This is an awesome debate topic. Although it may be harder on a pro position , making the topic about having multiple sex with one partner only is interesting.
I dont see anyone touching this. As another said, the topic is not really debatable. Nor is it an issue brought up by those who argue against any trans position
Are you saying confidential recordings that are historical like recently released documents on u.f.o.'s or confidential files that happen to be about historical recordings that may be open to the public?
Yes. But not now. I just got into others and hit my limit. I dont want to say when I can do it or when to schedule it as I can not predict my schedule.
Thanks for input.
I must point out that I tried to indicate that pro comments on the "bad" things in socialism are applied only to communism not socialism as a whole - example is the intro "debunk" philosophies of karl marx which is explicitly communism as marx indixates socialism is a stepping stone for communism even though there is no explocit need to jump from one to the other.
Yes I understand my position may have seemed too generalized or jumped around. I was trying to prevent a single image of socialism. That single image would always be compared to communism or fascism in some way.
Otherwise thanks for pointing out weakpoints. I will reread and compare arguements. Thanks again.
This is an awesome debate topic. Although it may be harder on a pro position , making the topic about having multiple sex with one partner only is interesting.
I look forward to reading this
If this just goes to forfiet I would like to try at debate after current one. You open?
This may be good for forum
Yay
Hey would you be available or wish to skip this debate?
So how does this work if you are con?
I know. I know. They move before us before we notice. quicker than the blink of an eye, some would say. Or as quick as.
You all forgot the most distinct characteristic that men have which women do not. Amazing eyelashes.
I did not expect such a quick turn around. Lol
No worries. That happens.
Are they available?
Sure. I'd have to ask for 3 days or more between rounds. I can only put in so much time per debate.
If time between debate was extended, Id join. But do whats good for you.
Any more debates like this? Looks fun
Huh. I guess I was off on my math. Thats ok.
I put my best foot forward.
Hey Slainte. I hope to see you double down and post like I didn't miss the round.
I was just going to add more videos and elaborate the connection between repetitive exposure in subtle suggestions and exposure to imagery.
Thanks again for accepting the debate.
I dont see anyone touching this. As another said, the topic is not really debatable. Nor is it an issue brought up by those who argue against any trans position
Awesome. I look forward to seeing it. Good luck.
Thats a poor vote.
Pro is trying to do something
Con doesn't provide anything until the end
Pro probably got tired of behavior they did not expect or wanted
Kinda wish this was a debate
What is thbt?
What is on balance?
Any criterias or concerns or themes?
Are you saying confidential recordings that are historical like recently released documents on u.f.o.'s or confidential files that happen to be about historical recordings that may be open to the public?
Yes. But not now. I just got into others and hit my limit. I dont want to say when I can do it or when to schedule it as I can not predict my schedule.
When I am free, I can send message about it.
Does that mean math exists outside of humanity?
Will there be another one of theses?
I dont think Ill make deadline but lets see. Errrrr.
Im sorry I missed my time.
We can set up another debate after my other debate concludes. I can only handle two debates at a time.
Hey thanks for accepting challenge
My bad. I thought my post had gone through, sorry to make ya wait longer.
I feel like Mall will say I concede or forfiet the debate instead of the validity of the questions themselves.
Does your position require an answer to move forward?
Thanks for input.
I must point out that I tried to indicate that pro comments on the "bad" things in socialism are applied only to communism not socialism as a whole - example is the intro "debunk" philosophies of karl marx which is explicitly communism as marx indixates socialism is a stepping stone for communism even though there is no explocit need to jump from one to the other.
Yes I understand my position may have seemed too generalized or jumped around. I was trying to prevent a single image of socialism. That single image would always be compared to communism or fascism in some way.
Otherwise thanks for pointing out weakpoints. I will reread and compare arguements. Thanks again.
Cool thanks. Is there anything specific you wanted to see in the debate but maybe was missing?
Change time between arguements, increasing availability. Then I will accept. Life, you know .
Any comments on context would be helpful for those reading or voting
What is meant by preservative? Just asking.
I am not sure how @ mention works but letting you know I asked a question.
I dont mind giving a go at this but I just accepted another debate with you. Would that be a problem?
Probably want pg
I might join if the ending is explained. Like you mean according to the words in the bible?