Not really true, as we have evidence that people like Jesus DO in fact exist. 80% of Historians confess that Jesus was a real dude, and he really died on a cross
Then you're nothing but a coward who barks and insults others, but when it's time to prove yourself, you run away. This site isn't for 10 year olds. I recommend going and doing something more productive.
I agree. Human beings participate in stuff like war and that doesn't benefit us at all. We make junk food that kills us, and murder eachother for literally no reason. It isn't good for our survival at all
Lucy, if I'm wrong, tell me how. Because it seems like you can't. All you do is talk and you're wasting your own time.
Pierre, ik what you're talking about. But that doesn't change what I said at all. Just because frogs are gay doesn't make it good for them, because they can't continue the family. I'm assuming you didn't even read what I said. Biology is part of nature bro.
Just because something occurs naturally, doesn't make it good at all. You're going to have to prove to me that changing your gender (which can lead to infertility, this is proven bro) or being gay is good for our species, because it really isn't.
Lucy, are you actually serious? I feel like you're just a troll honestly.
Anyway, pierre, im assuming that you believe that natural = good or that if animals do it, we should do it too.
Saying "it's natural" doesn't mean it's automatically good or morally right. Humans are part of nature, so technically everything we do — wars, pollution, genocide, you name it — is "natural" in that sense. But that doesn't mean it’s morally acceptable. That’s called the naturalistic fallacy — assuming something is right just because it happens in nature. It’s lazy logic.
If your argument is based on what animals do, that’s extremely flawed. Animals kill their own babies (lions do this when taking over a pride), some force themselves on others (look into duck mating behavior — it's brutal), and others even play with their prey for fun (like orcas tossing seals). These are all “natural,” but are they things we’d ever use to justify human behavior? No. Because we have morality, reason, and the ability to choose right from wrong — things most animals don’t operate with.
So when someone says, “Homosexuality or transgenderism is natural,” sure — there are documented cases of same-sex behavior in over 1,500 animal species. Gender nonconformity also exists in some species (like clownfish changing sex). But just pointing out that something exists in nature doesn’t mean it’s morally justified or not. Slavery has existed in human history for thousands of years — does that make it right?
So yeah, if your whole argument is “it happens in nature = it’s good,” that’s not only weak, it’s dangerous.
I agree with you!
But I think wylted was being sarcastic
what even is "Dialectical materialism"
Not really true, as we have evidence that people like Jesus DO in fact exist. 80% of Historians confess that Jesus was a real dude, and he really died on a cross
Bro why did you make it 6 months. Please reduce it to like, a week.
Then you're nothing but a coward who barks and insults others, but when it's time to prove yourself, you run away. This site isn't for 10 year olds. I recommend going and doing something more productive.
I agree. Human beings participate in stuff like war and that doesn't benefit us at all. We make junk food that kills us, and murder eachother for literally no reason. It isn't good for our survival at all
Lucy, if I'm wrong, tell me how. Because it seems like you can't. All you do is talk and you're wasting your own time.
Pierre, ik what you're talking about. But that doesn't change what I said at all. Just because frogs are gay doesn't make it good for them, because they can't continue the family. I'm assuming you didn't even read what I said. Biology is part of nature bro.
Just because something occurs naturally, doesn't make it good at all. You're going to have to prove to me that changing your gender (which can lead to infertility, this is proven bro) or being gay is good for our species, because it really isn't.
Lucy, are you actually serious? I feel like you're just a troll honestly.
Anyway, pierre, im assuming that you believe that natural = good or that if animals do it, we should do it too.
Saying "it's natural" doesn't mean it's automatically good or morally right. Humans are part of nature, so technically everything we do — wars, pollution, genocide, you name it — is "natural" in that sense. But that doesn't mean it’s morally acceptable. That’s called the naturalistic fallacy — assuming something is right just because it happens in nature. It’s lazy logic.
If your argument is based on what animals do, that’s extremely flawed. Animals kill their own babies (lions do this when taking over a pride), some force themselves on others (look into duck mating behavior — it's brutal), and others even play with their prey for fun (like orcas tossing seals). These are all “natural,” but are they things we’d ever use to justify human behavior? No. Because we have morality, reason, and the ability to choose right from wrong — things most animals don’t operate with.
So when someone says, “Homosexuality or transgenderism is natural,” sure — there are documented cases of same-sex behavior in over 1,500 animal species. Gender nonconformity also exists in some species (like clownfish changing sex). But just pointing out that something exists in nature doesn’t mean it’s morally justified or not. Slavery has existed in human history for thousands of years — does that make it right?
So yeah, if your whole argument is “it happens in nature = it’s good,” that’s not only weak, it’s dangerous.
Bring up Penal Substitutinary Atonement. It's extremely heretical and anti-trinitarian.
The claim that the Bible contradicts Christianity is vile, but do you wanna debate it?
You seem new. I recommend watching some debates or people like Trent Horn. They'll help you improve you're arguements.
Catholic