This is a Casual debate: No moderation is allowed in this topic, Removing of votes ,or removing of comments is not allowed in this debate.
A person who accepts this debate also accept above rule. This is a casual debate.
I informed you to consult fauxlaw before you removed his vote in second time in comment, I strictly said to consult or ask me / fauxlaw before removing his vote second time , but you removed without asking us. Why you gave power to vote, Do you think all people has preferences like you , or If you want to follow rules 100% , then you need robot, humans can't vote.
you need to read this debate fully , If my opponent forfeites all rounds and i also forfeited all round,then there is no debate at all , no winner , or no loser, no damage to anyone., i asked to consider" ok and blank " as forfeit , if opponent forfeites all rounds and i argued in only one round , then i am winner .
I strongly object your act of removing fauxlaw's vote. Your reason was my sources are not strong, sources for each topic changes, and this topic is within this site , and no one can provide sources from external websites. I provided sources to support my argument in round 3. I provided links to expose that loophole, for this kind of debate I can't provide research papers, and con not gave any sources . As con is forfeited by rule , one conduct comes to me. As fauxlaw is a senior, high experienced voter, he will analyze his votes completely from round 1 to last. Removing his vote without prior asking him is worst. If you have any doubts about his vote anymore ,ask him or me before removing.
My sources are:
Check in round 3
you should be winner,. anyone can use chatbot as a tool like pen , but idea, words should be yours, the purpose of debating should not be spoiled by ai, debating improves some of your skills. we can use chat gpt for decorations , mistake checking purposes.
I am very sad to miss round 2, I accept my defeat, congratulations to chat knight buddy, I am really sad to miss it. and regretted for wasting time of judges and con, If con wish we can recreate this debate with more rounds and more interval periods,.
Thanks, you shared your experience , I usually think experience is valuable than any, on all fields including life. I want to know how to get our Miss whether we want to rush to find our love or we want to wait for her. Living for me or living for us [family] which you selected and why,.
"💪 Power or Weakness is a Mindset
In nature, no one is born powerful or permanently weak. These are not fixed labels.
Anyone can become strong — it depends on the mindset, effort, and experience."
moreover fauxlaw added his own words like[ "fitness" does not necessarily equate to greater strength, but greater will. Thus,
pro's superior argument "Power or Weakness is a Mindset."] he say these are said by pro, but pro tells nothing of these.
Remove the vote of fauxlaw, i think he is confused , in his reason he saying that pro said" power or weakness is a mindset" but you can check pro never said this in his argument, that is told in my argument, how can he vote for pro by saying my arguments.
Reason:
I consider this a 2-round debate. Both debaters started off well. The Pro gave detailed arguments like "water is not dry, so it must be wet" and "water makes other things wet, so it is wet." But in Round 1, the Con responded effectively by saying, “Fire makes things burn, but fire itself isn’t burned.”
This debate mainly focused on popular beliefs rather than strong factual evidence. Although the Pro included some sources, they were mostly dictionary definitions and he didn’t explain why he chose them. Also, the Pro failed to properly explain why water is not dry — he just kept repeating the same idea without solid reasoning or scientific backing. In Round 2, the Pro repeated his earlier points, and the Con almost forfeited without completing his arguments.
Overall, the debate felt incomplete. The Con’s argument was simple and catchy, but both sides lacked depth and didn't build their cases properly. Since the debate was unfinished and mostly based on opinions or common myths, I’m voting for a tie. In terms of conduct and legibility, it's also a tie. I can't fully accept sources that are just dictionary definitions without proper explanation.
Removal of vote of pierree by barney is not acceptable, Barney saying vote is not well defined, It is totally understandable. As per voting policy forfeiture reduces conduct point, pierree mentioned it,anyone can accept this vote except brainless Barney, A cheapest moderator, brainless idiot not considered pierree's effort and time, but barney voted by just saying forfeiture.
Reason:
Both pro and con explained their views shortly in round 2, so i consider argument of pro and con as tie, neither of the above produced sources, due to forfeiture of pro from round 1 itself also pro forfeits 50% debate so in conduct wise con is won, Also con strongly argued against pro by saying women have major role in pregnancy. considering all these factors i vote for con.
This is a two round debate
I already said no one will accept this debate,
This is a Casual debate: No moderation is allowed in this topic, Removing of votes ,or removing of comments is not allowed in this debate.
A person who accepts this debate also accept above rule. This is a casual debate.
I informed you to consult fauxlaw before you removed his vote in second time in comment, I strictly said to consult or ask me / fauxlaw before removing his vote second time , but you removed without asking us. Why you gave power to vote, Do you think all people has preferences like you , or If you want to follow rules 100% , then you need robot, humans can't vote.
I am out from this debate , delete this
pure cheating. removed votes that favoured me .
you need to read this debate fully , If my opponent forfeites all rounds and i also forfeited all round,then there is no debate at all , no winner , or no loser, no damage to anyone., i asked to consider" ok and blank " as forfeit , if opponent forfeites all rounds and i argued in only one round , then i am winner .
I could argue seriously , if i forget you want to remind me
I strongly object your act of removing fauxlaw's vote. Your reason was my sources are not strong, sources for each topic changes, and this topic is within this site , and no one can provide sources from external websites. I provided sources to support my argument in round 3. I provided links to expose that loophole, for this kind of debate I can't provide research papers, and con not gave any sources . As con is forfeited by rule , one conduct comes to me. As fauxlaw is a senior, high experienced voter, he will analyze his votes completely from round 1 to last. Removing his vote without prior asking him is worst. If you have any doubts about his vote anymore ,ask him or me before removing.
My sources are:
Check in round 3
you should be winner,. anyone can use chatbot as a tool like pen , but idea, words should be yours, the purpose of debating should not be spoiled by ai, debating improves some of your skills. we can use chat gpt for decorations , mistake checking purposes.
no one will accept this debate
sorry, due to some issues I delayed argument.
This would be a spicy debate
not safer than any other common transports road, sea, track.
To Wylted : I think you confused with me, I am an Indian , in India there are several languages, and in our state we speak Tamil, Idk Hindi. :),
we can copy first round of this debate, and continue next rounds in new debate.
I am very sad to miss round 2, I accept my defeat, congratulations to chat knight buddy, I am really sad to miss it. and regretted for wasting time of judges and con, If con wish we can recreate this debate with more rounds and more interval periods,.
Thanks, you shared your experience , I usually think experience is valuable than any, on all fields including life. I want to know how to get our Miss whether we want to rush to find our love or we want to wait for her. Living for me or living for us [family] which you selected and why,.
I publish after 12 hours but within 15 hours.
Thank you
I can't create forum, it not showing any button
IDK about what is forum, And IDK how to start it, Can you tell about it.
Thank you for sharing this, This would be helpful, I wish for best future to you.
Why you not continued your navy job?
quick buddy
I post argument within 8 hrs
I collected information from several sites, including wikipedia , google, chat gpt, recovo.
What is cute'
Enjoy trip , don't waste your time for people like me, i have more time these days, so i am freee
meow whiteflame
sorry , i not know about your situation
ok, If any other ask you will remove quick , if i ask you will question 100 times.
Its time to remove vote, he can revote as you[whiteflame] found the mistake.
here evening
how my argument makes opponent win ,
"💪 Power or Weakness is a Mindset
In nature, no one is born powerful or permanently weak. These are not fixed labels.
Anyone can become strong — it depends on the mindset, effort, and experience."
This is said by me, check my argument.
he said that pro is saying that sentence, but pro not said that or related to it, in fact that is said by me
Are you wish to continue this debate.
fauxlaw is creating new arguments , instead of analyzing the arguments.
moreover fauxlaw added his own words like[ "fitness" does not necessarily equate to greater strength, but greater will. Thus,
pro's superior argument "Power or Weakness is a Mindset."] he say these are said by pro, but pro tells nothing of these.
Remove the vote of fauxlaw, i think he is confused , in his reason he saying that pro said" power or weakness is a mindset" but you can check pro never said this in his argument, that is told in my argument, how can he vote for pro by saying my arguments.
very short debate
Thanks for your detailed report.
English is just a language , it does not reflect your intelligence.
I am eager to debate.
Reason:
I consider this a 2-round debate. Both debaters started off well. The Pro gave detailed arguments like "water is not dry, so it must be wet" and "water makes other things wet, so it is wet." But in Round 1, the Con responded effectively by saying, “Fire makes things burn, but fire itself isn’t burned.”
This debate mainly focused on popular beliefs rather than strong factual evidence. Although the Pro included some sources, they were mostly dictionary definitions and he didn’t explain why he chose them. Also, the Pro failed to properly explain why water is not dry — he just kept repeating the same idea without solid reasoning or scientific backing. In Round 2, the Pro repeated his earlier points, and the Con almost forfeited without completing his arguments.
Overall, the debate felt incomplete. The Con’s argument was simple and catchy, but both sides lacked depth and didn't build their cases properly. Since the debate was unfinished and mostly based on opinions or common myths, I’m voting for a tie. In terms of conduct and legibility, it's also a tie. I can't fully accept sources that are just dictionary definitions without proper explanation.
I vote as tie
Removal of vote of pierree by barney is not acceptable, Barney saying vote is not well defined, It is totally understandable. As per voting policy forfeiture reduces conduct point, pierree mentioned it,anyone can accept this vote except brainless Barney, A cheapest moderator, brainless idiot not considered pierree's effort and time, but barney voted by just saying forfeiture.
My vote goes to con
Reason:
Both pro and con explained their views shortly in round 2, so i consider argument of pro and con as tie, neither of the above produced sources, due to forfeiture of pro from round 1 itself also pro forfeits 50% debate so in conduct wise con is won, Also con strongly argued against pro by saying women have major role in pregnancy. considering all these factors i vote for con.
yes
round 2 is not modified by ai