Total votes: 15
While pro does not provided enough argument , but con written round 1 argument fully by AI, and round 2 argument in more than likely to be written by ai 60%. so i consider argument as a tie. more over in round 2 con does not explain his argument he moreover criticise pro. in conduct wise pro is won. Con failed to say why he used ai. using ai in some parts to beautify is acceptable.
Debate is incomplete.
Though con forfeited ,i think that is mutually accepted by both because pro said to skip, i consider this debate as 3 rounds. In starting pro asks questions out of topic and he does not give relation to questions in first round , source are given only con ,he given definition form some web and mentioned it, but i can't accept it as source. conduct of con is visible from first round itself. Legibility is good for both but con's is better. it is not on how long is argument, i consider con's argument is catchy ,detailed and suits topic well. pro doesn't able to argue better in first round.
Both pro and con are out of topic, poor argument, legibility and sources, i consider it as tie.
As con is forfeited , this debate is incomplete I can't make a judgement, but argument of both are not catchy ,but con's argument.,. was better than pro, but this debate can't be decided on a single round. so I consider it as tie.
As con is forfeited ,I will consider total debate as a single round. Con's argument was catchy and explained with a example, but pro neglected con's reason and con didn't given any explanation in second round ,so the debate is incomplete, so I could not select winner of debate, but from my view pro produced some sources and good arguments.
I can't understand pro's first round, since both of them accept each others argument especially pro, so I consider this debate as 2 rounds and it is tie.
Debate is not completed neither started, pro doesn't made any effort to start debate. so it is illegal , he tries to increase win %.
Topic selection by pro itself says he is winner, con failed to give logical arguments.
no argument, con is just asking questions.
Pro clearly explained his point of view
topic selection itself says pro is winner