Total posts: 8,696
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
I call the whole question entirely irrelevant to Christianity. If Christ thought it was important for people to perceive him as a magic triplet god, he would have said so. It's only important to people who want to focus on the doctrine of monotheism and scriptural precision instead of listening to and believing in the Sermon on the Mount.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
-->@oromagiWe can agree that you don't know why.I mean you’re the one comparing football to a “groundbreaking affront to democracy, not me.”
No. You said the rating were terrible when in fact they were comparable to the best weekly television ratings. We agree that you are incapable of the insight required to wonder why you lie Trump instinctively.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Idk why you thought that was supposedly a flex
We can agree that you don't know why.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Looks like “democracy” is just as important as Sunday Night Football lmfaoo
Looks like you forgot to apologize for manufacturing fake news.
Created:
Posted in:
CHENEY: In our country, we don’t swear an oath to an individual, or a political party. We take our oath to defend the United States Constitution. And that oath must mean something. Tonight, I say this to my Republican colleagues who are defending the indefensible: There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain.
Greyparrot: Let's talk about something else, please.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
The ratings have been garbage lol.
Nielsen Media Research estimates that at least 20 million households watched the first hearing on traditional television, comparable to the average rating for NBC Sunday Night Football, which ranks as television's number one program.
Created:
Posted in:
plain = VANILLA
we have a problem = Houston
a removable ten plain sacks, phew! - plain =
a removable ten sacks phew-(we have a problem)=
tecksans=
Texans
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
-->@oromagi4 votes on you, full claim
Folks familiar with my style of play know that I've already made my claim, albeit a little concealed by anagrams and crossword puzzle clues.
Created:
Posted in:
There are 12 team that have not won a Superbowl
2 team in NFC North (2 claims of NFC North)
Pie - NFC North - Minnesota Vikings, Detroit Lions
Badger - NFC North - Minnesota Vikings, Detroit Lions
2 teams in NFC South (1 claimed, the other is Panthers)
Grey - NFC South - Atlanta Falcons - Hated Townie
0 teams in NFC East (1 claim)
Barney - NFC East -
1 team in NFC West (3 claim)
SirAnon - NFC West - Arizona Cardinals
Whiteflame - NFC West - Arizona Cardinals
MisterChris- NFC West - Arizona Cardinals
2 team in AFC North(1 claim)
Speedrace - AFC North - Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns
3 teams in AFC South (3 claims)
Danielle - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars,
Oro - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars,
That2 - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houstan Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars,
1 team in AFC East (1 claim)
Earth - AFC East - Buffalo Bills
1 team in AFC West (0 claims)
Created:
Posted in:
There are 12 team that have not won a Superbowl
2 team in NFC North (2 claims of NFC North)
Pie - NFC North - Minnesota Vikings, Detroit Lions
Badger - NFC North - Minnesota Vikings, Detroit Lions
2 teams in NFC South (1 claimed, the other is Panthers)
Grey - NFC South - Atlanta Falcons - Hated Townie
0 teams in NFC East (1 claim)
Barney - NFC East - Dallas Cowboys, Philadelphia Eagles, New York Giants, Washington Commanders
1 team in NFC West (3 claim)
SirAnon - NFC West - San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, Los Angeles Rams, Arizona Cardinals
Whiteflame - NFC West - San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, Los Angeles Rams, Arizona Cardinals
MisterChris- NFC West - San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks, Los Angeles Rams, Arizona Cardinals
2 team in AFC North(1 claim)
Speedrace - AFC North - Pittsburgh Steelers, Baltimore Ravens, Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns
3 teams in AFC South (3 claims)
Danielle - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Indianapolis Colts
Oro - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houston Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Indianapolis Colts
That2 - AFC South - Tennessee Titans, Houstan Texans, Jacksonville Jaguars, Indianapolis Colts
1 team in AFC East (1 claim)
Earth - AFC East - New England Patriots, Miami Dolphins, New York Jets, Buffalo Bills
1 team in AFC West (0 claims)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
If my theory is correct, you are either Packers or Bears and Badger is the one you're not.
Sorry, dumb mistake. I should have said the opposite teams- You and badger are Lions and Vikings.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Texans never made it to the Superbowl.
Did your team ever win a Superbowl?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
-->@oromagiDoes your theory assume GP is town or scum. Cause he’s the only full claimed person
Well, it is a theory about theme, not theme division but if theme is confirmed then I think I can name one scum and that one scum is not GP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
If my theory is correct, you are either Jaguars or Titans and That2 is the other.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
I don't think there are going to be any counter-claims to characters because the mod said he gave scum a pool of teams to pick from iirc.
that's right.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
If my theory is correct, you are either Packers or Bears and Badger is the one you're not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
-->@oromagiSpeed was online, had just asked a question and so, couldn't claim afk when he ignored my request.This is an answer
To your question, yes. When I answered WF's question, I could assume he'd already picked up on the obvious bits.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
That doesn’t answer the question.
It did, in fact. WF asked for a reason and I gave him one. H
Why Speed over Barney and Earth?
Speed was online, had just asked a question and so, couldn't claim afk when he ignored my request.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Do you have a reason why you're pursuing Speed?
I have a theory on theme but I'd like to see a team from a division with only one claimant to increase confidence.
Created:
Posted in:
Dashboard
oromagi AFC South Houston Texans
TOWN______Division__Claim____________Role
Whiteflame NFC West
SCUM______Division__Claim____________Role
Created:
Posted in:
I think I have the theme figured out. I predict the last two claims will be AFC East and AFC West.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
That means "feast of music". You wouldn't do in Ireland.
Oh I would do Ireland nicely. I was at my own Flea de Che's oil last night at a very nice house party- live band, good tequila.
Um, what's your conference and division, please?
Created:
Posted in:
- Pie kicks right off with asking for claims without rationale- sus
- The last time Badger claimed hangover he was scum -sus
- It seems like Greyparrot has claimed HATED in two or three recent games with him- sus
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
@badger
Claim your conference and division, then popcorn someone else.
Conference already claimed- AFC South
popcorn badger
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
-->@oromagiWake up
I'm up! working that second cup of coffee now
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
It does seem odd. If anyone was to be hated, I would have expected the Patriots.
Pats and Raiders are scum for sure
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
VTL Supa cause he’s gay and it’s pride month
Supa is an alternate and not in this game (yet).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
@Speedrace
@MisterChris
@SirAnonymous
Nice to see you!
Created:
Posted in:
First Rule of DART mafia: Speedrace is always scum
Second Rule of DART mafia: lol is Pie's scum tell
Third Rule of DART mafia: Greyparrot is always hated
Fourth Rule of DART mafia: Oromagi is always town
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Supadudz although Supadudz is only an alternate right now so....
(a removable ten plain sacks, phew!)
UNVOTE
Dashboard
Votes:
Greyparrot (1/7) - Speedrace,
Danielle (1/7) - Badger,
Supadudz (1/7) - ILikePie5,
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Mafia mafia (famous godfathers and mafioso)
Godfather mafia (characters from the movie)
Netflix documentaries mafia
Egyptian pharoahs mafia
Egyptian pantheon mafia
Books of the Old Testament mafia
Airplane disasters mafia
Ant species mafia
Charles Dickens mafia
Crew of the Pequod mafia
Master and Commander: the Far SIde of the World mafia
Actors who have portrayed Batman mafia
Incarnations of Doctor Who mafia
Exumations/Reburials of Abraham Lincoln mafia
Poems of Emily Dickinson mafia
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
-->@oromagiDoesn’t the US pay farmers not to produce as much crop?
Not this year. Ukraine produces 7% of world's wheat but not much got planted this year. Africa's looking at a 40% in grain supplies next winter. We should be positioning to overproduce for temporary new markets until Putin is dead.
If memory serves me correct on demand for crops go up with the rising population, we can easily produce more without destroying the farmers’ way of making a living for themselves.
Well, as the last couple of years of shown us, shifting the global supply chains is not as straightforward as supply/demand but US farmers do have some capacity to increase production to the extent that La Nina and significant drought allow.
The real question is how do we decrease the World's population by 70-80% ASAP non-violently and without diminishing the quality of life for all?
Created:
TEXAS COPS ADVISE PUBLIC that TOP REPUBLICAN OFFICIALS are LYING about UVALDE MASS MURDER
For Immediate Release
May 31, 2022
Austin TX — At this time, The Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas, or CLEAT, is advising our members to cooperate fully with all official governmental investigations into actions relating to the law enforcement response to the Uvalde mass shooting. Our President, Executive Director, staff attorneys, and union field representatives have been in communication with officers in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy.
Out of respect for the investigative process, the grieving families, and law enforcement as a whole, we have refrained from commenting on specifics related to the massacre of school children in Uvalde, Texas. We share in the collective and powerful oscillating feelings of absolute grief, horror, sympathy, frustration, and outrage over the loss of so many promising, beautiful lives, the loss of innocence of the survivors, and the lack of solid answers, some of which will never seem satisfactory and others we may never have.
There has been a great deal of false and misleading information in the aftermath of this tragedy. Some of the information came from the very highest levels of government and law enforcement. Sources that Texans once saw as iron-clad and completely reliable have now been proven false. This false information has exacerbated ill-informed speculation which has, in turn, created a hotbed of unreliability when it comes to finding the truth. The truth we all can trust. For this reason, we believe that a strong, independent investigation by the U. S. Department of Justice with assistance from the FBI will discover what really happened, thus helping agencies everywhere to understand how best to stop a similar compounded tragedy from happening again.
As a law enforcement organization, we stand behind those professionals who put an end to the assault on Robb Elementary. Without the officers who breached the door and took out the murderer, this already devastating event would have lasted longer and more children would have been lost. We would also like to acknowledge those who are assisting on the ground in Uvalde to help the community heal and those who have increased presence at schools and institutions nationwide. We thank you for taking your role in the protection of your communities seriously, with an honor and dedication befitting the badge.
Last legislative session, we testified in committee about the disparity in training across the State of Texas. While our large cities and urban counties have ample resources and state-of-the-art training, our rural areas suffer. Officers and Deputies are vetted, hired, and trained by political subdivisions and they perform to the level of their training. Training IS confidence. Law enforcement agencies in Texas are para-military and operate in a chain-of-command structure. We are committed to our rank and file members in Uvalde and committed to ensuring all officers who wear the badge are provided with ALL tools and training required to carry out the most dangerous of missions.
Officers swear an oath to protect and serve in a para-military setting where they, as individuals, do not get to make the final decisions. As we continue to wait for the remaining facts on scene to be revealed, we already know that we need more proper funding for fusion centers, more officers conducting threat assessments, a permanent renewal of the heavy, rifle resistant vests, and active cooperation of the federal government. We share a unique connection with the public in pushing for the strongest, best trained, and highly qualified force of law enforcement professionals.
Media Contact:
CLEAT Public Affairs
[email protected]
May 31, 2022
Austin TX — At this time, The Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas, or CLEAT, is advising our members to cooperate fully with all official governmental investigations into actions relating to the law enforcement response to the Uvalde mass shooting. Our President, Executive Director, staff attorneys, and union field representatives have been in communication with officers in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy.
Out of respect for the investigative process, the grieving families, and law enforcement as a whole, we have refrained from commenting on specifics related to the massacre of school children in Uvalde, Texas. We share in the collective and powerful oscillating feelings of absolute grief, horror, sympathy, frustration, and outrage over the loss of so many promising, beautiful lives, the loss of innocence of the survivors, and the lack of solid answers, some of which will never seem satisfactory and others we may never have.
There has been a great deal of false and misleading information in the aftermath of this tragedy. Some of the information came from the very highest levels of government and law enforcement. Sources that Texans once saw as iron-clad and completely reliable have now been proven false. This false information has exacerbated ill-informed speculation which has, in turn, created a hotbed of unreliability when it comes to finding the truth. The truth we all can trust. For this reason, we believe that a strong, independent investigation by the U. S. Department of Justice with assistance from the FBI will discover what really happened, thus helping agencies everywhere to understand how best to stop a similar compounded tragedy from happening again.
As a law enforcement organization, we stand behind those professionals who put an end to the assault on Robb Elementary. Without the officers who breached the door and took out the murderer, this already devastating event would have lasted longer and more children would have been lost. We would also like to acknowledge those who are assisting on the ground in Uvalde to help the community heal and those who have increased presence at schools and institutions nationwide. We thank you for taking your role in the protection of your communities seriously, with an honor and dedication befitting the badge.
Last legislative session, we testified in committee about the disparity in training across the State of Texas. While our large cities and urban counties have ample resources and state-of-the-art training, our rural areas suffer. Officers and Deputies are vetted, hired, and trained by political subdivisions and they perform to the level of their training. Training IS confidence. Law enforcement agencies in Texas are para-military and operate in a chain-of-command structure. We are committed to our rank and file members in Uvalde and committed to ensuring all officers who wear the badge are provided with ALL tools and training required to carry out the most dangerous of missions.
Officers swear an oath to protect and serve in a para-military setting where they, as individuals, do not get to make the final decisions. As we continue to wait for the remaining facts on scene to be revealed, we already know that we need more proper funding for fusion centers, more officers conducting threat assessments, a permanent renewal of the heavy, rifle resistant vests, and active cooperation of the federal government. We share a unique connection with the public in pushing for the strongest, best trained, and highly qualified force of law enforcement professionals.
Media Contact:
CLEAT Public Affairs
[email protected]
Created:
ENCYCLOPEDIA: AP is neither privately owned nor government-funded;
GREYPARROT (without evidence) : sounds like government supported
ENCYCLOPEDIA: A Tomato is not a vegetable but an edible berry
GREYPARROT (without evidence): must be a vegetable, then
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
Must believe. Follow them. Everything they say must be right
Your words, not mine. Blind Trust is right-wing trait.
You asked who fact checks the AP and I responded thousands of media organizations across the political spectrum.
Created:
READERS will note that Novice has deceptively evaded the following arguments:
- No police department, District Attorney's office, or other government agency has characterized the attack as committed by Antifa.
- No local news report characterized the attack as Antifa. Oregonlive.com reported that the few signs they carried suggested left-wing dissatisfaction with the Democratic party.
- Rose City Antifa, the Portland based chapter and the original Antifa group in the US condemned the attack, saying that while some of the participants may consider themselves anti-fascist in ideology, Antifa itself limits its activities to countering right-wing violence and that those hundred or so rioters would be more properly characterized as anarchists.
- Strategically, the action only benefited the Right wing and seems calculated to alienate the Left.
- Tactically, organized and experienced Antifa members don't wear Antifa brand swag when protesting or advertise their plans on social media.
- Your one source lacks any credibility within even conservative leaning media.
- You are citing evidence from a notoriously unreliable sensationalist tabloid.
- The USFG, DOJ, FBI, DHS have declared Jan 6th a terrorist attack but have not done the same regarding any act by Antifa or BLM
- Novice's own sources falsify his thesis
Created:
-->
@Novice
Nothing has been dropped so I shall ignore such a silly tangent
READERS will note that Novice has deceptively evaded the following arguments:
- No police department, District Attorney's office, or other government agency has characterized the attack as committed by Antifa.
- No local news report characterized the attack as Antifa. Oregonlive.com reported that the few signs they carried suggested left-wing dissatisfaction with the Democratic party.
- Rose City Antifa, the Portland based chapter and the original Antifa group in the US condemned the attack, saying that while some of the participants may consider themselves anti-fascist in ideology, Antifa itself limits its activities to countering right-wing violence and that those hundred or so rioters would be more properly characterized as anarchists.
- Strategically, the action only benefited the Right wing and seems calculated to alienate the Left.
- Tactically, organized and experienced Antifa members don't wear Antifa brand swag when protesting or advertise their plans on social media.
- Your one source lacks any credibility within even conservative leaning media.
- You are citing evidence from a notoriously unreliable sensationalist tabloid.
I think most sensible people...
- "most people think" is not a reasoned argument.
QANon....is beneficial to our nation, our schools, our communities and people.
- Fake news death cults are the enemy of democracy, civilization, and reason.
- The core QAnon theory is that a cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic sexual abusers of children operating a global child sex trafficking ring conspired against former U.S. President Donald Trump during his term in office. QAnon has direct roots in Pizzagate, an internet conspiracy theory that appeared one year earlier; it also incorporates elements of many other theories. Some experts have described QAnon as a cult.
BLM rioters and Antifa rioters are quite close to terrorists.
- Let's recall your original assertion was: "other significantly worse [than Jan 6th] atrocities and actions of domestic terrorism such as the Black Lives Matter and Antifa."
- But now you are backtracking "close to terrorists" rather than worse terrorists than Trumpists on Jan 6th.
- The Dept of Justice, DHS, FBI list Jan 6th as an act of domestic terrorism but have never labelled Antifa or BLM as terrorist organizations or any attributed any act of terrorism to either.
I did not even feel the need to provide anything for this seeing at it is essentially a fact.
- Your feelings are not evidence.
Here is clear documentation of Antifa's wild savages calling for violence.An antifa activist group disseminated a message in a Telegram channel on Saturday that encouraged people to consider Minnesota National Guard troops “easy targets,” two Defense Department officials said. The message encouraged activists to steal “kit,” meaning the weapons and body armor used by the soldiers. The officials were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity .
- Anonymous threats that came to nothing is not really evidence for terrorism, is it? Every high school in American fields a couple of similar empty threats a year- is that all much worse than a Right-wing coup in your estimation?
Here are more Antifa terrorists openly admitting to organizing and using violence
- Anonymous is not "openly." Rumours of violence are not acts of violence although Rose City Antifa does state that they endorse the use of violence in response to right wing violence but only in response to right wing violence.
Much of the blame for the chaos, property damage and violence over the last year have landed on the self-described anti-racist, anti-facist far left
- But that's a different attribution than Antifa. If we are counting every anti-Fascist as Antifa than most loyal Americans are Antifa by that definition.
Lastly, from the Washington Post:
- You quote selectively from this article but apparently don't believe most of this article's findings, including
- YOUR SOURCE: "Out of nearly 14,000 racial justice protests in 2020, antifa was identified in just 37, or 0.2 percent. That would not qualify as an infiltration of the Black Lives Matter movement.
- YOUR SOURCE: "Antifa groups use a variety of nonviolent tactics such as “doxing” and other forms of public shaming. They also use violence to oppose fascist organizing, often responding to right-wing violence with similar tactics."
- YOUR SOURCE: "Most of the 2020 racial justice protests were locally organized. Even if protesters chanted or carried signs supporting Black Lives Matter, BLM-affiliated groups were rarely involved. In fact, reports found only about 3 percent of the summer’s 14,000 protests were coordinated by BLM-affiliated groups."
- YOUR SOURCE: "We checked to see whether formal BLM appearances made any difference in a protest’s violence and found no evidence to suggest that it did. When BLM organizations showed up, protests were no more or less violent than when they did not. Both types of events had low levels of violence on every measure."
- YOUR SOURCE: "Extremism is a concern, and right-wing extremism may pose a greater threat, but maligning BLM through association with antifa clearly misses the mark."
Now that you have shifted to more reliable sources, all you have to do is first read and then comprehend those reliable sources you quote here for your thesis to be reduced to ashes.
Created:
-->
@Novice
DROPPED ARGUMENTS:
- No police department, District Attorney's office, or other government agency has characterized the attack as committed by Antifa.
- No local news report characterized the attack as Antifa. Oregonlive.com reported that the few signs they carried suggested left-wing dissatisfaction with the Democratic party.
- Rose City Antifa, the Portland based chapter and the original Antifa group in the US condemned the attack, saying that while some of the participants may consider themselves anti-fascist in ideology, Antifa itself limits its activities to countering right-wing violence and that those hundred or so rioters would be more properly characterized as anarchists.
- Strategically, the action only benefited the Right wing and seems calculated to alienate the Left.
- Tactically, organized and experienced Antifa members don't wear Antifa brand swag when protesting or advertise their plans on social media.
- Your one source lacks any credibility within even conservative leaning media.
- You are citing evidence from a notoriously unreliable sensationalist tabloid.
Moving the goalposts, essentially an admission that I was right.
- You said "Antifa was undoubtedly involved in many of the BLM riots"
- And then cited the NY Post as evidence. I interpreted to BLM riots to mean George Floyd Protests since the BLM doesn't organize riots (BLM doesn't organize much at all, in fact). BLM was quite satisfied with the election of Biden as was Rose City Antifa. The point is that if this is your only example of an Antifa organized action then its important to note that there is no evidence that either group participated and the vandalism did not conform in any way with either group's methods or principles. The example also seems way off the mark because they were protesting Biden's election. Your one (discredited) example seems entirely non-representative of what we were talking about.
- Well it seems I have made an extremely minor mistake with "post," and "times."
- LOL. Oops so what if I said it was the Washington Post when in fact it was the Washington Times? So what if I said it was Reuters when in fact it was RT? So what if I said it was the Economist when in fact it was Infowars? What's the big deal? All news sources are equal in objectivity and credibility, right?
While Fox news is entirely irrelevant to this,
- The New York Post and FOX News are the same thing- they are owned by the same family, their reporters are interchangeable, they coordinate their stories: If it's not credible enough for the WSJ to break, they give it to FOX, if it's not credible enough for FOX to break they give it to the Post. Whether you understand it or not, the disinformation you believe was manufactured for you in a FOX News content meeting. The reporter you cite got his paycheck from FOX News.
QAnon is irrelevant to this.
- In fact, FOX, QANon, and Russia are the three main distribution nodes for the Antifa disinformation you believe.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
-->@GreyparrotSo who’s fact checking AP?
AP is neither privately owned nor government-funded; instead, as a not-for-profit news cooperative owned by its American newspaper and broadcast members, it can maintain its single-minded focus on newsgathering and its commitment to the highest standards of objective, accurate journalism.
So 1300 news organizations, including Murdoch's.
Created:
Greyparrot is the Amber Heard of debating: takes a dump in your bed and reports you as the bully.
Created:
-->
@Novice
- Simply one piece of evidence is sufficient to disprove your implication that these radical street thugs are simply innocent little boys and girls.
Okay, let's examine the quality of your evidence. You are trying to prove that Antifa committed "atrocities of domestic terrorism" during the George Floyd protests but your one example was not a George Floyd protest at all. Rather, you cite a protest that explicitly targeted the results of the 2020 election. I'll assume that you tried to find a legitimate example of Antifa participation in the George Floyd protests, failed, and so moved on to a different set of protests. Since you are attempting to disprove credible reports that the Trump administration and Russian networks had manufactured false evidence of Antifa participation in the George Floyd protests and none of your evidence describes any George Floyd protest, you argument is toast on arrival.
Let's note that the "reporter" of your single source of evidence is entirely discredited as a reliable source of information. The Columbia Journalism Review describes him as a"discredited provocateur." The LA Times characterized his book on Antifa as "supremely dishonest" and "the very kind of propaganda that keeps authoritarians in power." 300 reporters at the Wall St. Journal signed a letter protesting his "lack of fact-checking and transparency." He's been fired from two news organizations in two years for misquoting his sources and doxxing victims of violence. Soon after filing your citation, he quit the business of Journalism and moved to another country. Assuming that if you could have found a credible source to back your claim, you would have used that instead, this demonstrates awareness that your claims are based on fake news sources.
Also, you claimed you were citing the New York Times, the paper of record, when you were in fact citing the New York Post, as sensational FOX News tabloid that recently ran the headline "Newly Discovered Planet Could Destroy Earth Any Day Now"
As far as the credibility of the actual claim goes, the Multnomah County Democratic HQ certainly had its windows smashed on the evening of Nov 8th, but the political provenance of the suspects should be viewed with extreme skepticism.
Consider-
- No police department, District Attorney's office, or other government agency has characterized the attack as committed by Antifa.
- No local news report characterized the attack as Antifa. Oregonlive.com reported that the few signs they carried suggested left-wing dissatisfaction with the Democratic party.
- Rose City Antifa, the Portland based chapter and the original Antifa group in the US condemned the attack, saying that while some of the participants may consider themselves anti-fascist in ideology, Antifa itself limits its activities to countering right-wing violence and that those hundred or so rioters would be more properly characterized as anarchists.
- Strategically, the action only benefited the Right wing and seems calculated to alienate the Left.
- Tactically, organized and experienced Antifa members don't wear Antifa brand swag when protesting or advertise their plans on social media.
- If somebody on Twitter or Facebook is claiming to be Antifa, they are most likely fake and motivated to discredit Antifa.
As evidence of Antifa complicity in George Floyd riots, your one rebuttal is a miserable fail. It seems likely that everything you think you understand about Antifa has been constructed for you by FOX News and QAnon to make you feel frightened. Making you feel frightened is simply how the right operates.
Created: