Total posts: 5,875
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
It would be hard to see unless you increased the contrast?
That it is dwarfed by white on white crime, and harder to see even if you increase the contrast.
What are your thoughts on it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
@n8nrgmi
But you did claim to know that "there once wasn’t life and evidence that there was life."
Yes.
What is the evidence that there once wasn't life?
It isn't an assumption, it is a conclusion based on the available evidence.
That is what an assumption is.
That is incorrect.
Coming to a conclusion when there is no evidence is called an assumption. But again, you have a right to be illogical. I will not stop you.
I affirm your right to believe in a concept without evidence.
Thank you, but unnecessary. There is evidence.
You should alert the scientific community post haste.
And there is evidence. That would be the main crux of my rebuttal to the OP.
It'll be exciting and novel when you finally post it.
"Regular" is a concept in your mind, like color. It isn't in the shape.
Incorrect.
I'm not interested enough to teach you basic physics. Be well in your lack of knowledge.
Correcting your errors is not validation of OP's claim.
But displaying faith in things you cannot explain is. Thanks.
One of the cornerstones of physics is that elementary particles are exactly alike.
That is not correct.
That is OK. A sound education in physics is no longer common these days. I'm sure your strengths are in other fields.
It's not blind, I witness it all the time.
I daresay you have powerful eyes if you see atoms all the time. But you're halfway there, at least you admit to it being faith.
I have awareness of evidence for abiogenesis.
By revelation? Because you sure did not observe any evidence for abiogenesis.
Yes, I understand what is meant by this statement.
So will most people reading your replies here.
I don't acknowledge that they are "facts,"
Facts tend not to need your acknowledgment.
I'm just letting you know that those statements can, contrary to your claim, be dismissed.
But facts cannot. And look, they still stand.
You were incorrect when you called them facts...
Luckily for me, your words don't create reality.
...and you were incorrect when you said that they cannot be dismissed
Yet there they stand, in spite of your feelings. Perhaps you are confusing "ignore" with "dismiss".
You can ignore a fact, but dismissing one does nothing.
Faith is belief ..... because of ..... the lack of evidence
Perceptive man that Dawkins.
n8nrgmi, I'm convinced your claims were validated.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
I know you don't know. You're ignorant, remember?I have indicated to you that I do not know.
This is why I repeat in bold, underlined and CAPITALS.
You repeat because your argument is fakery and think repetition will sway the audience where facts and logic couldn't.
And you use bolding, underlining and caps because that is what internet loons do. I think it's in your contract when you join the troll association.
Now answer the question...
I've answered it twice now. It isn't in the bible. Of course, you cannot answer why you think it should be in the bible.
You can't answer why you're searching the bible.
I told you, the bible doesn't contain all the scripture there is. But your silliness requires you to pretend not to see that.
Maybe you should ask Mike if he can make font color an option. Bolding, caps, and underlining isn't working for you. Wouldn't your lying spam be spectacular in say, red or orange?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Absolutely. And if we did not give money to any Muslim state, there would be enough money for Israel and more left over for the wall.USA should absolutely divest Saudi Arabia before they divest Israel.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
One in Asia, one in South America, and none in Africa. Hmmm.Most of Europe. Japan. Brazil. A few others.
I didn't say it was a racial thing in Israel, either.
Ethnicity is a racial thing.
Were they Ethiopian Jews?
By religion yes, but not by ethnicity.
I see you have ignored the whole "fighting their wars" argument. Do you concede?
No. It's just too ridiculous an argument to debate without insulting you. I rarely address arguments that are obviously silly because most Gentle Readers see the silliness without my comment.
I don't think you're being fully transparent about your position on Israel. But that is an avenue it is not profitable to go down.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
What is an ethno state?
Well, it is a nation reserved for those of a certain racial or ethnic group.
But this is not true of Israel. I know some black Ethiopians who became Israeli.
They are beginning to experiment with some interesting DNA stuff.
I'm too wise to take such weak bait. But I think I have you pegged now.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Which country do you consider to be a worthy ally of America now?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
For leftists, logic is only optional.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
We who? Even the fans in your overactive imagination are fantasies Hosea. You are alone.We dont need your childish behaviour around here.
Bye Bye Ethang
That's more like it. You can't make anyone leave, so if you're miffed, you go. Lesson one taken.
It is children who write in gibberish.
Created:
-->
@PGA2.0
And like the democrats, they will find that the public isn't nearly as dumb as they think it is.Of course, just like the Democrats, many sway public opinion with nonsense, IMO.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Outplayz
Hi! Hope you get your issues sorted. The board is always better with you actively on it. Don't hesitate to post another poem if you have it.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Then tell me, why has America continued to treat them as an ally through successive governments?We have complete evidence of that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
I don't know that.
But you did claim to know that "there once wasn’t life and evidence that there was life."
It isn't an assumption, it is a conclusion based on the available evidence.
That is what an assumption is. And there is no evidence for abiogenesis whatsoever. But I affirm your right to believe in a concept without evidence. To OP does too. Atheists call that faith.
Things don't need to be observed in order to happen.
But they do need evidence that they happened. Things not based on your faith anyhoo.
Regular shapes are.
"Regular" is a concept in your mind, like color. It isn't in the shape. But there is a reason we tell little kids at first that you can't subtract a larger number from a smaller one. People can only deal with what they are capable of dealing with.
Yes it can.
No it cannot. Thanks for validating the OP's claim again.
Correct, but certain collections of atoms can.
One of the cornerstones of physics is that elementary particles are exactly alike. If you think a certain arrangement of atoms makes them alive and capable of being self-aware, I have not seen a better rendition of blind faith.
Not that I'm aware of.
You lack of awareness of any evidence for abiogenesis didn't stop you then. It was this type of thinking Dawkins meant when he said, “Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, lack of evidence.”
I dismiss them.
Of course you do. But facts don't care about your feelings. That's why they are called "brute facts". Your " dismissal" means nothing. They continue to exist after you "dismiss" them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Sure, he's in the same group as you.
Cheating game.
Cheating game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
Who do you think is a useful ally for America?
Created:
-->
@Stephen
I only have one question.
When Jesus says in John 7:38, "scripture", what is He referring to?
You tell me Popoff.
Again, you can't answer a question about your own post. Is it ignorance or deception?
When Jesus said these words did those he was directing them towards understand which " scripture" he was referring to?
Did any of them question Him?
Was it common knowledge to his audience.
Of course. But that is not what you started out saying is it? Do you wish to move the goal posts again?
If the bible did not exist when Jesus said that, why are you searching the bible for it? Does that not strike you as stupid?
This is like searching a history book written in 1720 looking for a country that came into existence in 1960. Dumb.
Now watch the genius do his shuck and jive again. Pretend he doesn't see the answer, post the verse in bold again, and repeat his silly conclusion.
Go Jethro. Jesus was referring to the bible, 500 years before there was a printing press. Lol.
Maybe Jesus should have used the verse numbering system that would not be invented for 300 years when he spoke. That may have helped you find it in the book that did not exist then.
Scripture is every word that has come out of the mouth of God, but not every word out of the mouth of God is in the Bible.
This silliness reminds me of an old joke.
A man comes home one evening to find his neighbor on his hands and knees searching his lawn.
"Did you lose something neighbor?" Says the man.
"My car keys" replies his neighbor. So he gets down on the lawn and searches too.
After several minutes of fruitless searching, the man, a little exasperated, says, "where exactly did you lose your keys neighbor?"
"Over on my lawn" replies the neighbor.
"If you lost your keys over there, why are you searching for them on my lawn?"
The neighbor replies with a shrug, "The light is better here."
Stephen is searching for the verse in the wrong place because he needs to hop up a fake dilemma for the bible.
Keep searching Jethro. The light is better in the bible.
Created:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
The attention ....lady of the night... goes berserk. Lol.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Glad you do. But it had nothing to do with "manipulating mods"
Must be why you were warned.
Yes I can see why YOU would believe that to be "negative".
OK Jethro. You asked, why was Satan not expelled from Judas. I show to you scripture says Judas left immediately. You pretend not to see it. Hilarious.
But you are not the first to accuse me...
Why am I not surprised at that? Lol.
The thread is there, and will remain there. Your lies and your ignorance are there. Maybe you're trolling, maybe you have a mental problem, I don't know which it is, but your cluelessness is apparent.
You said scripture did not explain, then you had to pretend you didn't see the explanation. I embarrassed you.
Lying will do that on a site that permanently records the things you post.
Stalking? I can go to any thread I believe I have some input or where I see blatant hypocrisy.
Lol. OK. I have been trained for this. It's no wonder you're always at Stephen's threads.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I know. So they have done bad things. We have too. They were desperate. Let it go.They were in the middle of a war and the US wasn't involved. They wanted to bomb our ship and blame it on another country to spark outrage and get our intervention.
Under Saddam Hussein's rule, Israel regarded Iraq as a major security threat.
Iraq was not their war. You're reaching.
Actually, it is billions every year. How about we give aid to none of those instead?
I would not agree. Israel is a friendly nation who gives us valuable counter terrorist intelligence. We want to encourage democracy in that region.
I would be cool to not giving one red cent to any Muslim country though.
My problem is with Israelis, more specifically their leaders. Not Jews. But nice attempted slander.
Sorry. I did not intend to slander you, but your gripes seem trumped up. The anger at historical events, the lame "fought their wars" thin excuse, all point to more than just rational reasons. Your reasons seem more emotional.
What is an ethno state?
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
So you're saying they are a theocracy since Judaism is a religion and Israel is a Jewish state?
No. I'm saying your claim that they are an ethnostate is wrong, so I asked you what you meant by "ethno state".
America is a Christian country but not a theocracy.
I don't particularly like the country that purposely bombed an American ship,...
That bombing was years ago. Every country has bad in their past. How long will you hold a grudge?
Are you still angry at America for what it did to Native Americans? Or to the Japanese?
I know the history of Israel. And I know the contexts of those incidents.
...has us fight their wars, takes billions of dollars every year, and more.
I don't know what war America has ever fought for Israel, the 3 times Israel fought wars with its neighbors, it was only Israel fighting.
And I'm way more OK with the millions we give to Israel than the millions we've given to undemocratic, terrorist states like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Somalia.
I'm beginning to think your issue might be the Semitic part of the equation.
Created:
-->
@PGA2.0
Because none of them are interested in actual debate. All they want is a podium to spew invectives at God.I've gone down this road too many times and no one sticks with the discussion.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
I only have one question.
When Jesus says in John 7:38, "scripture", what is He referring to?
It cannot be what Stephen is "searching" as it would be more than 300 years before the bible would exist when Jesus said this.
In fact, when Jesus said this, the Torah had not even been divided into verses yet.
So Jesus was clearly not referring to the thing Stephen is searching.
The confusion stems from ignorance about how the bible came about, and what "scripture" is.
Scripture is every word that has come out of the mouth of God, but not every word out of the mouth of God is in the Bible.
Because he is ignorant (I do not mean that in a pejorative way) he thinks the word Jesus used, "scripture", means "Bible", it doesn't, and cannot. The bible did not exist then, and would not exist for hundreds of years.
Now given this, look at how ludo posts. Another ignorant validating the ignorant. And this is why Stephen posts, for the uninformed comments he'll get from the choir.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
The OP did not say that the Big bang theory posited something from nothing. He said it has no explanation for something from nothing. We know the universe was not always here, yet now it is. Didn't you say,..Big bang theory doesn’t posit something from nothing. No issue.
Obviously no logic required either. So now there is life, why is your assumption of abiogenesis correct? Especially when no instance of abiogenesis has ever been observed in all of history?We have evidence that there once wasn’t life and evidence that there was life. No faith required.
We also observe order from chaos as well. Crystals form intricate and regular structures, random rules can create order geometric shapes. There is no violation of scientific principle.
Shapes are not order. You simply call one shape "order" over another. In the context of the OP, "order" is analogous to information. Information cannot come about from chaos.
Well, that’s just like, your opinion, man.
It may also be his opinion, but he is correct. We are made of atoms. Atoms cannot think, or feel, or love. The OP said,
No matter how organized, it is impossible for physical material to produce the immaterial realities of human consciousness. Our morality, beliefs, desires and preferences all exist outside of mere physical matter.
Though no one can yet explain how this is so, the fact remains that our consciousness exists outside of mere physical matter.
These are brute facts that cannot be dismissed by materialists.
Created:
Posted in:
Triangle describes himself as anti-Democracy, and opposed to both capitalism and socialism.
I can't figure out if its the democratic, the capitalist, or the semitic parts about Israel that bother him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Take a hike Ethang >>>>>
Hit the road Jack >>>>
No.
Bolding will not give you authority. Stop pretending you can tell anyone what to do. Your time would be better spent on improving your grammar.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
So you do not know the reason, and dismiss and disbelieve the reason they gave, but suspect that they just wanted to keep Christians out and are using this as a lame excuse.
You usually think much better than this.
If Israel has info that there will be an attack on Christian pilgrimage, or that Palestinians would use the approval for Christians to demand something that would be detrimental to Israel, they would be right to refuse permission.
They are an ethnostate,...
What does this mean?
Israelis are multi-ethnic. No ethnicity is refused citizenship. Israel is a Jewish state, Judaism is a religion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
No. I would say the two are not logically related even though it may look so from the perspective of the created.Question one: Would you say that a universe where 100% of the space is suitable for life is proof that universe was created for the purpose of hosting life?
My house was designed by me. It has a swimming pool and a fireplace, both locations unsuitable for my life.
Life may be only part of the reason for the creation of the universe.
Created:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Perhaps if they mentioned the details, some of their intelligence gathering would be compromised?The very general claim of "security concerns". Not sure if that is actually a concern for them, but whatever.
But they are the ones who have missiles raining down on them, and are surrounded by hostile countries, and have sleeper cells launching random knife attacks.... So sure, whatever.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
What if I want to? See, if you bury a falsehood inside a paragraph and I don't address it, you (and others) are going to think I agree with that falsehood.You really don't have to split up the discussion into 50 different comments lmao
By this logic, the natives should have the right to form a native-American nationalist state and kick out all other Americans.
They do. The land is theirs. But the kick out part is your spin. Are the "other Americans" trying to annihilate all native-americans?
The fact that you call them "native-americans" when they preceded the American state shows your lack of understanding and bias.
However, Palestinians could arguably trace their heritage to the original Jewish inhabitants.
Of course. But that only reinforces my point that the Jews were there first and that the land is theirs.
The Jewish settlers in Palestine were not quite exactly genetically the same as the original Jews.
My point concerns only the original Jews, whom you admit preceded Palestinians and later non-ethnic Jews. Thanks.
If you're making the argument that the land is Jewish on a religious rather than ancestral/ethnic basis (quite stupid coming from a Christian anyways)...
Lol. Or it would be if the Christian had made that argument. You're dying to have "God" introduced aren't you? Deal with the argument before you, not the one you're wishing for.
In the context of Palestine, however, there is more solidarity between Muslims and Christians provided their similar ethnicity and common enemy of Zionists.
Its always hilarious to watch reporters interviewing Christians in Israel asking them how they feel about Muslims.
Christians in London and Oslo are terrified of offending Muslims, how much more Christians surrounded by Muslims in Israel?
Christians in Israel do not view Zionists as their enemies. That is your skewed view.
The Palestinian Christian population was around 10% prior to Jewish settlement. It's decreased since the state of Israel was declared.
The 3 times the surrounding Muslim countries have attacked Israel have had no effect have they? Or the multiple attacks on Christian churches and Christians? Do you know any Muslim country where Christians have increased?
Man you really are blinded by partisan politics, barely even being able to tell I was making a joke lmao
I was too. Notice only you laughed?
My bigger point was that conservative American Evangelicals have almost no sympathy for Palestinian Christians since they've been largely brainwashed by JIDF propaganda to support Zionism and dehumanize Palestinians. They've been so deluded as to support oppressors of a Jewish apartheid above their own fellow Christians.
Yeah. Everyone else is deluded but you. If Christians in Israel view Zionists as enemies and Muslims as friends, why don't they go stay with their brothers in Gaza?
The only one brainwashed is you buddy. You are siding with a murderous, terroristic state, known for atrocities all over the world, and are against a modern democratic state that has the rule of law and protects the freedoms of its citizens.
Here is a simple question.
If a Palestinian citizen of Israel felt that the government was apartheid, could he say so in public without fear of attack?
Could Palestinian citizen of Gaza or the West Bank do the same in Palestine?
The fact that you even use the silly word "apartheid" in relation to Israel shows your brainwashed state.
America has been reversing those silly liberal ideas in the last 3 years. Embassy in Jerusalem, Golan Heights, anti-semetic hate laws, Jerusalem as capital of Israel, Israeli Settlements in Israel legal....
More is coming. At the end, squatters have to understand that they will not take the home of another just by obstinacy.
Created:
-->
@triangle.128k
So triangle doesn't know. Does anyone?
And if you do, does the reason matter?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
No, I will continue to post here for as long as I like. Until you realize you aren't boss, and no one has to do what you like.
Also, stop saying "we" and "us". No one is with you. No one follows you. You mentor no one. You're just a weird guy on the net who knows much less than he actually does.
Immature air farts is all of you have to offer us
I guess this is your example of a mature significant thing to say. Lol.
And by the way, both Trump and Johnson won. Ditto again for 2020. Your world view will need some work.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
I said nothing about moderators or reposting. And I don't threaten people I don't know.Stop threatening me. It is against the rules to threaten anyone with reporting to moderators.
I remember. You and a few others tried to manipulate the mods into banning others. It looks like this old dog has not learned any new tricks.I have had a warning for doing this over a year ago.
If you don't want negative consequences, don't do negative things. Stalking is a bad, unreasonable thing to do.
You can keep lying until you're blue in the face, my answers from scripture will be in the posts up on the board showing you to be a fake and a fraud.
I don't care what you say, I only care that up on the board, in clear black and white, your own posts call you a liar, and my posts show you as a fake.
Those things you can't change.
Created:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
EVERYBODY FOCUS ON ME...... FOCUS ON ME.
Lol. If only you could slob after attention without riding on Jesus' coattails. Without Jesus, you'd have committed suicide long ago out of lack of attention.
Tell him its from me.
I'm sure He'll be relieved He can pay His rent this month. Thanks!
But you're still in a group called Dart. Do you think its the only group that debates? Or only your debates are relevant? Yes?
Do you guys meet on discord too? PM maybe? Lol.
They say loons do not know they're loony. But reading their own loony posts later, it doesn't ring a bell?
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Stop being bitter. Your slop was to post stupidity to clueless atheists. I know the bible, so I show you up for the fake you are. I'm not the one causing you to dodge questions or post fakery.
I just got rid of a 2nd stalker, let's hope I don't have to work on you too.
Created:
-->
@DynamicSquid
Notice, our genius didn't answer you.How will you give money to Jesus?
You could have asked him how he knows that Jesus loves cash. But he wouldn't have answered that either.
Deb doesn't address questions. Deb only posts slander, and then nonsense, then out. Only to repeat the tired silliness in another post when an "episode" hits him/her.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Because Armageddon is in two weeks?I mean, what is the point of giving everything away to the "poor" when there will be nowhere for the poor to spend what you have given them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Can you emphatically prove that all Christian Conservatives are not fascists?
Sure. Look at the definitions of fascist and Christian Conservative, they are mutually exclusive concepts.
But if you have a private definition for Christian Conservative, then never mind.
Created:
-->
@triangle.128k
Why did Israel do it?
Does the reason matter to you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
@Barney
Though I understand the necessity of keeping "distance" between two parties with friction, it seems a person who has behaved perfectly can have an RO instated against them by a disgruntled member.
I am a Christian, so I address challenges made to Christianity. Some member doesn't like that, and requests an RO against me, though I've behaved in no way that violates the CoC.
And I get restricted for no illegal behavior.
Even worse is someone else misbehaving, like insulting or stalking me, and because RO's are reciprocal, I get restricted when he does though I was the victim in the episode. It seems this system could be tweaked to not be so punitive of members who have not done anything worthy of being under an RO.
I'm afraid trolls and unstable people will learn how to use RO's as a weapon against others.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Yet another post devoid of anything sensible to say.
Like the climate alarmists at COP, you will not understand why the countries did not respond to your wild-eyed rants about climate.
You will go the way of all the other fad surfing chicken littles before you.
Now that you've policed yourself on your weird illogical symbols in your posts, take a look at your spelling and grammar. Your posts are already borderline unreadable.
Hot air is what you have to offer us.
Us who? There is no one with you. Hardly anyone even responds to you. If you keep behaving like a street corner alarmist, soon, no one will talk to you at all.
No one is "offering" anything to you. You aren't vetting anyone. Pay more attention to your hair-brained posts and poor reading comprehension.
Created:
Posted in:
Now its Global Warming, aka, climate change. Yawn. Wake me 15 minutes before the world ends.
Above is what you stated. Denial of truth makes you look foolish.
I denied nothing in my statement above. But I will defer to the expert on looking foolish.
Pleasetry again when your not so confused and have any actual rational, logical. common sense of relevant significance. Thanks.
Bolding doesn't make you more credible. Logical things are not things you like. The only one here confused is you. I did not compare global warming with nuclear winter, I said I was old enough to remember the world going after both fads.
We need mature adults to reply meaningful, considerate comments.
We who? Is the gibberish you post mature and meaningful?
I first read of greenhouse effect i Bucky Fullers book "Critical Path" 1979.
Yes, you mention your idol in every other post. B. Fuller was an eccentric loon.
You appear to asleep at....
You've used that tired insult too often. So I dismissed you. If you are going to admonish people to reply with reply meaningful, considerate comments, it helps if your own comments aren't inconsiderate and meaningless.
You aren't the boss, and no one has to do what you like, or meet any standard you've set. And you don't have the right to begin insulting them when your believe they haven't satisfied you.
Calm down. Write in English, take off the striped shirt, and remember, no one cares about Mr. Fuller.
Created:
Posted in:
Not only have the mods been prompt and correct on their recent bans, they have been fair. And that is what was missing.
Supa is a great guy, and TRN is caustic, but no one is above the law and no one gets preferential treatment.
When it comes to modding the board, mods should have no friends OR enemies.
TO THE MODS:
There is always lag between good moderation and symptoms of it on the site. Give yourself time, don't become discouraged. Remember good work is its own reward.
Good job.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I have no problem with your distinctions.
Please categorize these public figures for me. Are they liberal or leftist?
Nancy Polosi
Adam Shiff
Barack Obama
Jerry Nadler
Can one categorize organizations? How about....
CNN?
MSNBC?
HUFF POST?
VOX?
Thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
No, you are. I said, "I'm old enough to remember 3 previous "scares"...."Huh? Your confused between nuclear annihilation via hydrogen bombs on land and at sea and resultants of greenhouse effect.
Reading comprehension can be your friend. Really.
Created:
Posted in:
My questions to Yang would be....
1. Why limit UBI? If its s good, why shouldn't the government simply print up money and give it to people?
2. Why wouldn't the trickle-up theory work with that situation?
3. The UBI seems to violate the most basic tenants of economics, the laws of supply and demand.
a. If you gave away free money, the value of money depreciates. (Inflation)
b. If you increase taxes, fewer people pay taxes.
c. If wealth generators are not adequately compensated, they will cease generating wealth.
These common and well known facts make UBI's the economic equivalent of the perpetual motion machine. Impossible.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Paul
The problem I have with what you are saying is that I've never seen or read about people being people without a brain.
You're having a problem with that because no one has said it. Look up the definition of "personhood" in philosophy.
If it were possible to be a person without a brain I think all of us would know about it.
How would we all "know" about it?
I did not say we are persons without brains, I said brains are the necessary interface needed for communication between persons.
You just keep stating that people can be people without a brain, but you aren't providing any explanations,
That's because of two mistakes you 're making. First, "person" is not the same as "personhood", and second, I've never said that people can be people without a brain.
...but you aren't providing any explanations, demonstrations or argument
That is what my computer processor analogy is about Paul. I've had to repeat myself because you keep failing to get it. But I see you aren't able to grasp it, at least not now.
It's no biggie. Thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
Only 12 more years until Global Warming doomsday folks.
Antarctica is going to be a paradise.
I'm old enough to remember 3 previous "scares" the nuclear horror of the 50's and the over-population explosion of the 70's, and the aids apocalypse of the 80's.
Now its Global Warming, aka, climate change. Yawn. Wake me 15 minutes before the world ends.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
He can't answer you, he's been banned. I tried to alert him, he didn't listen.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
You have been answered. Stupidly re-asking doesn't make you look smarter. Pretending I have not debunked your nonsense doesn't change the fact.
You do the same dumb thing every time, pretend you don't see the answer, and then claim I haven't answered, and then stupidly re-post the question.
I guess you're thinking you're fooling someone. You're empty Stephen. Vacuous.
Created: