Total votes: 56
Pro could have won. Both parties had good arguments, but got hung up on defining "dysfunctional".
Had Pro pressed for a more clear idea such as "society is not functioning as well as it could" , Pro could have won.
Because Pro forfeited a rounds, I sadly award points to Con
Both Pro and Con gave good arguments, with Con having a slight edge.
I gave conduct to Pro since Con forfeited 2 rounds.
Pro had essentially no argument and no sources.
I am judging that having having essentially no argument and no sources makes for poor conduct.
I have voted accordingly.
Pro offered little in the way of factual information. Con countered by at least addressing the topic.
Pro's arguments were disjointed and repetitious. Pro failed to distinguish between "gender" and "gender identity"
Overall, a weak debate, but points go to Con.
Pro gave no argument
Con gave no argument
Ergo a tie