what topic are we going to discuss? remember in this case you are against the topic we are going to discuss. Like if you want to discuss about the acknowledgement of queer people outside lgbt, write it like(if you're against the acknowledgement itself): "queer people should be acknowledged outside lgbt community"
let me know if it's clear for you
um now that I'm thinking about it, my argument is very strict in content so it's totally comprehensible if you think it is out the rail of the topic, will try better next round
it's lovely! me as a Marxist I also be less accepting the LGBT as a whole, but only because I believe in the class battle. If you haven't read it yet I really reccomend you the book Middlesex, it is about this gender topic and also immigration, great novel!
you're actually right at asking and I know it controversial the title so my apologies.
For more real(more realistic) I meant for the life application and how it is related with the formal logic application
well yes you're right about this but it always depends on his definition of brutality. But I think it shouldn't be centered only on the US but also in other countries. But definitely yes you're right
I just read again what I wrote. I apologise in first place to not be clear in some sentences I was thinking it with my native language structure. If you need clarifications for anything I wrote, I will welcome without problems to clarify any point. I apologise again🙏
it's actually apolitical, the meaning that you directly award to "Liberal" should be clarified.
In second place it welcomes formal and, theoretically, academic debates. It's not to argue but I think it should be clarified
what topic are we going to discuss? remember in this case you are against the topic we are going to discuss. Like if you want to discuss about the acknowledgement of queer people outside lgbt, write it like(if you're against the acknowledgement itself): "queer people should be acknowledged outside lgbt community"
let me know if it's clear for you
you got painfully off topic talking about poor people, will explain better when I'll make the argument
I've made a profile kn it, waiting to debate someone
is it enough also a small argument?
fuck it
wth does that even mean... it could have been a great debate for anyone else.
this debate as always fucked up
um now that I'm thinking about it, my argument is very strict in content so it's totally comprehensible if you think it is out the rail of the topic, will try better next round
it's lovely! me as a Marxist I also be less accepting the LGBT as a whole, but only because I believe in the class battle. If you haven't read it yet I really reccomend you the book Middlesex, it is about this gender topic and also immigration, great novel!
it is common sense to accept other gender identities
it is a quick argument but I hope it is satisfying, didn't want to exaggerate adding concepts and stuff, I will do it subsequently
oh yes I'm sorry I had the connection down for like two weeks I'm sorry
uh..? I Will answer asap for the other debate, just making from scratch a good argument yk
can you vote for the lifted debates PLEASE
4 big guys....
pink floyd
the most greatest song that has ever been composed by human beings
he was banned
I only can say porco dio
yk*
it's not really that, imo and for my sensitivity it's delicate to touch such a topic yi
ohhh okay I understand I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, it was a translation and terminology problem.
the take on the doctors could've been avoided imo...
islamism, like Christianity and Judaism, is a Judaic and Abrahamitic religion
you're actually right at asking and I know it controversial the title so my apologies.
For more real(more realistic) I meant for the life application and how it is related with the formal logic application
the Marxist theory itself
you're forgetting about islamism
PLEASE VOTE TIME IS ABOUT TO END!!!
well yes you're right about this but it always depends on his definition of brutality. But I think it shouldn't be centered only on the US but also in other countries. But definitely yes you're right
no worries!
yeah it may be difficult but I think it's interesting an opinion exchange on such a difficult topic, what do you think?
I have to extend my thanks, I'm pleased to have the opportunity to debate this topic
can you do this debate again? I want to debate on this
oh thank god finally 🙏
vietnam
imo even 10'000 chars aren't enough, it is a very controversial topic that needs to be analyzed from the inside as you said
please next time study what is communism and what is the Marxist theory 🙏
no worries for the length of the argument, it has content and this is the important thing
I'm sorryy I wrote what we call in Italian "Liberalismo" and thought it was the same in English. My bad
if you accept this draft, I will proceed to avoid completely the debate.
thanks 🙏
I'm down for it
don't tie it🙏🙏🙏
I just read again what I wrote. I apologise in first place to not be clear in some sentences I was thinking it with my native language structure. If you need clarifications for anything I wrote, I will welcome without problems to clarify any point. I apologise again🙏
it's actually apolitical, the meaning that you directly award to "Liberal" should be clarified.
In second place it welcomes formal and, theoretically, academic debates. It's not to argue but I think it should be clarified
that's fucking worse than trolling, they shouldn't let you be here yet
perfect
no worries, but I think it's better skip this second round and do only two rounds, what do you think about this?
buddy you have made a mistake on the topic
it's three for a reason. next time think about it