if you need a source for "people spend hours on social media" in my r2, here it is https://www.digitalmarketing.org/blog/how-much-time-does-the-average-person-spend-on-social-media#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20people,over%20the%20past%2012%20months.
bruh. you playin devils advocate or something? You had plenty of rounds to establish the foundation and history of Grid structure. You could've forced me to throw in the towel by round 2
the BB is just kind of like BS, they're talking nonsense. It's entertainment style because the rounds are very fast paced, allowing only for 3 minutes each site and a cross examination where each site goes back and forth (1 minute max for each side), and a fast 1 minute conclusion. So in total the maximum is 10 minutes and they debate silly or nonsensical topics
Do you think it would’ve helped to stress the power of the dreams fulfilled? I guess my side is really hard to craft solid advantages for because it’s just a game plot
what's your initial thoughts? I feel like at least "Happiness monster" is defeated, as human rights to their lives have infinite value under this new system while happiness monster cannot generate infinite happiness, therefore you wouldn't sacrifice the humans to the happiness monster.
are you also con with this? I think pro side is difficult to argue since you'd have to suggest strong ideas to kill the zygote better than research innovation
as usual, I'm playing devil's advocate. I don't really personally want to be taught creationism lol. I'm just going down the list of Edeb8's secret topics for fun.
since you know I can I BB, I guess you can vote... though it felt weird to debate against "objective morality"; I thought con's side needed their own bop
have you played To the Moon? I wouldn't expect anyone who enjoyed the game to disagree with the idea. That beings said, there are two ways I can see you winning this:
1) You agree with To the Moon's precise philosophy, that no one other than near death individuals deserve this technology
2) You disagree with To the Moon's fantastically made story as Johnny could be one outlier out of all the people they serve
In I can I BB, the literal translation is more of High Class vs Dog (but high class doesn't necessarily mean human), so in the end "noble" kind of works out too
actually, I am very curious how you counter the blurring of what is instinct and learned. I'm just gonna leave this here for future me: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453#:~:text=And%20yet%20the%20capacity%20to,though%20every%20language%20is%20learned.
vote plz
if you need a source for "people spend hours on social media" in my r2, here it is https://www.digitalmarketing.org/blog/how-much-time-does-the-average-person-spend-on-social-media#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20people,over%20the%20past%2012%20months.
hey. What's your thought on this?
bruh. you playin devils advocate or something? You had plenty of rounds to establish the foundation and history of Grid structure. You could've forced me to throw in the towel by round 2
the BB is just kind of like BS, they're talking nonsense. It's entertainment style because the rounds are very fast paced, allowing only for 3 minutes each site and a cross examination where each site goes back and forth (1 minute max for each side), and a fast 1 minute conclusion. So in total the maximum is 10 minutes and they debate silly or nonsensical topics
actually, I guess equal means most people might do nothing as they are lazy. It's up to debate
the benefits either outweigh the negatives, or are equal.
Con arg is basically staying true to yourself
do you think pro side is winnable? It seems pretty hard, merely due to peer pressure to take this strange mental-altering "drug"
what do you think? Which issue is more pressing to prevent/vouch for?
er... typo. I accidentally said vote for pro (RM also mistook me for pro). I meant vote for me lol, not a concession
Do you think it would’ve helped to stress the power of the dreams fulfilled? I guess my side is really hard to craft solid advantages for because it’s just a game plot
hey man you wanna try voting?
at the press of a button, like I can I BB presented.
in R2 I forgot to link Statnews https://www.statnews.com/2019/06/05/creating-eggs-sperm-stem-cells/
or worse
r1
forfeited
forfeited
r2
forfeited
forfeited
Define human cloning. A fear a semantic argument with legalizing the ability for humans to clone animals vs cloning humans
The design could prove it's not from earth (unnatural traces of uranium, strange design, etc)
that's a TROLL debate with ONE vote. You ain't winning against the master of trolls in a troll debate.
yeah, I know. I watched Frozen like four times, and I'm pretty sure Tangled is better than it.
imabench isn't *that* strong of a debater. Not as strong as you at least.
are you pro with this? I feel like the difficulty to truly measure "love" puts a severe dent in my side
what's your initial thoughts? I feel like at least "Happiness monster" is defeated, as human rights to their lives have infinite value under this new system while happiness monster cannot generate infinite happiness, therefore you wouldn't sacrifice the humans to the happiness monster.
mall be like : o no oromagi's gonna destroy me
is this also I can I BB?
you haven't done anything wrong with regards to code of conduct, it's just that you take absurd debates that you have zero chance of winning
are you also con with this? I think pro side is difficult to argue since you'd have to suggest strong ideas to kill the zygote better than research innovation
con probably be like "it's impossible to completely abolish death penalty; you cannot get every country to agree with this gg no re"
as usual, I'm playing devil's advocate. I don't really personally want to be taught creationism lol. I'm just going down the list of Edeb8's secret topics for fun.
also my link in r1 is broken here it is: https://virtualspeech.com/blog/guide-to-debating
vote please?
Frank's argument is completely useless against Agnostics.
just who are you? Truth seeker?
I’m very curious why pro thinks lack of belief requires faith.
Mall: why are we still here? Just to survive?
since we debated a variation of this, I think you're most qualified to vote. Take a look when you have time please?
since you know I can I BB, I guess you can vote... though it felt weird to debate against "objective morality"; I thought con's side needed their own bop
are you requesting a video based debate to settle this? I think Whiteflame used google hangouts to do it? Do you have a google account to do it
Why
vote?
Vote please?
to be fair, GTA doesn't paint murder in an incredible powerful idea that evokes back to feelings of love, of regret.
pro's source is either the best gish gallop I've ever seen, or people who side with con are wrong.
oops I meant I move the floor to pro but whatevs
have you played To the Moon? I wouldn't expect anyone who enjoyed the game to disagree with the idea. That beings said, there are two ways I can see you winning this:
1) You agree with To the Moon's precise philosophy, that no one other than near death individuals deserve this technology
2) You disagree with To the Moon's fantastically made story as Johnny could be one outlier out of all the people they serve
In I can I BB, the literal translation is more of High Class vs Dog (but high class doesn't necessarily mean human), so in the end "noble" kind of works out too
no, I'm just a baka. Remember that seldiora takes debates 9sk disagrees with
Oho. I'm impressed. Have you watched Dr. Stone? The main character notes that Cell Phone is the most powerful weapon, right next to gunpowder.
actually, I am very curious how you counter the blurring of what is instinct and learned. I'm just gonna leave this here for future me: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453#:~:text=And%20yet%20the%20capacity%20to,though%20every%20language%20is%20learned.
I am not convinced even whiteflame can win con side on this one