Instigator / Pro
1
1458
rating
27
debates
44.44%
won
Topic
#6232

Advising is too heavy nowadays, It makes you boomer

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
0
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

pierree
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
1,500
Contender / Con
7
1515
rating
17
debates
61.76%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

The Con (pierree) delivered a full, well-structured argument across all rounds, while the Pro forfeited a critical round. But more importantly, Con’s points stand undisputed: they clearly explained how over-advising kills creativity, builds mental dependency, and promotes conformity — especially among youth. They didn’t just whine about bad advice; they explained why too much advice, even with good intentions, can lead to real harm — emotionally, culturally, and intellectually.

While the Pro eventually made a few points about “polite advice” and cited Steve Jobs, that was too little, too late. Con’s case was consistent, mature, and filled with original insights. They called for less noise, more thinking — and that’s not a "boomer" mindset, that’s just balance.

This wasn’t just about who gave better advice — it was about who debated better. And the Con clearly did. Pro also did a great job!