you removed my votes several times for not providing enough reason, but they not provided enough reason , not said why con won. you saying reason instead of them, you can remove their votes, they can revote with enough reason.
I just asked you and some body to vote on this topic, because sometimes topic is not visible. but i neither asked any to vote for me, who complained me ,idk
I not received any warning from you or any moderators, whether you have any evidence that I tried to influence individual voter. I not influenced any person. you know now who is influencing voters.
These arguments are written by a human being called Rohith that is me. You can read arguments fully . But its grammar alone improved by ai. there is no rule in this site policy inhibiting Ai use. but these are arguments are fully written by me by spending my thoughts and time. Round 3 is not edited by ai.
Go and debate on stage why you using this platform. I can't understand why such people opposing use of new technologies , These uncles want to live in stone age, but mistake they are born now.
hereafter you can't delete my vote, I consider all arguments more than twice. It is my final vote . I can't provide essay as reason, i can only shortly tell my reason, there is no rule to produce reason as essay.
Moderators please inform your developers to consider blank space as forfeiture.
ok i finish this, you cannot satisfy my questions as well as i cannot satisfy my opinions to you.
whether ok , and blank space is an argument?
I am not asking reason from you , I asked them to add this reason on their votes. ok provide me a reason why you won't remove their votes
I kindly ask you to remove votes of TheRizzler,Barney,AdaptableRatman
They not provided reason why con won, you are my last trust
idk know why you supporting them.
you removed my votes several times for not providing enough reason, but they not provided enough reason , not said why con won. you saying reason instead of them, you can remove their votes, they can revote with enough reason.
That is totally unfair, you giving reason instead of them
TheRizzler vote should be removed , he not provided reason , why con won
AdaptableRatman vote should be removed, he not provide why con won, he only said pro is forfeited.
Barney's vote should be removed, he provide his reason that pro is failed , but not provided reason why con won.
here pro argues for USA and for India
ok i consider it.
I not received any warning, and no one have right except Truthful moderators alone to warn, i not consider normal persons as warnigs that is advice.
although i tagged them , i not asked to consider in voting,
whether i don't have right to say my opinion in comment, only few sees comment , i not sent that to any single person, are asked to consider to voters
I just asked you and some body to vote on this topic, because sometimes topic is not visible. but i neither asked any to vote for me, who complained me ,idk
Where you found that I am influencing voters
I not received any warning from you or any moderators, whether you have any evidence that I tried to influence individual voter. I not influenced any person. you know now who is influencing voters.
I not used ai in round 1 and 3, used ai in round 2 for improving style. not my words.
These arguments are written by a human being called Rohith that is me. You can read arguments fully . But its grammar alone improved by ai. there is no rule in this site policy inhibiting Ai use. but these are arguments are fully written by me by spending my thoughts and time. Round 3 is not edited by ai.
So many boomers in this world.
Go and debate on stage why you using this platform. I can't understand why such people opposing use of new technologies , These uncles want to live in stone age, but mistake they are born now.
advices are not needed for me now, Thank you
Base essay is written by me and its style and grammar is improved by chatgpt for better understanding of all people.
In this full debate con considered only his perspective he not considered other people, he thinking all people are like him.
ok.
Thanks for your deep analysis on my debate.
I support fauxlaw's opinion.
Yes, i voted in emotions wrongly.
Can you clarify me this topic, I think you saying Powerful people should protect weak people, whether it is mentally or physically.
No any jobs, so robots work for us and each government gives a standard income for all.
Are you ready for next round.
Jonrohith voted by emotions, not provided any reason.
Moozer325 doesn't give reason why he voted for pro, he only says con is forfeit.
TheRizzler voted just against me ,not given any reason
It is an incompleted debate, sorry i voted wrongly ,i should be vote for tie.
"its really good because it could take over our jobs"
It also have this meaning, as ai took our jobs we are stress free, and sophisticated, so ai is good.
Hey Rat
hereafter you can't delete my vote, I consider all arguments more than twice. It is my final vote . I can't provide essay as reason, i can only shortly tell my reason, there is no rule to produce reason as essay.
Base essay is written by me. and enriched its grammar and style by ai for better understanding of all persons.
i publish it in 24 hours,thanks
sorry , i missed it, iparticipate in next round
For this confusion , i started a debate , after that debates complete you must vote on that, ok
You can vote again, but give me a detailed reason,
You not allowing me to make mistakes, thank you. :)
Ok sorry
The base essay is written by me and enriched by chatgpt for better understanding of all people.
Fishchaser reason for vote is not acceptable, he says pro is won due to pro's happiness
Sorry for these happenings. I try to improve . Thats all.