Total posts: 5,875
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Good post Doc.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
You are saying that MoPac is not a literal sheep
No.
Then you ARE saying MoPac is a literal sheep. Think about that.
that is the way you want to and are interpret the word and out of context.
Just like you're doing the bible.
They are different words. and they do mean TWO DIFFERENT things.
But the two words are not in the same verse Otis. Why couldn't "hate" in Luke 14:26 be like "sheep" in your comment? Having a different meaning?
FFS try reading this contradictory crap for yourself and keep up.
But only one word is used in each verse Cletus.
You used sheep, but did not mean barnyard animal.
Why can't you see that the bible used hate, but did not mean dislike?
Why are you the only one who can use simile? Neither of the verses use two words. They do not contradict unless you insist on saying "hate" has only one meaning and take the word out if context.
What if I had another comment by you where you used "sheep" to mean a barnyard animal. Could I then claim you contradicted yourself?
How can you not be embarrassed to post such stupidity? Is the rush you get from castigating the bible worth being a public fool? Really?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dynasty
@SirAnonymous
Nah, its the same guy. I've known him for years on DDO. His schtick is to be outrageous, but to keep people interested, he has to get more and more outrageous. Eventually, he exhausts his site, and then changes his name and starts again elsewhere.That's either the same guy or a rather clever troll imitating him to troll people here.
He's not a Christian, but it doesn't matter, Jesus will judge him just like He will everyone else. None of us will fool Him.
We may be dealing with some mental issues there too.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@dustryder
she was miles ahead of Trump
In what concrete way?
in terms of being an effective politician and leader,
Hillery was Sec of state! How much progress did she make with North Korea? China? Iran? Mexico? Israel? Saudi Arabia? How were our borders while she was in office? How was the economy?
You dodged every question in my post, so I will assume you didn't want to answer them.
But I will suspect you knew answering them honestly would contradict your claim that she was better.
Created:
Posted in:
That right I do, and they were.
No they weren't homer. This is a debate site. You've asserted something and are now admitting you have no logical reason for your assertion.
Lol. I know Abdul. Now everyone (and you too) see out of your own mouth that you are completely ignorant on the subject you're blathering about.You don't agree and i don't fkn care. now what.
Now what? Everyone sees that I am right to call you a fraud who is not here to debate. All you want is to accuse. And you can't even support your fake accusation.
Those perfume and anointing oils were worth over a years fkn wages...
How do you know genius? Should we take your word on faith?
but here they were just throwing it all over Jesus when they could have given that money to the "poor".
So one item makes them rich? Do you think before you write?
so much so that even Judas got upset at the fkn wasted expense.
He did not say this because he cared about the poor but because he was a thief;
Lol.
Like I said. you don't agree and I don't fkn care . So off you pop princess. nothing for you here.
You got that right. There is nothing here. Unless you count lies and ignorance, then there is a lot here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
WOW!!! I can see I have been hitting raw nerves with you because of your over emotive responses!
Lol! You use insults, all caps and all bold and I'm over emotive? OK jabba.
All your ludicrous posts are designed to elicit emotion, so you're telling me what you wish. I haven't even really burned you yet. But you'll see.
But really, when you have nothing to say. Shut up. No wonder you've resorted to spam. You have nothing to say.
You can't upset me. Your childish insults are laughable, and I can outlast you. You may think you're original, but posters like you are a dime a dozen on the net.
You live in this little pretend world where you think you "slap" and "embarrass" people. Just like hari.
I see you're trying to get a hold of your ridiculous template posting. I did that. I changed you. Told you I am a professional.
You want attention? You want to be outrageous? Well Dee Dee, you got my attention. You will choke on it.
You've tried the dumb template posting, you've tried being a jerk, you've even tried grade school taunts. None of those things move me. What else do you have?
How many times can you post the same silly, "I slapped you" or the equally moronic, "I saved you from embarrassment."?
Come on, Mr. True Christian. Your dumb insults and boorish posts will not help you from being eviscerated. Come tell us again how you'll embarrass someone in front of the membership. We know what's important to you.
Gentle Reader, if you're wondering what brother Dee Dee is spamming at the end of his posts to me, his "tried to post" means, "I haven't posted", but our genius is as good with English as he is with Christian doctrine. I'm supposed to be embarrassed. Lol.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
No one has denied that Judas was a thief Abdul.
You claimed that the disciples were rich.
You claimed that Judas was rich.
You again have offered no support for your bogus claims.
You are offering proof for what is not in contention, and post the same verse from various versions because you are empty.
You didn't even address a single point in my 2 posts. But here you are, ready with your potty mouth.
You can't support your claims, and you can't contradict mine, but I am spent? Lol.
On what, other than your insane bias, are basing your claim that the disciples were rich? I say they were not, and gave several examples showing they were poor, and your reply is to post the same verse several times saying Judas was uncaring?
The one spent and empty is you Jed. You have nothing but accusations and bluster.
Created:
Posted in:
Because Mary and Joseph could only offer a sacrifice of a pair of doves or two young pigeons after Jesus was born (Luke 2:22-24), we can presume that “at least at the time of Jesus’ birth Mary and Joseph had very few financial resources” as Blomberg says.
We know this because according to Leviticus 12:1-8, after the forty days of purification, a lamb was to be brought as a burnt-offering, and a pigeon as a sin offering. But the poor could only bring the two birds instead. So clearly Jesus was not born into a wealthy family, or even a mildly well-off family.
Moreover, if Jesus and his followers were in fact well-off, why did they need welfare handouts from the wealthy women as mentioned above? As Hagner notes, “Jesus had a few relatively wealthy followers (e.g., Joseph of Arimathea, Lazarus, Zacchaeus, and perhaps Matthew) and was happy to take advantage of their hospitality (cf. Luke 8:3).”
Other indications of their lack of wealth can be cited. At one point for example Jesus had to get some tax money out of a fish (Matt. 17:24-27). If the amount owed was about “two days pay for an ordinary workman” as Morris says, such an amount should not have been too difficult to come by. But “their lack of ready money” as France says may point to their relative poverty.
Although this may not be very decisive evidence, it could be, as Morris suggests, that Jesus and his band of followers did have the money, but did not want to squander the “little group’s meager store of money” on a tax that Jesus by rights did not have to pay.
Moreover, we are clearly told that Jesus had nowhere to lay his head, even though foxes had dens and birds had nests (Luke 9:58 – see also Matt 8:20). The context of this verse (vv. 57-62) is about the cost of discipleship. Jesus is making it crystal clear that being his disciple will cost them everything, including material possessions, security, comfort, and their valued resources.
Speaking of the Matt 8:20 passage, France says this: “The itinerant ministry (4:23) which now required their crossing the lake would allow no certainty of lodging, and many nights must have been spent in more exposed locations even than those of the foxes and birds; the coming night will find Jesus sleeping in a boat (v. 24).”
But let me draw this to a close. There is no question that as the eternal second person of the Trinity, the Son is of course rich beyond measure. God is the creator of all things, and owns the cattle on a thousand hills (Psalm 50:10). But that is not the issue. The issue is this: during his life on earth, was Jesus “extremely wealthy” as folks claim, or was he very much like most people back in first century Palestine: basically poor, but able to get by?
All the biblical evidence we have would suggest the latter. And given how often Jesus warned about the dangers of wealth, it is highly unlikely that he chose an opulent and extravagant lifestyle. In fact, everything we know about Jesus suggests the exact opposite.
------------------------------------------------------
But the accuser needs a lie to be able to accuse.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
That is silly. You still have no biblical support for your claims.That's correct!!!
I am saying they were rich and influential. Keep up.
Then the stories were not ambiguous were they?
Notice that Stephen has so far failed to give any biblical support for his claim?
Notice that he has failed to address the ambiguity in his equivocation on the word "disciple"?
Soon he will lie that he did present support. If pressed further, he will go crying to the mods that I'm harassing him.
His work here is done. Make the bogus charge. That is all. Don't support it. Don't debate it. Just like a bigot yelling out "homo!!" from the crowd, this poster is not seeking truth, he only wants to accuse.
But I was comprehensively trained for these tactics too. He will not escape his burning.
But for the time being let's watch him do the dodge dance.
Created:
-->
@rbelivb
Where do they go? Death? Migration out? Interbreeding to oblivion?Over the next 20 to 30 years the ethnic majority in the US is projected to dwindle,
Andrew Yang, Ben Shapiro, Tucker Carlson etc all trying to claim that Trump's win is due to religious, "cultural," spiritual, economic reasons, and so on, and not a conservative reaction against ethnic transformation.
So the evidence that you are right is that intelligent people think you're wrong?
Libertarian, in that I support free movement and open markets.
You mean open borders and no tariffs. Lol, you're close enough to liberal in my book RB.
Created:
Here is the story...
Gen 3:14 - So the LORD God said to the serpent:
“Because you have done this,
You are cursed more than all cattle,
And more than every beast of the field;
On your belly you shall go,
And you shall eat dust
All the days of your life.
(Notice here that science agrees with the bible that snakes once had legs)
Gen 3:15 - And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between your seed and her Seed;
He shall bruise your head,
And you shall bruise His heel.”
Then at the last supper, Jesus, who was the "her seed" mentioned above in Genesis, says of Judas, who was the "your seed" mentioned above in Genesis,...
John 13:18 - “I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats bread with Me has lifted up his heel against Me.
Now, what scripture is Jesus referring to? Genesis 3:15 of course.
So, whose seed was Judas? Speaking to the Father, Jesus says of Judas...
John 17:12 - “While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.
Judas is called the "son of perdition" who is "lost", and who is mentioned in scripture.
Then, Paul, in his epistle to the Thessalonians, says,....
2Th 2:3 - Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,
But this is not Satan, this person is called the beast. Revelations let's us know he is different from Satan, who is called the dragon...
Satan has tried to mimic God with a trinity of his own. John explains it in Revelation...
Rev 13:1 - Then I stood on the sand of the sea. And I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten crowns, and on his heads a blasphemous name.
Rev 13:2 - Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. The dragon gave him his power, his throne, and great authority.
This is the first "beast". Satan gives him his power, his authority, and his throne.
Rev 13:3 - And I saw one of his heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and his deadly wound was healed. And all the world marveled and followed the beast.
This is the expected "falling away", that atheists remind us has already started. There will be fewer and fewer Christians, as they fall away.
Rev 13:4 - So they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?”
So this "Beast 1" one gets set up by Satan and worshipped by men, and causes others to worship Satan.
Rev 13:5 - And he was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies, and he was given authority to continue for forty-two months.
Rev 13:6 - Then he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name, His tabernacle, and those who dwell in heaven.
The way Stephen and Dee Dee do now.
Rev 13:7 - It was granted to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them. And authority was given him over every tribe, tongue, and nation.
This is where Christian get the "One World Government", and why they oppose it.
Rev 13:8 - All who dwell on the earth will worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
So you either submit to "Beast 1" or die.
Rev 13:9 - If anyone has an ear, let him hear.
Rev 13:11 - Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon.
Rev 13:12 - And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
So we have the 2nd Beast, completing the Satanic trinity with the 1st beast and the dragon. The first beast comes out of the sea, the second comes out of the Earth. He has all the authority of the 1st beast, and forces everyone to worship the 1st beast.
Rev 13:13 - He performs great signs, so that he even makes fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.
Rev 13:14 - And he deceives those who dwell on the earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived.
Rev 13:15 - He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.
Rev 13:16 - He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads,
Rev 13:17 - and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
So this 2nd beast will be able to convince people through seeming miracles, and under threat of death, to worship the 1st beast.
Rev 13:18 - Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.
666 then, is the number of the 1st beast, not Satan. The beast called the son of perdition.
This is the Antichrist Jesus spoke about. The son of perdition, whose father is Satan. The same Satan who entered Judas, and caused him to betray Jesus.
The beasts are men, but demon possessed. It is this first beast/demon who possessed the serpent in Eden, and the same one that possessed Judas.
But the good news is...
Rev 17:14 - “These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.”
Satan has lost. Jesus is triumphant.
That is "who" possessed the serpent in Eden.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Varrack
I tend to view it as a pointless maneuver completely devoid of honesty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->@Historyfluff
I never block anyone, even hypocritical posters who post TO me, but have blocked me.
But its nice to know you've flip-flopped on how wonderful Hillery is. During the election, high off the gas-lighting MSDNC had given you, you were singing hosannas in her honor.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@dustryder
How is Trump "bad"? Please tell me you don't think the economy would have been better under Hillery? Or that she would have dealt with Iran better. Or the our borders would not be wide open under her presidency?
Not personally liking Trump does not mean Trump is a bad president. Where is the logic behind this sentiment??
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Jesus already looked in His mind's eye...
Jesus doesn't have a "mind's eye" Dee dee.
...and discovered the women of Zion's "secret parts?"
Jesus doesn't "discover" anything Abdul, He is omniscient. And nothing is secret to Him. He created women Einstein.
And to your weak thinking, this is not perverse?
Lol. Sorry, I'm not a blithering idiot.
2. Tell us, when is it not perverted when someone like Isaiah includes this statement within his book, and uses the term "secret parts of the women of Zion?"
When someone like Isaiah does it. If you do it, it would be perverted because YOU are perverted.
3. Why did Jesus have to discover the women of Zion secrets parts to begin with? Can you answer this for us?
I keep telling you but you're kinda slow. Jesus is omniscient, He already knows everything, He "discovers" nothing.
4. When Jesus is considered to be ever loving and forgiving, then why did Jesus inflict scabs upon the women of Zion foreheads? Wasn't it enough for Jesus to "discover their secret parts?"
Jesus didn't do what you like. So? When you become His boss, you can question Him on it. Of course you are completely clueless that words have more than one meaning, and that "discover" can mean something other than your perverted mind thinks. Its called an education. Get one.
5. I need another laugh at your expense again, therefore, tell us what a woman's secret parts could be, other than what it explicitly says and means within the passage in question?
If it explicitly, within the passage in question, says what it means, why do you need something else?
Of course, with your atrocious reading comprehension, its anyone's guess what you think it says and means.
I ignored the repeat stupidity in the rest of your robotic post. And you don't have to beg for attention from me Dee Dee. I'll be here for you.
Created:
-->
@EtrnlVw
...you are from God Itself and have access to anything anyone else does. It is part of your journey to learn and experience everything the Creator has to offer.
When you put it that way, it's staggering how much he loses by being closed, angry, and bitter.
Created:
Posted in:
Funny, people who voted for Hillery are calling her a bad choice now.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Still no answer. The question is from this thread.
You're upset about the bibles use of the words "hate" and "love". But you do the same thing with words too.
Words can have more than one meaning, and can be used in different ways. But when you are asked about it, you run crying to the mods.
I asked you repeatedly because you dodged. So this is the correct thread. Tell us, how come you can use simile but you object when the bible does?
Talk about a double standard.
Created:
a metaphor means that all other supernatural claims in the bible, including the resurrection of Jesus, the central myth of Christianity, is ALSO a metaphor
Why? This seems like a false dichotomy.
he also likes to pick and choose some parts to just be metaphor lol.
This implies that they are either ALL literal or ALL metaphor. Why? Why can't the bible have both?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
It wasn't to me, it was about me.What part of my statement to you in another thread didn't you understand???!
You are an attention whore, I understood it fine.
But as I said, I was trained for tro... ahem... people like you. I will toss you and you will run. Your posts are already empty of substance and you're spamming stupidity.
You will find that your silly insults are ineffective, and nothing you can say will upset or surprise me.
You will have have to get more and more loony to get people to notice you as they become more and more bored with your schtick.
But I will be here for you. I like tro... ahem... I like people like you. I'll toast you as I toss you. You won't even know you're being embarrassed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
You have nothing to do with this thread whatsoever,
And yet my name comes out of your pie-hole every post you make.
who in the Hell do you think you are?!
The one who tosses you for lolz. Why?
Once again, your direct Bible ignorance is duly recognized in front of the membership!
Lol. You're supposed to wait till I post before using the "recognized in front of the membership" template Dee Dee.
Jesus is omniscient genius, He doesn't discover anything. He is also the creator of women, they have no "secret parts" for Him to discover.
You're playing the "true Christian" right? You obviously didn't study for your role, did you Dee Dee?
You think Jesus is perverted because perversion comes to your mind when you hear, "the secret parts" of women.
There is a consequence to frequenting prostitutes Dee Dee. If you get your own mind out of the gutter, you'll see that Jesus is not a perv like you.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
Who's outraged?
You are.
All I said was start a thread, suddenly you're all upset.
No sir. You said start a thread and I said no thanks and you told me to go fck myself. No worries, I know your memory only picks up insults at you, never ones from you.
I point it out because you wondered if I have a life (outside of this forum I presume?)
No. At all.
which I point out is ironic because you're doing three times as much as what I'm doing.
And yet you're still here, whining about who knows what. If you do have a life, please go find it.
That said, I'm done giving you rope to continually trip over in this topic,..
You're one of those dweebs who keeps coming back after the poster has said "no thanks" so I'll believe you when I see you're actually done.
I kind of feel bad, like I'm punching a mentally handicapped child.
A mentally handicapped child can goad you into vulgarity and unprovoked insults? Lol, that's funny because your lame insults would not bother a mentally handicapped child.
I remain interested in reading it, but we both know you can't and won't.
That must be why you declined when I asked you, "what's wrong with this thread?" Thanks for "saving" me.
It funny how you sjw's think your disbelief is what makes us theists not want to post.
For good measure, I'll throw in...
You're still begging! I'm flattered that you pay so much attention to my posts. It isn't just you. That is how I have so many posts. People find me interesting.
...have a great day, Jethro!
Are you leaving now? Ya sure this time?
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Just call me a prophet.But then again, posting the same stupidity over and over is your strong suite. Knock yourself out.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
I certainly won't change for you snowflake.
Are you tiring? Is your outrage soothed? Now you're counting my posts. Lol.
Lord, they just banned one obsessed loon, I sure I hope I'm not getting another.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Lol. Even you have a stupidity limit huh? It hilarious how you think that if I haven't made a post in the religion forum it's somehow embarrassing for me.Naw, just the days are embarrassing enough for you, so why pour more salt upon your open wounds by including minutes and seconds!
So is your 3rd grade antics about spamming what is already posted on the board. Lol
But think about it genius. Its supposed to be an update. If it's so often that the info is the same, it isn't updating anything is it Einstein?
But then again, posting the same stupidity over and over is your strong suite. Knock yourself out.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
And you're still here. Has letting out your bile soothed your bitterness?
You follow me on DDO too huh? You losers kill me. How in the world do you let a stranger on the internet get you bitter?
Do you have a life?
Or are you a anti-theist dweeb who stalks religion boards because your real life is a failure.
You can beg, fume, taunt, and insult, and I will not do what you want. You can't scare me, confuse me, or out last me.
After I leave this post, I don't think about you at all. You're stewing in bitterness and I don't even think of you.
I can't toss you for lolz cause you're not funny. You're angry and sad.
I actually even said "or don't" to starting a new thread,
And I didn't. Yet here you are buttaching about me not doing it.
Stop shaming yourself loser. But if that floats your boat, I'm here for you.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hey genius. If you're going to update us every few seconds, then update us with the minutes and seconds too.
You may have found your purpose Dee Dee.
Created:
And other times I like to play a victim, right?you're here to complain and run your usual "I'm a tough guy" act no one buyfs,
Can the class say "Ethang5 doesn't actually have an argument and just wants to toss his toys out of the pram in a tantrum?"
Neither your childish taunts nor your silliness will make me do what you want.
I am glad to keep pointing it out.
You really are lonely aren't you? Just another bitter moron yapping at my heels after he has said goodbye and I have told him no thanks.
I wanted to debate you right now and right here. You wanted another thread that you said you may or may not take part in. So I declined. Now I'm the one who never debates?
For some reason you're miffed. Why? I don't care about you or your idiot's opinion of me. I've declined your offer to start another thread, and I've declined your pop religion page. Did that upset you?
Do you have a life? Please go find it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
There you go again, condemning others when your morality is suspect.
I guess you just a judgemental person.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Good boy!
I knew there had to be some use for you.
You even used your elementary template.
Lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
I'm clearly talking JESUS' disciples.
Yes. That is the fakery your lame "assessment" depends on.
They were rich businessmen in the fishery business.
So you lie. Where are the verses saying so? The disciples of Jesus were poor. Jesus Himself said he purposely chose lowly men.
And Judas' came from one of the richest families on the Mediterranean.
Really? Yet he betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver? Where is your support for these lies Hosea?
Semantics
No sir. A pound back then was not the same as it is today. You have no clue what you're blubbering about.
all your arguments are spent and you are devoid of anything at all substantial to argue against anything that I highlight
I present my arguments with supporting verses. Where are yours?
...in these ambiguous biblical half stories.
If the stories are ambiguous, how do you know they were poor? The stories are world famous and have been famous for hundreds of years. They are confusing and biguous to you because you have a problem.
That's right. show me where I am wrong if you have a dispute.
You can't show yourself right. Just saying Jesus' disciples were poor is not evidence. Show us some verses corroborating you.
What do you think is meant by the phrase "women of substance" Einstein?
Depends on how its used mohindra.
All lies so that you can make the ludicrous charge about a rich man entering the kingdom.
What charge? I have ask questions , here, but of course you missed them.
This charge...
This seem a very bias and hypocritical statement coming from the Christ when we consider that he had surrounded himself with very rich and influential disciples.
Why do you lie?
Jesus' disciples were poor. Having some expensive ointment does not mean a person is rich.
As always, your charge is bogus. First you lie, equivocating on the word "disciple". Then you just simply insist you're right, with no biblical support.
When challenged, you want me to " prove you wrong". It doesn't work that way. You are not right till you prove yourself right.
Its OK if you have a problem with the rich man and heaven story, but you needn't lie. You needn't be oily.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
So you're still not happy. OK, let it out.
So in fact you WOULD rather complain.
If I don't do what you want, then I must rather do what you offer as the only alternative, right?
To review: you suggest a topic ("Let us make our case for God! JUST THIS ONCE!") that differs from this topic. I suggest "Go ahead and make the topic", and say I'll be glad to at least read it. You say "nah," for whatever reason
I gave my reason. You invited me to blog. I don't blog. I'm here for debate.
(I think it's because you like to play the victim),
Lol. You must be a lawyer then, cause if I'm a victim you certainly are chasing that ambulance. Perhaps if you keep posting to me, you'll continue to think I like to "play" the victim.
subsequently reveal a terrible argument for god ("A lot of people believed in him over a lot of time, therefore it's likely true"),
That was not an argument for God. That is the only the position your paint-by-the-number argument is equipped to deal with.
Our topic was to draw a line from the cause of the universe (which you said you agreed with) to the Christian God.
You had not yet heard my argument and called it unconvincing. I told you the many people it has convinced contradict you, and suddenly you have elevated that comment as my argument. The same argument you wouldn't let me make!
I find a pre-existing topic that is EXACTLY THE TOPIC YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT, and coincidentally is pursuant to the user guidelines for this site, and you say "I don't do pop religion," apropos of nothing at all.
How many there share your belief that the universe has a cause? How many there are capable of understanding physics?
You asked me. I declined. Yet you keep harassing me. Who made you my convo finder? What do you want? For me to do what you'd like? Sorry liberal. I will no
Oh, not to mention you say "That's not my argument" then refuse to clarify in EITHER topic
Clarify what? You declined my explanation in this thread. What am I supposed to clarify for you? You suggested I make another thread. I declined. You suggested I go to an existing thread. I declined.
I don't have to do anything or go anywhere you direct. I do no wrong by not doing what you suggest. I am not obligated to obey you.
I hope Jesus isn't too disappointed that you're blatantly saying "Nah, I don't do that" to 1 Peter 3:15!
Jesus will be fine. It's always funny when the same atheist who hates biblical quotes, starts quoting the bible to you.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
This is where I demonstrate my patience to you.
Though I've told you several times that if you do not answer my questions I will not answer yours, you keep asking me questions.
I don't know if you're slow, or if you mistakenly believe only your questions deserve answers, but either way, you will learn.
Were I not professionally trained, I might be berating you for your persistent lack of understanding right now. But I am patient.
So once again. You are a serial question dodger. As such, your questions will be considered garbage until you grow some integrity and start answering questions.
And if you need more patience and tolerance, I have plenty. You will learn.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
The confusion is all you cube.
Ive made clear many times, others lack of morals on specific issues, just as I have for myself.
Its then still hypocritical to condemn others. Your time would be better spent fixing your own rotten morals instead of castigating others.
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
No thanks. I don't do pop religion.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Why what?OK. That'll do. WHY?
Created:
Posted in:
The lonely pastor again begs for attention from Ethan. But with a silly empty post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
The same place your posts come from. Why do you ask?
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Why doesn't Jesus need "no defense"?
I don't know.
But I can tell you why He NEEDS no defense. Lol.
That reading comprehension is a mother isn't it?
Created:
[ UPDATE: It has been ONE YEAR, 5 MONTHS, AND 13 DAYS since ethang5 and even tried to post a new thread upon his own! LOL! ]
"..even tried to post a new thread upon his own.."
Lol.
You keep us updated OK Dee Dee? Everyone will want to know how long its been since Ethan even tried to post a new thread upon his own. You're always talking about Ethan anyway, so you are the best person to keep us updated.
(Do I need to say it?)
Created:
Posted in:
-->@Dee Dee
In prayer with Jesus a long time ago, He told me to lead the way in cleaning up the Godforsaken state of Nevada and its ungodly prostitution Brothels, therefore, who am I to tell Jesus that I didn't want to follow His command???!
Indeed. Who are you?
Hey, did you record his voice like I asked you to? Surely Jesus won't mind you recording him as he talks to you? Spread the message so to speak?
You know how prayer works,...
Not prayer to the "jesus" you pray to, no. Is the voice of the guy you pray to not recordable? That would be a bummer.
Let me know OK?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Hmmm, my threads do not even come close in representing what you have said,
Sure they have. They are empty. You post using a silly template, and basically say the same irrelevant thing every time.
but yet you visit them anyway with your blatant Bible ignorance nonetheless,
You keep directing them to me. In fact, you obsessively talk about me even to other people on other threads that have nothing to do with me. Most people ignore you.
But I like you Dee Dee. I have been professionally trained for people like you.
You use childish taunts. How long since I started a thread. Do silly things like that work outside of grade school?
When you can make a post with substance in it, I will treat you more seriously. For now, you are a joke, and I like jokes.
Pull out that silly template and crack us up again.
Created:
-->
@BrotherDThomas
You again have an empty post Dee Dee.
There is nothing in it. Basically, it's spam.
No one cares what you think of me. No one is here for your subjective opinion of me.
Do you have anything of substance to say? Notice I don't have to impugn you to the Gentle Readers as your character does that for me by itself.
I have better things to do than waste time posting to some street corner internet yeller spamming by template.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
..my morals have fallen way short...
Don't worry about it, as your own corrupt morals have never stopped you from condemning the morals of others.
There is a word for that. It begins with "H" and has "Y".
Created:
-->
@ludofl3x
It's cool to think that you've devoted more thread initializations to Harikrish and your petty squabble with him than you have to your case for Jesus.
Jesus needs no defense.
In fairness to you, if your entire case is "lots of people believe it therefore it's probably true,"
That is what you want my case to be. You won't let me present it to you, but you're ready to present your fake substitute as mine for me. You want to discuss "my case" by innuendo instead of formally.
If you say Christianity is not convincing, then the sheer number of people being convinced by it contradicts you.
you're better off not starting the thread, I agree, because that is completely uninteresting,
And yet here you are, still buttaching that I haven't. You asked me to. I've declined. What are you still whining about now?
I mean unless you can tell me why you're right and muslims, who outnumber Christians, are wrong.
Muslims do not outnumber Christians, and their number has nothing to do with whether they are right or wrong.
Or alternative plan, go facebook stalk some internet forum poster and make topics about how much the two of you don't like each other, that seems a strength. Just kiss already!
That is what he's doing. And if I remember correctly, you supported his virulent racism. Either way, he's been perma banned from Dart, so your self-serving tangent here means nothing.
Now, how many more posts do you have for the subject you claim is "completely uninteresting"?
Created:
-->
@EtrnlVw
Tell him Etrnl, before the paranoia makes him pop.
Lol.
Created:
-->
@EtrnlVw
Tell him Etrnl, before the paranoia makes him pop.
Lol.
Created: