to conflate religion and politics. Resulting in the assumption that all christians are conservative and all non-religious people are liberals
Perhaps that is why the U.S. is apparently so divided.
So America is divided because I'm right.
So once more for the record....I am atheist, apolitical and eclectic....As defined by conditioning relative to age and location.
You are not apolitical. Not unless TDS is a symptom of political objectivity.
You may be eclectic about some things, but politics sure isn't one of them.
Which I suppose makes me liberal in terms of tolerance, yet underpinned with a mildly conservative mind set.Sort of...As long as it doesn't impinge upon my lifestyle, then someone else's life choices don't bother me.
You might be relatively less liberal to some, but calling yourself conservative is a stretch. For one thing, you are far too focused on yourself. Liberals tend to be the bellybutton gazers.
On the fence Mr E.
If the fence is in Berkly California, maybe.
And give my regards to the lovely Mrs E.
I think I'll go and wake her and give her some of my regards instead.
Created:
Posted in:
I think this is why all great literature is considered great. From Animal Farm, to Old Man and the Sea, to Lord of the Flies, if it is true to human nature, and has deep insight to the human condition, it will strike a chord.
This principle works for even movies, music, dance and even cartoons. The Far Side, Calvin &Hobbs, and Charlie Brown astounded readers with their insight.
It even works with relationships. You meet someone who understands you, how gets what you feel, can relate to what's happening inside of you, and can see the world as you do, and you fall in love.
That is how the Bible has made millions of people feel. 6,000 rears later, the Bible still has no equal. So the haters, having found they cannot fight it, have decided to simply cancel it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
Is your business track record that successful? I'll bet not.
What business?? Snarking one liners from the sidelines?
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
The glaring question now is, if economics do not account for the difference we see, what does?
Do you have an idea?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Day number I-have-lost-count of telling you that I am not a leftie.
If you tell me that you're not a leftie but behave like a leftie, I will put more weight on your behavior than your words.
Any day now right, snowflake?
Should be.
You seem less sure. Conservatives don't go around trying to get people cancelled after they've stalked them. Grow up.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
You made a post with "important bits"??
What's your definition of important? You make flippant, snarky posts, and then chaff when you are treated flippantly.
You only reap what you sow Z-man.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
Please don't @ me unless your post is in English. I have no need for jibberish.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Perhaps you should go crying to the mods hypocrite. Threatening me with silliness is .....well, silly.
You insulted my mother, made what you claimed were jokes about child rape, and pestered me after I repeatedly declined your loony "invitation", but you go crying to the mods like a victim. You liberals are so predictable.
If I do get banned, at least you won't be able to beg me any more.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Still trying your cancel culture loony leftie?
Guess you got bored of the silly begging huh? I told you you'd learn.
Any day now right, snowflake?
Created:
-->
@rosends
Job said, he knew that his Vindicator, Redeemer lives and would one day be on Earth, and that one day he would see God with his own eyes.
There is no way for you to spin that into something it is not, or to try to spin something out of it that's there.
Created:
-->
@3RU7AL
@Tradesecret
I refuse to believe Brut really subscribes to such clunky illogic. I think he's just testing because he loves debate and discussing ideas.
I too am interested in your reply.
Created:
And lefties grit teeth in frustration once again that it isn't Trump committing crimes.
Quick, pull out the "guilt by association" fallacy!
No Bill & Hillery, not now!
Created:
-->
@rosends
Vindicator, Redeemer.
Will stand on the Earth, testify on Earth
See for myself, see with my own eyes
Seems like the implicit resurrection idea began in the first book of the Bible.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Are those cases secret? Cause you've offered none.
“It all agrees with The Bible”
We who? You mean the "experts" you have faith in?
“It disagrees with the Bible? It must be these phoney experts.“
It's easy to "win" arguments when you insert your own lies for your opponent's arguments isn't it? I prefer challenges.
We know there wasn’t a global floodWe know animals weren’t specially createdWe know that animals cannot all be traced back to small founder groups.We know that the earth came into existenceafter the sun and the stars.We know sea creatures existed before treesSo on the one hand; the Bible makes some Huge and incontrovertible errors that are clearly utterly false.
Sigh. The liberal once again conflates his posting an opinion for factual evidence. Some of the things you claim above are not even biblical. You don't know the Bible well enough to oppose it.
The Bible didn’t predict that the mantle contained vast quantities of water - it didn’t even predict a mantle.
If the Bible said water poured out of the Earth enough to add to a global flood, would it not have to know there was water in the Earth?
Why would the author add this bit of counter-intuitive information?
Science works with one finding at a time. Here is an example. The planet Uranus appeared to go off orbit. Scientists did not know why.
But the data was not thrown out because the reason for the discrepancy was not known. Later, it became apparent that "something" massive must be pulling Uranus out of orbit. Though no one knew of or had seen Neptune, scientist theorized that there must be a planet outside the orbit of Uranus. They predicted Neptune existence from how Uranus was behaving BEFORE anyone knew of a Neptune.
We do not yet know the mechanism for how the water came to the surface, but that doesn't nullify the truth that the water exists. Just as Neptune was found later, the water mystery will be found out too. Everything is not explained at once. Science finds out a bit at a time.
But the atheist, terrified that God may be slipping in, wants everything explained right now, or else proclaims the whole thing untrue.
Here is what you cannot deny. There is enough water on Earth to supply a global flood like the one put forth in Genesis.
Here is what has been taken away from you. The claim that rain alone could not produce enough water in the specified time to cover the Earth as it says in Genesis. Gone. You can no longer use that clunker.
The claim that there is not enough water on Earth to supply Noah's flood. Gone. You can no longer use that clunker.
Since you're just listing your opinions, I'll list some of mine too.
You were wrong in the date you thought the Bible offered for the flood.
You were wrong in thinking the Bible says the Earth came into existence before the sun and stars.
You were wrong in thinking the Bible says that sea creatures existed before trees.
Here are just a few things the Bible got right long before science confirmed them.
*Early Earth had one giant land mass.
*It did not rain on Earth for a long time after it reached life sustaining temperatures.
*The first life was in the sea
*Plants preceded animals. Fishes preceded amphebians. Reptiles preceded mammals. Man came last.
*The sun existed long before it became luminescent.
For a book not trying to explain science, the Bible is astounding. It's no wonder no other book can come close to equalling the Bible's effect on human history.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
https://www.salon.com › ... › Brett Bachman's Articles
28 Aug 2021 — Maher then featured a slate of what can only be described as conservative memes, before launching into a monologue about what he called ...
Bill Maher Rips Liberal Media On COVID Lies, Inaccuracies
https://www.outkick.com › Politics
17 Apr 2021 — “Even as things were getting better, reporting remained negative.” Shocker, right? Maher also ripped politicians for “staying in practice” with ...
Bill Maher is slowly moving right - Politics & Religion - TigerNet
https://www.tigernet.com › clemson › forum › message
Bill Maher scolds Democrats for avoiding Fox News - The ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › 2019/03/16 › bill-m...
16 Mar 2019 — Bill Maher on Friday implored Democrats to “grow a pair” and ... He highlighted
'I'd much rather play Milwaukee than San Francisco': Bill Maher
https://www.jsonline.com › entertainment › 2021/08/09
9 Aug 2021 — During a recent telephone interview, Maher said he likes Midwest audiences that mix liberals and conservatives, just like the guests he gets on ...
28 Aug 2021 — Is conservative comedy having its own moment right now? Bill Maher explored this on a new "Real Time" episode.
Bill Maher Says Democrats “Suck The Fun Out Of Everything
https://deadline.com › 2021/05 › bill-maher-democrats-...
7 May 2021 — On 'Real Time' Friday, Bill Maher bemoaned the increasing rigidity of the Left and...
16 Mar 2012 — 2. Describes himself as a libertarian. “The line I've always used is, I would be a Republican if they would. Which means that I like ..
The shift is undeniable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
You'll be glad I'm no longer stopping you huh genius?
Lol. What an idiot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
So did I, but you keep begging... err, inviting.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
No, the Bible is so much more significant than mere psychology.
Thank you. I've always thought so, even before I was a Christian. The fact that the Bible is an unequaled as a work of literature is evident. Anyone dismissing it only displays their ignorance, no religion needed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Do you sing this one to the lovely Mrs E every morning.
Not unless I want her to run screaming out of the room.
Myself, I find the bible as profound as a currant bun.
Uneducated people have a similar opinion of school.
I ask if the bibles effect on humanity is psychological, and you tell me (again) about your unbelief! But you aren't a liberal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hey village idiot,
I knew you'd run. Not to worry, no one takes you seriously anyway.
But even your moron hindu pal knows you confessed your disobedience to your Lord. Funny that your beliefs are closer to a loony Hindu than to the Bible.
Can the class say, pseudo-christian?
I thought it could.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Yes - so science agrees with the Bible - except of course for all the cases where it doesn’t
Are those cases secret? Cause you've offered none.
And yet you are here....
Wow. There can be no other reason huh, slick?
I wasn’t able to find more than the single study after a brief search...
Well that certainly proves there is only one.
So the first is theoretical - the second is rank speculation.
I'm not using the leftist method of validating only what I already believe.
Like I said - to get the water out from where it is,..
Dude, a short while ago, you didn't even know there was water there and were claiming there was not enough water. Now you're an expert? The fact remains. The Earth does have enough water. The mechanical logistics is another matter.
The Bible makes all sorts of claims we can invalidate -
We who? You mean the "experts" you have faith in?
...but there are some where it’s able to by right by accident. Like this one
Lol. You say, "by accident", and that is speculation. But that is fine by me. You admit the Bible was correct WHEN NOBODY ELSE KNEW, not even scientists.
Yet you are here sounding like you found the bible version of the higgs boson.
I only sound that way to you because you are terrified of any science that validates any biblical story.
More scientific revelations will come validating the Bible. The more we learn, the more we learn.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
The Earths geology varies greatly relative to time.
You don't say.
It's no good advocating the "science" that agrees with your biblical commitments, but then denying the science that doesn't agree.
What science have I denied? Your assumed date for the flood is not science.
That just makes you appear to be "cherry picking".Which is what you are doing. Mr E.
"That" is your assumption, not what I'm doing. Your bias makes you not able to differentiate.
Created:
Posted in:
Ever heard the song, Killing Me Softly by Roberta Flack?
Parts of the lyrics go...
Telling my whole life with his words
I felt all flushed with fever, embarrassed by the crowd
I felt he'd found my letters and read each one out loud
He sang as if he knew me, in all my dark dispair...
That was the exactly the impression I got reading the Bible. It was so true to my understanding of human nature, so true to what is within me, that I was "flushed and embarrassed". The Bible's authors were telling my whole life with their words.
Is this psychological? For the exact thing seems to have happened to millions of people all of different ethnicities, races, nationalities, genders, and ages.
And no other work of literature has had such a profound, lasting, or universally influential effect on humanity as the Bible has.
How could the human response to the Bible be only psychological?
Created:
From Job, the oldest booking the OT.
Job 19:25 - For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
Job 19:26 - And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
Job 19:27 - Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
1. Godhead: I believe in three distinct, separate, two physical and one spirit beings; that God, the Father, his Son, Jesus Christ, Redeemer of mankind, and the Holy Spirit, the Comforter, comprise the Godhead.
What is the basis for this belief? Did you gain this information through revelation? Logic? Or did you just make it up because you like it?
Are you presenting it as truth, or as just your belief?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Fruit_Inspector
Lol. Funny. There is no question Ram can't answer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Not the first time Biden drank the fake news kool-aid.
Remember when he claimed that Trump had told people to drink bleach? Or when he claimed an officer had been killed on Jan 6th?
Be balanced. Be fair.
Don't forget:
Remember when he claimed that Trump had told people to drink bleach? Or when he claimed an officer had been killed on Jan 6th?
Be balanced. Be fair.
Don't forget:
Biden little girl hair sniffing: success
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Have you come here to beg some more then ask why I don't leave?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Have you come here to beg some more then ask why I don't leave?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Thanks bones. But what will you do when I'm gone?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Amoranemix
[a] As I think any unbiased person reading this thread will see you are wrong, I can leave this point as is.
[b] Yet other than ask questions about claims, you haven't once defended atheism or attacked the claim that it is irrational.
[c] Both of those tangential topics were brought up by atheists. Atheism is irrational because it is self-contradictory.[18]
[a] Fortunately reality is independent of your thoughts.
Is that why you tell us your thoughts when we ask for reality?
[b] So? That atheism requires defending is your opinion, not mine.
Then your responding here is quizzical.
[c] I agree an atheist brought up a diffent topic, which you chose to engage in in stead of ignoring it or steering the conversation back the the alleged irrationality of atheism.
Atheists can ONLY debate the existence of God. Any theistic topic gets devolved to the existence of God by atheists. It is a waste of time trying to keep them on topic.
[18] How so ?
Atheism contradicts itself. Self-contradiction is self-evudently irrational no?
[20] No. A sound, on topic argument is required. Don't worry. I won't hold my breath.
What ever you hold, you don't hold the keys to what is required or whether it is sound.
Contrary to what you claimed, some atheists have spoken about atheism.
Not one, including you, has defended atheism.
No, I don't think that is logic.
No wonder it's in your toolbox.
[24] That is kind and tolerant of you, but I'll pass. You too may feel free to be irrational.
Ethan is not a liberal. Irrationality is not an option for him. You go on though.
[25] Do you expect people to believe you find that amazing ?
No, I expect them to find it amazingly close to my comment,
No, you don't.
Your skill at observation is impressive.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hey village idiot!
Did you see what your moron pal Hari has posted on DDO?
BrotherThomas declares Jesus a racist.
https://www:Debateart.Com/forum/topics/6762-is-it-a-weak-point-that-many-types-of-miracles-of-the-bible-don't-happen-nowadays Page=1&post_number=19
BrotherThomas wrote: EtHAMg5, The Ham cursed black man and king of non sequiturs as he runs away from biblical axioms,
No, Bible fool, I am not racist, But our JUDEO-Christian Bible and Jesus most certainly are!
No, Bible fool, I am not racist, But our JUDEO-Christian Bible and Jesus most certainly are!
So your moron Hindu pal cited where you confessed your disobedience to your Lord Jesus for me. You asked me to show you. Now I have.
And to prove you are a fake and a fraud, you will run from your own cited comments. Like a pseudo-christian hypocrite, you will dodge and duck. To take a page from your own schtick...
BEGIN.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Doesn't mean you are compelled to reply.
I didn't say I was compelled. I said I like idiot militant trolls, which you are. Keep begging, and I will keep tossing you for the idiot you are.
So you're my dog now are you, you can only leave if I give you permission?
I can only leave if I was the one who came begging. You came to me begging for attention. I said no. You're now following me around begging like a mangey dog. Why would I not reply you? I like idiot trolls.
I'm sure you think I'm both.
That, my young friend, is your fault. Someone says no to your request and you then follow them around requesting over and over. That is stupid. That is ignorant. That is begging. I don't just think you are ignorant and stupid, you prove it in every vapid post you vomit.
Stupid also hate when they're being put into situations in which they know their stupidity will be exposed.
Stupid people do that to themselves. In your case, by posting.
Plus, I have no interest in proving you stupid to anyone.
You have no interest, or you cannot?
Cannot what? I don't need to prove you stupid to anyone. Your posts have already done that. PLUS, I have no interest in proving you stupid to anyone. You understand "plus" as well as you understand "no".
Funny how you copy my conclusion (that you were refuted) and ignore the argument.
Repeatedly posting a definition is not a refutation idiot. Begging comes from repetition. One can beg with repeated requests after they have been told no. When people beg, they are making a request. You are begging me.
Still waiting for you to tell me.
My guess is that you will continue to beg while you wait.
This is the first time you've tried to provide an argument. I'm very excited
I do try to be entertaining as I toss some idiot or other. I have the gentle readers to consider.
So if Siri accidentally turned on and responded to you, are you then compelled to having a conversation with it for eternity?
Siri isn't as mindlessly stupid as you. But if you're tired, you can quit. I was minding my business when you stumbled in. The number of times I reply you is decided by me. The number of times you beg is decided by you.
Of course not you can chose.
So can you. But as a liberal, you want to chose for me, or at least have me choose what you want. Ethan is not that way.
Just like how you can chose to leave now. Just because I started a conversation doesn't mean you are compelled to stay here.
If I had approached you with a request and you had said no, you wouldn't be speaking to me now. You are an imbecile. You keep replying me, and then wonder why I keep replying you.
As I've said. It will sink into your thick skull. Even if you have to spend your whole summer vacation spamming. I will be here for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hey village moron!
Did you see what your moron pal Hari has posted on DDO?
BrotherThomas declares Jesus a racist.
https://www:Debateart.Com/forum/topics/6762-is-it-a-weak-point-that-many-types-of-miracles-of-the-bible-don't-happen-nowadays Page=1&post_number=19
BrotherThomas wrote: EtHAMg5, The Ham cursed black man and king of non sequiturs as he runs away from biblical axioms,
No, Bible fool, I am not racist, But our JUDEO-Christian Bible and Jesus most certainly are!
No, Bible fool, I am not racist, But our JUDEO-Christian Bible and Jesus most certainly are!
So your moron Hindu pal cited where you confessed your disobedience to your Lord Jesus for me. You asked me to show you. Now I have.
And to prove you are a fake and a fraud, you will run from your own cited comments. Like a pseudo-christian hypocrite, you will dodge and preen. To take a page from your own schtick...
BEGIN.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
You are cherry picking the science that agrees with the bible; ignoring all the other science that does not; and then claiming science validates the bible. Cherry picking
No Sir. I said science validates one claim of the Bible, that there is enough water on Earth for Noah's flood. You are trying to insert an argument for me...
The Bible needs no validation.
We can rule out a global flood 5-6 thousand years ago by various means
Noah's flood did not happen 5 to 6 thousand years ago. It is a much older event.
If water in rock is squeezed out under pressure as it melts - then where the hell did all this water you claim was on the surface go?
I did not say rocks (or magma) came out. I said water. You brought out the magma clunker.
Water below the crust is not in water form, it’s in dissolved form. It can’t be “squeezed out” unless there is a high pressure gradient.
I called it "tremendous pressure". Perhaps you missed that?
Just as a FYI, a water droplet trapped under 2km of Non porous rock is not going to turn to steam....
I said nothing about water turning into steam. You did. Please stop wasting my time by creating straw-men and fighting them. You don't need me for that.
- one study
It's more than one study. Your ignorance doesn't make the others not exist.
This is how science is done. We find out things bit by bit. We don't expect the entire picture immediately.
For example, science doesn't know how life began, but it has been picking up clues,
- Life is carbon based
- Amino acids play a role
- All life seems to have a common ancestor
While these clues do not tell us definitely how life began, they are consistent with our current running theories. Scientists aren't cherry-picking.
In this case, we do not currently know the mechanics of Noah's flood, but we are getting clues.
- There IS enough water on Earth
- the rainfall was augmented by water from below the surface
these are consistent with our current running theories.
You want to make this about the larger Noah's flood so you can escape having to concede the limited point of this thread, that there is enough water on the Earth to be consistent with a global flood of the kind mentioned in Genesis.
So it’s kinda odd that this is the hill you want to die on
It's kinda funny (and typical) that you assume I'm gonna die.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
I don't really need to be arguing this non-sense Mr E.But it's entertaining.So if the polar ice caps melted, the level of all available water on planet Earth would on rise by approx 60m above current sea levels.That would be approx 8800m short of what would be needed to cover the entire Earth.There just ain't enough water Mr E.
I see you decided not to read the links and remain ignorant. Science will go on without you.
Magical fountains are the stuff of myths legends and wild imagination
I'll be sure to let the scientists who have just found 3 times the Earth's oceans worth of water inside the Earth.
But if it makes you feel good Mr E.....That's good enough for me.
Yep. I will make your credulity my standard immediately. Since reality resides between your ears, if you don't believe it, how can it exist??
But it's entertaining
I'll say! Try tossing the moron DeeDee if you really want fun.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
Yet you know you're own intellect cannot keep up with me.
So thinks the stupid guy.
Then why do you keep coming back?
You first contacted me idiot. You're the one who first came, and keeps coming back.
Doesn't mean you have to come back.
You haven't told me no. I didn't contact you. I want nothing from you. You're the one lapping at my heels like a trained seal.
You can because objectively losing a debate to someone is suggestive that you are not as informed as your opposition.
Not being informed does not necessarily equal being stupid. I did not say you were ill informed, (though you are) I said you were stupid. Stupid people never accept they are stupid. Plus, I have no interest in proving you stupid to anyone. Why would I? Your posts do a great job of that by themselves.
Already refuted.
You just begged me again to debate you after I've told you no. That is begging moron.
Tell me exactly where I "begged". Again
Are you begging unconsciously? Lol.
Ok sure. You're an old man who's bad at debating and who derives joy from people who he claims are "insecure stupid teenagers".
Thanks.
Tell me, if you were really as bright as you claim,
I did not claim to be bright. I said you were stupid. It is your stupidity that makes you think calling you stupid means I'm bright.
why are you talking to insecure stupid teenagers?
Allow me to post 2 answers here. I could not decide which one had more zing, so you choose.
#1. Because the stupid insecure teenager keeps talking to me.
Or
#2. I like stupid militant trolls. Their age is of no consequence to me.
Take you pick.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Now you're obsessing about me in threads I'm not actively in? Resist the moron Hari path Zed.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
God: Anybody who refuses to worship me and agree with me on everything by faith burns in hell forever (a fate worse than death).
Both types of Christains: This is fine.
Where did you get that concept of God? Divine revelation? Cause it certainly isn't in the Bible.
If you must lie to make an anti-christian argument, your argument can't be worth much can it?
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hey DeeDee, did you run away?
Where did I admit and personally say that I don't follow Jesus???!!
When you said Jesus was a racist but you are not. Did you forget DeeDee?
We see, your schtick didn't cover racist contradictions.
If Jesus your Lord is a racist, shouldn't you be too?
Actually, I see several places where you oppose Jesus.
Jesus is smart, you are an imbecile.
Jesus is truthful, you are a filthy liar.
Jesus opposed cults, you are a member of the Landover church, a man made cult.
Hey Mr. Only True Christian, you're looking decidedly fake.
Created: