Advising is too heavy nowadays, It makes you boomer
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,500
No information
- Advising stops you from making mistakes. But without mistakes, nothing new is discovered. Mistakes are the father of invention. If you don’t make mistakes, you can’t be creative or skillful.
- Advising creates dependency. You start depending on others’ opinions. Then you struggle in new environments or during stressful situations, because you never learned to think on your own.
- Advising and motivation are directly related.People keep saying AI is growing every second, so you should study harder, every second. No fun. No break.In India, people say:"If you want to get into a good college, study 12 hours a day.""If you want a job, work 12 hours a day."Then they say:"You’ll live peacefully when you’re old."But this mindset is what’s making people die before 45!
- How many pieces of advice do you usually hear in a week?
- In what way has advice actually helped you?
- Has any of your natural talent or originality been harmed because of too much advice?
It was my mistake — I forgot about Round 2. So please consider this as a two-round debate.
There are many ways to give advice — politely, or in an arrogant tone. Polite advice is usually best for most people, but these days, many boomers tend to give advice in a strict, commanding manner. That’s not really advice — that feels more like an order. We live in a democratic society. When someone orders me to do something, my blood boils. I refuse to follow commands like that. Polite advice is somewhat acceptable, but still, it should be given in moderation.
To reduce the problem of over-advising, we must start with ourselves. Let’s stop giving advice in an arrogant way. We can give polite advice, but even that should be limited. We need to control this habit of constant advising. Please — don’t make this world too serious.
On Misadvice:
When it comes to sensitive topics like health, many people give advice without proper knowledge — they’re not doctors. Today, a huge amount of health advice floating around is actually misinformation. Health is a serious issue, and wrong advice can be dangerous. Here's a real-life example:
Example:
Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple Inc., passed away on October 5, 2011, at the age of 56 due to complications from a rare pancreatic cancer called pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET).
He was diagnosed with this rare, slow-growing cancer in 2003. At first, instead of choosing immediate surgery — which could have helped — he delayed it and tried alternative therapies, including special diets and acupuncture.
Eventually, he did undergo surgery in 2004, but by then, the cancer had already begun to spread.
Steve Jobs was heavily influenced by books like "Diet for a Small Planet" by Frances Moore Lappé and "Mucusless Diet Healing System" by Arnold Ehret. He had already been experimenting with fruitarian and vegan diets since college. Sadly, the advice and ideas he took from those books likely cost him precious time. His illness might have been curable in the early stages with proper medical treatment.
This shows how dangerous misinformed advice can be — especially in health matters.
"We celebrate things that are rare. Advice should be one of them.
To keep your respect alive, keep your advice limited." – Rohith
The Con (pierree) delivered a full, well-structured argument across all rounds, while the Pro forfeited a critical round. But more importantly, Con’s points stand undisputed: they clearly explained how over-advising kills creativity, builds mental dependency, and promotes conformity — especially among youth. They didn’t just whine about bad advice; they explained why too much advice, even with good intentions, can lead to real harm — emotionally, culturally, and intellectually.
While the Pro eventually made a few points about “polite advice” and cited Steve Jobs, that was too little, too late. Con’s case was consistent, mature, and filled with original insights. They called for less noise, more thinking — and that’s not a "boomer" mindset, that’s just balance.
This wasn’t just about who gave better advice — it was about who debated better. And the Con clearly did. Pro also did a great job!
it's three for a reason. next time think about it
This is a two round debate
how can I end up this sht, I drop out, you forfeited, if you make an argumnt I won't answer it. for me it's case closed
didn't you forget to answer, did you?
I'm trying to build a great argument, but you're so right on the kind of advices that we hear nowadays, AND THIS IN FACT FOR ME WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT TO BUILD A REASONED ARGUMENT. And I'm so happy of this honestly