Total posts: 5,875
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
What Preoccupies Us?
For some people its religion. They are completely besotted with religion. The really funny thing is that some of them claim to be atheists, but their every waking moment is consumed with religion.
They live on religion boards, and will change the topic of any conversation to religion regardless of the original topic.
I wish you'd do a thread on why some atheists are obsessed with religion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Are you just desperately scratching around for an explanation.
No sambo. You asked why the son would think he had sinned against God. The answer is, because he realized he had broken the 5th commandment.
This son, by the way, hadn't defied his father had he?
No one has said anything about defying genius. He dishonored his father, as the 5th commandment says not to do.
He hadn't openly resisted or refused to follow any advice or demand made of him by his father, either.
But he had dishonored his father. Will you go on listing irrelevant things he did not do?
This metaphorical "death" of the son seemed to be the understood language of the day.: if you didn't believe in or follow the laws and dictates of god you were classed as "dead" to believers.
Eh. Your loony interpretations are of no interest to me.
And it appears that this once "dead" son only returned because where he was living at the time: "there was a severe famine in that whole country" Luke 15:14,
That is not what the son himself said, but you have a fake "controversy" to peddle don't you?
...otherwise, who knows, he may never had returned home but preferring to remain "dead".
And yet his father was gracious and forgiving enough to accept him back without judgement.
I heard a great sermon once about this story and how the celebrations were not for the returning son, but actually for the rejoicing Father.
I think it takes being a parent to get the full meaning of this parable and the feeling of the father.
Luk 15:10 - Likewise, I say to you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repents.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
Lol!! Preoccupation? 26+ threads in one day? Everyday? The same post over and over? Having been sacked from numerous websites because of it?I have a preoccupation in exposing the facts about Christianity.
No Sal, I think you're way past simple preoccupation. You're in full blown obsession.
You've been "exposing" for more than six years. Other than getting banned, How has it gone for you?
Created:
Posted in:
Lol. Metaphors gives our genius conniptions.
There is no explanation as to why this son should believe he had sinned against "heaven"
Because rational people all know instinctively. But for you, the 5th commandment. Honor your parents.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
How do you reword a lie? Does a re-worded lie become the truth?I'll find a way to word it .
It isn't my place to tell you how to behave deb, but have you considered simply not lying?
And after you've gotten the hang of that, giving actual telling of the truth a try?
Just saying. You'll be safe because other than Christians, there aren't any groups of truth tellers. None that sing anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
From what we could glean from 6 years of comments, he had some terribly traumatic episode in his youth and somehow blames Christianity for it.
He claims he used to be Christian (catholic) so of course certain scenarios jump to mind. Over the years, posting insults to Christianity has given him a positive feedback loop.
He insults Christianity, Christians are outraged, he feels as if he's "struck back", taken a stand, manned up.
So he insults again, and the loop continues. Over the years it has become a compulsion. He justifies the compulsive behavior by rationalizing that he's fighting for the deluded masses, fighting against the evil, world dominating Christianity.
But no matter how strongly a guy who washes his hands 40 times a day may argue about germs, he knows his behavior is compulsive. Sal is aware he has a problem.
The thing is, as people grow bored of the same uni-topic post over and over, they tune him out. His compulsive response is to post even more clunkers, looking for that "high" of having hurt Christians.
And of course, as it ends with almost all addicts, the mods have to step in because compulsions, like addictions, only get worse and less controllable.
From the time I noted yesterday that Sal had made 12 threads in 3 days, he has added 5 more that I know of.
If he posted on other threads, it would be bad enough, but he's one of those atheists completely obsessed with religion. He resides on the religion board.
Here is a small sampling of his threads from DDO, some of which he has transferred here.
Are Christians Deluded?
Christians Are Deluded
Deluded Christians
Most Deluded Christians
Does Christianity Delude Christians?
Is Christianity A Delusion?
Is The Christian God Deluded?
Do Christians Know They Are Deluded?
He has hundreds more on lying, evil, stupid, insane, etc. All in the same format...
Are Christians Lying?
Christians Are Lying
Lying Christians
Most Lying Christians
Does Christianity Lie To Christians?
Is Christianity A Lie?
You get the picture.
And for the last year and a half, with the DDO board dead, and him banned from Dart, he has simply kept posting his repetitive clunkers to himself, getting no replies, but never coming to his senses.
After more than a year of no one to insult, he must feel like a kid in a candy shop now. So he will go a little crazy. Anti-theists will gaslight him, and he will repeat his history here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
This Christian doesn't agree.Christians will all agree.
I find this offensive.
And I find lying offensive.
But I bet you won't stop lying for me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Paul
If we did, wouldn't we be talking about philosophers, and not the philosophy of personhood?
Do you have any thoughts of your own on philosophy, or can you only regurgitate what great philosophers have said?
How is which man I find "agreeable" relevant to our discussion?
And in terms of stature, Eric Olson doesn't belong in that group.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
I can quote and site your racist comments if your bitter comment here about it being right for Christians to have been persecuted is not enough for you.
Did you think because there are Mods here, your racist behavior in other places would be excused? Not with Ethan Sal.
Everyone reaps what they sow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PGA2.0
Yes, fifteen threads in three days is a lot to handle. It would be for me a full-time job to conscientiously answer my critics with this many threads.
That is because you care about engagement and communication. You don't post out of bitterness and petty spite. You want your posters to understand, even if they don't believe.
Some people don't care about those things at all. They are like the demonstrators yelling "killer! Killer!" Over and over, not caring what their opponent says.
Good debate on that other thread with Ludo. Interesting intellectual stuff.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
On DDO, and old posts here before he was banned.Huh? Where did this guy do that? Please highlight, here's the post just in case:
Also WTF is the Simpson desert.
Lol. His spell check probably tried to "correct" a misspelling of Sahara.
Why are you asking me what his posts means? Are you not on speaking terms?
Created:
Posted in:
I repeat my posts simply because when you quote my posts you slyly...
Untrue. You repeat your post every time, whether I quote you or not. And you do so with everyone.
That's right. And will keep doing so while you and anyone else insists on misquoting and misrepresenting what I say,
Does everyone "misquote and misrepresent" your posts?
You are a fkn disgrace!!!!!
And your parents must be so proud of you.
Stop spamming. Answer questions put to you. Behave like you were raised in a human family. You outlook will improve.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PGA2.0
15 threads in 3 days and counting. Who else could it be?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
Is racism repulsive Sal? Mopac doesn't even know you and he has correctly ascertained that your act is pretense.
So you find his faith repulsive. Is racism repulsive Sal? Does your moral indignation cover virulent racism? Or is it only faith that you find repulsive?
See Sal. You aren't anonymous here, some people here know you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
I'm willing to let you arbitrate. I think you could be impartial.
Created:
Posted in:
You call Aboriginals people subhuman and inferior, but advocate for their religion?...the religion is still followed by Aboriginals today.
So which is the right one?
Finding out requires a brain. One not choked by irrational bitterness.
D'oh!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PGA2.0
As futile as it was with Willows. Yeah, that's him. Lol.
Created:
You said the message was not inclusive, not isolated verses. You are wrong.Those verses are clearly NOT INCLUSIVE of any other peoples or nations.
Can you explain to....
I already have homer. You said the Great Commission was not inclusive. That isolated verse is not the Great Commission.
Repeating your debunked post is called spamming. You said this.
I am referring to the Great commission.
Were you lying? Confused? Being dishonest? Dodge away.
The great commission is not in the OT.
Thomas, a disciple of Jesus, converted an Ethiopian. The Ethiopian was not a Jew. Thomas did not seem confused in the least. And it was Jesus who sent Thomas to witness to that Ethiopian.
How do you explain that? You cannot. Where is the "confusion"? Only in your tortured head.
You dodge every question and point in my post and spam your nonsense again. Why? Because you are empty and bitter. You have nothing. Your posts are like the chirping of crickets. Void of real content.
Created:
Posted in:
There is no lie there princess.
Sure there is. You changed what Mopac said.
Mopac said "we" referring to his church. He did not say "he". You are lying.This is Mopac's post clearly saying they have these documents.
Mopac said...
"we have documents...." Referring to his church. If he had them in his possession, he would have said, "I have the documents ". You sir, are a liar.
When someone tells me they have something, it means they have it.
He said "we" genius. We being his church.
OR ARE YOU CALLING MOPAC A LIAR NOW!!!!?
I'm calling you a liar, and posting your lie for all to see.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@EtrnlVw
He can't control his compulsion to post bitter spam so you may not be gone long.Have fun I'll join back in when the quality raises.
Take care.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ronjs
If one feels threatened by this alleged attack on their intelligence, how intelligent are they?
Good point.
On DDO, he's basically been posting to himself. He has dozens and dozens of zero-reply threads, but, being bitter and compulsive, he just keeps spamming them.
I've known him for 6+ years, he's like disgusted (bulproof) and hari, nothing gets past his obtuse barrier.
He lost the ability to control his compulsive posting years ago. Now he just posts basically the same "Christians Bad" clunker over and over with slightly revised titles.
He is incredibly caustic and bitter, openly advocating that religious people, especially Christians, be locked up or killed.
He's also racist, and the only theists he will tolerate are racist ones, as he did with hari. I feel bad about his illness but if he won't do something about it, there is nothing can do. I've pleaded with him over the years to seek help, but he's far too eaten up by irrational bitterness to listen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
Would you like me to predict your future on Dart?Do you feel it appropriate then that theists should be allowed to attack the intelligence of others by preaching utter lies, doom and gloom, hatred and morbid fear?
I did it once before, you didn't listen but I was right. Would you like to know the name of the road you're currently travelling?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@EtrnlVw
It is Willows Etrnl. Good catch. And he's made 12 threads in 3 days. Far more than he can post to.
He is still suffering from an antichristian posting compulsion. But the way he bad mouthed Dart, swearing he'd never return, I'm surprised to see him here.
...the compulsive behavior is obvious...
To everyone but him. But I suspect he knows he has a compulsion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Please stop lying. Mopac did not say he had them in his possession....you claim to have in your possession
You've been told that is a lie. Repeating it means you are deliberately lying.
Why do you need to lie?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
You repeat your lame posts with everyone. You repeat because you do not debate or answer questions. You repeat because you are vacuous.I repeat my posts simply because when you quote my posts you slyly and deceitfully edit them and present them out of context and also present them in a way that promotes your own deluded and pervert bias agenda,
So while you are allowed to continuously get away with this blatant deceit, I will simply keep re-posting MY whole quote over and over if I have to and in full context.
You will keep spamming because only the accusation is your aim. You are fake. You can spam as much as you like. Your fakery will not fool anyone.
There is simply nothing honest or genuine about you ethang, You are just a compulsive liar who cannot help himself.
When I predicted that you would not like your fakery being exposed, you thought I was just talking, huh?
I don't run away from questions. You do. Do you know why defendants in court are forced to answer questions? So that the truth is revealed.
You lie, and then hide from questions. Everyone sees it. I told you, I don't need you to answer. Your fakery is still exposed even when you dodge.
Your poor thinking, your unreasonable bias, and your ignorance of Christian doctrine will be spotlighted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Till you true disposition slips out again.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
There is absolutely nothing clever about quoting the scriptures verbatim.
Then its no wonder you do so often.
SO! Can you explain to those reading here what it is that you find INCLUSIVE about Ammonites or Moabites being EXCLUDED and forbidden from entering the assembly of the Lord?
You dodged my questions Pablo. There was no Christianity in Deut. genius.
And the exclusiveness, intolerance and racism is eye watering in those verses above showing absolutely no INCLUSIVENESS whatsoever!
Inclusiveness in what? Can a person marry into Christianity? The dumb liberal assumption that everyone has a right to be included in everything is just that. Dumb.
Why don't you explain to us where the inclusiveness you keep insisting on is shown in that verse? Or stop telling bare faced lies!
Stop being stupid. You said there was no inclusiveness in the Christian message. That verse does not contain the Christian message Pablo. Stop trying to conflate different things. Doing that is akin to lying.
Why don't you explain to us where the "inclusiveness" you keep insisting on is shown in that verse above?
I did not say inclusiveness (whatever that is to you) is in that verse genius. I said inclusiveness is in the christian message.
And the prohibition on marriage was not permanent. Why are you trying to pretend it was?
...Or stop telling bare faced lies!
Truth is what opposes you. That is why
you run away from questions. Lies is what you try to hide.
so what is to be made of this "Make disciples of all the nations", from (Matthew 28:19) when the scriptures themselves clearly show no such thing as the inclusiveness of all nations. ?
You've been answered, but you're doing your obtuse dance. The disciples were not "confused". Only you are confused.
You actually are trying to equate a religious ritual in Deut, to a admonition by Jesus to His disciples 6,000 years later!
Do you really think joining the "congregation" in the second book of the bible is akin to christian conversion today?
Could you be that clueless? Could you be that dishonest?
I am referring to what has been called "The Great Commission".
And is the "Great Commission" in Deut? Is it in Lev? What are you "referring" to homer? Cause it seems to change every time you fake another controversy.
Every time we examine you, we find empty nonsense and Fakery.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Where are you Dee Dee?
Did it become too hard for you to be a "true" christian?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
I have heard this "ultimate reality"argument before and Mopac is steadfast for a reason. He has absolutely no reason or argument in defence of his idiosyncratic belief.
Sure he does. And he answers when asked. You on the other hand, have absolutely no reason or argument in defence of your idiosyncratic hate.
I say this because I have seen this pattern quite a number of times.
Where Sal?
In each case the answer is the same and on each occasion, when answering a challenge, the answer is identical.
Sounds like you.
It (stating the ultimate reality) is no more than a smokescreen to hide a weak constitution.
Is racism the sign of a strong constitution?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PGA2.0
That is what Salixes does. Assert. He doesn't debate, doesn't support, doesn't defend. His only care is to insult Christianity, no matter how silly the insult.Fact: Not one of these facts are referenced or linked, just asserted.
He's made ten threads in the last 3 days. 10. Has he debated in any one of them? No, he responds to each rebut with another round of unsupported assertions against Christianity while his thread topic languishes.
But can any poster respond to ten threads in 3 days, with multiple people responding? And it's ten now, but already today he's added 2 more.
He's aware of this PGA, and doesn't care. Like the compulsive who keeps washes his hands 30 times a day, he can't stop, and cares nothing about the responses he gets as long as they allow another opportunity to take another poke at Christianity.
Compulsion is insidious.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
Motels don't clean out rooms while the guest remains in it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
I guess the smarmy moral high horse is all you've got. It still won't fly here.
Your idea of intelligent discussion lacks intelligence. Carry on, your compulsive need to attack Christianity probably slows you from going completely bonkers.
Bitterness is like emotional cancer. It'll eat you up from the inside without you knowing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
Ah! There is our sjw. Do you think calling people unintelligent, arrogant, hateful and ignorant is intelligent discussion?
Your every post is insulting to Christians, even to the point of you saying it was right that Christians were persecuted throughout history.
And you want to cry crocodile tears now about demeaning personal attacks? Lol.
I know you liberals tend not to see the insults you give, and perceive every disagreement as insulting to you.
Tell me, which is more insulting, to be the pinnacle of arrogance and ignorance and worse than hateful, or to be a loony sjw progressive liberal snowflake?
You asked a question, I answered you. I did not insult you. I did not call you a loony sjw progressive liberal snowflake.
In response to your question, I said if a person thought religious views were the pinnacle of arrogance and ignorance and worse than hatred, then they are most likely a loony sjw progressive liberal snowflake.
How is that an insult to you? How is what you said not an insult to another?
You may be clueless, or just trying to grease the mods, but the smarmy moral high horse stance will not fly here.
Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
And to your great frustration, millions continue to rely on it and use it as a moral authority. Dispute all your rage you're still just a rat in cage.The Bible is an unreliable, unverified source of information and is riddled with mistakes, anecdotal accounts It is by no means authoritative and is classified as a reference book.
The morals as outlined in Biblical scripture are draconian, barbaric, primitive, corrupt and well behind the times by hundreds of years.
And your morals will be called draconian, barbaric, primitive, corrupt and well behind the times by hundreds of years a hundred years from now. And that morality will be called draconian, barbaric, primitive, corrupt and well behind the times by hundreds of years a hundred years from that time. Do you see the silliness?
Properly conducted independent research studies around the world have confirmed that the IQ of theists is lower because of restriction of education by religious institutions.
Restriction of education does not affect IQ. Perhaps you don't know what I Q measures.
Not one science "was in fact the result of the investigation........"I challenge you to name one science that is.
Do you mean field of science? If so then you'd be wrong.
An atheist is quite entitled to say with certainty that there is no God due to the complete lack of evidence whatsoever of the presence of God or any other supernatural phenomena.
That is a logical fallacy. But anyone is entitled to say anything. Before we found out the world was round, atheists insisted there was no evidence it was round and felt entitled to say with certainty that the Earth was flat.
Theists have no right at all and are talking erroneously to claim that there is a God due to the complete lack of evidence whatsoever of the presence of God or any other supernatural phenomena.
Yet to your huge frustration, millions continue to believe in God and find evidence satisfactory enough for them!
...the Christian religion is the "only" religion and that anyone not following such a doctrine is inferior and condemned to an afterlife of damnation.
So, pretty much exactly what you're doing with atheism.
Theists have lower IQs than atheists and has been proven so.
You mean in general? Because you aren't so bright.
You have failed to back up any of your outrageous, arrogant and flippantly mocking claims.
That sounds exactly like you.
Christians have been persecuted for centuries. And, for good reason.
There goes that not draconian, civilized, current, non-corrupt, and well ahead of the times by hundreds of years morality for you.
Placing women and children in lion pits to be mauled to death was good. How advanced that morality is!
All you have to do with these fakes is scratch the self-righteous halo a bit and the scaly red shows through.
I guess not everything from hundreds of years ago would this moral sage call "behind the times".
Hypocrite much?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Thats it? This is the best refutation that you can do to the biblical fact that Jesus as Yahweh God incarnate is NOT Hebrew?!
We agree now? Lol. When did you realize that God was not Hebrew?
Pssst, don't look now, but the biblical axioms below state without question that our Jesus, as Yahweh God incarnate, is HEBREW!
Nope. Your poor reading comprehension has flummoxed you again. God is the God of... the Hebrews, not Hebrew Himself. Even little kids know this Dee Dee.
You wrote all that silliness, with each verse saying "the God of the hebrews", and you read it every time as "the God who is Hebrew". Do the words dance around in your vision too?
School must have been torture for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Do you even know what you're saying?
I don't think you do.
What you call "ramifications" is just more deluded silliness.
Stop contradicting yourself. You have a learning disability. It's really not that big a deal. Read slowly. Calm down.
If you say Jesus is a different person than the Father, then Jesus cannot be the Father. Think Dee Dee.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Dee Dee, really when you have nothing to say, don't make a post.
Your obsession causes you to think you must post even when you have nothing to say. You really don't have to.
I look forward to discussing with you what Jesus proposed and condoned, okay?
No you don't. You just want to interact with me because you're an attention addict. Your addiction will be satisfied.
Aren't you glad that I didn't take your "suggestion" that I stop posting Dee Dee?
Lol!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
Can you and Dee Dee both go start your own board, or maybe just email each other the useless crap posts so we don't all have to read them? Nothing's more annoying on this board than getting an interesting topic, and interesting discussion, only to know you guys are going to get into a tiff over who's the toughest poster in history. It's fkng tedious.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Lol. It's exciting to talk to the object of your obsession huh?ETHANG5, YOU ARE IN MY THREAD ONCE AGAIN, WOW!!!
1. So, under this biblical axiom, how do you feel about Jesus agreeing with Exodus 21:17?
I feel fine.
2. Are we still too postulate that Jesus is ever loving and forgiving under these circumstances?
Yes. And "to" is different from "too".
3. How would you defend Jesus when He stated that kids that curse their parents should be murdered, or do you agree with Jesus?
Jesus needs no defense. I always agree with Jesus.
4. How are we to get others to join Christianity when Biblical narratives like this make themselves know, that lets admit it, puts us in a bad light?
Christianity has no problem getting converts. That is why you spend your time being silly on the internet.
Therefore, address the questions above, and then I have many more for you upon this topic, okay?
I'm sure you do. But I already know you're one of those losers who ask questions but never answer any.
So your answer privileges are suspended till you grow a backbone and answer a few.
While you do, I'll continue to toss you for lolz Dee Dee. The comedy show must go on, and I have Gentle Readers to entertain.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Did Jesus save the Samaritan woman at the well? Yes. But our genius fails to mention that. Why?
Did Jesus save the Canaanite woman? Yes. But our genius fails to mention that. Why?
There is an Epistle to the Romans. Were the Romans Jews? No.
Revelations mentions seven churches. Are all of them Jewish? No.
John says of his vision of Heaven on the last day, that there were multitudes from every nation present.
Jesus Himself says that His message will be preached to all the Earth. Why does our vacuous preacher fail to mention every fact that would render his argument nonsense?
Now, Jesus initially sent His disciples only to the Jews, because as God's chosen people, they had first dibs on the good news.
What our genius wants is to imply but not say it outright, that the message of Jesus was NEVER intended for non-jews. He knows this would be a lie, so he says it by innuendo. But Jesus Himself contradicts that.
So he fakes interpret a saying by Jesus, throws in a few OT verses, and tadaa! He's faked a controversy.
Paul was specifically sent to non-jews, and in his blistering sermon in Acts, he explains how the gospel first had to be preached to the Jews, and now was being given to gentiles.
Stephen hopes that his audiences general unfamiliarity with the bible will cause them to consider his fake argument.
Just before Jesus leaves them, after they have gone out and preached to Israel, the disciples return excited that they could perform miracles. This was the first time Jesus had sent them out. The first time, they were restricted to Israel only, as prophesy required.
But just before Jesus left for Heaven, He again charged His disciples to go out to all the world and make disciples.
Here are the questions I would ask our genius if he did not dodge questions.
1. If the disciples were restricted the first time, what makes you think the restriction was permanent?
2. Paul was sent to non-jews. Were you aware of that?
3. Jesus tells His disciples to preach to All Nations, why is that confusing?
Stephen then says "And staying with the Old Testament, we don’t find an all-inclusive message there, either."
But this is a cleverly worded lie. The message has never changed. It has always been all-inclusive. What changed was who it would be preached to.
How do I know? Many non-jews became followers of Jehovah in the OT. Many times with God Himself telling the Jews not to restrict anyone who wanted to follow Him.
God insisted to the Jews that He was the God of all men, and promised, even in the OT, that His purpose was to save all men.
This is yet another fake "contradiction", made up out of smoke and mirrors and half truths. I believe Stephen knows his posts contain lies. So what does he get out of lying?
If he truly believes Christianity is bad, why does he need to lie about it? What are his lies supposed to accomplish?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ronjs
The genius doesn't care about debate or supporting his illogical claims, the bitterness within him simply wants to vent.
Notice he will post more threads a day than he can reply to. He is not interested in logical argumentation.
When, for example, an idiot keeps yelling out "homo!" at an Elton John concert, do you think what he wants is an honest discussion of the morality of homosexuality?
Salixes will reach the point where no one will take his bait anymore, and just watch, he will just keep posting his clunkers. We had someone just like him here, name of Willows. Could make 26+ threads a day!
That is a compulsion, not a search for engagement. He's angry and bitter, a past hurt left to fester has turned to obsession expressed as a compulsion to post basically the same thing over and over.
"Christianity bad, progressive liberal good."
No reasoning, no argumentation, no logic required or wanted. Posters like him are the atheist equivalent of the Hillsboro Baptist Church mindset.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
You may be right.
He is right.
You can show us how simple all of this is when you have let me see those ancient documents you claim to have in your possession
He did not say he had them in his possession. Why lie?
No Christian has claimed Jesus was god in three persons and one god alone....and let us see where the Jews proclaim Jesus was god in three persons and one god alone.
What Christians claim is that Jesus is one of the three persons making up the Godhead.
The bible says so too. In several places, using the actual word God in referring to Jesus. Would you like to be educated?
Created:
-->
@Zaradi
ROFL!!You sound like someone who needs a hobby
I think we left the "hobby can fix it" stage many, many, posts ago.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
If you're a loony sjw progressive liberal snowflake, then yes.Surely, isn't that the pinnacle of arrogance and ignorance and worse than hatred?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
So basically, you want all religious people to become progressive liberal snowflakes?
No one has ever told that in the world outside your sjw safe places, theists outnumber progressive atheist?
So who is your "we"?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
If you made no such choice...
If I didn't why did you lie?
...then would you like to contribute to the topic and say who you think is the worst?
I did. You must have missed it with your obtuse glasses on. Here, I'll post it again just for you Pedro.
Who was the worst of the worst?
I've travelled the world, and lived in more than 12 countries. Most people do not know who Jones or Hitler was. But they all know Jesus.
No one but deluded western idiots count Jesus as among the worst. The world counts Him as the best. His name has become synonymous with virtue and kindness.
There are houses of worship to Him on every continent on Earth, and countless works of art dedicated to him, and millions who have braved death rather than deny Him. Your question immediately paints you as clueless dolt.
But we both know you didn't care about an answer. All you wanted was to make the insult. Like a moron spray painting an insult on a church wall, only the insult matters to you.
But like the spray painting idiots, you're always flummoxed as to why everyone see you as a clueless dolt.
Did your grafitti soothe the bitterness in your soul? Did you get emotional release? No. As your obsession to keep posting nonsense like this will force you to keep embarrassing yourself.
Do another "whose worse of the worse" about the Black Widow, Jezabel, and Mother Theresa, that should be interesting. Lol.
Did that get past your obtuse glasses?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dynasty
Good job Dynasty. I'll add one to your list, 11. "If the Bible was true, everyone would believe it."
Then the lies start.
Most governments censor videos depicting gratuitous acts of sex and violence that are far milder than what the Bible sets out to promote.
Here the genius tries to imply that the Bible "promotes" sex and violence. Where does it "promote" sex and violence?
They need lies like this to keep their claim afloat.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Jesus Christ existed...
Ask the typical atheist if he believes Plato existed, and he will say yes. But there is more evidence for Jesus existing than Plato! Then watch them contort to rationalize that one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Salixes
I made no such choice Abdul.I totally agree with your choice of Jesus being the least bad of the three.
The other two actually existed.
So one of your options is fake, and that fake option is the one you chose? Lol.
Are you trying to make people take you less seriously?
Created: