middle-age might seem irrelevant, but the past builds toward the future. From mistakes about monarchy, we have established stronger monarch based governments. Similarly, if we allow the pope to be tax-exempt merely because they can excommunicate the monarch, then there is a terrifying implication of power and influence. I hope that question didn't seem too outlandish.
I think the questions dwindle over time as they are answered. Also thanks for making the topic worldwide. I think this is near impossible in US where you can't really buy land like in Estonia
oops. Well, you could argue that this version is more compacted together and allows all answers to be viewed at once, rather than check and guess for random ideas. Or delete this debate if you really want. Up to you.
you know, argument A sounds a lot like trying to argue music is objective. People argue what elements of the song appeal to them (melody, rhythm, lyrics), "therefore there must be an objective standard"
Hmmm? I am saying it is impossible to argue that it is based on accuracy. They mistook your words as threat towards me and thought you multi accounted, doxxed, insulted ramshutu (the only correct idea). Ragnar’s interpretation of events is his own truth and own beliefs.
ah, I just came up with a good idea. Parents are free to ground their children, limiting their freedom of liberty (access to communication, locations). They can even disown and cut off ties with children for good reason. I should probably mention this, as it troubled me for an additional reason, even if it can be proven fetus have "rights".
I think the reason why the topic was about “beautiful” was because men chase after looks is a stereotype, while attractive women are more well received in workplace
oh, sure. You could say there's more to just rhythm/flow/whatever the dissertation + data scientists say
you will regret this day you allowed me to go first.
okay
do whatever you want. Just make sure to waive one round.
do you like this?
we could redo this except "We should colonize mars" instead if you want. The edeb8 title of "SEEK to colonize" is a really weird wording
My argument being said though, I think 40,000 or even 50,000 would be a fine upper limit for Whiteflame.
SEO Hacker source: https://seo-hacker.com/traffic-numbers-matter/
cloud storage source: https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing
wow you are brave man
middle-age might seem irrelevant, but the past builds toward the future. From mistakes about monarchy, we have established stronger monarch based governments. Similarly, if we allow the pope to be tax-exempt merely because they can excommunicate the monarch, then there is a terrifying implication of power and influence. I hope that question didn't seem too outlandish.
I think the questions dwindle over time as they are answered. Also thanks for making the topic worldwide. I think this is near impossible in US where you can't really buy land like in Estonia
don't worry. I'll probably extend this to higher characters if nobody accepts in a few days.
done. Though I'm not entirely convinced you can back up that it's a waste of resources using only 20 words.
thoughts on this one?
Death Penalty in the USA is near impossible for 100 char to discuss. I think it's better this way.
9spaceking's reminder to future self to use this in case of disabled children: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bioe.12679
sorry, I meant "that does outweigh", not that doesn't outweigh, for the $790,000 vs $780,000 argument
did you visit edeb8 to see this feature?
you are a brave man.
con may be able to eek out one exception that cannot be negated in 20 words
we have a lot of space. 3~4 questions doesn't seem like a lot.
are you pro or con on this? Is this debate even possible? lol
oh, sorry. I thought you meant each round you can ask 4 questions. Asking only 1 is too short lol
oops. Well, you could argue that this version is more compacted together and allows all answers to be viewed at once, rather than check and guess for random ideas. Or delete this debate if you really want. Up to you.
ok, we can test if discord or DART is a better platform for asking these kind of questions.
the fact that DART doesn't have Cross Examination further helps my case if you think about it.
One day for arg is not enough for such a scientific idea
you know, argument A sounds a lot like trying to argue music is objective. People argue what elements of the song appeal to them (melody, rhythm, lyrics), "therefore there must be an objective standard"
vote
have you changed your view on this?
thoughts?
perhaps this debate was what you were looking for? https://www.debateart.com/debates/1244-is-christianity-a-good-moral-system-to-follow
too late.
Bad wording last round, I meant, nobody beats Oromagi, who uses way more char than Trent. Only Ragnar succeeded
Hmmm? I am saying it is impossible to argue that it is based on accuracy. They mistook your words as threat towards me and thought you multi accounted, doxxed, insulted ramshutu (the only correct idea). Ragnar’s interpretation of events is his own truth and own beliefs.
Now... do you think con can win THIS one?
the link doesn't work. try https://discord.com/channels/764887724158222347/764925377256095824
vote?
If there was an emergency that landed half the population in a vegetative state, do they have civil liberties? Etc, etc.
done.
I’m getting a weird feeling con might do some weird thing about vegetative people. Just a hunch.
I will also leave https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078237/ here in case of your vegetative person argument.
ah, I just came up with a good idea. Parents are free to ground their children, limiting their freedom of liberty (access to communication, locations). They can even disown and cut off ties with children for good reason. I should probably mention this, as it troubled me for an additional reason, even if it can be proven fetus have "rights".
I think the reason why the topic was about “beautiful” was because men chase after looks is a stereotype, while attractive women are more well received in workplace
Somehow, Mitsuha managed
do you think I had a chance to win this debate? Maybe G.W Isn't the most pressing issue? Would food security, poverty stand a chance in your opinion?
vote
no. You could gish gallop if I gave you 30,000.
I'm going to pull an Imabench on this one
sacrificing your elo to prove your innocence? I like it.